Options

The Voyage [chat]

13567100

Posts

  • Options
    VanguardVanguard But now the dream is over. And the insect is awake.Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    oh capping bonuses.

    somebody remind me why the hell the bonuses matter.

    Because the bonuses make up the majority of absurdly inflated executive pay.

    and we care why

    . . .

  • Options
    HaphazardHaphazard Registered User regular
    Bonuses are ok when they're paid as, you know, bonuses for good work. It just seems bonuses (boni?) are always payed; whether the work was good or poor doesn't really matter.

  • Options
    CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited February 2013
    Very large wealth inequality is generally seen as a bad thing. There have been studies on the effects of wealth inequality and there are several negative effects I always forget about.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/25/business/yourmoney/25view.html?_r=0

    Couscous on
  • Options
    AntinumericAntinumeric Registered User regular
    Zephiran wrote: »
    Well, if the shareholders think the bankers deserve it, they can get double a years salary as bonus.

    Without checking this up at all whatsoever, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that this probably encompasses most if not all existing bonus schemes, so it wouldn't end up being much of a cap for anybody.

    But hey. Maybe we can lower the allowed bonuses the next time the economy hits the shitter.
    Shouldn't it be something like- There must be at least a majority shareholder vote to confirm board members salaries/bonuses. IIRC at the moment the board can set their own salary and unless the majority of shareholders vote against it it goes through. Since the majority of shareholders don't know/ don't vote it never gets stopped.

    In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence.
  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Couscous wrote: »
    Very large wealth inequality is generally seen as a bad thing.

    yeah but just capping bonuses is starting at the wrong end

    redistribute the wealth instead.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Couscous wrote: »
    Very large wealth inequality is generally seen as a bad thing.

    yeah but just capping bonuses is starting at the wrong end

    redistribute the wealth instead.

    Sadly, one is more feasible in the USA than the other.

  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    anyway I don't have a problem with it either

    except that doing that when the economy is in the shitter just feels like a symbolic band-aid

    it's not gonna fix shit

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    Mojo_JojoMojo_Jojo We are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourse Registered User regular
    Giving people bonuses when they've done fucked up is silly. It's sad that these needs legislating against, but apparently it does.

    Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Couscous wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Couscous wrote: »
    Very large wealth inequality is generally seen as a bad thing.

    yeah but just capping bonuses is starting at the wrong end

    redistribute the wealth instead.

    Sadly, one is more feasible in the USA than the other.

    yeah well it doesn't help

    if you make rich people less rich, and the poor just as poor, then you haven't fixed jack shit.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    edited February 2013
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    oh capping bonuses.

    somebody remind me why the hell the bonuses matter.

    Because the bonuses make up the majority of absurdly inflated executive pay.

    and we care why

    Because executive pay has exploded out of all proportion to the value they bring to the company. Instead of receiving a bonus for improving the performance of the company a guaranteed massive, yearly increasing bonus has become part of executive corporate culture because it allows them to fiddle their tax bills and siphon off huge amounts of cash for themselves.

    Executive pay has risen relatively by hundreds of percent since the 80's while everyone else's has stagnated or gone down relative to the cost of living. It's even at the point now where these thieving cunts pay themselves so much it effects the bottom line of the company, this is why even shareholders are starting to get pissed off with it.

    so yeah we care. It's corruption pure and simple and its harming everyone except the privileged few in on the scam

    Casual on
  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Mojo_Jojo wrote: »
    Giving people bonuses when they've done fucked up is silly. It's sad that these needs legislating against, but apparently it does.

    I'm not sure it does need legislating against just because it seems silly.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    KalkinoKalkino Buttons Londres Registered User regular
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    oh capping bonuses.

    somebody remind me why the hell the bonuses matter.

    Because the bonuses make up the majority of absurdly inflated executive pay.

    and we care why

    Because executive pay has exploded out of all proportion to the value they bring to the company. Instead of receiving a bonus for improving the performance of the company a guaranteed massive, yearly increasing bonus has become part of executive corporate culture because it allows them to fiddle their tax bills and siphon off huge amounts of cash for themselves.

    Executive pay has risen relatively by hundreds of percent since the 80's while everyone else's has stagnated or gone down relative to the cost of living. It's even at the point now where these thieving cunts pay themselves so much it effects the bottom line of the company, this is why even shareholders are starting to get pissed off with it.

    so yeah we care. It's corruption pure and simple and its harming everyone except the privileged few in on the scam

    The thieving counts are unduly extracting wealth that belongs to the shareholders it seems. Running the business for their benefit and all that

    Freedom for the Northern Isles!
  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    oh capping bonuses.

    somebody remind me why the hell the bonuses matter.

    Because the bonuses make up the majority of absurdly inflated executive pay.

    and we care why

    Because executive pay has exploded out of all proportion to the value they bring to the company. Instead of receiving a bonus for improving the performance of the company a guaranteed massive, yearly increasing bonus has become part of executive corporate culture because it allows them to fiddle their tax bills and siphon off huge amounts of cash for themselves.

    Executive pay has risen relatively by hundreds of percent since the 80's while everyone else's has stagnated or gone down relative to the cost of living. It's even at the point now where these thieving cunts pay themselves so much it effects the bottom line of the company, this is why even shareholders are starting to get pissed off with it.

    so yeah we care. It's corruption pure and simple and its harming everyone except the privileged few in on the scam

    well, it isn't corruption. But yeah.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    anyway paying attention to one thing doesn't mean you can't pay attention to the important things.

    It just feels that way which is why this bugs me a little.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    Mojo_JojoMojo_Jojo We are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourse Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Mojo_Jojo wrote: »
    Giving people bonuses when they've done fucked up is silly. It's sad that these needs legislating against, but apparently it does.

    I'm not sure it does need legislating against just because it seems silly.

    It's a bit like how you should not need laws to tell people to wear their seat belt in a car. It's silly not to and yet if you don't people get other people killed.

    Except here it's "just" corruption.

    Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
  • Options
    VanguardVanguard But now the dream is over. And the insect is awake.Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Mojo_Jojo wrote: »
    Giving people bonuses when they've done fucked up is silly. It's sad that these needs legislating against, but apparently it does.

    I'm not sure it does need legislating against just because it seems silly.

    Read Casual's post.

  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Vanguard wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Mojo_Jojo wrote: »
    Giving people bonuses when they've done fucked up is silly. It's sad that these needs legislating against, but apparently it does.

    I'm not sure it does need legislating against just because it seems silly.

    Read Casual's post.

    I did. It came after.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Mojo_Jojo wrote: »
    Giving people bonuses when they've done fucked up is silly. It's sad that these needs legislating against, but apparently it does.

    I'm not sure it does need legislating against just because it seems silly.

    Of course it needs legislating against. People cannot be trusted to be fair and objective when it comes to setting their own salaries.

  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    edited February 2013
    E: i have no idea how this post has screwed up so badly the quote tags were all in the right place :?

    Casual on
  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    so is the problem as you see it the way their pay gets decided, or that it simply is too high?

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    OrganichuOrganichu poops peesRegistered User, Moderator mod
    edited February 2013
    stop shitting on abd's dream to one day be paid gargantuan bonuses

    Organichu on
  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    oh capping bonuses.

    somebody remind me why the hell the bonuses matter.

    Because the bonuses make up the majority of absurdly inflated executive pay.

    and we care why

    Because executive pay has exploded out of all proportion to the value they bring to the company. Instead of receiving a bonus for improving the performance of the company a guaranteed massive, yearly increasing bonus has become part of executive corporate culture because it allows them to fiddle their tax bills and siphon off huge amounts of cash for themselves.

    Executive pay has risen relatively by hundreds of percent since the 80's while everyone else's has stagnated or gone down relative to the cost of living. It's even at the point now where these thieving cunts pay themselves so much it effects the bottom line of the company, this is why even shareholders are starting to get pissed off with it.

    so yeah we care. It's corruption pure and simple and its harming everyone except the privileged few in on the scam

    well, it isn't corruption. But yeah.

    If giving yourself massive bonuses while cutting profits, employee wages and shareholder dividends isn't corruption than I don't know what is.

    They are the people placed in charge of dividing up the pie for everyone and they're giving themselves a larger slice by stealing from everyone else.

  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Organichu wrote: »
    top shitting on abd's dream to one day be paid gargantuan bonuses

    if there is one place I mos def do not wanna go in life, it's into management.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    OrganichuOrganichu poops peesRegistered User, Moderator mod
    i want to be a regular ol developer/engineer, just doing challenging, interesting work with a fun team on software projects, maybe getting to do a little bit of traveling once or twice a year for my company... retire as a senior engineer

    except

    EXCEPT

    i want to be paid 62 million us dollars per annum

    #realisticgoals

  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    oh capping bonuses.

    somebody remind me why the hell the bonuses matter.

    Because the bonuses make up the majority of absurdly inflated executive pay.

    and we care why

    Because executive pay has exploded out of all proportion to the value they bring to the company. Instead of receiving a bonus for improving the performance of the company a guaranteed massive, yearly increasing bonus has become part of executive corporate culture because it allows them to fiddle their tax bills and siphon off huge amounts of cash for themselves.

    Executive pay has risen relatively by hundreds of percent since the 80's while everyone else's has stagnated or gone down relative to the cost of living. It's even at the point now where these thieving cunts pay themselves so much it effects the bottom line of the company, this is why even shareholders are starting to get pissed off with it.

    so yeah we care. It's corruption pure and simple and its harming everyone except the privileged few in on the scam

    well, it isn't corruption. But yeah.

    If giving yourself massive bonuses while cutting profits, employee wages and shareholder dividends isn't corruption than I don't know what is.

    They are the people placed in charge of dividing up the pie for everyone and they're giving themselves a larger slice by stealing from everyone else.

    urgh, man the hyperbole ain't helping your arguments any, so quit it.

    okay, for one, the board of directors represent the shareholders, and they decide the wages of the executives (or, the supervisory board and the executive board, in some places)

    they're not just taking money for themselves. The stockholders are the ones who in the end okay this.

    At no point is there corruption. Use another word with bad connotations, because that one doesn't fit.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    don't cap them just tax them

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    Dark Raven XDark Raven X Laugh hard, run fast, be kindRegistered User regular
    Cat just tried running underneath me as I was sitting down

    This seems even more foolhardy than attempting to run between my legs while rapidly descending stairs

    Oh brilliant
  • Options
    SparvySparvy Registered User regular
    Better tell Bernanke to get the inflation going.

    I have no idea what I want to be yet. Feels like I'm running out of time to decide if I want to get their in a reasonable time.

    Maybe I'll just kind of stumble along and see what happens. You can totally get rich and successfull doing that right?

    Right?

  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    now taxing them so that more of the money spent on executives go to the state than if you spent it elsewhere in the company, might not be a bad idea.

    but anyway, rich people can be rich and make loads of money. I am perfectly fine with that as a socialist.

    We're just going to take a lot of their money and use it for other stuff. Like welfare queens.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    SparvySparvy Registered User regular
    Damnit, it should be 'there'

    Why don't mobile have an edit function?

  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Organichu wrote: »
    i want to be a regular ol developer/engineer, just doing challenging, interesting work with a fun team on software projects, maybe getting to do a little bit of traveling once or twice a year for my company... retire as a senior engineer

    except

    EXCEPT

    i want to be paid 62 million us dollars per annum

    #realisticgoals

    exchange the appropriate terms for engineering stuff and yeah that's my career goals too

    except I want to make enough to have a cozy house somewhere I like, and a boat.


    basically I want want my dad got. Because it seems like he kind of hit a sweet spot.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    ZephiranZephiran Registered User regular
    Me, I just want to punish success.

    Don't think you're better than me.

    Alright and in this next scene all the animals have AIDS.

    I got a little excited when I saw your ship.
  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    don't cap them just tax them

    Because that works so well right?

    It isn't hyperbole at all. Shareholders are the ones leading the charge for legeslation. So obviously they aren't happy with executive pay.

  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    don't cap them just tax them

    Because that works so well right?

    It isn't hyperbole at all. Shareholders are the ones leading the charge for legeslation. So obviously they aren't happy with executive pay.

    well it is because if it was corruption you could have thrown them in jail already.

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    and yeah taxation works pretty well

    it's p cool

    FAKEDIT: well, in a country where money doesn't dominate politics

    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    Mojo_JojoMojo_Jojo We are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourse Registered User regular
    I am concerned that is heading towards a silly "If it's not illegal then it's moral" place. Instead of that, let us discuss the relative merits of frozen desserts.

    Frozen yoghurt? Just crap ice cream? Or ninth wonder of the modern world?

    Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Casual wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    don't cap them just tax them

    Because that works so well right?

    It isn't hyperbole at all. Shareholders are the ones leading the charge for legeslation. So obviously they aren't happy with executive pay.

    well it is because if it was corruption you could have thrown them in jail already.

    That's a very funny joke you just told. Honestly my sides, they are splitting.

  • Options
    AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    edited February 2013
    if shareholders want executive pay to be less but can't make it so, then there's a bigger problem here. That shareholders can't get their will through. Unless the majority don't want it.

    Abdhyius on
    ftOqU21.png
  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    Like, I'm happy for you that Norway is a utopia and everyone is honest there but that just isn't what the rest of the world is like.

  • Options
    tyrannustyrannus i am not fat Registered User regular
This discussion has been closed.