Can we just stop pussyfooting around with trying to interpret narration and go Are NPC monsters considered "a threat to the adventuring party" as defined by the sample villager PM in the OP?
Can we just stop pussyfooting around with trying to interpret narration and go Are NPC monsters considered "a threat to the adventuring party" as defined by the sample villager PM in the OP?
If all PC threats to the party are removed, then it is assumed that the party will be able to handle the npc threats. So no.
Given the unpredictable nature of the forums lately, it would be in our best interest to kill this thing quickly. Trying to control them is just stupid- and we don't know how many monsters are left- or what kind.
I can has cheezburger, yes?
0
Options
ObiFettUse the ForceAs You WishRegistered Userregular
Given the unpredictable nature of the forums lately, it would be in our best interest to kill this thing quickly. Trying to control them is just stupid- and we don't know how many monsters are left- or what kind.
I also wonder since the narration mentions an "end" and a "relic", if maybe when we reach the relic something awesome happens?
Given the unpredictable nature of the forums lately, it would be in our best interest to kill this thing quickly. Trying to control them is just stupid- and we don't know how many monsters are left- or what kind.
I also wonder since the narration mentions an "end" and a "relic", if maybe when we reach the relic something awesome happens?
That might be something to keep putting in front of everyone if the cyclops is still alive for Day 4.
I can has cheezburger, yes?
0
Options
BaidolI will hold him offEscape while you canRegistered Userregular
Woop woop, self-preservation time now that Starbuck hates me. Although I will say this:
Thanks for not going with "OmLoz," Tayrun. I think that abbreviation lacks both menace and panache. Also, Obi is silly. It's awfully close to the reasons people voted for INANTP. Trying to promote conversation is somehow bad? Good to know! :^:
Scroll up, and ye shall find. Like seriously man, Flarne and jdark both posted a vote count higher up on this very page. Flarne's is the third post from the top!
The idea of leaving the cyclops around is intriguing, as the mafia can't use him without leaving a record. On the other hand, we get goodies for killing monsters, and having an extra 6 damage each night that'll probably hit villagers more often than mafia does not work in our favor. On the first hand, however, the devil we know is better than the one we don't. The next monster could be a lot worse for us. Granted, it could also be better, but at least this one we always know what he's up to/who directed him.
To be honest, I don't know who to vote for. Is gut feeling all we have to go on right now?
I'm just going to throw out a vote on Peccavi for the whole "let's leave the monster alive" argument. If someone else has a better argument, I'm open to changing my vote.
Well, having gone for a run while mulling on this, I'm pretty strongly in support of leaving the cyclops alone for now. Granted, I wasn't in the mini, so maybe I don't understand the monster spawning system. Were there any nights in the mini where the village didn't have a monster to kill (or, in the same vein, were there any nights where there were multiple monsters to kill)? If every monster we kill is just going to be replaced by another one, it all seems Sisyphean. The 18 damage (or more, if there isn't total coordination between hit squads) that we deal to the cyclops could instead be used to hunt mafia. The mafia worry me far more than these monsters, and at least they will stay dead, rather than being replaced night after night.
Posts
MrT 3
OmLoz 2
SLyM 2
Cythraul 1
INANTP 1
JPants 1
TheAnon 1
Trust 1
If all PC threats to the party are removed, then it is assumed that the party will be able to handle the npc threats. So no.
Nintendo ID: Pastalonius
Smite\LoL:Gremlidin \ WoW & Overwatch & Hots: Gremlidin#1734
3ds: 3282-2248-0453
Penny Arcade Rockstar Social Club / This is why I despise cyclists
Yes. The cyclops has an incredibly short memory. Like Memento short.
Or maybe because if the answer was "no" then the system would be so easily gamed that it would be a pointless restriction.
Nintendo ID: Pastalonius
Smite\LoL:Gremlidin \ WoW & Overwatch & Hots: Gremlidin#1734
3ds: 3282-2248-0453
I like the idea of Memento Cyclops
I can has cheezburger, yes?
I also wonder since the narration mentions an "end" and a "relic", if maybe when we reach the relic something awesome happens?
This is Logan. Don't trust him!
Well I mean not without outing themselves.
But simultaneously a villager can't then use the cyclops without looking mafio
3DS: 1289-8447-4695
That might be something to keep putting in front of everyone if the cyclops is still alive for Day 4.
I can has cheezburger, yes?
Unless the villager votes for the vote leader, yeah.
It is not really a question of let, if I am understanding the monster's power correctly.
Thanks for not going with "OmLoz," Tayrun. I think that abbreviation lacks both menace and panache. Also, Obi is silly. It's awfully close to the reasons people voted for INANTP. Trying to promote conversation is somehow bad? Good to know! :^:
MrT, it's nothing personal.
!!!
Liez. I switched my vote away from SLyM.
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
Just kinda thinking out loud.
what's up with that!!!!!!
To be fair, she has been suspicious of me since the start. Though I don't recall her ever giving a reason.
I'm just going to throw out a vote on Peccavi for the whole "let's leave the monster alive" argument. If someone else has a better argument, I'm open to changing my vote.
I can has cheezburger, yes?
Penny Arcade Rockstar Social Club / This is why I despise cyclists