The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[Movies] Watch Edge of Tomorrow. Bitch about it. Repeat.

19394969899102

Posts

  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    useless4 wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    Black Widow is more likely to pull off a film on her own than Hawkeye I guess. I'm not enthused about either idea though, and prefer the lower powered Avengers being in films together because I think that makes for more entertaining films.

    (Also I think Jeremy Renner is sort of a poor man's Nathan Fillion but don't tell Hollywood I said that)

    Well Renner's crime show Rook was kind of poor...

    Rook was awesome. Sad it was cancelled so quick.

    Wait there was an actual show named Rook? I was just making a Castle joke.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • DasUberEdwardDasUberEdward Registered User regular
    thanks for moving the marvel discussion guys!

    i really appreciate it. while it's a fun topic it's pretty easy to find places to discuss them and it makes this thread a bit harder to search through in relation to other movies.

    steam_sig.png
  • cj iwakuracj iwakura The Rhythm Regent Bears The Name FreedomRegistered User regular
    edited March 2015
    Saw Selma on Tuesday. Really enjoyed it, inaccuracies aside. I liked that it wasn't afraid to shy away from canonizing MLK.

    Also, I really don't think it should be rated R. The violence was TAME by modern standards.
    Hell, rate it G. Force kids to watch it.

    cj iwakura on
    z48g7weaopj2.png
  • TexiKenTexiKen Dammit! That fish really got me!Registered User regular
    My Own Man, a really bad documentary, ticked off Netflix decided to pay for this movie to be made as opposed to putting Full House on in the US!

    40 year old guy is going to have a kid, it will be a boy, he's worried about not being an alpha male. So he tries to learn how to be a man like his father, because his 70 year old dad was a successful heart surgeon and father of three who the movie desperately tries to make a bad guy for having dated views on what being a man and a woman are, which in reality aren't (he's not calling people nancies or sissies or some usual cliche Hollywood would use, he's been in a stable loving marriage for 43 years and truly loves his wife, so much so they ride a tandem bike all the time with matching bike suits, he's just a go getter hard working straight guy so of course that is apparently evil these days). But as you see, the father's biggest sin was being a successful man who had a kid who basically got to do whatever he wanted and was spoiled to the point where he never really had to pick something because his parents would always bail him out.

    So here we have the new type of documentary, the "self reflective" style but in all actuality a narcissistic film where a person pretends to act self deprecating but just wants people to talk about them doing whatever topic they choose is because they need attention. For as much as it says alpha male in this movie the people who do really aren't, it's essentially a bunch of old nerds who all went to ivy league schools trying to out-lie one another and be the dominant nerd in the group, it's the kind of posturing "real men" don't need to do because they're completely secure and generally don't like to talk about themselves, as we see with the main character's father. There is literally a scene where the lead guy is getting lessons from a skinny, effeminate, strongly implied gay guy acting coach who is trying to make him Tim the Tool Man Taylor in the very stereotypical male way, and the irony seems to be completely lost on everyone. And then the guy decides in order to be a man he needs to hunt, so he buys a rifle, hits himself in the head with the recoil so badly he bruises and bloodies his head, then kills a deer (a younger one too which really isn't cool) in an attempt to get these unseen man points (to which his older brother, who is much more secure with himself, rightly points out is ridiculous). Oh, and he juxtaposes getting ready for his hunting trip with scenes of his third trimester pregnant wife looking at her belly because can't you see, life and death, man! Acoustic guitar strumming in the background all the time for musical cues on how you should feel!

    This is not film. This is not art. It's the movie equivalent of someone fishing for compliments or taking selfies and getting paid a decent amount to do so with a lot of scenes that do feel like they're manufactured or forcing subjectivity in order to create a different meaning, and that's just weak, yo.

  • knitdanknitdan Registered User regular
    Saw Foxcatcher last night.

    It was really slow, and seemed like it was trying to push you toward a certain interpretation of Mark Schultz' and John du Pont's relationship.

    Channing Tatum was really good at portraying a wrestler, and Steve Carrell was pretty good at playing a creepy-as-fuck rich dude who talks without moving his face.

    “I was quick when I came in here, I’m twice as quick now”
    -Indiana Solo, runner of blades
  • useless4useless4 Registered User regular
    Preacher wrote: »
    useless4 wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    Black Widow is more likely to pull off a film on her own than Hawkeye I guess. I'm not enthused about either idea though, and prefer the lower powered Avengers being in films together because I think that makes for more entertaining films.

    (Also I think Jeremy Renner is sort of a poor man's Nathan Fillion but don't tell Hollywood I said that)

    Well Renner's crime show Rook was kind of poor...

    Rook was awesome. Sad it was cancelled so quick.

    Wait there was an actual show named Rook? I was just making a Castle joke.

    Dumb ass me fell for it too... I was thinking of the Unusuals... which he played a cop in. Of course he was still that guy from Senior Trip back then.

  • DasUberEdwardDasUberEdward Registered User regular
    @Astaereth I finally got a chance to watch New World. Gee oh my that was an interesting collapse.

    I was pleasantly surprised by how it turned the usual story upside down. Although I am very curious as to where it will go if the rumors of a trilogy are true. Thanks a ton for the suggestion.

    steam_sig.png
  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    useless4 wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    useless4 wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    Black Widow is more likely to pull off a film on her own than Hawkeye I guess. I'm not enthused about either idea though, and prefer the lower powered Avengers being in films together because I think that makes for more entertaining films.

    (Also I think Jeremy Renner is sort of a poor man's Nathan Fillion but don't tell Hollywood I said that)

    Well Renner's crime show Rook was kind of poor...

    Rook was awesome. Sad it was cancelled so quick.

    Wait there was an actual show named Rook? I was just making a Castle joke.

    Dumb ass me fell for it too... I was thinking of the Unusuals... which he played a cop in. Of course he was still that guy from Senior Trip back then.

    I miss dat show. With Joan of Arcadia and Hawkeye as cops.

  • Uncle PKUncle PK Registered User regular
    edited March 2015
    Astaereth wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Pretty sure there is an entire thread to talk about marvel movies.

    See, this isn't a good thing I feel, cause then you're basing your standards compared to other Marvel movies, and not just movies in general. It becomes insular and the standards on what is accessible or good is solely based around those flicks, not the medium itself.

    What's considered a good Marvel movie could be mediocre to terrible compared to the rest of cinema.

    The only way the discussion of Marvel movies in this thread is not going to be an insular discussion is if me or Atomika start tearing into statements like "Marvel's got a good track record with their movies on that front [getting good scripts]" and then we'll be here all day rehashing that.

    I'm not sure you're understanding the concept of what i'm discussing, but ok, i'll play ball. No need to split hairs over the minute.

    I am a bit confused over this part:
    Astaereth wrote: »
    But, fine. Legitimate cinema spits on most of your Marvel movies but still wishes they'd get around to some gender parity. The excuses for why gender parity is so haarrd because writing is hard, you guys, and so much harder to do when writing about vagina-possessing individuals than when writing about penis-possessing individuals that it makes sense that Marvel has zero of the former and 10 of the latter (and 1 of the former planned for another 10 of the latter in the future) are 100% bullshit.

    Where did this come from? Gender party? Where is that in my post? Didn't bring that up at all in my point, this is straight out of left field. Just odd.

    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Ha, my last post was made in here because I forgot I wasn't in the MCU thread.

    Yeah, let's take this discussion over there if we want to continue it.

    And then nobody talks about it in the MCU thread

    Uncle PK on
  • maximumzeromaximumzero I...wait, what? New Orleans, LARegistered User regular
    Saw Cinderella tonight. It was pretty damn good. Much better than that hilariously terrible Maleficent from last year.

    FU7kFbw.png
    Switch: 6200-8149-0919 / Wii U: maximumzero / 3DS: 0860-3352-3335 / eBay Shop
  • Uncle PKUncle PK Registered User regular
    Saw Cinderella tonight. It was pretty damn good. Much better than that hilariously terrible Maleficent from last year.

    That is actually a surprise! Cinderella is the blandest fairy tail in the Disney catalog, i'm curious how they fleshed out what were essentially cardboard cutout characters and plot narrative.

  • AstaerethAstaereth In the belly of the beastRegistered User regular
    @Astaereth I finally got a chance to watch New World. Gee oh my that was an interesting collapse.

    I was pleasantly surprised by how it turned the usual story upside down. Although I am very curious as to where it will go if the rumors of a trilogy are true. Thanks a ton for the suggestion.

    For the life of me I can't think of what you're referring to. Could you link me to an IMDB page for this?

    ACsTqqK.jpg
  • AstaerethAstaereth In the belly of the beastRegistered User regular
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Astaereth wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Pretty sure there is an entire thread to talk about marvel movies.

    See, this isn't a good thing I feel, cause then you're basing your standards compared to other Marvel movies, and not just movies in general. It becomes insular and the standards on what is accessible or good is solely based around those flicks, not the medium itself.

    What's considered a good Marvel movie could be mediocre to terrible compared to the rest of cinema.

    The only way the discussion of Marvel movies in this thread is not going to be an insular discussion is if me or Atomika start tearing into statements like "Marvel's got a good track record with their movies on that front [getting good scripts]" and then we'll be here all day rehashing that.

    I'm not sure you're understanding the concept of what i'm discussing, but ok, i'll play ball. No need to split hairs over the minute.

    I may have jumped a couple steps. My experience is that, here or in any other thread, most people consider Marvel movies to be pretty good in general; if you want this conversation to include any criticism of those movies, I could fulfill that goal as one of the few resident anti-Marvelists, but that's a conversation we've had in this thread several times over already (and loudly at that).
    I am a bit confused over this part:
    Astaereth wrote: »
    But, fine. Legitimate cinema spits on most of your Marvel movies but still wishes they'd get around to some gender parity. The excuses for why gender parity is so haarrd because writing is hard, you guys, and so much harder to do when writing about vagina-possessing individuals than when writing about penis-possessing individuals that it makes sense that Marvel has zero of the former and 10 of the latter (and 1 of the former planned for another 10 of the latter in the future) are 100% bullshit.

    Where did this come from? Gender party? Where is that in my post? Didn't bring that up at all in my point, this is straight out of left field. Just odd.

    Gender parity, or gender equality, is what much of the conversation over the last few pages was about. I assumed you were asking for somebody to weigh in on that from the non-Marvel-fan's perspective, so I did. So this part was not actually directly addressed to you but to the subject as a whole; but that address was something I thought you were asking for.

    ACsTqqK.jpg
  • RT800RT800 Registered User regular
    edited March 2015
    Ah yes, Cinderella.

    The story about the guy who falls madly in love with the girl whose face he can't remember.

    RT800 on
  • Uncle PKUncle PK Registered User regular
    Yeah I had a feeling that was targeted towards another poster, thanks for clearing that up

  • Regina FongRegina Fong Allons-y, Alonso Registered User regular
    RT800 wrote: »
    Ah yes, Cinderella.

    The story about the guy who falls madly in love with the girl who's face he can't remember.

    He didn't ask to be a podophile, don't be such an ableist.

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Astaereth wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Astaereth wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Pretty sure there is an entire thread to talk about marvel movies.

    See, this isn't a good thing I feel, cause then you're basing your standards compared to other Marvel movies, and not just movies in general. It becomes insular and the standards on what is accessible or good is solely based around those flicks, not the medium itself.

    What's considered a good Marvel movie could be mediocre to terrible compared to the rest of cinema.

    The only way the discussion of Marvel movies in this thread is not going to be an insular discussion is if me or Atomika start tearing into statements like "Marvel's got a good track record with their movies on that front [getting good scripts]" and then we'll be here all day rehashing that.

    I'm not sure you're understanding the concept of what i'm discussing, but ok, i'll play ball. No need to split hairs over the minute.

    I may have jumped a couple steps. My experience is that, here or in any other thread, most people consider Marvel movies to be pretty good in general; if you want this conversation to include any criticism of those movies, I could fulfill that goal as one of the few resident anti-Marvelists, but that's a conversation we've had in this thread several times over already (and loudly at that).

    Discussing this kind of thing in the MCU thread seems kinda weird anyway. The demographics are heavily weighted and it really feels like wandering into someone's treehouse to shit all over their club.

  • DasUberEdwardDasUberEdward Registered User regular
    oh gosh silly me. I meant @TexiKen in regard to New World.

    steam_sig.png
  • WashWash Sweet Christmas Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    Astaereth wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Astaereth wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Pretty sure there is an entire thread to talk about marvel movies.

    See, this isn't a good thing I feel, cause then you're basing your standards compared to other Marvel movies, and not just movies in general. It becomes insular and the standards on what is accessible or good is solely based around those flicks, not the medium itself.

    What's considered a good Marvel movie could be mediocre to terrible compared to the rest of cinema.

    The only way the discussion of Marvel movies in this thread is not going to be an insular discussion is if me or Atomika start tearing into statements like "Marvel's got a good track record with their movies on that front [getting good scripts]" and then we'll be here all day rehashing that.

    I'm not sure you're understanding the concept of what i'm discussing, but ok, i'll play ball. No need to split hairs over the minute.

    I may have jumped a couple steps. My experience is that, here or in any other thread, most people consider Marvel movies to be pretty good in general; if you want this conversation to include any criticism of those movies, I could fulfill that goal as one of the few resident anti-Marvelists, but that's a conversation we've had in this thread several times over already (and loudly at that).

    Discussing this kind of thing in the MCU thread seems kinda weird anyway. The demographics are heavily weighted and it really feels like wandering into someone's treehouse to shit all over their club.

    Yeah, that is the thread to go to if you're looking to gush over the MCU. Honestly, I would love to have a discussion about films within the MCU outside of the context of them being in the MCU, if only just to see more analysis that runs counter to the attitude you'd find in that other thread.

    gi5h0gjqwti1.jpg
  • Uncle PKUncle PK Registered User regular
    edited March 2015
    shryke wrote: »
    Astaereth wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Astaereth wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Pretty sure there is an entire thread to talk about marvel movies.

    See, this isn't a good thing I feel, cause then you're basing your standards compared to other Marvel movies, and not just movies in general. It becomes insular and the standards on what is accessible or good is solely based around those flicks, not the medium itself.

    What's considered a good Marvel movie could be mediocre to terrible compared to the rest of cinema.

    The only way the discussion of Marvel movies in this thread is not going to be an insular discussion is if me or Atomika start tearing into statements like "Marvel's got a good track record with their movies on that front [getting good scripts]" and then we'll be here all day rehashing that.

    I'm not sure you're understanding the concept of what i'm discussing, but ok, i'll play ball. No need to split hairs over the minute.

    I may have jumped a couple steps. My experience is that, here or in any other thread, most people consider Marvel movies to be pretty good in general; if you want this conversation to include any criticism of those movies, I could fulfill that goal as one of the few resident anti-Marvelists, but that's a conversation we've had in this thread several times over already (and loudly at that).

    Discussing this kind of thing in the MCU thread seems kinda weird anyway. The demographics are heavily weighted and it really feels like wandering into someone's treehouse to shit all over their club.

    Nailed it.

    It's tough to hold a discussion when you're stepping into a stronghold, you're just going to get overwhelmed to the point of frustration. It's like a Democrat expecting a balanced debate at the Republican National Convention.

    It seems any valid criticism gets sidelined or diverted to 'take it up in MCU thread' instead of addressed. We're adopting special rules for a branch of movies where other action movies would be called out on without a moments hesitation, it's weird and a bit biased.

    Uncle PK on
  • Regina FongRegina Fong Allons-y, Alonso Registered User regular
    A mod already weighed in on this so if you want to argue about it you should PM him. Otherwise take it to the MCU ghetto.

  • programjunkieprogramjunkie Registered User regular
    .
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Saw Cinderella tonight. It was pretty damn good. Much better than that hilariously terrible Maleficent from last year.

    That is actually a surprise! Cinderella is the blandest fairy tail in the Disney catalog, i'm curious how they fleshed out what were essentially cardboard cutout characters and plot narrative.

    Seconded. Mulan would be a legit as fuck live action Disney movie. Albeit you'd have to grab a Pirates of the Caribbean level rating to do it right.

  • Uncle PKUncle PK Registered User regular
    edited March 2015
    A mod already weighed in on this so if you want to argue about it you should PM him. Otherwise take it to the MCU ghetto.

    Yeah yeah, I get it. I'm not interested in pursuing it any further, just wanna be heard.

    It's just strange how we've got two solid pages of discussion on Marvel without any intervention until I bring up basic plot dissection on Thor 2, and now it's 'take it to the MCU thread'. I'm totally cool with it if we're applying this to all Marvel movies.

    Uncle PK on
  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    .
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Saw Cinderella tonight. It was pretty damn good. Much better than that hilariously terrible Maleficent from last year.

    That is actually a surprise! Cinderella is the blandest fairy tail in the Disney catalog, i'm curious how they fleshed out what were essentially cardboard cutout characters and plot narrative.

    Seconded. Mulan would be a legit as fuck live action Disney movie. Albeit you'd have to grab a Pirates of the Caribbean level rating to do it right.

    Ming-Na Wen needs a role in this.

  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    Saw Cinderella tonight. It was pretty damn good. Much better than that hilariously terrible Maleficent from last year.

    How was Frozen Fever?

  • Uncle PKUncle PK Registered User regular
    .
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Saw Cinderella tonight. It was pretty damn good. Much better than that hilariously terrible Maleficent from last year.

    That is actually a surprise! Cinderella is the blandest fairy tail in the Disney catalog, i'm curious how they fleshed out what were essentially cardboard cutout characters and plot narrative.

    Seconded. Mulan would be a legit as fuck live action Disney movie. Albeit you'd have to grab a Pirates of the Caribbean level rating to do it right.

    The big question is, who has the moxie to play Shan Yu?

  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    A mod already weighed in on this so if you want to argue about it you should PM him. Otherwise take it to the MCU ghetto.

    Yeah yeah, I get it. I'm not interested in pursuing it any further, just wanna be heard.

    It's just strange how we've got two solid pages of discussion on Marvel without any intervention until I bring up basic plot dissection on Thor 2, and now it's 'take it to the MCU thread'. I'm totally cool with it if we're applying this to all Marvel movies.

    Official Last Word That Will Occur In This Thread:

    Like I said, the post i made in here on the subject was an accident; I forgot which thread i was in. As much as my posting about MCU films in here was a tacit endorsement of that line of conversation, that whole tangent is my bad, and i don't hold other folks responsible for that instance.

    I understand the frustration with trying to post general criticism of the entire MCU in that thread. The series is popular, disliking the whole shebang is a minority opinion, and holding minority opinions in popular threads is difficult. However, we've just witnessed what this thread looks like when the MCU gets mentioned; it drowns out discussion of anything else.

    It's kind of a bummer that certain viewpoints are difficult to accommodate, but this is the best situation we're going to get until such time as more people are of the opinion that the films are generally bad.

    If anyone wants to further discussion of this topic - i.e. how to divvy up thread topics - you're welcome to PM me, with the caveat that I am exceedingly unlikely to change my mind.

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled movie discussion.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    RT800 wrote: »
    Ah yes, Cinderella.

    The story about the guy who falls madly in love with the girl whose face he can't remember.

    It's only because she has a totally slammin ass.

    Anyway, I've always found the animated film charming, if a little generic. Cinderella as a person has an infectious personality. She's optimistic, intelligent, capable, and confident. She has a shitty lot in life, but she refuses to give into it.

    She's a lot better than Snow Fucking White, whose singular personality trait is that she's literally terminally stupid. Oh, and she can bake a pie.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • TaramoorTaramoor Storyteller Registered User regular
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    .
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Saw Cinderella tonight. It was pretty damn good. Much better than that hilariously terrible Maleficent from last year.

    That is actually a surprise! Cinderella is the blandest fairy tail in the Disney catalog, i'm curious how they fleshed out what were essentially cardboard cutout characters and plot narrative.

    Seconded. Mulan would be a legit as fuck live action Disney movie. Albeit you'd have to grab a Pirates of the Caribbean level rating to do it right.

    The big question is, who has the moxie to play Shan Yu?

    The Rock could still do it, I think.

    Or Jason Momoa.

  • DasUberEdwardDasUberEdward Registered User regular
    Taramoor wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    .
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Saw Cinderella tonight. It was pretty damn good. Much better than that hilariously terrible Maleficent from last year.

    That is actually a surprise! Cinderella is the blandest fairy tail in the Disney catalog, i'm curious how they fleshed out what were essentially cardboard cutout characters and plot narrative.

    Seconded. Mulan would be a legit as fuck live action Disney movie. Albeit you'd have to grab a Pirates of the Caribbean level rating to do it right.

    The big question is, who has the moxie to play Shan Yu?

    The Rock could still do it, I think.

    Or Jason Momoa.

    or

    or

    we could use an asian american actor.

    because damn do they need work.

    steam_sig.png
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    RT800 wrote: »
    Ah yes, Cinderella.

    The story about the guy who falls madly in love with the girl whose face he can't remember.

    It's only because she has a totally slammin ass.

    Anyway, I've always found the animated film charming, if a little generic. Cinderella as a person has an infectious personality. She's optimistic, intelligent, capable, and confident. She has a shitty lot in life, but she refuses to give into it.

    She's a lot better than Snow Fucking White, whose singular personality trait is that she's literally terminally stupid. Oh, and she can bake a pie.

    A solid foundation for a lasting marriage.

  • ArchangleArchangle Registered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    RT800 wrote: »
    Ah yes, Cinderella.

    The story about the guy who falls madly in love with the girl whose face he can't remember.

    It's only because she has a totally slammin ass.

    Anyway, I've always found the animated film charming, if a little generic. Cinderella as a person has an infectious personality. She's optimistic, intelligent, capable, and confident. She has a shitty lot in life, but she refuses to give into it.

    She's a lot better than Snow Fucking White, whose singular personality trait is that she's literally terminally stupid. Oh, and she can bake a pie.
    Snow White and the Huntsman was the weirdest script I have seen in a long time. Like, there's the whole love triangle thing, but Non-Hemsworth is totally 3rd wheeling it up throughout (despite the "I AM AN UNDERCOVER PRINCE DON'T SUSPECT ME" c-plot) and Hemsworth himself not seeming to give a shit about Snow White herself and more involved with getting over his dead wife. Despite this, it's Hemsworth who delivers the CurseBreaker Kiss (tm) not Prince dude. Wtf was going on there?

    And don't even get me started on the "she brings life back to the forest" b-plot which gets dropped as soon as the Forest Lord dies. Which is a pity - the production design on that b-plot was fucking fantastic, and combined with Charlize being A Boss brings the movie up to a bearable level.

  • DasUberEdwardDasUberEdward Registered User regular
    So I ran into this little oddity starring Jackie Gleason and Steve McQueen

    Soldiers in the Rain
    600full-soldier-in-the-rain-screenshot.jpg

    The two star as an odd pair of military gents with Gleason playing the straight man to McQueen's fumbling, bumbling, and charming slacker who only wants to get the most out of life with the last amount of effort. While Gleason is his superior the two become fast friends despite their differences because Gleason's character is simply wary of his long military career and seems to welcome the change of pace. There are some genuine laughs and some sincere drama (Gleason's character struggles with his weight and McQueen is often taken advantage of) and as a result the movie has a bit of an odd pace. Tuesday Weld plays the closest thing this film has to a leading lady and and plays her role wonderfully.

    It is by all means a film worth viewing and it may be a bit confusing that it has so little notoriety considering Gleason and McQueen at the helm. Soldiers in the Rain was released at the box office on November 27th 1963. Five days after the Kennedy assassination and went largely unnoticed as a result.

    There is also one exceptionally kinetic and brutal fight sequence that really shows both stars give it their all to defend their friendship. It may be worthwhile viewing just to see Jackie Gleason and Steve McQueen stand side by side in a bar room brawl.

    steam_sig.png
  • cj iwakuracj iwakura The Rhythm Regent Bears The Name FreedomRegistered User regular
    That reminds me, I also watched a little cult classic called Two-Lane Blacktop(Criterion edition). Stripped-down is one way of putting it. Talk about straight and to-the-point. It has very little exposition, and the characters don't even get names. It's just a direct look at 70s road culture, and great as a historical vehicle.

    I can't say I enjoyed it much, but it was certainly memorable.

    z48g7weaopj2.png
  • TaramoorTaramoor Storyteller Registered User regular
    Taramoor wrote: »
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    .
    Uncle PK wrote: »
    Saw Cinderella tonight. It was pretty damn good. Much better than that hilariously terrible Maleficent from last year.

    That is actually a surprise! Cinderella is the blandest fairy tail in the Disney catalog, i'm curious how they fleshed out what were essentially cardboard cutout characters and plot narrative.

    Seconded. Mulan would be a legit as fuck live action Disney movie. Albeit you'd have to grab a Pirates of the Caribbean level rating to do it right.

    The big question is, who has the moxie to play Shan Yu?

    The Rock could still do it, I think.

    Or Jason Momoa.

    or

    or

    we could use an asian american actor.

    because damn do they need work.

    Honestly those were just the first big muscular guys that I like to watch act that came to mind. I'm open to suggestions.

    If Bolo were still 30 he'd be pretty awesome, but half of Shan Yu's power is his design and the other half is Miguel Ferrer's voice.

  • DasUberEdwardDasUberEdward Registered User regular
    Yeah I can't think of a single Asian male leas who would fit the role. Which is kinda sad.

    steam_sig.png
  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Have you ever questioned the nature of your reality? Registered User regular
    Kimball Cho

  • TaramoorTaramoor Storyteller Registered User regular
    Apothe0sis wrote: »
    Kimball Cho

    If you mean Tim Kang from The Mentalist... hmm.

    I am intrigued. Big guy, black belt in taekwando, pretty good voice, definite presence.

  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Have you ever questioned the nature of your reality? Registered User regular
    Taramoor wrote: »
    Apothe0sis wrote: »
    Kimball Cho

    If you mean Tim Kang from The Mentalist... hmm.

    I am intrigued. Big guy, black belt in taekwando, pretty good voice, definite presence.

    I do.

    He's the manliest motherfucker on teevee.

  • DracomicronDracomicron Registered User regular
    Uli Latukefu, who plays Byamba in Marco Polo could probably pull it off.

This discussion has been closed.