The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Bicycle Thread Is Coming Your Way

1495051525355»

Posts

  • djmitchelladjmitchella Registered User regular
    This comic has the most realistic depiction of bike maintenance I have ever seen -- it's a fairly specific topic to cover, but it does so very well:
    rlft03eqgzyg.png

  • honoverehonovere Registered User regular
    enc0re wrote: »
    honovere wrote: »
    Put some tape on the seat railing.
    4vbr885i6n8q.png
    Not sure I did it the right way around.

    I'd love lots of updates on how the HSD is working out for you. We're moving into an urban apartment where parking is a little farther away. I'm thinking of getting an e-bike to transport a kid on good weather days and as my general bike for when the wife and kids are on their own.

    Two kids: 3 and 6 year old. But I expect I'll only haul one at a time. I'm deeply conflicted between getting a (probably Tern Quick Haul) long tail or short tail. Long tail seems like it would be a pain in the city to get through barriers, reposition at stop light crossings, etc.

    Had a longer post but the forum ate it.

    Still like the bike. Feels very agile compared the the 100 pounds long john urban arrow we got.

    Didn't know the was a quick long haul now. That still looks pretty short for a long tail and we manage with the comparatively ungainly long john that has a turn radius like a car fine in 99% of trips. Like compared to a long tail with 26+ wheels, too, it looks short.

    If you got two kids get a bike for two I'd say. Seems way more flexible. Also a front carrier for bags or so.


    Also I'm a big fan of gates belts for a daily driver.

    If you can manage to get a test ride definitely do that. I tried the quick haul, too and the lack of front wheel suspension made it feel a bit too wobbly for my taste when going over curbs and bumbs.

  • djmitchelladjmitchella Registered User regular
    Yes, it's a Red Bull video so it bears very little resemblance to real-world cycling -- but the final sequence when it all works is just an incredible combination of concept, skill, camerawork, and somewhat unusually, train driving.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP_0Vv5F29I

  • djmitchelladjmitchella Registered User regular
    Finally got around to clearing out the drawer of "miscellaneous bike parts related to lights/that are made of black plastic":
    zo70dkmtmcru.jpg
    I have eight (spare) brackets for a particular type of rear bike light -- which in itself is not so bad, except that I only have one of those lights any more, so I guess they seem to be a type of light that breaks/gets lost a lot and maybe I should have been buying a different one all those times?
    5r0ehpjee19b.jpg
    The most unnecessary thing, though, is that not only do I have a bunch of spare handlebar end plugs:
    yqyqbkquk66p.jpg
    but I also at some point seem to have thought "you know what I need more of? bar end plugs" and bought _another_ bunch of the things:
    25eithwtuetk.jpg





  • djmitchelladjmitchella Registered User regular
    Youtube tends to think I want to watch bike trials videos. Which is fair enough, it's not wrong. The thing is, as with any video about people being good at things, they tend to occasionally make it look _too_ easy, and then I'll try and do something and realise "no, it's not easy, it's just that the person in the video is really good". But there's a scale of how to present skills, and just now I wound up on the other end than usual

    On one end, the classic example, Danny MacAskill. Red Bull rider, high production values, location shooting, big tricks, possibly a bit gimmicky at this point, but still very impressive stuff:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70NBZV6z_o0

    In the middle, Fabio Wibmer, who really does just make everything look easy. A lot of video editing in this one, but still very impressive.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsDpkyNbyBM

    And today, it showed me this, which is just a guy doing _insane_ tricks. I don't know I've seen someone use a bike to climb up obstacles as if he was a mountain goat like that before; this is very close to just "doing parkour while holding a bike". And it seems like they just went to the seaside, one of his mates got his phone out and that was how they filmed it.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLd1w0NvWHo

    The descent after the cannon jump, or the rail sequence after that, are some of the most "well, I guess it must be possible because he did it" things I've ever seen. And, I mean, I can work out how the physics of it all happened, but his ability to control weight and momentum so precisely is just ridiculous.

  • PaladinPaladin Registered User regular
    One of my parents is looking for a bicycle with small tires for ease of use - I'm not familiar with this stuff or if they're good. Anybody have experience with these things?

    Marty: The future, it's where you're going?
    Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
  • neverreallyneverreally Registered User regular
    Paladin wrote: »
    One of my parents is looking for a bicycle with small tires for ease of use - I'm not familiar with this stuff or if they're good. Anybody have experience with these things?

    Sounds like maybe they're talking about a fold up bike like these? https://us.brompton.com/c/bikes

    There are definitely cheaper options. And electric options. That's just one nicer brand.

  • honoverehonovere Registered User regular
    https://www.isy.de/gb-en/

    https://www.ternbicycles.com/en

    for some small wheeled options

    From my experience with an electric Tern shorttail I have to say the small wheels do not nessecarily make the bike easier to handle. it drives pretty dynamic and wiggly, compared to a bike with larger wheels.

    So depending on what they mean with ease of use a regular bike with a step through frame might be the better choice.

  • SporkAndrewSporkAndrew Registered User, ClubPA regular
    I daily drove a Brompton for 5 years and put a few thousand miles on it. The tiny wheels definitely don't make it easier to handle. The fact that you're sitting up so far away from them actually feels a lot worse at first and like honovere said can feel a very "wiggly."

    Like anything, though, you can get used to it and there were a few occasions that I ended up doing 10+ mile trips on it after missing a train, or the train getting cancelled, or the train being delayed by hours and I never hated the experience.

    Going back to a proper racer bike was very weird after spending so long with the Brompton.

    The one about the fucking space hairdresser and the cowboy. He's got a tinfoil pal and a pedal bin
  • japanjapan Registered User regular
    Dahon is another one that does a lot of decent small wheel options

    The thing about small wheels is that they make the bike a lot more sensitive to surface quality. On a perfectly smooth road/path there's not much in it, but a pot hole that a typical 26" or 700c wheel will just roll over will swallow a small wheel (especially very small wheels like the 16" wheel bromptons). As a rule it's a design choice that is trading off ride quality to reduce the overall size of the bike.

    honovere is probably right that they might be thinking small wheels = easier to ride which is not straightforwardly true, so it's likely worth unpicking why they think they would prefer small wheels

  • Mortal SkyMortal Sky queer punk hedge witchRegistered User regular
    Honestly even just bumping down to 26 or 650b should be enough of a difference in reducing standover height to appease folks while still having a usable seat height, relative to 700c

  • schussschuss Registered User regular
    Yeah, big wheels are better for bumps and other stuff, they just steer a little slower. It's why mountain bikes have largely moved to 29 fronts - smooths out the terrain.

  • PaladinPaladin Registered User regular
    They want a beginner bike for shorter people that's stable and can be used for pretty even terrain, cheap but also portable in the back of a SUV, before graduating to a more standard bicycle. They're older and don't want to go fast or fall. They don't want training wheels or a trike, and they're looking at bikes for kids but want the wheels even smaller.

    I wish I could have them try out different styles of bikes to actually see how these styles change the ride, but the portability factor will limit the options too. Step through sounds interesting.

    Marty: The future, it's where you're going?
    Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
  • schussschuss Registered User regular
    The gyroscopic effect also means that bigger wheels will be slightly more stable than smaller wheeled ones - it's slightly counterintuitive, but you should be on the biggest wheel possible. I would look at foldable "Cruisers" or similar as they'll probably have the right geometry/ergos for what they want.

Sign In or Register to comment.