As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

[XCOM] You can't parry a shotgun. The Resistance is Live!

DuriniaDurinia Evolved from Space PotatoesRegistered User regular
edited February 2016 in Games and Technology
  • PC Only
  • Procedurally generated levels
  • New mobile command center
  • Drones
  • Super-customizable soldiers ( You said what?)
  • ...and more!

Release date: February 5th, 2016

Trailers and Other General Moving Visual Stimuli:
Launch trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIRDb_O6qXA

Announcement trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E_-2wIJIzQ

December hype trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0qHZG1-rEg

Also, they let Beaglerush have a go at it.
HEY YOU - want to send fellow Penny Arcadians to their horrific deaths as members of your XCOM 2 squads?

XCOM 2 adds the concept of "character pools", which allows you to customize soldiers and then share them. We here at the PA XCOM thread are collecting these soldiers as a PA pool, which will be updated regularly and (hopefully) automatically synced through Steam. Here's the details on how YOU can join!

Here is the CURRENT POOL

Ready to fight for Earth with other Penny Arcadians?

This is the form for submitting your willingness to participate in the various shenanigans that will result from this character pool being distributed to the denizens of the PA Forums G&T XCOM Thread.

If you've got XCOM 2 yourself, export your character in a character pool file and then head over to the Character Pool Upload Page, which will save both of us a lot of work.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXPORTING:
In game, go into the character pool -> select the character you want to send -> click "Export" -> on the next page click "create new pool" (at the top) -> name the pool -> THEN select the pool you just created to export.

Then, take the "whatyounamedyourpool.bin file (located in ...\Documents\My Games\XCOM2\XComGame\CharacterPool\Importable) and upload it to the site.

Don't have XCOM 2, but still want to see your name in lights? (Likely on a memorial wall...)

Then proceed with this survey. Good Luck, Commander.

(If you plan on having XCOM 2 on release day, please just wait and upload your character pool file on Friday.)

For reference, you might want to peruse the different customization options visually on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOPsOjkT7x4

INSTRUCTIONS FOR TWEAKING CHARACTER SELECTION
You want to go into \Documents\my games\XCOM2\XComGame\Config\XComGameData.ini (or the DefaultGameData.ini file in your install directory) and set it like this:
alingis wrote:
The .ini settings were misreported in a few forums & on a few videos. There are 3 configuration lines to change:
InitialSoldiersCharacterPoolSelectionMode - starting soldiers
RewardUnitCharacterPoolSelectionMode - soldiers granted by completing vip missions & certain POIs
RecruitsCharacterPoolSelectionMode - soldiers available for recruitment
Setting these to eCPSM_PoolOnly will force the game to use characters within your pool first and then generate randoms afterward. RandomOnly means you only get random soldiers in the pool.


Because of <reasons> I'm not familiar with 20 year old strategy games. What was XCOM, and why is this a big deal?
Some XCOM History:
In 1994, Microprose released the original XCOM: UFO Defense. This game mixed real-time strategy with turn-based strategy. The RTS part, called the Geoscape, took place on a global scale. You started with one base (with the ability to build more) somewhere on the planet. You had to manage your resources, which included buying or manufacturing weapons, ammo, armor, outfitting your air force and troops, and directing research and manufacturing focuses. The money for all of this (including paying everybody's salary) could come from selling your supplies or manufactured goods, but mainly from the funding council of countries. If a country was happy with your performance, you'd receive more money from them the next month. If they were displeased (or infiltrated by the aliens) they would cut off their funding. Actually putting soldiers on the ground for a specific mission (UFO crash, etc.) triggered the turn-based portion of the game, called the battlescape. Missions in the battlescape started with your squad on the landing craft, ready to take on the alien menace. By directing your soldiers, you either killed the enemy or led your soldiers to their (permanent) deaths.

The point being the game was deep, hard, and brutal. High casualties and squad-wipes were not only normal, but expected. It has remain well-played to this day. In fact, you should really go read @Fishman's LP of the original right now. It's one of the best LPs in the history of forever.
UFO Defense had some sequels which some people have strong opinions about. There were other attempts to clone or revive the series, most of which failed in a spectacular manner. This is the first time that a dedicated, high-budget team has attempted to bring the classic into the modern age.

WTF is XCOM: Enemy Unknown Within?

Fast Forward to 2012: Our friends at Firaxis gave us a straight-up re-imagining/modernization of the original XCOM. We're going from this:
e.png

to this:
hJXvdBc.jpg

How is this all made possible? Jake Solomon, GENTLEMAN ADVENTURER tells us.

XCOM: Enemy Within Expansion
XCOM: Enemy Within is the expansion pack for XCOM: Enemy Unknown, released 11-12-13 (I KNOW, WITTY AMIRITE?).

Similar to other expansions for Firaxis games (see: Civ V), XCOM: EW is not a "new campaign", but a set of significant changes/enhancements to the original game. The expansion introduces new mechanics both at the tactical layer (MEC and Gene Mod troops, new meld resource in missions, new mission types) and the strategic layer (introduction of new concurrent enemy faction, new resource to manage, new tactics for reducing panic).

HEY YOU - want to send fellow Penny Arcadians to their horrific deaths as members of your XCOM:EU/EW squads?
You can drop this file into C:\Users\<YOUR USER>\Documents\My Games\XCOM - Enemy Within\XComGame\Config

(if using Windows 7)

to use custom names.

Be sure to report on the exploits of fellow forumers! For example, Lanrutcon died twice in defense of humanity in the first 12 hours of EU.
Capture121.jpg
That's him in the pink.

How Cover Works: A Tutorial
Videos!

The hottest (video) ticket in-thread these days is for the Ironman Impossible videos of one BeagleRush. Follow along as he narrates his pain in real time. As a bonus, you will definitely learn something about the tactics needed to win the harder difficulties.

Season One
Season Two

A bit of an introduction into the three special "Council Mission" types:
Escort Mission
Abduction Mission
Bomb Disposal

For business reasons, I must preserve the outward sign of sanity.
--Mark Twain
Durinia on
«134567100

Posts

  • Options
    DuriniaDurinia Evolved from Space Potatoes Registered User regular
    edited January 2016
    OLD THREAD

    I wasn't quite content complete on this thread yet, but you guys blew out the last 4 pages of the old one in record time.

    I'll keep adding/editing the OP.

    Durinia on
    For business reasons, I must preserve the outward sign of sanity.
    --Mark Twain
  • Options
    wiltingwilting I had fun once and it was awful Registered User regular
    edited January 2016
    I've said this already but I really dislike the idea of the aliens getting a special cheat rule when concealment is broken on their turn. The rules should be consistent, breaking concealment should always do the same thing. The question is what those things are. Nor do I think enemy turn ambushes should be completely removed. Made less effective sure, but still a viable tactic.

    Nor should they shoot AND move to cover, its one or the other.

    The key factor is standing out of cover in order to be deliberately discovered, make it so there is a risk associated with that.

    wilting on
  • Options
    SnicketysnickSnicketysnick The Greatest Hype Man in WesterosRegistered User regular
    Probably the easiest thing to change is just to make the scatter to cover part of the ambush sequence "free". So if you can take em all in one overwatch set on their turn, great, but if you don't they are going to get to shoot at you before you can fire again. That way ambushes work the same on either the player's turn, or the alien's, you can still get a load of exposed shots if you plan right, but it's not a free round.

    7qmGNt5.png
    D3 Steam #TeamTangent STO
  • Options
    RendRend Registered User regular
    wilting wrote: »
    I've said this already but I really dislike the idea of the aliens getting a special cheat rule when concealment is broken on their turn. The rules should be consistent, breaking concealment should always do the same thing. The question is what those things are. Nor do I think enemy turn ambushes should be completely removed. Made less effective sure, but still a viable tactic.

    Nor should they shoot AND move to cover, its one or the other.

    The key factor is standing out of cover in order to be deliberately discovered, make it so there is a risk associated with that.

    The risk should be the same risk as leaving your soldier out when enemies know they're there: your operative should have a very high likelihood of dying.
    A special cheat rule isn't exactly the most elegant way to accomplish a thing but regardless of what the solution is, I think the fairest way is for the exposed operative to be fired upon that turn.

  • Options
    durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    You could always just say that patrolling aliens are effectively blue-moving around the map.

    Like when they stumble upon you in the open, they then all can either duck into cover or shoot you.

    So then overwatch from concealment makes sense only in the case that you all conceal and alert the enemy by firing on them.

    Take a moment to donate what you can to Critical Resistance and Black Lives Matter.
  • Options
    NinotchkaNinotchka Registered User regular
    edited January 2016
    You could always just say that patrolling aliens are effectively blue-moving around the map.

    Like when they stumble upon you in the open, they then all can either duck into cover or shoot you.

    So then overwatch from concealment makes sense only in the case that you all conceal and alert the enemy by firing on them.
    Therefore the ones who chose not to duck into cover leave themselves sitting ducks for the next turn, but they can be assumed to be happy about that situation since they got a free shot at you and they know their comrades will avenge them/raise their dead bodies as zombies.

    Ninotchka on
  • Options
    WACriminalWACriminal Dying Is Easy, Young Man Living Is HarderRegistered User regular
    So excited about the news from the Long War team. I'm sure, if nothing else, they've got some great QoL ideas they're adding.

  • Options
    SnicketysnickSnicketysnick The Greatest Hype Man in WesterosRegistered User regular
    edited January 2016
    From the looks of this XCOM stream fireaxis are doing now http://www.twitch.tv/firaxisgames, they've changed it so pods have a chance to shoot at an exposed soldier when they stumble across them, rather than moving to cover, which also means they don't trigger the overwatch fire because they don't move. OTOH they might still be stood in the middle of the street next turn, but it's bad news for the bait soldier.

    *e*
    (It was a sort of prologue thing before the show started properly, so I don't know if it's going to come up again)

    Snicketysnick on
    7qmGNt5.png
    D3 Steam #TeamTangent STO
  • Options
    durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    Cool, that's a sensible fix. That basically is just saying "they used 1 action to move, they saw you, now they're using one action for what they think is best". Fair, and it makes leaving a squaddie in the open as bait an actual risk.

    Take a moment to donate what you can to Critical Resistance and Black Lives Matter.
  • Options
    DuriniaDurinia Evolved from Space Potatoes Registered User regular
    As an update on the character pool stuff: I've got an initial character pool upload form that aggregates files and syncs them to my NAS so I should be able to just do a mass import every once in a while and then publish to Workshop (assuming that part works - no details I've found yet).

    With that arrangement, I think people will just be able to subscribe to the "mod" (which is just the pool file) and then will need to do an in-game re-import out of the file whenever it updates, but there should be no need to go manually download anything once it's set up/subscribed.

    For business reasons, I must preserve the outward sign of sanity.
    --Mark Twain
  • Options
    BlindPsychicBlindPsychic Registered User regular
    Its so weird to me that Firaxis streams interlaced video, it looks so bad and I've never seen anyone else do it.

  • Options
    AegeriAegeri Tiny wee bacteriums Plateau of LengRegistered User regular
    edited January 2016
    Basically exactly the change I thought they would do, which is the most sensible and even method they could have picked IMO. If you give a player a choice between getting two rounds of free shooting or one round of shooting, but the aliens can move/respond to what you did, just about everyone will go "I take two rounds of free shooting". Now there is a substantial risk to your previous "Free Lunch".

    Edit: My only complaint is that they didn't silently fix it and have people discover it naturally on release.

    That would have been a real hoot.

    Aegeri on
    The Roleplayer's Guild: My blog for roleplaying games, advice and adventuring.
  • Options
    WACriminalWACriminal Dying Is Easy, Young Man Living Is HarderRegistered User regular
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Basically exactly the change I thought they would do, which is the most sensible and even method they could have picked IMO. If you give a player a choice between getting two rounds of free shooting or one round of shooting, but the aliens can move/respond to what you did, just about everyone will go "I take two rounds of free shooting". Now there is a substantial risk to your previous "Free Lunch".

    Edit: My only complaint is that they didn't silently fix it and have people discover it naturally on release.

    That would have been a real hoot.

    From Jake Solomon's Twitter, in that alternate universe: "Oh, your cheesy strategy didn't work in the final release? How...interesting. Jenkins, fetch my tear goblet."

  • Options
    AegeriAegeri Tiny wee bacteriums Plateau of LengRegistered User regular
    They show off the solution right at the start of this stream.

    Oddly enough it works exactly the way I thought it should. They choose (some % chance) to shoot the soldier or scatter. They can only choose to shoot the soldier that they have flanked or was deliberately exposed. It's basically the ideal solution, giving a high amount of risk - especially because a wounded soldier on legendary can be out of action for more than a month - but a high reward. So still viable but no longer the obvious "No duh" choice to start every engagement.

    The Roleplayer's Guild: My blog for roleplaying games, advice and adventuring.
  • Options
    DuriniaDurinia Evolved from Space Potatoes Registered User regular
    For business reasons, I must preserve the outward sign of sanity.
    --Mark Twain
  • Options
    see317see317 Registered User regular
    So, it's not XCOM2, but the current humble bundle has a metric shit ton (equivalent to approximately 2.2 imperial shit tons) of Firaxis goodness in it, including XCOM: Enemy Unknown. Pay more than the average (currently $9.93) for the Elite Soldier Pack, Slingshot Pack and XCOM: Enemy Within.

    Also Civilization: Beyond Earth and the Exoplanets map pack if you pay $15 or more.

    Could be a good chance to catch up if you haven't played them already.
    Humble Firaxis Bundle

    This bundle's on Firaxis! Is it hot in here, or is it just this Firaxis bundle? Whatever it is, with Civ V, Beyond Earth, loads of XCOM, and more, we recommend getting this bundle while it's hot and fresh out of the bundle kitchen!

    Pay $1 or more for XCOM: Enemy Unknown, Sid Meier’s Pirates!, Ace Patrol Bundle, and Sid Meier's Civilization III Complete.

    Pay more than the average price to also receive Sid Meier's Civilization IV: The Complete Edition, Sid Meier's Civilization V, Sid Meier's Starships, XCOM: Enemy Unknown - Elite Soldier Pack, XCOM: Enemy Unknown - Slingshot Pack, XCOM: Enemy Within, and 10% off one month of Humble Monthly.

    Pay $15 or more for all of that plus Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth, Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth - Exoplanets Map Pack, and a coupon for 33% off Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth - Rising Tide DLC in the Humble Store.

    Choose the price. Together, these games usually cost as much as $211. Here at Humble Bundle, though, you choose the price!

    Cross-platform and on Steam. All games in this bundle are available on Steam for Windows. Most titles in this bundle are also available on Steam for Mac and Linux. Please check out the full system requirements here prior to purchasing.

    Support charity. Choose where the money goes -- between Firaxis and Action Against Hunger USA via the PayPal Giving Fund. For details on how this works, click here. If you like this bundle or like what we do, you can leave us a Humble Tip too.

  • Options
    GaryOGaryO Registered User regular
    Just had a terror mission on my Long War campaign that had oh so many zombies. The map was a pier where we started on one end and had to fight all the way down
    Turn 1 activated a pod of crysalids all within face-eating range, just managed to down them all.
    Turn 2 activated a second pod crysalids right near my teams insertion point. Then some doors open from a cargo container and zombies just come pouring from it. 5 of them at first, then another group of five.
    cue much backtracking and frantic firing of guns before their all down

    My team then goes through the cargo container to the other side, straight into 10 more zombies. Said zombies are standing in a 5x2 line which means grenades absolutely wreck them.
    Mission won, but because of how Long War makes panic rise for every civilians death in a terror mission, I still lose America.

    Story wise im assuming America got overrun by a massive zombie/crysalid horde. Sadly there is no option to nuke America.

  • Options
    AegeriAegeri Tiny wee bacteriums Plateau of LengRegistered User regular
    Their change only applies to the initial concealment phase as well. Afterwards it seems that the aliens will always scamper as usual. So it is specifically a fix to abusing the concealment system and not to the whole game overall.

    The Roleplayer's Guild: My blog for roleplaying games, advice and adventuring.
  • Options
    Mr RayMr Ray Sarcasm sphereRegistered User regular
    edited January 2016
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment. The example someone gave was that Beagle was using a highway during one of his streams when an advent pod popped up behind him via a ladder, flanking his whole squad. Under the new rules, the flanking Advent would have gotten free shots at him from behind, in addition to ruining his concealment, so I guess watching your back while in concealment is going to be super important now.

    Mr Ray on
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    A feature with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment. The example someone gave was that Beagle was using a highway during one of his streams when an advent pod popped up behind him via a ladder, flanking his whole squad. Under the new rules, the flanking Advent would have gotten free shots at him from behind, in addition to ruining his concealment, so I guess watching your back while in concealment is going to be super important now.

    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    OpposingFarceOpposingFarce Registered User regular
    Very simple an elegant solution to the beaglebush, that makes it still an option but with risk. Like pretty much every other decision in the game.

    For those just tuning in, it basically gives the aliens Itchy Trigger Tentacle from EU/EW. So if a patrol wanders into a unit on their turn, some may run for cover like normal, but some may shoot.

  • Options
    The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment. The example someone gave was that Beagle was using a highway during one of his streams when an advent pod popped up behind him via a ladder, flanking his whole squad. Under the new rules, the flanking Advent would have gotten free shots at him from behind, in addition to ruining his concealment, so I guess watching your back while in concealment is going to be super important now.

    Yup. There are also pods on rooftops that can just drop down & surprise you, through no real decision faults of your own; if they drop into a flank and open fire, that's probably worse than OldCOM's 'sometimes spawn skyranger in the middle of alien kill team' flaw.

    That said, according to Firaxis, it's a feature you can turn off with a trivial .ini edit - so everyone can see how it shakes out and turn it off if it's creating too many BS squad wipes on their end.

    With Love and Courage
  • Options
    LeumasWhiteLeumasWhite New ZealandRegistered User regular
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment. The example someone gave was that Beagle was using a highway during one of his streams when an advent pod popped up behind him via a ladder, flanking his whole squad. Under the new rules, the flanking Advent would have gotten free shots at him from behind, in addition to ruining his concealment, so I guess watching your back while in concealment is going to be super important now.

    This doesn't really sound like much of a problem. I don't think concealment is supposed to be risk-free until you choose to trigger the enemies.

    QPPHj1J.jpg
  • Options
    The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment. The example someone gave was that Beagle was using a highway during one of his streams when an advent pod popped up behind him via a ladder, flanking his whole squad. Under the new rules, the flanking Advent would have gotten free shots at him from behind, in addition to ruining his concealment, so I guess watching your back while in concealment is going to be super important now.

    This doesn't really sound like much of a problem. I don't think concealment is supposed to be risk-free until you choose to trigger the enemies.

    ...If you're moving conservatively? I would argue that it should be risk free, yes. 'Risk' doesn't actually mean anything if absolutely every state of the game is dangerous.

    EW/EU are also entirely risk free until you trigger a pod, which in turn is what makes your decisions regarding movement around the map actually interesting.

    With Love and Courage
  • Options
    AegeriAegeri Tiny wee bacteriums Plateau of LengRegistered User regular
    edited January 2016
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment.

    Given how much mobility you have during concealment and how much opportunity you have to spot aliens first, this is a minor issue at best.

    And honestly, I am completely comfortable with having the player boned when aliens see you. If they break your concealment you deserve to get shot.
    The Ender wrote: »
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment. The example someone gave was that Beagle was using a highway during one of his streams when an advent pod popped up behind him via a ladder, flanking his whole squad. Under the new rules, the flanking Advent would have gotten free shots at him from behind, in addition to ruining his concealment, so I guess watching your back while in concealment is going to be super important now.

    Yup. There are also pods on rooftops that can just drop down & surprise you, through no real decision faults of your own; if they drop into a flank and open fire, that's probably worse than OldCOM's 'sometimes spawn skyranger in the middle of alien kill team' flaw.

    That said, according to Firaxis, it's a feature you can turn off with a trivial .ini edit - so everyone can see how it shakes out and turn it off if it's creating too many BS squad wipes on their end.

    So just... don't end your turn next to a rooftop where you have no vision? I mean "Through no fault of your own", where you put soldiers next to a building without checking the roof/having vision? How is that *not* the players fault?

    This honestly doesn't seem like a huge issue to me and I've not seen a single map* where you couldn't easily plan around it. The game isn't hiding that enemies can be on roofs or use ladders, plus they still have to actually SEE the soldier in question - if you're in cover even in their detection range they still won't see you.

    *Noting that most maps have plenty of buildings with lots of vertical spaces in them. However, I have yet to see a map that has buildings literally everywhere, to the point where you couldn't possibly adjust to avoid aliens by moving only in "Safe" regions or by being on a high building yourself. And again, the number of times I have seen aliens break concealment by flanking the player can be counted on one hand, out of a LOT of missions I've watched.

    Aegeri on
    The Roleplayer's Guild: My blog for roleplaying games, advice and adventuring.
  • Options
    WACriminalWACriminal Dying Is Easy, Young Man Living Is HarderRegistered User regular
    I mean say what you want about the value of "realism", but I think it's kinda cool if every once in a while, you have that story that starts out, "So there we were, prepping to breach the building, when suddenly a goddamn snake comes around the corner. That's when all hell broke loose. Lessons learned, rookie: Always check your corners."

  • Options
    The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment.

    Given how much mobility you have during concealment and how much opportunity you have to spot aliens first, this is a minor issue at best.

    And honestly, I am completely comfortable with having the player boned when aliens see you. If they break your concealment you deserve to get shot.

    In what way? I mean, this implies that the player necessarily made a poor decision and the game therefore punished said decision.


    I watched the stream in question (it was the same stream where an ADVENT member bugged out in the level geometry). Beagle, as always, was respecting his sight lines - but he couldn't check absolutely everywhere. You never can. In this case, the patrol was in the one spot that Beagle's position could not reasonably scout while maintaining concealment: directly underneath him.

    It was not bad decision making that put the pod there, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod going undetected, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod patrolling into the flank. The game accommodated the string of bad luck, though, by having the aliens simply run to cover rather than opening fire.

    So... why would he 'deserve' a squad wipe for circumstances that he had extremely limited at best control of?

    With Love and Courage
  • Options
    RendRend Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment.

    Given how much mobility you have during concealment and how much opportunity you have to spot aliens first, this is a minor issue at best.

    And honestly, I am completely comfortable with having the player boned when aliens see you. If they break your concealment you deserve to get shot.

    In what way? I mean, this implies that the player necessarily made a poor decision and the game therefore punished said decision.


    I watched the stream in question (it was the same stream where an ADVENT member bugged out in the level geometry). Beagle, as always, was respecting his sight lines - but he couldn't check absolutely everywhere. You never can. In this case, the patrol was in the one spot that Beagle's position could not reasonably scout while maintaining concealment: directly underneath him.

    It was not bad decision making that put the pod there, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod going undetected, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod patrolling into the flank. The game accommodated the string of bad luck, though, by having the aliens simply run to cover rather than opening fire.

    So... why would he 'deserve' a squad wipe for circumstances that he had extremely limited at best control of?

    XCOM is not a perfect information game, and so there will sometimes be potential for you to be blindsided. Not everything that happens in XCOM is the result of player choice, sometimes it's the result of alien choice, or the result of imperfect information.

    Sometimes you just weigh the risk and come out broken. Thin man somehow hit your dashing lightning reflexes assault? Yeah, that's bullshit, but sometimes that's how the cards are dealt.

  • Options
    LeumasWhiteLeumasWhite New ZealandRegistered User regular
    I think leaping from "enemies may shoot an exposed unit if you don't account for potential paths of incursion" to "absolutely every stage of the game is LETHAL" is a bit goosey. You've still got quite a bit of leeway during the concealment phase given how close you can get to units so long as you remain in cover, and given the distance I've seen enemy groups moving, you're unlikely to have one sneak up behind you unless you've holed up against a windowless building or something.

    QPPHj1J.jpg
  • Options
    AegeriAegeri Tiny wee bacteriums Plateau of LengRegistered User regular
    edited January 2016
    The Ender wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment.

    Given how much mobility you have during concealment and how much opportunity you have to spot aliens first, this is a minor issue at best.

    And honestly, I am completely comfortable with having the player boned when aliens see you. If they break your concealment you deserve to get shot.

    In what way? I mean, this implies that the player necessarily made a poor decision and the game therefore punished said decision.

    Yep. Put yourself in a position to be flanked and you deserve the consequences.
    I watched the stream in question (it was the same stream where an ADVENT member bugged out in the level geometry). Beagle, as always, was respecting his sight lines - but he couldn't check absolutely everywhere. You never can. In this case, the patrol was in the one spot that Beagle's position could not reasonably scout while maintaining concealment: directly underneath him.

    Actually he could see the ladder there and the aliens being beneath was a concern. In that particular instance he got caught out and deservedly so. Aliens can climb ladders and they can jump down from rooftops. These are both considerations you need to think about when ending your turn. They're also rather rare when they do happen and can be trivially accounted for by just using cover or not ending your turn next to them. If there is a ladder nearby and you know aliens can use ladders, you deserve the consequences when they climb up behind you and shoot you.

    No sympathy at all from me.
    I think leaping from "enemies may shoot an exposed unit if you don't account for potential paths of incursion" to "absolutely every stage of the game is LETHAL" is a bit goosey. You've still got quite a bit of leeway during the concealment phase given how close you can get to units so long as you remain in cover, and given the distance I've seen enemy groups moving, you're unlikely to have one sneak up behind you unless you've holed up against a windowless building or something.

    Yeah. I've watched people of very high skill (like Beagle) play to all the way to people who are utterly terrible at the game like Northernlion.

    I've mentioned it before, but when someone like Northernlion can bumble around every level barely understanding basic game mechanics like line of sight and flanking, but not get ambushed in concealment every 5 seconds, normal players are going to be fine.

    Aegeri on
    The Roleplayer's Guild: My blog for roleplaying games, advice and adventuring.
  • Options
    The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    So just... don't end your turn next to a rooftop where you have no vision? I mean "Through no fault of your own", where you put soldiers next to a building without checking the roof/having vision? How is that *not* the players fault?

    This honestly doesn't seem like a huge issue to me and I've not seen a single map* where you couldn't easily plan around it. The game isn't hiding that enemies can be on roofs or use ladders, plus they still have to actually SEE the soldier in question - if you're in cover even in their detection range they still won't see you.

    The slum maps are densely urban. You can't advance on these maps without at some point turning your back to a building (and some missions compel you forward with a timer or vulnerable objective).


    'Blue moves are safe'. That is is a general rule for nuCOM that is easy to explain to new players & that you can build a foundation for a much more complex experience on. It's not 100% universally true in all circumstances, but the basic premise is something you can take to the bank & then experiment with. Blue moves will not get you killed if you haven't yet made contact.

    Aliens shooting you after stumbling into you makes that general rule no longer true. So, one might then ask: what can I do that is safe? If the answer is 'nothing', then fuck it - you may as well just Gold move everywhere because risk/reward has been binned and blue moves can also result in squad wipes when you get jumped from a bad LoS line.

    With Love and Courage
  • Options
    UselesswarriorUselesswarrior Registered User regular
    Hello new thread. XCOM 2 out yet?

    http://youtu.be/N_j5tDuakKU

    Welp see you later.

    Hey I made a game, check it out @ http://ifallingrobot.com/. (Or don't, your call)
  • Options
    AegeriAegeri Tiny wee bacteriums Plateau of LengRegistered User regular
    edited January 2016
    The Ender wrote: »
    So just... don't end your turn next to a rooftop where you have no vision? I mean "Through no fault of your own", where you put soldiers next to a building without checking the roof/having vision? How is that *not* the players fault?

    This honestly doesn't seem like a huge issue to me and I've not seen a single map* where you couldn't easily plan around it. The game isn't hiding that enemies can be on roofs or use ladders, plus they still have to actually SEE the soldier in question - if you're in cover even in their detection range they still won't see you.

    The slum maps are densely urban. You can't advance on these maps without at some point turning your back to a building (and some missions compel you forward with a timer or vulnerable objective).

    However, they also have plenty of opportunities to get onto rooftops of your own safely, so you can easily check to see what might be on a roof in the background.

    Also having watched plenty of missions on slum/urban maps, what you're saying happens occurs so infrequently as to be an edge case of bad luck. One that good movement can easily mitigate.

    It's not a convincing or worthwhile argument against the aliens shooting you for making a bad mistake.
    Aliens shooting you after stumbling into you makes that general rule no longer true. So, one might then ask: what can I do that is safe? If the answer is 'nothing', then fuck it - you may as well just Gold move everywhere because risk/reward has been binned and blue moves can also result in squad wipes when you get jumped from a bad LoS line.

    You're just wrong here, for really obvious reasons as well.

    Again, concealment is one of the most generous mechanics I have ever seen and I am amazed it's designed to be so forgiving. If you get caught out while concealed, it's absolutely 100% your fault and you deserve the consequences. Nothing you say will change my mind on this, because I've watched so many missions play out in the game that the idea this is going to be some kind of regular issue that will regularly catch players out without a chance to prevent it is laughable.

    Aegeri on
    The Roleplayer's Guild: My blog for roleplaying games, advice and adventuring.
  • Options
    The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    Rend wrote: »
    The Ender wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment.

    Given how much mobility you have during concealment and how much opportunity you have to spot aliens first, this is a minor issue at best.

    And honestly, I am completely comfortable with having the player boned when aliens see you. If they break your concealment you deserve to get shot.

    In what way? I mean, this implies that the player necessarily made a poor decision and the game therefore punished said decision.


    I watched the stream in question (it was the same stream where an ADVENT member bugged out in the level geometry). Beagle, as always, was respecting his sight lines - but he couldn't check absolutely everywhere. You never can. In this case, the patrol was in the one spot that Beagle's position could not reasonably scout while maintaining concealment: directly underneath him.

    It was not bad decision making that put the pod there, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod going undetected, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod patrolling into the flank. The game accommodated the string of bad luck, though, by having the aliens simply run to cover rather than opening fire.

    So... why would he 'deserve' a squad wipe for circumstances that he had extremely limited at best control of?

    XCOM is not a perfect information game, and so there will sometimes be potential for you to be blindsided. Not everything that happens in XCOM is the result of player choice, sometimes it's the result of alien choice, or the result of imperfect information.

    Sometimes you just weigh the risk and come out broken. Thin man somehow hit your dashing lightning reflexes assault? Yeah, that's bullshit, but sometimes that's how the cards are dealt.

    The aliens aren't making choices. JFC, they're an automated obstacle, not another player with some agency. They can't win or lose the game; they are there to facilitate the player's experience.

    I mean, note that Lightning Reflexes can't actually be hit with overwatch. It's totally deterministic rather than a die roll. The deterministic elements of the game are what allow the player to manage the risks they are taking, and often use some kind of resource (LR requires that you spend a move, and can only trigger once per turn, for example).

    With Love and Courage
  • Options
    override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    why can't I play xcom 2 yet

  • Options
    AegeriAegeri Tiny wee bacteriums Plateau of LengRegistered User regular
    edited January 2016
    The Ender wrote: »
    Rend wrote: »
    The Ender wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment.

    Given how much mobility you have during concealment and how much opportunity you have to spot aliens first, this is a minor issue at best.

    And honestly, I am completely comfortable with having the player boned when aliens see you. If they break your concealment you deserve to get shot.

    In what way? I mean, this implies that the player necessarily made a poor decision and the game therefore punished said decision.


    I watched the stream in question (it was the same stream where an ADVENT member bugged out in the level geometry). Beagle, as always, was respecting his sight lines - but he couldn't check absolutely everywhere. You never can. In this case, the patrol was in the one spot that Beagle's position could not reasonably scout while maintaining concealment: directly underneath him.

    It was not bad decision making that put the pod there, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod going undetected, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod patrolling into the flank. The game accommodated the string of bad luck, though, by having the aliens simply run to cover rather than opening fire.

    So... why would he 'deserve' a squad wipe for circumstances that he had extremely limited at best control of?

    XCOM is not a perfect information game, and so there will sometimes be potential for you to be blindsided. Not everything that happens in XCOM is the result of player choice, sometimes it's the result of alien choice, or the result of imperfect information.

    Sometimes you just weigh the risk and come out broken. Thin man somehow hit your dashing lightning reflexes assault? Yeah, that's bullshit, but sometimes that's how the cards are dealt.

    The aliens aren't making choices. JFC, they're an automated obstacle, not another player with some agency. They can't win or lose the game; they are there to facilitate the player's experience.

    Actually they can technically win the game - the aliens in XCOM 2 have a specific objective they are trying to do to win (as opposed to XCOM failing to actively protect countries). In XCOM 2, the aliens can "win" the game by themselves if the player doesn't try to stop them, which is the opposite of the original where the player could choose to stall the aliens for as long as they wanted by not doing story orientated missions.

    So I would directly assert that you're incorrect: The aliens can and are actively trying to win the game, which is apparently the case with how the AI chooses blacksite missions. Apparently they give the player increasingly difficult choices depending on what the difficulty is, as you can't stop all of the blacksite missions.

    The fact the aliens have an objective they work to and will actively win the game is the biggest change to the strategic layer in the game!

    Aegeri on
    The Roleplayer's Guild: My blog for roleplaying games, advice and adventuring.
  • Options
    LeumasWhiteLeumasWhite New ZealandRegistered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    Rend wrote: »
    The Ender wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Mr Ray wrote: »
    An issue with the "Beaglerush fix" is that you're now completely boned if an enemy pod manages to sneak up on you during concealment.

    Given how much mobility you have during concealment and how much opportunity you have to spot aliens first, this is a minor issue at best.

    And honestly, I am completely comfortable with having the player boned when aliens see you. If they break your concealment you deserve to get shot.

    In what way? I mean, this implies that the player necessarily made a poor decision and the game therefore punished said decision.


    I watched the stream in question (it was the same stream where an ADVENT member bugged out in the level geometry). Beagle, as always, was respecting his sight lines - but he couldn't check absolutely everywhere. You never can. In this case, the patrol was in the one spot that Beagle's position could not reasonably scout while maintaining concealment: directly underneath him.

    It was not bad decision making that put the pod there, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod going undetected, nor was it bad decision making that led to the pod patrolling into the flank. The game accommodated the string of bad luck, though, by having the aliens simply run to cover rather than opening fire.

    So... why would he 'deserve' a squad wipe for circumstances that he had extremely limited at best control of?

    XCOM is not a perfect information game, and so there will sometimes be potential for you to be blindsided. Not everything that happens in XCOM is the result of player choice, sometimes it's the result of alien choice, or the result of imperfect information.

    Sometimes you just weigh the risk and come out broken. Thin man somehow hit your dashing lightning reflexes assault? Yeah, that's bullshit, but sometimes that's how the cards are dealt.

    The aliens aren't making choices. JFC, they're an automated obstacle, not another player with some agency. They can't win or lose the game; they are there to facilitate the player's experience.

    I mean, note that Lightning Reflexes can't actually be hit with overwatch. It's totally deterministic rather than a die roll. The deterministic elements of the game are what allow the player to manage the risks they are taking, and often use some kind of resource (LR requires that you spend a move, and can only trigger once per turn, for example).

    I really don't know why you're fine with, say, the percentage chance to hit, or randomized loot, but are so strongly against there being any element of chance in an otherwise generous mechanic. It's like an extremely niche scenario of nested failures is ruining the game for you: IF you don't account for enemy routes to your completely exposed dudes and IF they choose to shoot instead of going to ground and IF the shot hits and IF the damage is enough to take out your guy, then squad wipe gg game over man game over. And saying things like "if this scenario can occur, then I might as well just sprint everywhere all the time" is kind of extreme.

    QPPHj1J.jpg
  • Options
    AegeriAegeri Tiny wee bacteriums Plateau of LengRegistered User regular
    edited January 2016
    For the record, I'm going to mod the game so that aliens after concealment phase can scatter and shoot if discovered on their own turn (but not on XCOMs turn). So if I encounter them on my own turn, they just scatter. If encountered on theirs they can scatter and then take a shot.

    I like to keep things interesting and also discourage me from sitting in one place overwatching for 90% of the mission.

    Aegeri on
    The Roleplayer's Guild: My blog for roleplaying games, advice and adventuring.
  • Options
    BlindPsychicBlindPsychic Registered User regular
    That ITT thing won't rule like 90% of the time though, it only happens when you blow concealment by being flanked or spotted.

  • Options
    RendRend Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    The aliens aren't making choices. JFC, they're an automated obstacle, not another player with some agency. They can't win or lose the game; they are there to facilitate the player's experience.

    I mean, note that Lightning Reflexes can't actually be hit with overwatch. It's totally deterministic rather than a die roll. The deterministic elements of the game are what allow the player to manage the risks they are taking, and often use some kind of resource (LR requires that you spend a move, and can only trigger once per turn, for example).

    Slow down dude.

    The aliens are, in both XCOM and XCOM2 and in also the vast majority of games with good AI, making decisions based on some level of randomness applied to the current game state. To say the AI does not make choices is extremely misguided. Under any reasonable definition of choice, the AI makes choices just like the human player does.

    Also, I was talking about the LW version of lightning reflexes, which was a 90% aim reduction on the first shot, which, my bad for not mentioning specifically.

This discussion has been closed.