You've argued that the action in-of-itself is wrong and that the action is wrong because of how it relates to the litigation and perceptions that are applied to it.
Yes? Something can be wrong in more than one way.
I don't agree
the ethics of an action and the legality of it is, at best, tangents
How so?
0
Options
ElldrenIs a woman dammitceterum censeoRegistered Userregular
You've argued that the action in-of-itself is wrong and that the action is wrong because of how it relates to the litigation and perceptions that are applied to it.
Yes? Something can be wrong in more than one way.
I don't agree
the ethics of an action and the legality of it is, at best, tangents
How so?
nothing is wrong because it is illegal
murder is wrong
murder also happens to be illegal, but that means nothing for the ethics of it. It would be exactly as wrong were it legal.
blasphemy was illegal up until last year, which does not make it in any way wrong
"now if i fuck this model. and she just bleached her asshole. and i get bleach on my t-shirt. i'm going to feel like an asshole"
I can't begin to say all the ways I enjoy this piece of pure poetry
there's... no, there's too much to say I don't know how to start
Kanye proceeds that with
I just want to feel liberated,
If I ever instigated I’m sorry
Tell me who in here can relate
and after the line about her butthole he says he doesn't want to talk about it? Multiple times as if it's a conversation with the listener. But he already talked about it. Like that's the same fucking shit we all do because we're all kind of lame.
then he ends with
Everybody gon' say something
I'd be worried if they said nothing
Remind me where I know you from?
She looking like she owe you some
You know just what we want
I want to wake up with you in my beautiful morningI
because despite bleached assholes and money. dude just wants to wake up with someone and feel something.
that is some wild ass shit and absolutely art beneath the bravado. because i guess if you ain't never been near a butthole one moment then tried to have a good morning then maybe you're ignoring the more crass nature of humanity.
idk
DasUberEdward on
0
Options
ElldrenIs a woman dammitceterum censeoRegistered Userregular
Having exclusively watched the cartoon in the 90s and never reading the comics or playing any games, I have absolutely no emotional attachment to Psylocke
Me neither, but she is just one of a number of characters who are merely there.
It's so underdeveloped and the motivations are garbo.
+1
Options
ElldrenIs a woman dammitceterum censeoRegistered Userregular
Now I want the film where psylocke is played by a Brit
You've argued that the action in-of-itself is wrong and that the action is wrong because of how it relates to the litigation and perceptions that are applied to it.
Yes? Something can be wrong in more than one way.
I don't agree
the ethics of an action and the legality of it is, at best, tangents
How so?
nothing is wrong because it is illegal
murder is wrong
murder also happens to be illegal, but that means nothing for the ethics of it. It would be exactly as wrong were it legal.
blasphemy was illegal up until last year, which does not make it in any way wrong
I'm not saying it's wrong because it's illegal, that wasn't my argument, and it's technically not illegal to cheat. This is separate from the ethics argument for being a dick, it's the argument that cheating will get you in serious trouble financially and legally indirecting with getting a divorce. Because the wronged party will have evidence to take you to the cleaners legally, and may even taint your reputation. This can happen at a lower level outside marriage.
0
Options
Mojo_JojoWe are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourseRegistered Userregular
I don't care about whether that question really wanted answering. It was interesting to know just how slow the answer was.
Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
+1
Options
ElldrenIs a woman dammitceterum censeoRegistered Userregular
Like you know who would be a perf psylocke? Sophie Winkleman
You've argued that the action in-of-itself is wrong and that the action is wrong because of how it relates to the litigation and perceptions that are applied to it.
Yes? Something can be wrong in more than one way.
I don't agree
the ethics of an action and the legality of it is, at best, tangents
How so?
nothing is wrong because it is illegal
murder is wrong
murder also happens to be illegal, but that means nothing for the ethics of it. It would be exactly as wrong were it legal.
blasphemy was illegal up until last year, which does not make it in any way wrong
I'm not saying it's wrong because it's illegal, that wasn't my argument, and it's technically not illegal to cheat. This is separate from the ethics argument for being a dick, it's the argument that cheating will get you in serious trouble financially and legally indirecting with getting a divorce. Because the wronged party will have evidence to take you to the cleaners legally, and may even taint your reputation. This can happen at a lower level outside marriage.
that just makes it a bad idea, not wronger
but since the perspective in the debate was the person who the cheater sleeps with, there's a somewhat interesting train of thought to be had about the ethics of enabling bad ideas (which in this case would be parallel to the ethically wrong thing you are enabling)
You've argued that the action in-of-itself is wrong and that the action is wrong because of how it relates to the litigation and perceptions that are applied to it.
Yes? Something can be wrong in more than one way.
I don't agree
the ethics of an action and the legality of it is, at best, tangents
How so?
nothing is wrong because it is illegal
murder is wrong
murder also happens to be illegal, but that means nothing for the ethics of it. It would be exactly as wrong were it legal.
blasphemy was illegal up until last year, which does not make it in any way wrong
I'm not saying it's wrong because it's illegal, that wasn't my argument, and it's technically not illegal to cheat. This is separate from the ethics argument for being a dick, it's the argument that cheating will get you in serious trouble financially and legally indirecting with getting a divorce. Because the wronged party will have evidence to take you to the cleaners legally, and may even taint your reputation. This can happen at a lower level outside marriage.
that just makes it a bad idea, not wronger
but since the perspective in the debate was the person who the cheater sleeps with, there's a somewhat interesting train of thought to be had about the ethics of enabling bad ideas (which in this case would be parallel to the ethically wrong thing you are enabling)
Exactly. It's just another reason not to do it, the meat of my argument was about ethics.
You've argued that the action in-of-itself is wrong and that the action is wrong because of how it relates to the litigation and perceptions that are applied to it.
Yes? Something can be wrong in more than one way.
I don't agree
the ethics of an action and the legality of it is, at best, tangents
How so?
nothing is wrong because it is illegal
murder is wrong
murder also happens to be illegal, but that means nothing for the ethics of it. It would be exactly as wrong were it legal.
blasphemy was illegal up until last year, which does not make it in any way wrong
I'm not saying it's wrong because it's illegal, that wasn't my argument, and it's technically not illegal to cheat. This is separate from the ethics argument for being a dick, it's the argument that cheating will get you in serious trouble financially and legally indirecting with getting a divorce. Because the wronged party will have evidence to take you to the cleaners legally, and may even taint your reputation. This can happen at a lower level outside marriage.
that just makes it a bad idea, not wronger
but since the perspective in the debate was the person who the cheater sleeps with, there's a somewhat interesting train of thought to be had about the ethics of enabling bad ideas (which in this case would be parallel to the ethically wrong thing you are enabling)
Exactly. It's just another reason not to do it, the meat of my argument was about ethics.
not a given that's it's a reason not to sleep with someone in a relationship
I mean, up to a point people can take full responsibility for their own bad ideas
Betsy would impale someone's mind with her psychic sword, eviscerating their very ego & persona, and I would be like, 'That is exactly how my own life has played out,'
Then she would go 1 v 8 with armed mercs and cut them all down, emerging unscathed from the melee, with her expertly crafted katana, and I would be like, 'How does this comic know so much about me???'
You've argued that the action in-of-itself is wrong and that the action is wrong because of how it relates to the litigation and perceptions that are applied to it.
Yes? Something can be wrong in more than one way.
I don't agree
the ethics of an action and the legality of it is, at best, tangents
How so?
nothing is wrong because it is illegal
murder is wrong
murder also happens to be illegal, but that means nothing for the ethics of it. It would be exactly as wrong were it legal.
blasphemy was illegal up until last year, which does not make it in any way wrong
I'm not saying it's wrong because it's illegal, that wasn't my argument, and it's technically not illegal to cheat. This is separate from the ethics argument for being a dick, it's the argument that cheating will get you in serious trouble financially and legally indirecting with getting a divorce. Because the wronged party will have evidence to take you to the cleaners legally, and may even taint your reputation. This can happen at a lower level outside marriage.
that just makes it a bad idea, not wronger
but since the perspective in the debate was the person who the cheater sleeps with, there's a somewhat interesting train of thought to be had about the ethics of enabling bad ideas (which in this case would be parallel to the ethically wrong thing you are enabling)
Exactly. It's just another reason not to do it, the meat of my argument was about ethics.
not a given that's it's a reason not to sleep with someone in a relationship
I mean, up to a point people can take full responsibility for their own bad ideas
No, it's not a given - but it should make you think twice doing it with a married person. That's one it's one reason among many not to do it.
What makes you think I'm not for people taking responsibility for their actions with cheating?
@RMS Oceanic Does new X-Men feature a Quicksilver scene on par with the Days of Future Past one?
You can argue they fell into the trap of "People liked this in the last movie so let's make it EVEN MORE EPIC", but yeah there is such a scene and it worked for me
Honestly that Quicksilver scene alone is worth the price of admission for an otherwise kind of mediocre DoFP, so I'll presume the same is true for Apocalypse.
Honestly that Quicksilver scene alone is worth the price of admission for an otherwise kind of mediocre DoFP, so I'll presume the same is true for Apocalypse.
You've argued that the action in-of-itself is wrong and that the action is wrong because of how it relates to the litigation and perceptions that are applied to it.
Yes? Something can be wrong in more than one way.
I don't agree
the ethics of an action and the legality of it is, at best, tangents
How so?
nothing is wrong because it is illegal
murder is wrong
murder also happens to be illegal, but that means nothing for the ethics of it. It would be exactly as wrong were it legal.
blasphemy was illegal up until last year, which does not make it in any way wrong
I'm not saying it's wrong because it's illegal, that wasn't my argument, and it's technically not illegal to cheat. This is separate from the ethics argument for being a dick, it's the argument that cheating will get you in serious trouble financially and legally indirecting with getting a divorce. Because the wronged party will have evidence to take you to the cleaners legally, and may even taint your reputation. This can happen at a lower level outside marriage.
that just makes it a bad idea, not wronger
but since the perspective in the debate was the person who the cheater sleeps with, there's a somewhat interesting train of thought to be had about the ethics of enabling bad ideas (which in this case would be parallel to the ethically wrong thing you are enabling)
Exactly. It's just another reason not to do it, the meat of my argument was about ethics.
not a given that's it's a reason not to sleep with someone in a relationship
I mean, up to a point people can take full responsibility for their own bad ideas
No, it's not a given - but it should make you think twice doing it with a married person. That's one it's one reason among many not to do it.
What makes you think I'm not for people taking responsibility for their actions with cheating?
if you happen to be somewhere where it's a factor. Rather specific cirumstances ::pop:
but I think you misunderstood me: I said full responsibility, as in, nobody else takes any.
Let's leave out cheating; somebody goes "if I do X with you, somebody would get to run off with most of my money" then my view on that is like, well, run a quick pros and cons list in your head or whatever, or don't, it's fully your choice to make
Posts
and she was okay in some of the video games but hard to use.
How so?
Is there a thing happening?
this kind of opulence cant be botp'd
I can't begin to say all the ways I enjoy this piece of pure poetry
there's... no, there's too much to say I don't know how to start
sorry if i was a dick to anyone.
night!
New movie, a blue smurf named Apocalypse is in it.
Guest starring Sansa Stark.
new one cam out with Apocalypse finally apparently its mediocre at best.
sounds like this is the best part to come out of it and its not even in the movie
You're thinking of Jean Grey/Phoenix
Psylocke just switches bodies with hot Japanese chicks all the time
Which I mean, who wouldn't?
That's Jean Grey, Psyloche is most known for this look.
And being a psychic ninja.
nothing is wrong because it is illegal
murder is wrong
murder also happens to be illegal, but that means nothing for the ethics of it. It would be exactly as wrong were it legal.
blasphemy was illegal up until last year, which does not make it in any way wrong
I'm getting really confused here, so much that I don't know what your arguing.
Kanye proceeds that with
I just want to feel liberated,
If I ever instigated I’m sorry
Tell me who in here can relate
and after the line about her butthole he says he doesn't want to talk about it? Multiple times as if it's a conversation with the listener. But he already talked about it. Like that's the same fucking shit we all do because we're all kind of lame.
then he ends with
Everybody gon' say something
I'd be worried if they said nothing
Remind me where I know you from?
She looking like she owe you some
You know just what we want
I want to wake up with you in my beautiful morningI
because despite bleached assholes and money. dude just wants to wake up with someone and feel something.
that is some wild ass shit and absolutely art beneath the bravado. because i guess if you ain't never been near a butthole one moment then tried to have a good morning then maybe you're ignoring the more crass nature of humanity.
idk
Man you had me thinking Sansa was psylocke
Which would have been a genius casting decision
I'm not arguing anything I'm just quoting the kanye west line DUE posted, and expressing how much I am in awe of the lyrical genius that is kanye
now if I fuck this model
and she just bleached her asshole
and I get bleach on my t-shirt
I'm going to feel like an asshole
I love it so much
Me neither, but she is just one of a number of characters who are merely there.
It's so underdeveloped and the motivations are garbo.
BECAUSE HE HAS ASSHOLE BLEACH ON HIM LIKE BLEACHED ASSHOLES HAVE
man I did not expect this to be what made my day.
Right, so at 1nm away you'd need to be going faster than 8.9*10^-10m/s
Which is very slow. Something like 3cm a year.
I'm not saying it's wrong because it's illegal, that wasn't my argument, and it's technically not illegal to cheat. This is separate from the ethics argument for being a dick, it's the argument that cheating will get you in serious trouble financially and legally indirecting with getting a divorce. Because the wronged party will have evidence to take you to the cleaners legally, and may even taint your reputation. This can happen at a lower level outside marriage.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2110418/?ref_=tt_cl_t5
that just makes it a bad idea, not wronger
but since the perspective in the debate was the person who the cheater sleeps with, there's a somewhat interesting train of thought to be had about the ethics of enabling bad ideas (which in this case would be parallel to the ethically wrong thing you are enabling)
I think a Xenomorph may be repeatedly attempting and failing to rip itself out of my chest. Poor fella.
So no sleep tonight.
x.x
Exactly. It's just another reason not to do it, the meat of my argument was about ethics.
Girlfriend didn't like it as much, I liked it more if only because it was longer
not a given that's it's a reason not to sleep with someone in a relationship
I mean, up to a point people can take full responsibility for their own bad ideas
This is truth.
Betsy would impale someone's mind with her psychic sword, eviscerating their very ego & persona, and I would be like, 'That is exactly how my own life has played out,'
Then she would go 1 v 8 with armed mercs and cut them all down, emerging unscathed from the melee, with her expertly crafted katana, and I would be like, 'How does this comic know so much about me???'
No, it's not a given - but it should make you think twice doing it with a married person. That's one it's one reason among many not to do it.
What makes you think I'm not for people taking responsibility for their actions with cheating?
You can argue they fell into the trap of "People liked this in the last movie so let's make it EVEN MORE EPIC", but yeah there is such a scene and it worked for me
Honestly that Quicksilver scene alone is worth the price of admission for an otherwise kind of mediocre DoFP, so I'll presume the same is true for Apocalypse.
gasp
if you happen to be somewhere where it's a factor. Rather specific cirumstances ::pop:
but I think you misunderstood me: I said full responsibility, as in, nobody else takes any.
Let's leave out cheating; somebody goes "if I do X with you, somebody would get to run off with most of my money" then my view on that is like, well, run a quick pros and cons list in your head or whatever, or don't, it's fully your choice to make
you, the person who the cheater sleeps with, hold no responsibility for the fact that they chose to cheat.
You are responsible for your actions, which were fucking somebody's SO. Which I don't think is cool.
But even though it takes two to tango and you made it possible for the cheater to cheat, you're not the one who chose to cheat.