The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Avenatti arrested for domestic violence, Surefire Intelligence claims credit

So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
edited November 2018 in Debate and/or Discourse
From the Los Angeles police department:





Michael Avenatti is the lawyer for Stormy Daniels, who is suing the President. He also represents one of Brett Kavanaugh's accusers. He is widely expected to run for president in 2020.

This thread is about his arrest and the allegations against him.

Jacob Wohl, who is behind allegations of sexual misconduct against Robert Mueller, is claiming involvement in this, apparently. I can't find a reliable news article on this so someone else can link it.

So It Goes on
«13456

Posts

  • PhasenPhasen Hell WorldRegistered User regular
    Wohl is going to be the isis of shitty twitter brats.

    psn: PhasenWeeple
  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    So It Goes wrote: »
    There is no way the police arrest Avenatti on a DV charge without speaking to an actual alleged victim.

    I’d normally agree, but Stormy herself was arrested when she was dancing. There’s are real effort to silence her and Avenatti and there are some police involved in it.

    Between what happened to Ms Daniels and Wohl’s activities, it’s not beyond reason for a few cops to arrest Acenatti on false pretenses.

    That was a charge where the officers were present and could write reports as actual witnesses to what went on.

    Without an actual person speaking to the police to give them a statement that Avenatti abused them, there's no way they make an arrest. So the scenario of Wohl making up a fake person to be the victim here just isn't plausible.

    This isn't to say someone couldn't bring false allegations that the LAPD goes for. Just saying that speculating Wohl made something up and that's what lead to this arrest is very unlikely.

    So It Goes on
  • ElvenshaeElvenshae Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    Here’s the tweet claiming credit:



    Surefire Intelligence is J.A.Wohl’s “private investigative” firm that was previuosly involved in allegedly attempting to get false testimony of sexual harassment / assault against Mueller.

    Elvenshae on
  • grumblethorngrumblethorn Registered User regular
    His wife came forward and said she was not involved in the event, so who knows.

  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    His wife came forward and said she was not involved in the event, so who knows.

    Source?

    Also the California statute covers many types of intimidate relationships, not just spouses

    So It Goes on
  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    Wohl totally could be involved in some way, though my guess is if he is it's very tangentially. Really though I'm guessing he's jumping on the publicity train here. We'll see.

  • milskimilski Poyo! Registered User regular
    So It Goes wrote: »
    His wife came forward and said she was not involved in the event, so who knows.

    Source?

    Also the California statute covers many types of intimidate relationships, not just spouses

    That's a surprisingly apt typo

    I ate an engineer
  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    Thanks phone! Intimate relationships, of course

  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/michael-avenatti-detained-los-angeles-police-n936426
    “Ms. Storie-Avenatti was not subject to any such incident on Tuesday night. Further, she was not at Mr. Avenatti’s apartment on the date that this alleged incident occurred,” Storie-Avenatti’s statement said. “My client states that there has never been domestic violence in her relationship with Michael and that she has never known Michael to be physically violent toward anyone.”

    It was TMZ that initially made the claim it was his ex, they've retracted it since. His first wife also made a similar statement, but I can't seem to find the AP article with it in it right now.

    matt has a problem on
    nibXTE7.png
  • Mild ConfusionMild Confusion Smash All Things Registered User regular
    So It Goes wrote: »
    So It Goes wrote: »
    There is no way the police arrest Avenatti on a DV charge without speaking to an actual alleged victim.

    I’d normally agree, but Stormy herself was arrested when she was dancing. There’s are real effort to silence her and Avenatti and there are some police involved in it.

    Between what happened to Ms Daniels and Wohl’s activities, it’s not beyond reason for a few cops to arrest Acenatti on false pretenses.

    That was a charge where the officers were present and could write reports as actual witnesses to what went on.

    Without an actual person speaking to the police to give them a statement that Avenatti abused them, there's no way they make an arrest. So the scenario of Wohl making up a fake person to be the victim here just isn't plausible.

    This isn't to say someone couldn't bring false allegations that the LAPD goes for. Just saying that speculating Wohl made something up and that's what lead to this arrest is very unlikely.

    This is assuming Wohl is actually involved and not making up bullshit to take credit, it’s not impossible that he paid someone for a false accusation like he tried to do to Mueller.

    I hate this, because between everything that happened with victim advocacy and victim smearing, especially after Kavenaugh, we’re in a place where shitheads like Wohl and the cops that arrested Stormy gives credit to the plausibility that this is fake when we shouldn’t even be having this discussion.

    Wohl creates a fake victim and police with similar ideas to silence a Trump critic arrest on false pretenses.

    I feel like a conspiracy theorist.

    steam_sig.png

    Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.
  • DisrupterDisrupter Registered User regular
    Eh. Wohl is getting exactly what he wants. He likely had nothing to do with this.

    616610-1.png
  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    From that same article
    Officers in West Los Angeles responded to an incident involving Avenatti, and he was detained in the process of taking an incident report, the sources said. He was booked into jail but released on $50,000 bond Wednesday evening.

    So sounds like it was an actual real time response instead of, for example, someone walking into the police station to report abuse after the fact. Unless NBC sucks at getting this detail right.

    So It Goes on
  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    So It Goes wrote: »
    From that same article
    Officers in West Los Angeles responded to an incident involving Avenatti, and he was detained in the process of taking an incident report, the sources said. He was booked into jail but released on $50,000 bond Wednesday evening.

    So sounds like it was an actual real time response instead of, for example, someone walking into the police station to report abuse after the fact. Unless NBC sucks at getting this detail right.

    I think NBC sucks. The report was taken Tuesday, LAPD announced they arrested him on Wednesday.

    https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/claudiarosenbaum/michael-avenatti-arrested?bftwnews&utm_term=4ldqpgc#4ldqpgc
    A report on the alleged incident was taken on Tuesday, and as of Wednesday afternoon, Avenatti was booked on a felony domestic violence charge, LAPD Officer Jeff Lee told BuzzFeed News

    That link also has the statement from the first wife.

    nibXTE7.png
  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    Could have taken report at time of incident but not made an arrest until the next day, would be unusual but not unheard of with high profile people in LA

    That sentence you quoted is also not quite detailed enough to be sure! "As of Weds" argh

  • Jealous DevaJealous Deva Registered User regular
    So It Goes wrote: »
    So It Goes wrote: »
    There is no way the police arrest Avenatti on a DV charge without speaking to an actual alleged victim.

    I’d normally agree, but Stormy herself was arrested when she was dancing. There’s are real effort to silence her and Avenatti and there are some police involved in it.

    Between what happened to Ms Daniels and Wohl’s activities, it’s not beyond reason for a few cops to arrest Acenatti on false pretenses.

    That was a charge where the officers were present and could write reports as actual witnesses to what went on.

    Without an actual person speaking to the police to give them a statement that Avenatti abused them, there's no way they make an arrest. So the scenario of Wohl making up a fake person to be the victim here just isn't plausible.

    This isn't to say someone couldn't bring false allegations that the LAPD goes for. Just saying that speculating Wohl made something up and that's what lead to this arrest is very unlikely.

    This is assuming Wohl is actually involved and not making up bullshit to take credit, it’s not impossible that he paid someone for a false accusation like he tried to do to Mueller.

    I hate this, because between everything that happened with victim advocacy and victim smearing, especially after Kavenaugh, we’re in a place where shitheads like Wohl and the cops that arrested Stormy gives credit to the plausibility that this is fake when we shouldn’t even be having this discussion.

    Wohl creates a fake victim and police with similar ideas to silence a Trump critic arrest on false pretenses.

    I feel like a conspiracy theorist.

    The police said there was a victim present with bruises/injuries.

    The TMZ story quotes Avenetti as saying "this is Bullshit, she hit me first" at the time of arrest.(But it also said it was his wife so it really isn't a greatly reliable source).

    So either Wohl is bullshitting it sounds like, or he paid someone to actively pick a fight with Avenetti?

  • Dark Raven XDark Raven X Laugh hard, run fast, be kindRegistered User regular
    Wait, if this was a setup, why would he take credit for it, tipping everyone off to it being a setup? That seems like such an unforced errors?

    Oh brilliant
  • PantsBPantsB Fake Thomas Jefferson Registered User regular
    I am not an Avenatti fan, especially as a political figure.

    Generally, the social cost of making an allegation of domestic or sexual violence means false allegations are going to be rare and as such should be treated with more seriousness on its face than the amount of evidence would otherwise garner.

    The exception may be enemies of the right, because if you have no shame, norms don't bind you and/or payoffs are involved the social cost can easily be dismissed. Either they eliminate and enemy or they undercut the seriousness of these claims or both. Its win win for the immoral sociopathic fascist trolls

    I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Avenatti was guilty on a nonrational "vibe" basis. But we know Mueller was targeted this way. So more caution is probably needed

    11793-1.png
    day9gosu.png
    QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
  • PolaritiePolaritie Sleepy Registered User regular
    Wait, if this was a setup, why would he take credit for it, tipping everyone off to it being a setup? That seems like such an unforced errors?

    Because this is the guy who tried to pay a law professor to make false police reports.

    Steam: Polaritie
    3DS: 0473-8507-2652
    Switch: SW-5185-4991-5118
    PSN: AbEntropy
  • Jealous DevaJealous Deva Registered User regular
    http://m.tmz.com/#!2018/11/14/michael-avenatti-arrested-domestic-violence-stormy-daniels-attorney/

    This was the initial TMZ story. If this is true(big if), it sounds like just a garden variety DV case and Wohl is just pulling the ISIS move of claiming credit for random bad things that happen you had nothing to do with.

  • AstaerethAstaereth In the belly of the beastRegistered User regular
    Wait, if this was a setup, why would he take credit for it, tipping everyone off to it being a setup? That seems like such an unforced errors?

    You mean Jacob “Unforced Errors” Wohl?

    More seriously, Wohl is claiming that his (fake) investigative company uncovered this allegation, and if you ignore the part where he was found to be faking before, that might bolster his reputation.

    ACsTqqK.jpg
  • PLAPLA The process.Registered User regular
    Wait, if this was a setup, why would he take credit for it, tipping everyone off to it being a setup? That seems like such an unforced errors?

    Yes, that's why I thought it could be a setup.

  • Desktop HippieDesktop Hippie Registered User regular
  • RT800RT800 Registered User regular
    What a bunch of grown men these are.

  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    What's wrong with that response? If these are false charges he has every right to come after the person who falsely accused him?

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • XaquinXaquin Right behind you!Registered User regular
    why isn't wohl in jail?

  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    Xaquin wrote: »
    why isn't wohl in jail?

    Rich white guy.

  • Desktop HippieDesktop Hippie Registered User regular
    Preacher wrote: »
    What's wrong with that response? If these are false charges he has every right to come after the person who falsely accused him?

    I think it’s probably exactly what I would say if I were arrested and charged for something I didn’t do and saw someone taking the credit.

    But I do think my lawyer would tell me that tweeting “I’m coming to get you!” isn’t a wise response.

  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    RT800 wrote: »
    What a bunch of grown men these are.

    Nah. If I were Avenatti I’d be doing the same thing.

    Wohl, if he is indeed behind this, is guilty of false reporting of a crime, harassment, and likely obstruction of justice.

    Doing this to a motivated lawyer is about the dumbest thing he could do, which means of course he was gonna do it.

  • RT800RT800 Registered User regular
    If Wohl did in fact set him up, then there's nothing wrong with seeking legal remedy.

    But a public twitter threat strikes me as childish. If you've got a case, then proceed. Don't talk - do.

  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited November 2018
    If the FBI or other law enforcement agencies aren't willing to do something about Wohl, I'm not going to lose any sleep if Avenatti makes an example of him (legally).

    Assuming the allegations are indeed false, which I haven't read enough to really have an opinion on, aside from Wohl having anything to say about it at all, which biases me a little against believing it, but I'm keeping an open mind until we learn more.

    Forar on
    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • Santa ClaustrophobiaSanta Claustrophobia Ho Ho Ho Disconnecting from Xbox LIVERegistered User regular
    Has it been brought up that in potential DV situations, in many places (and I believe California is one of them), the man is typically removed from the scene and often placed in custody. Even in cases where there was no actual violence.



    (At least I fairly sure that's a thing and not just some MRA-style bullshit. Happy to be corrected if wrong.)

    You're muckin' with a G!

    Do not engage the Watermelons.
  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    Has it been brought up that in potential DV situations, in many places (and I believe California is one of them), the man is typically removed from the scene and often placed in custody. Even in cases where there was no actual violence.



    (At least I fairly sure that's a thing and not just some MRA-style bullshit. Happy to be corrected if wrong.)

    Police separate people at the scene, either can be detained while officers get control of what's going on and start taking to people.

    You need probable cause to make an actual arrest.

    So no I wouldn't say that's accurate.

  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    Avenatti won't shut up, it's not his thing. Of course he's gonna tweet all day about this.

  • HamHamJHamHamJ Registered User regular
    So It Goes wrote: »
    Avenatti won't shut up, it's not his thing. Of course he's gonna tweet all day about this.

    That's how you have to do things these days.

    While racing light mechs, your Urbanmech comes in second place, but only because it ran out of ammo.
  • Santa ClaustrophobiaSanta Claustrophobia Ho Ho Ho Disconnecting from Xbox LIVERegistered User regular
    So It Goes wrote: »
    Has it been brought up that in potential DV situations, in many places (and I believe California is one of them), the man is typically removed from the scene and often placed in custody. Even in cases where there was no actual violence.



    (At least I fairly sure that's a thing and not just some MRA-style bullshit. Happy to be corrected if wrong.)

    Police separate people at the scene, either can be detained while officers get control of what's going on and start taking to people.

    You need probable cause to make an actual arrest.

    So no I wouldn't say that's accurate.

    I expect there are other circumstances involved here. I only bring it up as a reason why an arrest was made regardless of Avanatti's character or actions.

    I'm certainly willing to hear more details one way or the other.

    You're muckin' with a G!

    Do not engage the Watermelons.
  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    So It Goes wrote: »
    Has it been brought up that in potential DV situations, in many places (and I believe California is one of them), the man is typically removed from the scene and often placed in custody. Even in cases where there was no actual violence.



    (At least I fairly sure that's a thing and not just some MRA-style bullshit. Happy to be corrected if wrong.)

    Police separate people at the scene, either can be detained while officers get control of what's going on and start taking to people.

    You need probable cause to make an actual arrest.

    So no I wouldn't say that's accurate.

    I expect there are other circumstances involved here. I only bring it up as a reason why an arrest was made regardless of Avanatti's character or actions.

    I'm certainly willing to hear more details one way or the other.

    Detain = we just rolled up on the scene, sir you go over here ma'am you go over here (can involve either party bring asked to sit in the squad car, etc)

    Arrest = you are being taken to jail for a crime we have probable cause to believe you committed

    Just to be clear. "In California they always detain/arrest the man" is not a statement created in good faith, I don't think.

  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    I'm having a lot of trouble figuring out even what collection of events makes any amount of sense based on actual facts vs. based on a lot of deeply ingrained prejudices and assumptions.

    Does Avenatti seem like the sort of dude who might be violent towards women? Sure he does! He's a scumbag lawyer, why not?
    Do I trust that the cops would follow the actual rules about arresting someone, especially a high-profile shit-disturber "THE ENEMY LIBS" (since cops also skew conservative heavily)? I sure as hell don't
    Do I trust that Wohl is smart enough to set up enough of a disturbance that it would actually result in an arrest? Nope!
    Do I trust that if Wohl did manage to do it, he would immediately admit to a crime and brag about it on twitter? Sure as fuck do!


    Like, I have a scenario in my head of how it could've gone down, but I have no idea how much is coming from "fuck the police" and "fuck lawyers" and "fuck Wohl"

    The scenario I see would be that Wohl pays a woman to essentially assault Avenatti - put her in a place that they know he's going to, start some shit, swing a purse, hope he responds violently. I can see also that woman then reacting to any sort of pushback as though it was the most violent response possible (e.g. Acosta's power-bomb on the poor innocent W.H. Intern/fawn), and making a scene. I can then see the cops being called (Maybe by bystanders, maybe by Wohl/The woman?), and not asking too many questions about what's actually happening, but seeing Avenatti, having a crying woman claiming she was assaulted and going "Yeah book him".

    But I can just as easily see a scenario in which Avenatti was actually violent in a disturbance, or was actually a domestic abuser, and where Wohl just decided that confessing to a crime he didn't commit would be the move.

  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    I guess for me that TMZ leaked it was his wife and then had to retract that makes me leery here. Like I could believe Avenatti is a DV sure, but that we have wohl involved and at least one false report about someone who denies that entirely? Something is hinky as fuck here.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    TMZ also seems to be the only place reporting that the woman was on the sidewalk yelling about a restraining order, and that Avenatti showed up also yelling and was prevented from going up to his apartment.

    nibXTE7.png
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Isn't it a crime to call the cops with a false report?

Sign In or Register to comment.