Beef is still more important, but I feel like there's an amount of beef above which hunkness actually decreases, whereas hunkness can only ever increase with more looks.
If it's more about the beef would that make Arnold a hunk
Okay so maybe his head is a bit blocky for him to be a proper male super model or whatever, but I don't think there are many people who would call Arnold ugly?
I feel like I have seen skinny, attractive men described as hunks, but have never seen an ugly meathead type described as such. So my gut reaction is that hunkdom is defined by looks and merely connotes beef.
However, I have little-to-no conception of masculine attractiveness, so I will defer to experts on this matter.
Switch: SW-2431-2728-9604 || 3DS: 0817-4948-1650
0
Options
GustavFriend of GoatsSomewhere in the OzarksRegistered Userregular
A skinny/lean guy can be a hunk if he has enough swagger, machismo, motorcycle and leather jacket, etc. to make up for it
The beef ain't necessary, but you gotta replace it with something of equal hunkiness
James Dean is a good example of this - I might not describe him as a hunk myself, but I can see why someone would consider him a hunk despite his relative lack of beef
If it's more about the beef would that make Arnold a hunk
Okay so maybe his head is a bit blocky for him to be a proper male super model or whatever, but I don't think there are many people who would call Arnold ugly?
I vote looks, because I'm idealistic.
But Arnold lit the true path. He was average as hell.
But he put in the hard yards. And that makes anyone hot.
I guess I never thought about it. I have never really called anyone a hunk, or thought of anyone as a hunk. When I think of the word, I only think of the Elvis Presley song, and he wasn't really built.
If that's all there is my friends, then let's keep dancing
Posts
*snip*
totally missed that the panel was posted on p1
Maki Itoh is as much of a hunk as Jeff Cobb
Like is lean beef as hunky as a nicely marbled beef as some ribeye hunk?
Okay so maybe his head is a bit blocky for him to be a proper male super model or whatever, but I don't think there are many people who would call Arnold ugly?
Most of the mass of water comes from the oxygen though
Beefiness/Hunkitude are related to bulk/muscle.
You can be a hottie with a body without this. And you can be a Hunkmaster 5000 with max Beefswole but not attractive.
Not that it matters, its all subjective. What I think is a Sexy Hunk might just be a Hunky dude to you.
Finally accepting the truth eh bud?
nice
wrong, but nice
Both would refer to my 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Loredo.
However, I have little-to-no conception of masculine attractiveness, so I will defer to experts on this matter.
I ain't ever eaten no hunk of lookin' good
how dare you
an aesthetic
a look
...a look that requires beef. i fear i have chosen the wrong option.
However, I've heard enough arguments in the other direction to sway my vote.
The answer is beef.
I have concluded that while being hunky necessitates muscle, you don't have to be huge. It's easier to be a lean hot hunk than a swole ugly hunk.
I agree this is the correct ratio for generation of Hunkness.
.... for science
The beef ain't necessary, but you gotta replace it with something of equal hunkiness
James Dean is a good example of this - I might not describe him as a hunk myself, but I can see why someone would consider him a hunk despite his relative lack of beef
I vote looks, because I'm idealistic.
But Arnold lit the true path. He was average as hell.
But he put in the hard yards. And that makes anyone hot.
Honestly yeah, this works out pretty nicely.
hunks
beefy hunks
No beef in there.
Check fucking mate.