The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Wait, how did people think grifting confidence men who charge $100 a head to fill a hotel conference seating - or alternatively free seats but $100 DVDs and Booksets - make their money?
Wait, how did people think grifting confidence men who charge $100 a head to fill a hotel conference seating - or alternatively free seats but $100 DVDs and Booksets - make their money?
They had no idea, that's why they went to his talk in a hotel conference room and bought his DVDs and booksets.
For some reason I can't find the short being discussed in the above youtube, but if you don't want to watch it it's just Gary Vee saying he swallows every piece of gum he takes into his mouth because of "efficiency"
"excuse my French
But fuck you — no, fuck y'all, that's as blunt as it gets"
- Kendrick Lamar, "The Blacker the Berry"
For some reason I can't find the short being discussed in the above youtube, but if you don't want to watch it it's just Gary Vee saying he swallows every piece of gum he takes into his mouth because of "efficiency"
The most confusing thing here is that the guy who is making fun of Gary Vee is the one who is dressed like the guy in the comic.
+2
CambiataCommander ShepardThe likes of which even GAWD has never seenRegistered Userregular
For some reason I can't find the short being discussed in the above youtube, but if you don't want to watch it it's just Gary Vee saying he swallows every piece of gum he takes into his mouth because of "efficiency"
The most confusing thing here is that the guy who is making fun of Gary Vee is the one who is dressed like the guy in the comic.
This confused me also but I think it's just that the youths tend to dress this way and Gary Vee also dresses this way to show he is hip with the youths.
Here's an actual picture of him dressing this way:
Edit: I was hoping Tycho's post would provide more context and it does in a general way but doesn't point to the specific grifter in question. Still I think this grifter is as good as any. HIs description of this breed of grifter is a good one.
Cambiata on
"excuse my French
But fuck you — no, fuck y'all, that's as blunt as it gets"
- Kendrick Lamar, "The Blacker the Berry"
0
Kane Red RobeMaster of MagicArcanusRegistered Userregular
That post is one of the one's that reminds me that Jerry can Write though.
I guess Gwenyth "Goop" Paltrow or any of the Kardashian/Jenner tribe don't qualify because.....????
It's not quite an analog because they are marketing to different deficiencies and audiences (whereas the business bro grifters target vulnerable young men, the wellness grifters target people with health issues), but that was the first thing my brain jumped to as well. There absolutely is a "wellness" space that has both men and women in it who shill as "gurus" to offer you better life, sex, health, etc. in the form of shitty rebranded products. Jerry is probably just speaking from personal experience, because you have to have a friend or family member who is caught on the Herbalife or Goop train to see it up close.
This comic seems directed to the NFT male grifting set that Lularose isn't. Like these guys loop in suckers on the latest crypto grift, than the Girl Boss facebook grift.
I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.
This comic seems directed to the NFT male grifting set that Lularose isn't. Like these guys loop in suckers on the latest crypto grift, than the Girl Boss facebook grift.
Yeah, but we’re responding to a comment Jerry makes in the blog post about not having “seen the distaff side” of this phenomenon. I’m saying that he not only has, he’s commented on it.
Yeah, but we’re responding to a comment Jerry makes in the blog post about not having “seen the distaff side” of this phenomenon. I’m saying that he not only has, he’s commented on it.
Not "distaff side," "distaff manifestation." Specifically, a distaff manifestation of this grift. LuLaRoe is a different type of grift.
+1
doompookyWild (Let's Draw A) Horses Couldn't Drag Me AwayRegistered Userregular
I think we'd all be making a mistake if we didn't keep in mind, when talking about fathers, fathering and father-fallout, Jerry Holkins is going to choose his words with no small degree of care. This is a guy who made me cry talking about bugs in a birdhouse
I've said it before -- if people shilling get-rich schemes actually believed in their techniques, they wouldn't need to sell books and give paid talks to earn money.
That said, I'm not at all familiar with the specific type depicted in the comment, and I kind of resent Tycho's implication that I should be.
This confused me also but I think it's just that the youths tend to dress this way and Gary Vee also dresses this way to show he is hip with the youths.
As an older guy who still wears hoodies when it's cold, and beanies when it's colder, I feel personally attacked.
Now where did I leave my skateboard.
+2
zepherinRussian warship, go fuck yourselfRegistered Userregular
I will tell you all how to be millionaires, but your going to be grumpy about it.
Get Lucky
Be born a millionaire
40 years of scrupulous investment into a 401k (low fee index funds preferably. Pretty much from the time you are 20 (when you can't really afford too) maximizing any employer matching
Yeah, but we’re responding to a comment Jerry makes in the blog post about not having “seen the distaff side” of this phenomenon. I’m saying that he not only has, he’s commented on it.
Not "distaff side," "distaff manifestation." Specifically, a distaff manifestation of this grift. LuLaRoe is a different type of grift.
Yeah, I may not be giving Jerry his due especially when I mistake a forum post’s wording for his. I do think that MLMs target a related set of impulses, though.
I will tell you all how to be millionaires, but your going to be grumpy about it.
Get Lucky
Be born a millionaire
40 years of scrupulous investment into a 401k (low fee index funds preferably. Pretty much from the time you are 20 (when you can't really afford too) maximizing any employer matching
In addition to all that:
Even when you've done that last thing, realize that being a millionaire that way only means you won't have to eat cat food when you get old. That money isn't going to be spent on anything fun anytime soon.
+5
RingoHe/Hima distinct lack of substanceRegistered Userregular
Does marrying rich count as getting lucky?
As far as Jerry's "distaff manifestation", its presented as a truism and that says to me that Jerry just never noticed the people not directing their grift at him. Which I get, we're all in some ways blinded to experiences not our own, and Penny Arcade is not known for communicating about the world outside of its creators' distinct experiences. But it does irk a bit when the writing is clearly trying to communicate something of value and it just has this ignorant (and unwarranted) declaration casting a shadow over the rest of it. It detracts from the value
As far as Jerry's "distaff manifestation", its presented as a truism and that says to me that Jerry just never noticed the people not directing their grift at him. Which I get, we're all in some ways blinded to experiences not our own, and Penny Arcade is not known for communicating about the world outside of its creators' distinct experiences. But it does irk a bit when the writing is clearly trying to communicate something of value and it just has this ignorant (and unwarranted) declaration casting a shadow over the rest of it. It detracts from the value
Again, though, he's talking about this particular kind of grift. All the examples that have been given do not appear to be this particular genre, and there are so many instances in this genre.
If you feel there are, please give examples.
+2
RingoHe/Hima distinct lack of substanceRegistered Userregular
If you spend a lot of time on social media or moving throughout the world eventually you will discover that there is a class of men - I've never once seen a distaff manifestation of it - who has an almost instinctive ability to identify and manipulate other men with distant, cruel, or useless fathers
Would the distaff manifestation be women manipulating men with "distant, cruel, or useless fathers". Or perhaps women who manipulate men with "distant, cruel, useless mothers". Or women manipulating women in those same forms? Preying upon insecurity (real or imagined) is perhaps the starting place of all manipulation, and is available to people of any gender. Insecurities stemming from poor parenting aren't exactly in short supply either, as childhood trauma is often an unnoticed behavioral key to our actions as adults. Jerry states he hasn't ever seen such manipulations performed by women. And the only way that's true is if Jerry's experience of things is limited or he didn't recognize what he saw when he saw it.
Which, again, undercuts what he has to say in the next sentence:
Obviously, parenting is quite a lossy form of data transfer - but the only way to protect your children from these men is to ensure that they never need what these warlocks purport to offer. It's probably going to require that you become much, much better than you are.
Jerry states he hasn't ever seen such manipulations performed by women. And the only way that's true is if Jerry's experience of things is limited or he didn't recognize what he saw when he saw it.
Again, please give examples to these distaff grifters that you feel are the equivalent of the Gary Vee type of grifter. That will really cut through a lot of fluffy argumentation.
+1
MichaelLCIn what furnace was thy brain?ChicagoRegistered Userregular
edited November 2021
All I know is 'distaff' sounds like a crude retort by a wizard.
Jerry states he hasn't ever seen such manipulations performed by women. And the only way that's true is if Jerry's experience of things is limited or he didn't recognize what he saw when he saw it.
Again, please give examples to these distaff grifters that you feel are the equivalent of the Gary Vee type of grifter. That will really cut through a lot of fluffy argumentation.
I don't even know what a Gary Vee type of grifter is? He swallows gum for efficiency, apparently. Like all the things Jerry lists in his post are things loads of the Seminar set of grifters incorporate, except maybe crypto. Nope, I checked youtube, women do these crypto seminars too. Annd I have poisoned my search results forever. Sigh.
I honestly don't know what you're asking for. Women grift too. To believe they don't is naive at best. That's my point. If I have one
Jerry states he hasn't ever seen such manipulations performed by women. And the only way that's true is if Jerry's experience of things is limited or he didn't recognize what he saw when he saw it.
Again, please give examples to these distaff grifters that you feel are the equivalent of the Gary Vee type of grifter. That will really cut through a lot of fluffy argumentation.
I don't even know what a Gary Vee type of grifter is? He swallows gum for efficiency, apparently. Like all the things Jerry lists in his post are things loads of the Seminar set of grifters incorporate, except maybe crypto. Nope, I checked youtube, women do these crypto seminars too. Annd I have poisoned my search results forever. Sigh.
I honestly don't know what you're asking for. Women grift too. To believe they don't is naive at best. That's my point. If I have one
You said Jerry making an ignorant declaration that there weren't female grifters using the same tactics against female victims as there are of this type. Did I get that wrong?
It seems weird that you're saying Jerry is making an ignorant declaration, when you're ignorant of the tactics used by this sort of grifter. How can you judge that he's wrong?
Edit: One thing I think you're getting hung up on is what they're selling. It's not that, it's how they're selling it.
dennis on
+3
zepherinRussian warship, go fuck yourselfRegistered Userregular
Are folks arguing that women don’t scam in the same way men do?
I would say Elizabeth Holmes is a stark contrast to that sentiment.
But scammers lean into cultural stereotypes. And investment fraud (which is the leading type of fraud is perpetrated by Men over women about 70/30 (numbers get a bit fuzzy). Romance scams the numbers seam to be reversed.
But under reporting is very common, and so good statistics are not readily available.
You know, I don't think I ever asked anyone about Loom.
You mean the latest masterpiece of fantasy storytelling from Lucasfilm's™ Brian Moriarty™? Why it's an extraordinary adventure with an interface of magic, stunning, high-resolution, 3D landscapes, sophisticated score and musical effects. Not to mention the detailed animation and special effects, elegant point 'n' click control of characters, objects, and magic spells. Beat the rush! Go out and buy Loom™ today!
+1
RingoHe/Hima distinct lack of substanceRegistered Userregular
Jerry states he hasn't ever seen such manipulations performed by women. And the only way that's true is if Jerry's experience of things is limited or he didn't recognize what he saw when he saw it.
Again, please give examples to these distaff grifters that you feel are the equivalent of the Gary Vee type of grifter. That will really cut through a lot of fluffy argumentation.
I don't even know what a Gary Vee type of grifter is? He swallows gum for efficiency, apparently. Like all the things Jerry lists in his post are things loads of the Seminar set of grifters incorporate, except maybe crypto. Nope, I checked youtube, women do these crypto seminars too. Annd I have poisoned my search results forever. Sigh.
I honestly don't know what you're asking for. Women grift too. To believe they don't is naive at best. That's my point. If I have one
You said Jerry making an ignorant declaration that there weren't female grifters using the same tactics against female victims as there are of this type. Did I get that wrong?
It seems weird that you're saying Jerry is making an ignorant declaration, when you're ignorant of the tactics used by this sort of grifter. How can you judge that he's wrong?
Edit: One thing I think you're getting hung up on is what they're selling. It's not that, it's how they're selling it.
I assume the how is by preying on the insecurities left in the wake of poor parenting, which I already addressed. Clearly I don't understand what it is that you and Jerry believe is unique to only the Gary Vee's of the world. And not in a "prove to me" kind of way, I sincerely see nothing in what Jerry wrote or what has been said in this thread that isn't part and parcel to grifting as a whole, much less a certain subset of this. So unless I can begin to understand what sets Jerry's definition apart (and I currently do not), then my opinion is that Jerry is wrong in defining this form of grift as "male only"
Are folks arguing that women don’t scam in the same way men do?
No. No no no no no. Sorry, it's just getting frustrating saying the same thing repeatedly. The whole point Jerry made (that has been disputed) was in the approach used by the grifter.
Jerry states he hasn't ever seen such manipulations performed by women. And the only way that's true is if Jerry's experience of things is limited or he didn't recognize what he saw when he saw it.
Again, please give examples to these distaff grifters that you feel are the equivalent of the Gary Vee type of grifter. That will really cut through a lot of fluffy argumentation.
I don't even know what a Gary Vee type of grifter is? He swallows gum for efficiency, apparently. Like all the things Jerry lists in his post are things loads of the Seminar set of grifters incorporate, except maybe crypto. Nope, I checked youtube, women do these crypto seminars too. Annd I have poisoned my search results forever. Sigh.
I honestly don't know what you're asking for. Women grift too. To believe they don't is naive at best. That's my point. If I have one
You said Jerry making an ignorant declaration that there weren't female grifters using the same tactics against female victims as there are of this type. Did I get that wrong?
It seems weird that you're saying Jerry is making an ignorant declaration, when you're ignorant of the tactics used by this sort of grifter. How can you judge that he's wrong?
Edit: One thing I think you're getting hung up on is what they're selling. It's not that, it's how they're selling it.
I assume the how is by preying on the insecurities left in the wake of poor parenting, which I already addressed.
You addressed it by making an unsupported assertion. You didn't cite a single person who is a female grifter that preys on the insecurities left in the wake of poor parenting. Now, Jerry didn't either, and it's totally valid to disagree with him. He might be wrong! But to call him ignorant when you can't even point to a single example, and aren't even familiar with the male example in question seems to be going out on a limb.
Posts
They had no idea, that's why they went to his talk in a hotel conference room and bought his DVDs and booksets.
I'm sure that will be fine.
All I could find was a Kay Hansen who, I am reasonably confident, could fold you six times and just take your money if she wanted it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03dfODat4l4
For some reason I can't find the short being discussed in the above youtube, but if you don't want to watch it it's just Gary Vee saying he swallows every piece of gum he takes into his mouth because of "efficiency"
But fuck you — no, fuck y'all, that's as blunt as it gets"
- Kendrick Lamar, "The Blacker the Berry"
The most confusing thing here is that the guy who is making fun of Gary Vee is the one who is dressed like the guy in the comic.
This confused me also but I think it's just that the youths tend to dress this way and Gary Vee also dresses this way to show he is hip with the youths.
Here's an actual picture of him dressing this way:
Edit: I was hoping Tycho's post would provide more context and it does in a general way but doesn't point to the specific grifter in question. Still I think this grifter is as good as any. HIs description of this breed of grifter is a good one.
But fuck you — no, fuck y'all, that's as blunt as it gets"
- Kendrick Lamar, "The Blacker the Berry"
I guess Gwenyth "Goop" Paltrow or any of the Kardashian/Jenner tribe don't qualify because.....????
I mean, they mentioned LuLaRoe in a comic like a month ago. I’d think that qualified.
pleasepaypreacher.net
Yeah, but we’re responding to a comment Jerry makes in the blog post about not having “seen the distaff side” of this phenomenon. I’m saying that he not only has, he’s commented on it.
Not "distaff side," "distaff manifestation." Specifically, a distaff manifestation of this grift. LuLaRoe is a different type of grift.
That said, I'm not at all familiar with the specific type depicted in the comment, and I kind of resent Tycho's implication that I should be.
Powers &8^]
As an older guy who still wears hoodies when it's cold, and beanies when it's colder, I feel personally attacked.
Now where did I leave my skateboard.
Yeah, I may not be giving Jerry his due especially when I mistake a forum post’s wording for his. I do think that MLMs target a related set of impulses, though.
In addition to all that:
As far as Jerry's "distaff manifestation", its presented as a truism and that says to me that Jerry just never noticed the people not directing their grift at him. Which I get, we're all in some ways blinded to experiences not our own, and Penny Arcade is not known for communicating about the world outside of its creators' distinct experiences. But it does irk a bit when the writing is clearly trying to communicate something of value and it just has this ignorant (and unwarranted) declaration casting a shadow over the rest of it. It detracts from the value
Again, though, he's talking about this particular kind of grift. All the examples that have been given do not appear to be this particular genre, and there are so many instances in this genre.
If you feel there are, please give examples.
Would the distaff manifestation be women manipulating men with "distant, cruel, or useless fathers". Or perhaps women who manipulate men with "distant, cruel, useless mothers". Or women manipulating women in those same forms? Preying upon insecurity (real or imagined) is perhaps the starting place of all manipulation, and is available to people of any gender. Insecurities stemming from poor parenting aren't exactly in short supply either, as childhood trauma is often an unnoticed behavioral key to our actions as adults. Jerry states he hasn't ever seen such manipulations performed by women. And the only way that's true is if Jerry's experience of things is limited or he didn't recognize what he saw when he saw it.
Which, again, undercuts what he has to say in the next sentence:
Again, please give examples to these distaff grifters that you feel are the equivalent of the Gary Vee type of grifter. That will really cut through a lot of fluffy argumentation.
Lick this
This what?
Distaff!
Surely a crude retort is more likely used by an alchemist.
But I will admit I know of one magic user that employs a distaff.
I don't even know what a Gary Vee type of grifter is? He swallows gum for efficiency, apparently. Like all the things Jerry lists in his post are things loads of the Seminar set of grifters incorporate, except maybe crypto. Nope, I checked youtube, women do these crypto seminars too. Annd I have poisoned my search results forever. Sigh.
I honestly don't know what you're asking for. Women grift too. To believe they don't is naive at best. That's my point. If I have one
You said Jerry making an ignorant declaration that there weren't female grifters using the same tactics against female victims as there are of this type. Did I get that wrong?
It seems weird that you're saying Jerry is making an ignorant declaration, when you're ignorant of the tactics used by this sort of grifter. How can you judge that he's wrong?
Edit: One thing I think you're getting hung up on is what they're selling. It's not that, it's how they're selling it.
I would say Elizabeth Holmes is a stark contrast to that sentiment.
But scammers lean into cultural stereotypes. And investment fraud (which is the leading type of fraud is perpetrated by Men over women about 70/30 (numbers get a bit fuzzy). Romance scams the numbers seam to be reversed.
But under reporting is very common, and so good statistics are not readily available.
You mean the latest masterpiece of fantasy storytelling from Lucasfilm's™ Brian Moriarty™? Why it's an extraordinary adventure with an interface of magic, stunning, high-resolution, 3D landscapes, sophisticated score and musical effects. Not to mention the detailed animation and special effects, elegant point 'n' click control of characters, objects, and magic spells. Beat the rush! Go out and buy Loom™ today!
I assume the how is by preying on the insecurities left in the wake of poor parenting, which I already addressed. Clearly I don't understand what it is that you and Jerry believe is unique to only the Gary Vee's of the world. And not in a "prove to me" kind of way, I sincerely see nothing in what Jerry wrote or what has been said in this thread that isn't part and parcel to grifting as a whole, much less a certain subset of this. So unless I can begin to understand what sets Jerry's definition apart (and I currently do not), then my opinion is that Jerry is wrong in defining this form of grift as "male only"
No. No no no no no. Sorry, it's just getting frustrating saying the same thing repeatedly. The whole point Jerry made (that has been disputed) was in the approach used by the grifter.
You addressed it by making an unsupported assertion. You didn't cite a single person who is a female grifter that preys on the insecurities left in the wake of poor parenting. Now, Jerry didn't either, and it's totally valid to disagree with him. He might be wrong! But to call him ignorant when you can't even point to a single example, and aren't even familiar with the male example in question seems to be going out on a limb.