The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Just out of curiosity - anyone else went through a 'Japan-only' phase?
Were you heavily into manga and anime when you just discovered it back then? To an extent you would deride western comics with disdain only compareable to al-Qaeda's feelings for America? Attempted to learn Japanese?
Because I used to and now I look at that point of my life in sheer embarrassment. I remember praising Japanese comics for being 'darker' (LOL), adult (LOL), finite (LOL), having one singular writer (LOL) and aesthetically more pleasing (also a LOL). All of these are the usual baseless things most elitist Japanophiles thought western comics lack. The reason I'm asking this is because from the other forums I frequent, it seems like a common phenomenon for people to outgrow mangas, or at least their loyalty to it.
No, but from middle school until my sophomore year at uni, I forgot that comics really even existed. When this subforum was created I started to read it casually and ended up hooked some time after.
A lot of people will probably laugh at this and say "what do you think we do in America?" but I really think that 90% of manga is beyond cliche and caters to the lowest common denominator. What little of it I've seen is pretty much incomprehensible by anyone who isn't a creepy Japanophile.
Some manga are darker, more adult, finite and better than some US comics just like some US comics are better for similar reasons. In the end, they are identical in most respects as they are both comic books. I like both, but manga offers a far wider range and variety of comics as they are not stuck in the same rut as Us comics with "superheroes in tights only" and they do not consider the format for children only. That does not mean all US comics are like this. Good books are good books regardless of the country of origin. And I actually find it easier to read right to left despite growing up reading left to right. Personal preference and all that.
A lot of people will probably laugh at this and say "what do you think we do in America?" but I really think that 90% of manga is beyond cliche and caters to the lowest common denominator. What little of it I've seen is pretty much incomprehensible by anyone who isn't a creepy Japanophile.
This is pretty much true. I tried reading some of the mangas from my old collection and was pretty much ashamed that I used to think they were good. What can I say, I was around 12-16 back when I was still in that phase. I still dig some anime though.
Aleph on
0
Garlic Breadi'm a bitch i'm a bitch i'm a bitch i'm aRegistered User, Disagreeableregular
Some manga are darker, more adult, finite and better than some US comics just like some US comics are better for similar reasons. In the end, they are identical in most respects as they are both comic books. I like both, but manga offers a far wider range and variety of comics as they are not stuck in the same rut as Us comics with "superheroes in tights only" and they do not consider the format for children only. That does not mean all US comics are like this. Good books are good books regardless of the country of origin. And I actually find it easier to read right to left despite growing up reading left to right. Personal preference and all that.
The vast majority of American comics have been adult-oriented for probably 20 years or more, and I don't think I'm wrong to point out that the variety in manga simply changes up characters and settings from superheroes to doctors, lawyers, or high school students, while using the same tired plot devices.
I agree though that they are very similar in that both media probably contain their gems among the piles of junk books.
I like both japanese and american comics. There's lots of good manga out there. I really love the works of Osamu Tezuka, like Adolf, Phoenix, Buddha, Astro Boy, and several others. The Akira manga is good, so is the Nausicaa one. The horror comics of Junto Ito are pretty intense. There's stuff worth reading on both sides of the ocean. I went through a phase in middle school/early high school, I suppose you could say, when I explored Japanese comics and anime, but I've always been kind of picky on what I read and watch.
I used to read shonen mangas back then and about all of them were trash, this'd explain why I'm ashamed of them now. As an adult I never did try the seinen (I think that's they call their adult books) types although I've always been curious of Tezuka's works, especially Adolf.
they are not stuck in the same rut as Us comics with "superheroes in tights only" and they do not consider the format for children only.
this doesn't describe the US market at all
sure, superhero books are the most popular
but there are plenty of books that aren't about superheroes
and comics aren't for kids now
shit, they have to make comics specifically aimed at kids because the main ones aren't
When over 90% of the market is dominated by super hero books, its hard to say it is diversified. Just because Fables and Sandman and Y: the last man and so on are excellent books does not mean they are the norm or standard for the market.
And despite the fact you might think that superhero comics are not marketed at children, they are (teens are children in my definition). If it was grown up in any way, I could read a book without seeing things like @$$ or #### for "naughty" words and more grown up themes in the books. Just because it can be enjoyed by any age group does not mean it is not targeted at younger audiences still. Hell, Marvel Adventures are some of Marvels better books and that is their "kids" line of books. If you honestly think Marvel and DC target grown ups with their offerings outside Max or Vertigo, you are sadly mistaken.
Tezuka's use of a regular 'cast' in his comics is a pretty fantastic idea, and so well-suited to a visual medium like comics I'm surprised no western author has done the same. Urasawa's Pluto is also rather excellent, and a clever - almost 'ultimised' - updating of the original Astro Boy series.
Akira, though, disappointed me. It was beautiful and unsettling to look at, but the plot was pretty minimal. And it also caters to the typical pseudo-mystical BS ending that seems omnipresent in manga/anime. I wonder if Japanese storytelling in general is so typically anti-climatic as half these manga. I'm hardly well-read in East Asian fiction mind you, so maybe I'm not the best person to to hand out observations.
Certainly, I haven't seen/heard of any manga to rival a work like, ooh, From Hell.
I've said this before, but I had about a five year stint where I was pretty big into anime and manga (to the point that I attended several conventions ). The last couple of years of that period, though, I decreased my consumption drastically in favor of gaming and tech stuff. I finally threw in the towel on manga around 2004/2005, went through a bibliophile phase, and then discovered the graphic novel section at the book store. So for the last year and a half, I've been back into comics and haven't looked back. I did the "olol comics" and "Japan is the greatest" spiel for a while, until I started learning more about the place and culture and how it informs anime and manga. I still like anime and manga, but not nearly as much as I used to.
they are not stuck in the same rut as Us comics with "superheroes in tights only" and they do not consider the format for children only.
this doesn't describe the US market at all
sure, superhero books are the most popular
but there are plenty of books that aren't about superheroes
and comics aren't for kids now
shit, they have to make comics specifically aimed at kids because the main ones aren't
When over 90% of the market is dominated by super hero books, its hard to say it is diversified. Just because Fables and Sandman and Y: the last man and so on are excellent books does not mean they are the norm or standard for the market.
And despite the fact you might think that superhero comics are not marketed at children, they are (teens are children in my definition). If it was grown up in any way, I could read a book without seeing things like @$$ or #### for "naughty" words and more grown up themes in the books. Just because it can be enjoyed by any age group does not mean it is not targeted at younger audiences still. Hell, Marvel Adventures are some of Marvels better books and that is their "kids" line of books. If you honestly think Marvel and DC target grown ups with their offerings outside Max or Vertigo, you are sadly mistaken.
If they were aimed at children, they wouldn't have the censored expletives in there in the first place.
There's a difference between censorship and market demographics.
they are not stuck in the same rut as Us comics with "superheroes in tights only" and they do not consider the format for children only.
this doesn't describe the US market at all
sure, superhero books are the most popular
but there are plenty of books that aren't about superheroes
and comics aren't for kids now
shit, they have to make comics specifically aimed at kids because the main ones aren't
When over 90% of the market is dominated by super hero books, its hard to say it is diversified. Just because Fables and Sandman and Y: the last man and so on are excellent books does not mean they are the norm or standard for the market.
And despite the fact you might think that superhero comics are not marketed at children, they are (teens are children in my definition). If it was grown up in any way, I could read a book without seeing things like @$$ or #### for "naughty" words and more grown up themes in the books. Just because it can be enjoyed by any age group does not mean it is not targeted at younger audiences still. Hell, Marvel Adventures are some of Marvels better books and that is their "kids" line of books. If you honestly think Marvel and DC target grown ups with their offerings outside Max or Vertigo, you are sadly mistaken.
They target fanboys and obsessive collectors predisposed to shelling out ludicrous amounts of money to read a single story-line. Story arcs commonly run for 4-6 months. Comics themselves are priced way out of the range of a child's pocket money. The only reason that naughty words are still censored and full-blown nudity is uncommon is because the papers would have a field day if Spider-Man straight-out called the Green Goblin a twisted motherfucker. It's the public's perception of the industry as devoted to children that demands an element of restraint. Even though sex in comics has long since past any semblance of subtext. And there are plenty of gay superheroes. And incredible amounts of gore is apparent in even the most mainstream of titles, etc, etc.
The industry simply doesn't target children as its main audience. And that's one of the main reasons sales these days are so low.
I'd also put forth the argument that swearing is hardly grown up.
You're right that western comics need to move beyond men in tights. But have you read Love and Rockets, or From Hell, or (God help us) Blankets? Have you taken a long look at indy publishers or even the expanded catalogues of not-so-indy companies like Dark Horse? Have you even heard of stuff like Jimmy Corrigan?
There's plenty of non-superhero stuff available to read.
Yea, I definately went through that type of phrase. Being born and living most of my early childhood in Mexico, manga and anime were definately more prevalent than western comics. I mean, I knew Spiderman and Batman, but for a good while, Mexico(and latin america in general) had a really strong manga presence. And to a ten year old kid, the fighting in Dragonball, Ranma and Saint Seiya were just a lot cooler than any fight scene in western comics.
For a good while I stayed away from western comics, just because they didn't seem interesting at all. It wasn't until I started my first job and could read all the free comics I wanted that I got hooked.
It's funny, because now I don't even glance at manga/anime. I know it's stereotyping it, but too much of it seems really similar
As a librarian's assistant I'd end up filing a lot of stuff in the "graphic novel" category. Manga is placed there, and more often than not kids would flock to Marvel's Ultimate imprint instead of shit like Case Closed and Ah! My Goddess.
I'm just enthusiastic the Ultimate imprint is actually getting some of the readers it's aimed at instead of older readers looking for a new continuity.
I mean, kids were fuckin' hooked on the hardcovers of Ultimate Spider-Man we had.
Manga just didn't seem to attract anybody outside of the two or three kids who always eat the stuff up.
I dunno, my niece, who is about to be 15, reads manga almost exclusively. The only comic books I know of that she likes right now are Sandman and New X-Men. But yeah, you can't go wrong with Ultimate Spidey for getting kids into comics. That or Runaways, and even the current New X-Men would work.
they are not stuck in the same rut as Us comics with "superheroes in tights only" and they do not consider the format for children only.
this doesn't describe the US market at all
sure, superhero books are the most popular
but there are plenty of books that aren't about superheroes
and comics aren't for kids now
shit, they have to make comics specifically aimed at kids because the main ones aren't
When over 90% of the market is dominated by super hero books, its hard to say it is diversified. Just because Fables and Sandman and Y: the last man and so on are excellent books does not mean they are the norm or standard for the market.
And despite the fact you might think that superhero comics are not marketed at children, they are (teens are children in my definition). If it was grown up in any way, I could read a book without seeing things like @$$ or #### for "naughty" words and more grown up themes in the books. Just because it can be enjoyed by any age group does not mean it is not targeted at younger audiences still. Hell, Marvel Adventures are some of Marvels better books and that is their "kids" line of books. If you honestly think Marvel and DC target grown ups with their offerings outside Max or Vertigo, you are sadly mistaken.
'over 90%' is a pretty retarded claim to try and make without some figures backin' that ass up
because there's a significant amount of non-superhero work out there.
as far as manga goes, i dig ghost in the shell. i also have the first book of blade of the immortal because someone gave it to me. it's not bad, but i haven't felt terribly compelled to drop the fifteen bucks apiece for the next five hundred and eighty trades of it.
I don't think I've ever read a manga. The closest I ever came was some Pokemon comics that were shipped with Nintendo Power before the games were released, I think. I mean, there were always old DC and Marvel comics around, since my uncle had a pretty large collection he stored at my grandma's house.
Plus, I had one of those friends who was really into anime and manga for a while, and he kind of helped make sure I never got into it, for better or worse.
I was never into the manga and stuff. I had always preferred western stuff, which was cemented when my uncle gave me his 150+ comics that he had left from the late 70s/early 80s.
Micronauts and ROM are still my favorite series.
man two years worth of Shonen Jump, two years of Animerica, and a bunch of other crap. I am actually glad my parents never give money to spend on that stuff. Most of it is terribly drawn and written. Now anime is alright, Akira and Evangelion are great.
I largely stick to animation in general simply because live action rarely has any redeeming artistic value because they have to blow everything on budgets.
But most anime, now that the floodgates are open, strikes me as rather horribly bad, like anything else.
I largely stick to animation in general simply because live action rarely has any redeeming artistic value because they have to blow everything on budgets.
you mean like...live action...movies don't have artistic value?
Have you ever seen live action Japanese stuff? Almost universally filled with suck.
Also, it's been said ad nauseum, but there's no excuse for not checking out any of the Hayao Miyazaki/Studio Ghibli productions. Manga vs. comics, anime vs. cartoons, West vs. Japan, all of that shit doesn't matter when it comes to Miyazaki. It's just plain good storytelling that anyone can appreciate.
I largely stick to animation in general simply because live action rarely has any redeeming artistic value because they have to blow everything on budgets.
you mean like...live action...movies don't have artistic value?
There just aren't that many movies like Amelie or What Dreams May Come.
If you say my opinion about Miyazaki/Studio Ghibli or Ghost in the Shell is terrible, I think you should probably take a break from the internet and give yourself time to locate some good sense and taste.
I occasionally watch anime on Adult Swim. I used to watch Full Metal Alchemist a lot, and for some reason, I've hunted down S-Cry-Ed online so I could finish watching it. Never really sure why I liked it.
If you say my opinion about Miyazaki/Studio Ghibli or Ghost in the Shell is terrible, I think you should probably take a break from the internet and give yourself time to locate some good sense and taste.
I didn't say YOUR opinion was terrible.
I was saying there is a high velocity of terrible opinions.
Posts
A lot of people will probably laugh at this and say "what do you think we do in America?" but I really think that 90% of manga is beyond cliche and caters to the lowest common denominator. What little of it I've seen is pretty much incomprehensible by anyone who isn't a creepy Japanophile.
Right to left?
NO BOOK.
I WILL TELL YOU HOW I AM GOING TO READ YOU.
This is pretty much true. I tried reading some of the mangas from my old collection and was pretty much ashamed that I used to think they were good. What can I say, I was around 12-16 back when I was still in that phase. I still dig some anime though.
this doesn't describe the US market at all
sure, superhero books are the most popular
but there are plenty of books that aren't about superheroes
and comics aren't for kids now
shit, they have to make comics specifically aimed at kids because the main ones aren't
The vast majority of American comics have been adult-oriented for probably 20 years or more, and I don't think I'm wrong to point out that the variety in manga simply changes up characters and settings from superheroes to doctors, lawyers, or high school students, while using the same tired plot devices.
I agree though that they are very similar in that both media probably contain their gems among the piles of junk books.
When over 90% of the market is dominated by super hero books, its hard to say it is diversified. Just because Fables and Sandman and Y: the last man and so on are excellent books does not mean they are the norm or standard for the market.
And despite the fact you might think that superhero comics are not marketed at children, they are (teens are children in my definition). If it was grown up in any way, I could read a book without seeing things like @$$ or #### for "naughty" words and more grown up themes in the books. Just because it can be enjoyed by any age group does not mean it is not targeted at younger audiences still. Hell, Marvel Adventures are some of Marvels better books and that is their "kids" line of books. If you honestly think Marvel and DC target grown ups with their offerings outside Max or Vertigo, you are sadly mistaken.
Akira, though, disappointed me. It was beautiful and unsettling to look at, but the plot was pretty minimal. And it also caters to the typical pseudo-mystical BS ending that seems omnipresent in manga/anime. I wonder if Japanese storytelling in general is so typically anti-climatic as half these manga. I'm hardly well-read in East Asian fiction mind you, so maybe I'm not the best person to to hand out observations.
Certainly, I haven't seen/heard of any manga to rival a work like, ooh, From Hell.
If they were aimed at children, they wouldn't have the censored expletives in there in the first place.
There's a difference between censorship and market demographics.
They target fanboys and obsessive collectors predisposed to shelling out ludicrous amounts of money to read a single story-line. Story arcs commonly run for 4-6 months. Comics themselves are priced way out of the range of a child's pocket money. The only reason that naughty words are still censored and full-blown nudity is uncommon is because the papers would have a field day if Spider-Man straight-out called the Green Goblin a twisted motherfucker. It's the public's perception of the industry as devoted to children that demands an element of restraint. Even though sex in comics has long since past any semblance of subtext. And there are plenty of gay superheroes. And incredible amounts of gore is apparent in even the most mainstream of titles, etc, etc.
The industry simply doesn't target children as its main audience. And that's one of the main reasons sales these days are so low.
I'd also put forth the argument that swearing is hardly grown up.
You're right that western comics need to move beyond men in tights. But have you read Love and Rockets, or From Hell, or (God help us) Blankets? Have you taken a long look at indy publishers or even the expanded catalogues of not-so-indy companies like Dark Horse? Have you even heard of stuff like Jimmy Corrigan?
There's plenty of non-superhero stuff available to read.
For a good while I stayed away from western comics, just because they didn't seem interesting at all. It wasn't until I started my first job and could read all the free comics I wanted that I got hooked.
It's funny, because now I don't even glance at manga/anime. I know it's stereotyping it, but too much of it seems really similar
As a librarian's assistant I'd end up filing a lot of stuff in the "graphic novel" category. Manga is placed there, and more often than not kids would flock to Marvel's Ultimate imprint instead of shit like Case Closed and Ah! My Goddess.
I'm just enthusiastic the Ultimate imprint is actually getting some of the readers it's aimed at instead of older readers looking for a new continuity.
I mean, kids were fuckin' hooked on the hardcovers of Ultimate Spider-Man we had.
Manga just didn't seem to attract anybody outside of the two or three kids who always eat the stuff up.
because there's a significant amount of non-superhero work out there.
as far as manga goes, i dig ghost in the shell. i also have the first book of blade of the immortal because someone gave it to me. it's not bad, but i haven't felt terribly compelled to drop the fifteen bucks apiece for the next five hundred and eighty trades of it.
Plus, I had one of those friends who was really into anime and manga for a while, and he kind of helped make sure I never got into it, for better or worse.
Micronauts and ROM are still my favorite series.
But most anime, now that the floodgates are open, strikes me as rather horribly bad, like anything else.
But it has some of best artsy stuff around.
you mean like...live action...movies don't have artistic value?
Also, it's been said ad nauseum, but there's no excuse for not checking out any of the Hayao Miyazaki/Studio Ghibli productions. Manga vs. comics, anime vs. cartoons, West vs. Japan, all of that shit doesn't matter when it comes to Miyazaki. It's just plain good storytelling that anyone can appreciate.
There just aren't that many movies like Amelie or What Dreams May Come.
And produced such things as the Breakfast Club. :P
this thread is full of terrible opinions.
Also, no, I never went through a Japan only phase because, well, I have taste
or Cowboy Bebop.
I didn't say YOUR opinion was terrible.
I was saying there is a high velocity of terrible opinions.
God.
I love Porco Rosso you don't even know.