The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent
vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums
here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules
document is now in effect.
The Senator Larry Craig's Guide to Bathroom Erotica
Posts
pleasepaypreacher.net
You realize there's a difference between getting arrested for lewd conduct and getting arrested for solicitation, right?
Nothing in the police report demonstrates he wanted to get the man-lovin' on inside of that bathroom stall. It may very well have been his intention, but that is impossible to glean from what the cop saw before deciding to arrest him. Again, Lawrence v Texas makes gay sex a'ok in the states. So all this law has going for it is the claim that using some freaky code language communicating that you want some dick constitutes lewd acts.
Where did the exchange of money get involved or even mentioned?
This I can see, but it would seem to be one hell of a long stretch of the term sexual harassment.
Quadruple post.
Sorry, I edited my post kind of late:
I'm virtually certain that Craig could have fought this and won. And I'm equally certain Craig was soliciting sex, which he possibly intended to have in that stall (as evidenced by his blocking the view to his stall with his bag). Craig also has a history of these sort of allegations, I believe (not that those would necessarily be admissible). The officer was, I believe, factually correct. He probably had insufficient evidence to convict Craig and may have been hoping Craig would, under the pressure of interrogation, confess to the crime that the officer was looking to make an arrest on.
Exactly! I mean he could have just been looking for a fuck buddy? Or hell where was the mention of sex? All I saw was that he made movements that were considered an implication of impropriety. I thought you had to vocally ask the hooker/undercover to preform a sex act for cash before they could arrest you.
Using the logic here, if you stopped near a hooker on the street, and asked her for directions, the police could arrest you.
pleasepaypreacher.net
[NBA Jam]HE'S HEATING UP![NBA Jam]
I wouldn't be shocked. I mean, he was definitely trying to get some ass in that stall, but the cop didn't have any real proof of it and no crime was committed to justify Craig's arrest. It's too bad he plead guilty, I'm sure the ACLU would have been interested in this case and filed an Amicus brief on his behalf.
Yes, but the layover situation is basically the only thing which acts as evidence for the latter and would likely have been unknown to the cop at the time. (I don't know how the Minneapolis Airport is laid out and where bathrooms are in comparison to luggage, exists, etc.) It is only clear what the intention would have had to of been after the arrest occured, which doesn't give justification for the arrest.
Phillistines
Anyone know what the sodomy laws are for Idaho?
Could be.
My supervisor came over to my desk and then I left. Sorry.
That's a pretty complex sexual/psychological question and the only possible answer is "maybe."
So you are saying that gay people need to suck cock? Masturbation is a man's best friend.
Well, being gay doesn't necessarily equal engaging in homosexual sex. You can be a gay virgin, for instance.
Oh for fuck's sake, don't put words in my mouth.
What I'm saying is that semen isn't a fucking narcotic. A guy on coke got himself into the mess (unless of course somebody shot him up in his sleep or something), but it's hard to blame him if he keeps taking it. He has a chemical addiction.
Gay or not, nothing's forcing Senator Spud to fuck dudes. There's such a thing as self-control; inless you want to take the tack that he suffers from some form of sexual addiction. In any case it's the height of hypocrisy for him to sign same-sex marriage bans with one hand and jerk the pool boy off with the other.
This doesn't really follow. Not all gay people support "same sex marriage." The institution of marriage and sexuality don't necessarily HAVE to go hand in hand. There is no hypocrisy in that specific example at all.
I say this knowing a gay guy that was very vocally against same sex marriages. I didn't understand him, really, and I was a straight guy in support of it, but someone's stance on marriage and his sexual orientation don't necessarily have to coincide.
Forests have trees in them.
Isn't this like the third case in a year?
Also, basic psychology sometimes dictates that people lash out against what is inside themselves.
Not necessarily. And sometimes they are invisible.