The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Dynasty Warriors 6: Killing guys again, again. It sucks!

2

Posts

  • brynstarbrynstar Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Ketherial wrote: »
    Olivaw wrote: »
    See, I will be the first to admit that Dynasty Warriors, as a series, is pretty horrible

    But I accept that, because I have an addiction

    An addiction to killing hundreds of guys in ancient asian time periods

    i don't think anyone has to admit that dynasty warriors is horrible. it's actually pretty great, especially when you compare it to other games in the same genre. for example, has anyone played ninety nine nights? what about that capcom gang themed beat em up they made for ps 2. shit i cant even remember the name of it. namco has a shitty gang themed one too. and what about sengoku basara (devil kings)? tolerable but nowhere near great.

    the dynasty / samurai warriors games are actually pretty great. it's really the beat / hack / slash em up genre that's become stale i think.

    You had better mean something that isn't God Hand. For your own sake.

    I'm fairly certain he's referring to the modern 3D Final Fight, which was indeed horrible.

    God Hand was made by Clover and only published by Capcom, and also not Gang themed.

    brynstar on
    Xbox Live: Xander51
    PSN ID : Xander51 Steam ID : Xander51
  • KetherialKetherial Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    brynstar wrote: »
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Ketherial wrote: »
    Olivaw wrote: »
    See, I will be the first to admit that Dynasty Warriors, as a series, is pretty horrible

    But I accept that, because I have an addiction

    An addiction to killing hundreds of guys in ancient asian time periods

    i don't think anyone has to admit that dynasty warriors is horrible. it's actually pretty great, especially when you compare it to other games in the same genre. for example, has anyone played ninety nine nights? what about that capcom gang themed beat em up they made for ps 2. shit i cant even remember the name of it. namco has a shitty gang themed one too. and what about sengoku basara (devil kings)? tolerable but nowhere near great.

    the dynasty / samurai warriors games are actually pretty great. it's really the beat / hack / slash em up genre that's become stale i think.

    You had better mean something that isn't God Hand. For your own sake.

    I'm fairly certain he's referring to the modern 3D Final Fight, which was indeed horrible.

    God Hand was made by Clover and only published by Capcom, and also not Gang themed.

    you bastards (not you brynstar), im not talking about fucking god hand. god hand is fucking awesome.

    im talking about this pile:

    xbox-beatdown%20fist%20of%20vengence.jpg

    Ketherial on
  • VytaeVytae Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    The invisible mans and pop-in exist in DW5:E, but it only happens with a lot of guys on screen, and you only really notice it when you are hunting one specific guy and have to resort to the map.

    DW5:E was pretty damn fun and stressed the ps2 to its limits. Honestly,all they needed to do was fix the clobbing together someone already mentioned of the rank and file troops and second,to make the computer less cheating at higher levels. The only time at DW5:E i had invisible manz was when i had 10 Officers (some mine,some theirs) and their entire complements (so something around 200+ men) all fighting for one base. And thats asking alot of the ps2. So i Musoed and that fixed the problem with a blaze of gratuitous carnage.

    Vytae on
  • TheKoolEagleTheKoolEagle Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    awww man, i was really looking forward to this game.

    i haven't sated my urge to destroy thousands of men in asia since dynasty warriors 3

    TheKoolEagle on
    uNMAGLm.png Mon-Fri 8:30 PM CST - 11:30 PM CST
  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Ketherial: fair enough.

    Xagarath on
  • Magic PinkMagic Pink Tur-Boner-Fed Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    awww man, i was really looking forward to this game.

    i haven't sated my urge to destroy thousands of men in asia since dynasty warriors 3


    Dood, there's plenty of other good DW and Samurai Warriors games. If you haven't played one since 3 then for fucks sake look one up.

    Magic Pink on
  • HorsecalledwarHorsecalledwar Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Hmmm.... Long post with apologies:

    This is a really fucking UNBALANCED thread. I mean, I had to stop and check if I was actually on Penny Arcade. I can read this kind of tripe at any other lame game forum.

    First: You cannot possibly BITCH at pop up when the game runs at 60 FPS - the new animation system is by far the smoothest and the best the series has to offer. Dynasty Warriors has been and will always be about leveling up your guy and beating some general senseless. To do it with a completely NEW fighting engine and new level of graphics IS WHAT EVERY FAN HAS BEEN WANTING, FOR ABOUT FOREVER.

    While it is true that it would be great to see 400 enemies on screen at once - I would rather have the smooth animations and graphic detail, than see 400 nameless faces.

    Second: To argue that the game sucks ass because you mowed through 500 yellow turbans and they "didn't fight back enough" is a farce. EVEN IF THEY HAD, the point is to level up your character to destroyer-of-worlds status anyway. So destroying countless hordes, including one-shotting them was a foregone conclusion from the start.

    Third: Just exactly what did bodyguards bring to the table? Good riddance.

    Fourth: The camera is a little bit touchy -- some people are too stupid to go in and reverse the horizontal controls - that would be problem # 1 - they want to look right but then the camera goes left and then they have to yank the camera back and by this time they are pissed and overcompensate. Next, you just need to use a little touch - I had absolutely no problems with it. My buddy was acting like a goddam yard ape jamming the stick all over and crying like a cunt until he saw me play. It's not halo. And yes, I know the fucking difference between a broken camera and one that isn't - is it the "perfectest camera in the world"? It isn't but it isn't "broken".

    Fifth: The new level up system is great. It has a lot going for it and IF they build on these basic ideas we are in for a very interesting series. Is it the most revolutionary thing ever? No. But there are a lot of good firsts for this new engine, and this is one of them.

    Sixth: The game has, I believe, 6 difficulty levels. The bosses are HARD right from the start. That is a huge PLUS. How many of us really enjoyed the games but at some point, the difficulty just was not there anymore? They used to make extreme versions with new difficulties just to keep people playing - Koei HEARD the masses and gave us what we wanted.

    I can't speak for two player mode - I don't buy it for that or play it that way. I do wish it had on-line co-op which would be an absolute blast.

    To say that the game is shit because you took a character, ran around for three levels, got your ass kicked by a hard boss and then called it a wrap isn't really objective.

    Horsecalledwar on
    BALLS - Is coming home late after a night out with the guys, smelling of beer, lipstick on your collar, slapping your wife on the butt and having the balls to say: You're next, fatty.'
  • Magic PinkMagic Pink Tur-Boner-Fed Registered User regular
    edited February 2008

    First: You cannot possibly BITCH at pop up when the game runs at 60 FPS

    I can and I do. The FPS of the other games was completely satisfactory.
    To do it with a completely NEW fighting engine and new level of graphics IS WHAT EVERY FAN HAS BEEN WANTING, FOR ABOUT FOREVER.
    Well, we also wanted them to do it well and they didn't.
    While it is true that it would be great to see 400 enemies on screen at once - I would rather have the smooth animations and graphic detail, than see 400 nameless faces.

    I don't want to see 400 enemies. I want to see the enemies that are there ALL THE TIME. I don't care how many of them there are.
    Second: To argue that the game sucks ass because you mowed through 500 yellow turbans and they "didn't fight back enough" is a farce.

    That was one of many reasons. Admittedly, it's also a problem the series has always had.
    Third: Just exactly what did bodyguards bring to the table? Good riddance.

    Bodyguards is just a preference thing. I don't discount the game because of it. I just liked them.
    Fourth: The camera is a little bit touchy -- some people are too stupid to go in and reverse the horizontal controls - that would be problem # 1 - they want to look right but then the camera goes left and then they have to yank the camera back and by this time they are pissed and overcompensate.

    You may have had that problem. I certainly didn't. The camera was jumping around all on it's own.
    Next, you just need to use a little touch - I had absolutely no problems with it. My buddy was acting like a goddam yard ape jamming the stick all over and crying like a cunt until he saw me play. It's not halo. And yes, I know the fucking difference between a broken camera and one that isn't - is it the "perfectest camera in the world"? It isn't but it isn't "broken".

    Wow, you really come across as a complete jerk.
    Fifth: The new level up system is great. It has a lot going for it and IF they build on these basic ideas we are in for a very interesting series. Is it the most revolutionary thing ever? No. But there are a lot of good firsts for this new engine, and this is one of them.

    Yeah, I agree. It was really cool.


    To say that the game is shit because you took a character, ran around for three levels, got your ass kicked by a hard boss and then called it a wrap isn't really objective.

    Well, good thing I didn't then.

    edit: I should also point out I'm playing this on the 360. If you're on the PS3 there's a good chance you're experiencing a completely different situation.

    Magic Pink on
  • VaregaVarega Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I gotta say, they killed the grab of the series when they genericized all the characters. It tried to go for a more realistic character design, but kept the same over the top fighting action. The way to re-invent the game is not by changing tried and true individuals into clones of each other.

    Varega on
    League of Legends:Varega
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Hmmm.... Long post with apologies:

    This is a really fucking UNBALANCED thread. I mean, I had to stop and check if I was actually on Penny Arcade. I can read this kind of tripe at any other lame game forum.

    First: You cannot possibly BITCH at pop up when the game runs at 60 FPS - the new animation system is by far the smoothest and the best the series has to offer. Dynasty Warriors has been and will always be about leveling up your guy and beating some general senseless. To do it with a completely NEW fighting engine and new level of graphics IS WHAT EVERY FAN HAS BEEN WANTING, FOR ABOUT FOREVER.

    The pop in is horrible and makes the gameplay improvements moot. I wouldn't give a fuck if it looked like real people fighting as it stands now the gameplay is crippled because of the graphics.

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • QuVatQuVat Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Varega wrote: »
    I gotta say, they killed the grab of the series when they genericized all the characters. It tried to go for a more realistic character design, but kept the same over the top fighting action. The way to re-invent the game is not by changing tried and true individuals into clones of each other.

    I'm sorry if you feel this way. I think that if you take more time and look at each character you'll see that they are in fact unique. Do you mean you have a difficult time picking out the generals from the mobs of peons? In that case I would tend to agree with you however Koei made up for this mistake by making the map system better and allowing you to spot generals a lot easier.

    I understand people are upset with the change to the characters, and how they opted to go the more realistic route. But to say that they're clones of one another might be going a bit far.

    QuVat on
  • Magic PinkMagic Pink Tur-Boner-Fed Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    QuVat wrote: »
    Varega wrote: »
    I gotta say, they killed the grab of the series when they genericized all the characters. It tried to go for a more realistic character design, but kept the same over the top fighting action. The way to re-invent the game is not by changing tried and true individuals into clones of each other.

    I'm sorry if you feel this way. I think that if you take more time and look at each character you'll see that they are in fact unique. Do you mean you have a difficult time picking out the generals from the mobs of peons? In that case I would tend to agree with you however Koei made up for this mistake by making the map system better and allowing you to spot generals a lot easier.

    I understand people are upset with the change to the characters, and how they opted to go the more realistic route. But to say that they're clones of one another might be going a bit far.

    No, they really are. Several characters are exact clones of each other move wise. Even wiki mentions it:
    Also many characters share the same movesets. For example Taishi Ci and Zhang He look completely different; however, they have the same move set from basic attack to musou attack

    That seems pretty silly to me but in the other games I certainly wouldn't have noticed it; I doubt I ever would have here either.

    As for changes to characters, bring it on. I love when my characters get big overhauls. I like learning them again.

    Magic Pink on
  • VaregaVarega Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    QuVat wrote: »
    Varega wrote: »
    I gotta say, they killed the grab of the series when they genericized all the characters. It tried to go for a more realistic character design, but kept the same over the top fighting action. The way to re-invent the game is not by changing tried and true individuals into clones of each other.

    I'm sorry if you feel this way. I think that if you take more time and look at each character you'll see that they are in fact unique. Do you mean you have a difficult time picking out the generals from the mobs of peons? In that case I would tend to agree with you however Koei made up for this mistake by making the map system better and allowing you to spot generals a lot easier.

    I understand people are upset with the change to the characters, and how they opted to go the more realistic route. But to say that they're clones of one another might be going a bit far.

    Example : Nearly general falls into 3 categories, Spear, Sword, Bow. There's no real difference between the attacks for each of the generals if they are in the same category. The only differences that I have found were the tome attacks, and even then they are not used as much as I would think they should be.

    Varega on
    League of Legends:Varega
  • NailbunnyPDNailbunnyPD Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Magic Pink wrote: »
    QuVat wrote: »
    I understand people are upset with the change to the characters, and how they opted to go the more realistic route. But to say that they're clones of one another might be going a bit far.

    No, they really are. Several characters are exact clones of each other move wise. Even wiki mentions it:
    Also many characters share the same movesets. For example Taishi Ci and Zhang He look completely different; however, they have the same move set from basic attack to musou attack

    That seems pretty silly to me but in the other games I certainly wouldn't have noticed it; I doubt I ever would have here either.

    There were many characters in the previous games that shared the same movesets, just typically not the big dogs. Is it worse in DW6?

    All in all, it sounds like the game was not complete upon release. Hopefully they are continuing on to DW7 and can get that out with more QC.

    NailbunnyPD on
    XBL: NailbunnyPD PSN: NailbunnyPD Origin: NailbunnyPD
    NintendoID: Nailbunny 3DS: 3909-8796-4685
    steam_sig-400.png
  • NailbunnyPDNailbunnyPD Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    NailbunnyPD on
    XBL: NailbunnyPD PSN: NailbunnyPD Origin: NailbunnyPD
    NintendoID: Nailbunny 3DS: 3909-8796-4685
    steam_sig-400.png
  • brynstarbrynstar Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Haha Ketherial, that's right. I completely forgot about Beat Down. Okay, so both Beat Down and Final Fight Streetwise sucked. That's two bad modern beat-em-ups by Capcom.

    I almost picked up DW 6 last night but the explosion of debate in this thread has left me hesitant. I normally enjoy a good kill-lots-of-dudes experience, but I haven't seen opinions this polarized on such a simple game concept in quite some time.

    brynstar on
    Xbox Live: Xander51
    PSN ID : Xander51 Steam ID : Xander51
  • Magic PinkMagic Pink Tur-Boner-Fed Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Magic Pink wrote: »
    QuVat wrote: »
    I understand people are upset with the change to the characters, and how they opted to go the more realistic route. But to say that they're clones of one another might be going a bit far.

    No, they really are. Several characters are exact clones of each other move wise. Even wiki mentions it:
    Also many characters share the same movesets. For example Taishi Ci and Zhang He look completely different; however, they have the same move set from basic attack to musou attack

    That seems pretty silly to me but in the other games I certainly wouldn't have noticed it; I doubt I ever would have here either.

    There were many characters in the previous games that shared the same movesets, just typically not the big dogs. Is it worse in DW6?

    All in all, it sounds like the game was not complete upon release. Hopefully they are continuing on to DW7 and can get that out with more QC.

    I honestly can't say. Like I said, if there were in the other games I never noticed them and I didn'y play 6 long enough to find out. But wiki went out of it's way to say there were exact clones this time which seems a little strange.

    Magic Pink on
  • Magic PinkMagic Pink Tur-Boner-Fed Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    brynstar wrote: »
    Haha Ketherial, that's right. I completely forgot about Beat Down. Okay, so both Beat Down and Final Fight Streetwise sucked. That's two bad modern beat-em-ups by Capcom.

    I almost picked up DW 6 last night but the explosion of debate in this thread has left me hesitant. I normally enjoy a good kill-lots-of-dudes experience, but I haven't seen opinions this polarized on such a simple game concept in quite some time.

    The other DWs are and SWs are good, smacky fun. Grab one of those cheaper ones first if you want to give the genre a try.

    Magic Pink on
  • CherrnCherrn Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I honestly would give DW 6 a try if it was released at a budget price. You can't expect people outside of Asia to pay £40 for it; with all the bad press they're getting, you'd almost expect them to release it at £30 at least. I don't know how well it sells in the West, but surely it doesn't warrant full price.

    Cherrn on
    All creature will die and all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai.
  • Sunday_AssassinSunday_Assassin Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Thread's reminding me I should probably give Warriors Orochi another shot before I look to buy another one. Had a nice Jiang Wei-Zhao Yun-Musket guy combo set up (on another gamertag though unfortunatly).

    Sunday_Assassin on
  • CoreCore Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    So if I like Dynasty Warriors, would you guys reccomend DW 5: Empires for the 360 over DW 6? I've never played an Empires version before.

    Core on
    core_pa_sig.jpg
  • Magic PinkMagic Pink Tur-Boner-Fed Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Core wrote: »
    So if I like Dynasty Warriors, would you guys reccomend DW 5: Empires for the 360 over DW 6? I've never played an Empires version before.

    Good god yes. Or just DW5 for the 360 or Samurai Warriors 2 for the 360 or Dynasty Warriors Gundam for the 360.

    Magic Pink on
  • NailbunnyPDNailbunnyPD Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    DW5 vanilla never hit the 360. It was on the Xbox.

    NailbunnyPD on
    XBL: NailbunnyPD PSN: NailbunnyPD Origin: NailbunnyPD
    NintendoID: Nailbunny 3DS: 3909-8796-4685
    steam_sig-400.png
  • QuVatQuVat Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I didn't realize we were talking about moves, weapons, etc. I thought we were referring to characters LOOKING the same.

    In that case, sure there are a bunch of characters that share each others moves. I guess I never really felt like it was any worse than it has been in the other games.

    I'll admit I hated DW6 at first. But once I realized that change in this series is not only okay, it's GOOD, I was fine with it. In the end it has everything that I want from the other games (item collecting, character leveling, tons of characters).

    Why hasn't anyone commented on how bad ass the level design is this time around? That was the FIRST huge improvement I noticed, even before the character models.

    QuVat on
  • Magic PinkMagic Pink Tur-Boner-Fed Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I did really like the swimming and climbing addition and how that really opened up the levels to new and weird things.

    But the third time I saw soldiers skating by on top of the water? Yeah, the enchantment ended real quick.

    Magic Pink on
  • PemulisPemulis Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Core wrote: »
    So if I like Dynasty Warriors, would you guys reccomend DW 5: Empires for the 360 over DW 6? I've never played an Empires version before.

    I just picked up DW5:E for 360 and I'm having a blast with it. I like the strategy side of it, taking over all of China is a lot of fun.

    Pemulis on
  • DisruptorX2DisruptorX2 Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I haven't picked this one up yet, but I played a battle or two on a friend's game.

    The attacks feel really weak, and the combo system sucks. Graphics are really nice, though.

    I'll probably get it since I've been a Dynasty Warriors fan since the first one (2). This one seems kind of meh, like 4, though, rather than totally awesome like 3 and 5.

    DisruptorX2 on
    1208768734831.jpg
  • Glenn565Glenn565 Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    This is kinda disappointing, really. They changed a lot, but not for the better.

    I'd say just stick with Samurai Warriors 2 or Bladestorm. 6 would barely even be worth $20, let alone $60.

    Glenn565 on
    3DS code:4511-0654-1976
    NNID: Glenn565
  • StormyWatersStormyWaters Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Does this at least have the 'archers from hell' that DW 3 had?

    StormyWaters on
  • APZonerunnerAPZonerunner Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Glenn565 wrote: »
    This is kinda disappointing, really. They changed a lot, but not for the better.

    I'd say just stick with Samurai Warriors 2 or Bladestorm. 6 would barely even be worth $20, let alone $60.

    This.

    APZonerunner on
    APZonerunner | RPG Site | UFFSite | The Gaming Vault
    XBL/PSN/Steam: APZonerunner
  • APZonerunnerAPZonerunner Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Double post, but didn't wanna make a new thread for this:

    Just got a press release from Koei that Samurai Warriors 2 Xtreme Legends will be launching on PS2 on March 21st.

    On 360 it will be a download that adds on to Samurai Warriors 2. 2400 points. Features 36 new scenarios, new battlefields, Mercenary Mode, Two new difficulty settings, level cap raised by 20, and 6 new characters.

    Could the XBL release see the end of Koei's "same game, slightly different, full price" strategy? :D

    Either way, SW2 is great, and I recommend it + this expansion for anybody disappointed with DW6.

    APZonerunner on
    APZonerunner | RPG Site | UFFSite | The Gaming Vault
    XBL/PSN/Steam: APZonerunner
  • Magic PinkMagic Pink Tur-Boner-Fed Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Double post, but didn't wanna make a new thread for this:

    Just got a press release from Koei that Samurai Warriors 2 Xtreme Legends will be launching on PS2 on March 21st.

    On 360 it will be a download that adds on to Samurai Warriors 2. 2400 points. Features 36 new scenarios, new battlefields, Mercenary Mode, Two new difficulty settings, level cap raised by 20, and 6 new characters.

    Could the XBL release see the end of Koei's "same game, slightly different, full price" strategy? :D

    Either way, SW2 is great, and I recommend it + this expansion for anybody disappointed with DW6.


    It's not only download, EBGames has it for preorder as well.

    And I can't see why using XBL would change their strategy at all.

    Magic Pink on
  • APZonerunnerAPZonerunner Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I've been told that in the UK it's download only. I get UK press releases. Status may have changed in the US, though, as it was available for preorder in GAME in the UK, and is now marked with them as cancelled.

    This expansion is the equivalent of £20 here, and the previous 'Xtreme Legeneds' titles have retailed for £30 or £40 here, so on XBL it's a much better price.

    APZonerunner on
    APZonerunner | RPG Site | UFFSite | The Gaming Vault
    XBL/PSN/Steam: APZonerunner
  • KetherialKetherial Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    but didnt they take out japanese voices in samurai warriors 2?

    that saddened me to the extent that i havent bought it yet.

    Ketherial on
  • TiemlerTiemler Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Ketherial wrote: »
    but didnt they take out japanese voices in samurai warriors 2?

    that saddened me to the extent that i havent bought it yet.

    Yeah, it turned me right off. I promptly returned the game.

    And Empires got old real quick. In theory, I'm commanding an army. So why are my subordinates giving me quests and effectively ordering me around the battlefield to rescue their incompetent asses? And I think I mentioned a while back being pissed off that leveling my steed was pointless because some lewt I picked up on a battlefield gave me a 9999 level horse. That's kind of like playing a pen & paper RPG with a lazy, shitty gamemaster.

    Tiemler on
  • existexist Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Holy shit. The Samurai Warriors 2 expansion news is fucking awesome.

    exist on
    UmPiq.png
  • AvenroshAvenrosh Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Is there a reason why Koei hates multiplayer co-op over LIVE? Last time I checked, it's 2008...

    Avenrosh on
  • Resident0Resident0 Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I played Dynasty Warriors 1 back on the PSX, the one with the blocky 'Tekken 2' looking characters, if you want to complain about pop-in, just thank the lords you don't have PSX technology anymore...

    Do a Musou and the characters glitch in and out of the attack, characters weapons vanishing then reappearing after attacks, boss baddies having the smaller baddies clip through their legs or getting jammed, making a horrible shakey, clipping, glitching beast where you didn't know if you were hitting the Boss or just a grunt...

    DW6 is pretty damn hot in comparison, so is Dynasty Warriors: GUNDAM.

    Resident0 on
    sig.gif
  • Sunday_AssassinSunday_Assassin Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I found the demo for DW:Gundam horrendous. Like, really bad.

    The areas and the force-fields and the combat... ugh.

    Sunday_Assassin on
  • poshnialloposhniallo Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I have a 360 - which of the Samurai Warriors/Dynasty Warriors games should I get? I keep reading very contradictory reviews of them - e.g lots of 4/10 scores next to 9/10 scores. Obviously not DW6 from this thread, but I've no idea which of the rest is best.

    I live in Japan so I can get any of the different versions - but to confuse things, I know the history of the Japanese civil war, and I'm reading Romance of the Three Kingdoms at the moment (bit long...)

    Please help me decide?

    poshniallo on
    I figure I could take a bear.
Sign In or Register to comment.