we are compatable despite what zealots on both sides say
hugz.
I don't know why people won't consider the theory that God created the first organism that eventually evolved and became what we now know as pretty much everything.
we are compatable despite what zealots on both sides say
hugz.
I don't know why people won't consider the theory that God created the first organism that eventually evolved and became what we now know as pretty much everything.
why would he do that
waiting billions of years for the cool stuff to happen
we are compatable despite what zealots on both sides say
hugz.
I don't know why people won't consider the theory that God created the first organism that eventually evolved and became what we now know as pretty much everything.
actually you're making a conceptual error here, because evolution doesn't actually have anything to say about how the first life got here
it just deals with how life diversified once it got started
we are compatable despite what zealots on both sides say
hugz.
I don't know why people won't consider the theory that God created the first organism that eventually evolved and became what we now know as pretty much everything.
actually you're making a conceptual error here, because evolution doesn't actually have anything to say about how the first life got here
it just deals with how life diversified once it got started
No, I'm saying that it could be said that God provided all the raw materials, and science took all of the Lords gifts and made shit awesome.
I just don't understand some people's problem with the idea of God setting up all the laws of physics, and then saying "let there be light" and sitting back and watching stuff happen.
Of course, I also don't understand people who need to make religion a huge part of themselves, so maybe I'm not the best person for this debate.
I just don't understand some people's problem with the idea of God setting up all the laws of physics, and then saying "let there be light" and sitting back and watching stuff happen.
Of course, I also don't understand people who need to make religion a huge part of themselves, so maybe I'm not the best person for this debate.
I don't get people who need to make their religion so apparent to others, and prominently display it, and then not have a basic understanding of so many other common religions.
It's 2 AM here and I'm supposed to be writing about Hemingway anyway, so...
we are compatable despite what zealots on both sides say
hugz.
I don't know why people won't consider the theory that God created the first organism that eventually evolved and became what we now know as pretty much everything.
actually you're making a conceptual error here, because evolution doesn't actually have anything to say about how the first life got here
it just deals with how life diversified once it got started
No, I'm saying that it could be said that God provided all the raw materials, and science took all of the Lords gifts and made shit awesome.
you misunderstood me
the conceptual error I was referring to was your claim that no one will consider that God created the first organism(s)
which wouldn't be a theory by the way, simply because it's absolutely untestable
we are compatable despite what zealots on both sides say
hugz.
I don't know why people won't consider the theory that God created the first organism that eventually evolved and became what we now know as pretty much everything.
actually you're making a conceptual error here, because evolution doesn't actually have anything to say about how the first life got here
it just deals with how life diversified once it got started
No, I'm saying that it could be said that God provided all the raw materials, and science took all of the Lords gifts and made shit awesome.
you misunderstood me
the conceptual error I was referring to was your claim that no one will consider that God created the first organism(s)
which wouldn't be a theory by the way, simply because it's absolutely untestable
I don't get people who need to make their religion so apparent to others, and prominently display it, and then not have a basic understanding of so many other common religions.
It's 2 AM here and I'm supposed to be writing about Hemingway anyway, so...
Posts
hugz.
I don't know why people won't consider the theory that God created the first organism that eventually evolved and became what we now know as pretty much everything.
Are you a fatty, Fari?
THE BONER FORCE
silence
I am
THE OPPOSITE AND EQUAL ANTIBONER NORMAL FORCE
and i'm not fat i'm just big quarked
why would he do that
waiting billions of years for the cool stuff to happen
what a boring god
so without me, NO BONERS!
it just deals with how life diversified once it got started
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia#Evidence
No, I'm saying that it could be said that God provided all the raw materials, and science took all of the Lords gifts and made shit awesome.
Of course, I also don't understand people who need to make religion a huge part of themselves, so maybe I'm not the best person for this debate.
http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html
I have a friend who goes to Catholic school who is all kinds of "THERE IS NO GOD GOD IS BULLSHIT"
And I'm like whoa buddy.
Whoa.
I don't get people who need to make their religion so apparent to others, and prominently display it, and then not have a basic understanding of so many other common religions.
It's 2 AM here and I'm supposed to be writing about Hemingway anyway, so...
Teefs isn't your religion just weed?
E: Tam that story is the bestest.
the conceptual error I was referring to was your claim that no one will consider that God created the first organism(s)
which wouldn't be a theory by the way, simply because it's absolutely untestable
The walk down to the corner store is peanuts compared to you.
a.k.a. what really lax religious people have been doing for centuries
OIC.
nvm.
you know who else smoked weed?
hitler
nah I'm just kiddin'
in fact, Carl Sagan smoked weed
that makes smoking weed awesome
Tumblr blargh
wait is it the u mad cuz im stylin on u one
...each of them much better looking when you're stoned?