The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[BSG] Blood & Chrome is here and will frak your shit backwards in time

2456736

Posts

  • Gandalf_the_CrazedGandalf_the_Crazed Vigilo ConfidoRegistered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Oh, I'm not saying I won't see it.

    I'm saying that if it comes out and sucks, it will be much much harder to convince my friends to give the RDM version a try. And that pisses me off greatly.

    Gandalf_the_Crazed on
    PEUsig_zps56da03ec.jpg
  • Fatboy RobertsFatboy Roberts Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Jesus Christ I wrote a lot there. I'm gonna go back and spoiler for "self-indulgent essaying in a discussion thread."

    Sorry guys.

    As far as whether this movie being a pile of shit (if that's what it becomes) making it harder to get people into BSG, I'm okay. My attempts go as such.

    step 1) "Have you seen BSG? It's really fucking good."
    step 2) Shove dvd set of season 1 in their hands.
    step 3) "Get it back to me whenever."

    That's it. Anything beyond that is wasted effort. I've got plenty of friends who don't watch it and don't like it. Sucks for them. Would suck more if I bugged em about it, so I don't.

    Fatboy Roberts on
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    I think, for me, the most frustrating thing about Universal's fast-tracking the film version is that it does appear, for all intents, as a cash grab. For six years Universal had the opportunity to either take Ron Moore's fantastic vision to the mainstream via NBC or to work with R&D to perpetuate their series in cinematic form after the show had ended. But they didn't. At all.

    So now, when brand recognition is high an competing studios are doing well with similar-themed material, they're going full-tilt on yet another version?


    It's more than frustrating. It's insulting.

    Atomika on
  • theSquidtheSquid Sydney, AustraliaRegistered User regular
    edited August 2009
    So do we have any speculations or anything for
    1. What was Starbuck? Was she just some Cylon copy from the radio-active Earth? Speaking of which, how the fuck did her ship end up there, after blowing up jumps away from there?

    2. What the fuck did happen to all the Cylons on the nuked Earth? Like, was it some Cylon on Skinjob uprising that wiped out every single Cylon from both factions except the final 5? Or is there even more survivors from there floating about with subluminal speeds?
    1. I'm pretty sure she was an angel. In this universe, God is real. Make of that what you will.

    2. Nuclear armaggeddon. Final Five were probably the only survivors that actually made it anywhere.

    theSquid on
  • SaraLunaSaraLuna Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    SaraLuna on
  • Kipling217Kipling217 Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    My opinion is that Singer is fucked. He can make an amazing movie and still be fucked.

    Why? Because he is competing with a definitive version of the show. In the future people when people think about BSG, they will automaticaly think of nBSG. Not the original, certainly not the 1980s version, but the series that was so good the UN changed its charter because of it.

    Its kinda like King Kong. Peter Jacksons version was good, it had great effects and was respectfull to the original, but in the end people will remember the 1933 original.

    Kipling217 on
    The sky was full of stars, every star an exploding ship. One of ours.
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Kipling217 wrote: »
    Its kinda like King Kong. Peter Jacksons version was good, it had great effects and was respectfull to the original, but in the end people will remember the 1933 original.

    At least Jackson had the decency to wait three decades since the last version of the tale. Universal signed this deal before the last episode (The Plan) has aired and before the spin-off even saw its first episode.




    In other news, apparently Patton Oswalt is joining Caprica as a recurrent character who runs a TV chat show.

    Atomika on
  • EddieDeanEddieDean Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Please guys, no opinions on the finale, we had a whole thread of that and it was just a mess.

    In terms of some peoples' questions though, it's important to consider that God, or Gods, or some higher power, is very much an influence in the BSG universe. Head Six and Head Baltar can be seen as the voice of God, guiding a representative of each race to realise what they need to in order to achieve part of his vision (in this case his teachings, and the safety of Hera and her progeny). Starbuck, likewise, is the hand of God. She was always a guidance for the fleet, but since her death she became much more integral in pushing the two races towards another part of God's vision (in this case, the future home of humanity and humanity's creations).

    It is somewhat flimsy, but if one accepts that yes, there is a much higher power at work (as was hinted at, then outright accpeted, though only discussed in that one final scene with Baltar), it cleans up a lot of the other stuff.

    Either way, even without those few God-based mysteries, like the head characters, Starbuck, and Roslin's visions etc, we did at least get a very solid, very cohesive story of the entire history of the cylons, the thirteenth tribe, and indeed all the important bits of history driving all three races (human, cylon, final five) through the galaxy and up to where the miniseries begins.


    In other thoughts, I hope The Plan sells well, so that we get more BSG. I'd love to see something during the year on New Caprica, though it'd be hard to do so without Cylons. I don't think something like a racism plot (which they had planned for the end of season three but changed later on) would really sell that much. Though seeing a movie with one half of the story on New Cap with human problems, and one with the Cylons wondering where humans have gone (almost a sequel to The Plan, given that around New Cap time the plan changed significantly) could be good.

    Perhaps a Cylon War flashback would be awesome too, showing the actual original Cylon war. It could tie together both the Caprica and BSG storylines quite tidily, showing some of the characters of each, with the characters from Caprica older and dealing with their creations rising up, and the characters from BSG younger and fighting them.

    EddieDean on
  • RaynagaRaynaga Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Guys, guys. Don't talk about the finale.

    Now, watch as I talk about the finale.
    :P
    I think, for me, the most frustrating thing about Universal's fast-tracking the film version is that it does appear, for all intents, as a cash grab.

    The only reason they'd be making a theatrical version without any of the nBSG people involved is a desire to cash in on the name without having to pay off any of the people responsible for making it something worth cashing in on.

    Raynaga on
  • EddieDeanEddieDean Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    EddieDean wrote: »
    Please guys, no opinions on the finale, we had a whole thread of that and it was just a mess.

    In terms of some peoples' questions though, it's important to consider that God, or Gods, or some higher power, is very much an influence in the BSG universe. Head Six and Head Baltar can be seen as the voice of God, guiding a representative of each race to realise what they need to in order to achieve part of his vision (in this case his teachings, and the safety of Hera and her progeny). Starbuck, likewise, is the hand of God. She was always a guidance for the fleet, but since her death she became much more integral in pushing the two races towards another part of God's vision (in this case, the future home of humanity and humanity's creations).

    It is somewhat flimsy, but if one accepts that yes, there is a much higher power at work (as was hinted at, then outright accpeted, though only discussed in that one final scene with Baltar), it cleans up a lot of the other stuff.

    Either way, even without those few God-based mysteries, like the head characters, Starbuck, and Roslin's visions etc, we did at least get a very solid, very cohesive story of the entire history of the cylons, the thirteenth tribe, and indeed all the important bits of history driving all three races (human, cylon, final five) through the galaxy and up to where the miniseries begins.


    In other thoughts, I hope The Plan sells well, so that we get more BSG. I'd love to see something during the year on New Caprica, though it'd be hard to do so without Cylons. I don't think something like a racism plot (which they had planned for the end of season three but changed later on) would really sell that much. Though seeing a movie with one half of the story on New Cap with human problems, and one with the Cylons wondering where humans have gone (almost a sequel to The Plan, given that around New Cap time the plan changed significantly) could be good.

    Perhaps a Cylon War flashback would be awesome too, showing the actual original Cylon war. It could tie together both the Caprica and BSG storylines quite tidily, showing some of the characters of each, with the characters from Caprica older and dealing with their creations rising up, and the characters from BSG younger and fighting them.
    Raynaga wrote: »
    Guys, guys. Don't talk about the finale.

    Now, watch as I talk about the finale.

    :P Fair point. I guess I was mostly saying 'try to avoid "I HATED THE FINALE BECAUSE...", "NO IT WAS FINE BECAUSE...", because those're opinions and don't get us anywhere.'

    Interpretation of the content in terms of understanding the plot is all good though!

    EddieDean on
  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    I wasnt aware that a subject had to get us somewhere.. sometimes the point of discourse is to simply gather information, not change someones mind.

    I had to ignore the last BSG thread since I hadnt actually seen any of Season 4.5, and had to wait for it to come out on DVD.

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • edited August 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Yeah, it makes it easier to understand if you think of Starbuck as some corporeal from of an Angel, that just rematerializes each time she is killed.

    I'm still sorta curious why the attack on Cylon Earth was so much more effective than the attack on the 12 Colonies. Unless the attack on the colonies was part of the plan to force the 2 races to get together on Earth.

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • RaynagaRaynaga Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    EddieDean wrote: »

    :P Fair point. I guess I was mostly saying 'try to avoid "I HATED THE FINALE BECAUSE...", "NO IT WAS FINE BECAUSE...", because those're opinions and don't get us anywhere.'

    Interpretation of the content in terms of understanding the plot is all good though!

    For what its worth I happen to agree with your analysis. I just found the juxtaposition amusing :mrgreen:

    Raynaga on
  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Yeah, it makes it easier to understand if you think of Starbuck as some corporeal from of an Angel, that just rematerializes each time she is killed.

    I'm still sorta curious why the attack on Cylon Earth was so much more effective than the attack on the 12 Colonies. Unless the attack on the colonies was part of the plan to force the 2 races to get together on Earth.
    Well there were 12 colonies where space travel was commonplace, vs. 1 Cylon Earth where space travel seemed limited to keeping stuff in orbit. It's lot harder to get everyone in the first case than in the second.

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Richy wrote: »
    Yeah, it makes it easier to understand if you think of Starbuck as some corporeal from of an Angel, that just rematerializes each time she is killed.

    I'm still sorta curious why the attack on Cylon Earth was so much more effective than the attack on the 12 Colonies. Unless the attack on the colonies was part of the plan to force the 2 races to get together on Earth.
    Well the were 12 colonies where space travel was commonplace, vs. 1 Cylon Earth where space travel seemed limited to keeping stuff in orbit.

    I'm not sure how many resistance cells formed on the other colonies, but Halo survived for a while with his anti-radiation meds, and Sams resistance fighters all survived up in the mountains, and thats all just on Caprica.

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • Professor PhobosProfessor Phobos Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    The Plan looks fairly interesting. I'm a big Cavil Fan, and if there's a lot of Cavil being Cavil, I'll probably be happy.

    Professor Phobos on
  • NeadenNeaden Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Richy wrote: »
    Yeah, it makes it easier to understand if you think of Starbuck as some corporeal from of an Angel, that just rematerializes each time she is killed.

    I'm still sorta curious why the attack on Cylon Earth was so much more effective than the attack on the 12 Colonies. Unless the attack on the colonies was part of the plan to force the 2 races to get together on Earth.
    Well the were 12 colonies where space travel was commonplace, vs. 1 Cylon Earth where space travel seemed limited to keeping stuff in orbit.

    I'm not sure how many resistance cells formed on the other colonies, but Halo survived for a while with his anti-radiation meds, and Sams resistance fighters all survived up in the mountains, and thats all just on Caprica.
    Yeah, that is actually one of my beefs with the show. Presented as it is it is virtually certain that there were other human survivors with the twelve colonies. I mean we saw three separate groups of people who escaped the cylon attack and eventually found eachother against extremely unlikely odds meaning that there are probably more. Also I have a hard time believing that Sam's resistance fighters were the only survivors on all of Caprica, let alone all the twelve colonies.

    Neaden on
  • Professor PhobosProfessor Phobos Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Neaden wrote: »
    Richy wrote: »
    Yeah, it makes it easier to understand if you think of Starbuck as some corporeal from of an Angel, that just rematerializes each time she is killed.

    I'm still sorta curious why the attack on Cylon Earth was so much more effective than the attack on the 12 Colonies. Unless the attack on the colonies was part of the plan to force the 2 races to get together on Earth.
    Well the were 12 colonies where space travel was commonplace, vs. 1 Cylon Earth where space travel seemed limited to keeping stuff in orbit.

    I'm not sure how many resistance cells formed on the other colonies, but Halo survived for a while with his anti-radiation meds, and Sams resistance fighters all survived up in the mountains, and thats all just on Caprica.
    Yeah, that is actually one of my beefs with the show. Presented as it is it is virtually certain that there were other human survivors with the twelve colonies. I mean we saw three separate groups of people who escaped the cylon attack and eventually found eachother against extremely unlikely odds meaning that there are probably more. Also I have a hard time believing that Sam's resistance fighters were the only survivors on all of Caprica, let alone all the twelve colonies.

    There certainly are survivors; whether they survive the ensuing nuclear winter, maybe, maybe not. But 150,000 years later, when the survivors of our Earth are fleeing on board the UNS Galactic from a revolt from Microsoft's Cylon XP gone rogue after Service Pack 10, we'll be very happy that we can go in search of the ancient, mysterious "Twelve Colonies" as foretold by Graham Hancock.

    Professor Phobos on
  • RoanthRoanth Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Neaden wrote: »
    Richy wrote: »
    Yeah, it makes it easier to understand if you think of Starbuck as some corporeal from of an Angel, that just rematerializes each time she is killed.

    I'm still sorta curious why the attack on Cylon Earth was so much more effective than the attack on the 12 Colonies. Unless the attack on the colonies was part of the plan to force the 2 races to get together on Earth.
    Well the were 12 colonies where space travel was commonplace, vs. 1 Cylon Earth where space travel seemed limited to keeping stuff in orbit.

    I'm not sure how many resistance cells formed on the other colonies, but Halo survived for a while with his anti-radiation meds, and Sams resistance fighters all survived up in the mountains, and thats all just on Caprica.
    Yeah, that is actually one of my beefs with the show. Presented as it is it is virtually certain that there were other human survivors with the twelve colonies. I mean we saw three separate groups of people who escaped the cylon attack and eventually found eachother against extremely unlikely odds meaning that there are probably more. Also I have a hard time believing that Sam's resistance fighters were the only survivors on all of Caprica, let alone all the twelve colonies.

    There certainly are survivors; whether they survive the ensuing nuclear winter, maybe, maybe not. But 150,000 years later, when the survivors of our Earth are fleeing on board the UNS Galactic from a revolt from Microsoft's Cylon XP gone rogue after Service Pack 10, we'll be very happy that we can go in search of the ancient, mysterious "Twelve Colonies" as foretold by Graham Hancock.

    Kind of amusing that the survivors on the 12 colonies will be living much better lives than their compatriots who settled on new earth after the initiation of the Lee Adama plan

    Roanth on
  • Professor PhobosProfessor Phobos Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Roanth wrote: »
    Neaden wrote: »
    Richy wrote: »
    Yeah, it makes it easier to understand if you think of Starbuck as some corporeal from of an Angel, that just rematerializes each time she is killed.

    I'm still sorta curious why the attack on Cylon Earth was so much more effective than the attack on the 12 Colonies. Unless the attack on the colonies was part of the plan to force the 2 races to get together on Earth.
    Well the were 12 colonies where space travel was commonplace, vs. 1 Cylon Earth where space travel seemed limited to keeping stuff in orbit.

    I'm not sure how many resistance cells formed on the other colonies, but Halo survived for a while with his anti-radiation meds, and Sams resistance fighters all survived up in the mountains, and thats all just on Caprica.
    Yeah, that is actually one of my beefs with the show. Presented as it is it is virtually certain that there were other human survivors with the twelve colonies. I mean we saw three separate groups of people who escaped the cylon attack and eventually found eachother against extremely unlikely odds meaning that there are probably more. Also I have a hard time believing that Sam's resistance fighters were the only survivors on all of Caprica, let alone all the twelve colonies.

    There certainly are survivors; whether they survive the ensuing nuclear winter, maybe, maybe not. But 150,000 years later, when the survivors of our Earth are fleeing on board the UNS Galactic from a revolt from Microsoft's Cylon XP gone rogue after Service Pack 10, we'll be very happy that we can go in search of the ancient, mysterious "Twelve Colonies" as foretold by Graham Hancock.

    Kind of amusing that the survivors on the 12 colonies will be living much better lives than their compatriots who settled on new earth after the initiation of the Lee Adama plan

    Depends on how bad the nuclear winter is. I'd take "garden of eden" over "the road" any day. But we really, really shouldn't get into this argument again. It doesn't go anywhere.

    Professor Phobos on
  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Neaden wrote: »
    Richy wrote: »
    Yeah, it makes it easier to understand if you think of Starbuck as some corporeal from of an Angel, that just rematerializes each time she is killed.

    I'm still sorta curious why the attack on Cylon Earth was so much more effective than the attack on the 12 Colonies. Unless the attack on the colonies was part of the plan to force the 2 races to get together on Earth.
    Well the were 12 colonies where space travel was commonplace, vs. 1 Cylon Earth where space travel seemed limited to keeping stuff in orbit.

    I'm not sure how many resistance cells formed on the other colonies, but Halo survived for a while with his anti-radiation meds, and Sams resistance fighters all survived up in the mountains, and thats all just on Caprica.
    Yeah, that is actually one of my beefs with the show. Presented as it is it is virtually certain that there were other human survivors with the twelve colonies. I mean we saw three separate groups of people who escaped the cylon attack and eventually found eachother against extremely unlikely odds meaning that there are probably more. Also I have a hard time believing that Sam's resistance fighters were the only survivors on all of Caprica, let alone all the twelve colonies.

    There certainly are survivors; whether they survive the ensuing nuclear winter, maybe, maybe not. But 150,000 years later, when the survivors of our Earth are fleeing on board the UNS Galactic from a revolt from Microsoft's Cylon XP gone rogue after Service Pack 10, we'll be very happy that we can go in search of the ancient, mysterious "Twelve Colonies" as foretold by Graham Hancock.

    I think we have to find and settle on Kobol again to become the Lords of Kobol before we seperate out again.

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • Mike DangerMike Danger "Diane..." a place both wonderful and strangeRegistered User regular
    edited August 2009
    The BSGverse Thread: Adama Will Strangle Us All With His Old Man Hands If We Argue About Daybreak Again
    should I buy the Caprica DVD y/n?

    Mike Danger on
    Steam: Mike Danger | PSN/NNID: remadeking | 3DS: 2079-9204-4075
    oE0mva1.jpg
  • edited August 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • Professor PhobosProfessor Phobos Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Roanth wrote: »
    Neaden wrote: »
    Richy wrote: »
    Yeah, it makes it easier to understand if you think of Starbuck as some corporeal from of an Angel, that just rematerializes each time she is killed.

    I'm still sorta curious why the attack on Cylon Earth was so much more effective than the attack on the 12 Colonies. Unless the attack on the colonies was part of the plan to force the 2 races to get together on Earth.
    Well the were 12 colonies where space travel was commonplace, vs. 1 Cylon Earth where space travel seemed limited to keeping stuff in orbit.

    I'm not sure how many resistance cells formed on the other colonies, but Halo survived for a while with his anti-radiation meds, and Sams resistance fighters all survived up in the mountains, and thats all just on Caprica.
    Yeah, that is actually one of my beefs with the show. Presented as it is it is virtually certain that there were other human survivors with the twelve colonies. I mean we saw three separate groups of people who escaped the cylon attack and eventually found eachother against extremely unlikely odds meaning that there are probably more. Also I have a hard time believing that Sam's resistance fighters were the only survivors on all of Caprica, let alone all the twelve colonies.

    There certainly are survivors; whether they survive the ensuing nuclear winter, maybe, maybe not. But 150,000 years later, when the survivors of our Earth are fleeing on board the UNS Galactic from a revolt from Microsoft's Cylon XP gone rogue after Service Pack 10, we'll be very happy that we can go in search of the ancient, mysterious "Twelve Colonies" as foretold by Graham Hancock.

    Kind of amusing that the survivors on the 12 colonies will be living much better lives than their compatriots who settled on new earth after the initiation of the Lee Adama plan

    Depends on how bad the nuclear winter is. I'd take "garden of eden" over "the road" any day. But we really, really shouldn't get into this argument again. It doesn't go anywhere.

    It was still immensely pants on head retarded to throw all of your technology and history away, thereby leaving the potential open for the whole "Not learning from histories mistakes" part.

    JESUS CHRIST DON'T START THIS UP AGAIN.

    Professor Phobos on
  • AsiriyaAsiriya Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    I'm going to agree with Pants (we don't agree much regarding BSG, normally) in that discussion of the finale at this point is really just an exercise in annoyance.

    Instead, I'm looking forward to fresh annoyance: The BSG movie directed by Bryan Singer. (spoilered for length)
    Now, I recognize and understand that a lot of the bitching being done about this film is hilarious when you go back to around 2002 and read some articles/comments regarding Moore's remake before anyone had seen a frame of footage. The Aint it Cool archives in particular are pretty funny. The editorials on behalf of quality genre entertainment IN FAVOR of Larson's original vision. The impassioned defenses of Daggits and Lloyd Bridges as Commander Cain. Spittle, red-faced rage, claw-marks in the keyboard type of stuff. It's a glorious example of nostalgia unexamined being given voice, a vein of internet comedy rich with irony. I wonder how much irony is running through our veins right now online, as the lovers of Moore/Eick's version now sound a LOT like the people who thought Larson/Bellisario/Hatch were the only ones with the rights to touch anything Battlestar related.

    Granted, it's easier to take such a hardline position when the show you're defending is NOT a cheezy piece of pandering bullshit, but is, in fact, one of the most well-recieved pieces of televised Sci-Fi ever, and definitely one of the most influential filmic works of the last 10 years in terms of style. The protestations seem so much more righteous when you're defending something worth a shit, even if the people who love(d) the show are split on it's last 10 hours and it's (un)success, depending. I personally count myself amongst those who would call the film the finest Sci-Fi show ever made, and the finale as a piece of tonal perfection.

    So, taking that into account, I've done my fair share of tantrum throwing and public ranting, wild-eyed and foamy mouthed. I'm in the calm down period, where the rationality seeps in around the edges as I take deep breaths, and the realization is this: I'm going to watch the fucking thing in 2011. I could posture and bullshit about principle, but the fact of the matter is, regardless of how good the show was, it was just a TV show. Principle is wasted on such things as popular entertainment. What kind of an asshole doesn't see a movie out of principle? Don't get me wrong, I understand not seeing a film because you think it looks shitty, the ads are awful, the director is crappy, the actors piss you off. Those are valid reasons based on the quality of a finished product you've been exposed to in some form, more than likely marketing. But to say "I won't see Battlestar Galactica on principle, out of deference to Moore?" I can see not visiting an eatery because it's owners mistreat their workers. I can see not visiting a nightclub because it's ownership has been shown to be mildly racist. I can see not purchasing a certain brand of personal cleanser because of animal testing. But such stands of moral fortitude are fucking stupid when it comes to TV and movies. You can't talk about principle if you don't couple it with perspective, otherwise you're just being a grandstanding prick. Just like the people who STILL haven't watched Moore/Eick's BSG because they disagreed with their ideas on principle. Their massive loss. If only for the fact they missed out on Bear's score, one of the finest pieces of film music since John Williams set pen to paper in the late 70's.

    I don't want to be that kind of asshole. And Bryan Singer is a pretty good director. Combine that with my sense of curiosity, and unless the ads look mindless and the early critical reception is pure poison on a Uwe Boll level, I'm pretty certain I'm going to see this thing. I hear word of Singer taking meetings with Justin Timberlake, and I know there's a chance he's going to be Starbuck in this revamping of the core concept, and I grind my teeth. I like Timberlake, and I think he's got a good film career in him. Maybe as Apollo, I can see it. But not as Starbuck. Even so, even with the knowledge that all we're getting is an Adama wholly different than Greene or Olmos, and a Starbuck that isn't Katee Sackhoff OR Dirk Benedict, and a director whose last shot at a beloved property was a self-indulgent, bloated, reverential mess? I'm gonna see it. I know I'm gonna see it. I'm not gonna start cheerleading for the thing, don't get me wrong. But this movie isn't going to replace that complete series box set at any time. It won't even replace the 78 series. It will be its own thing, and it'll be interesting to look at, even if it's only interesting in the same way a lot of BSG fans are discovering that 78 series on Hulu with chortles, guffaws and winces. People still sought it out, and gave it a shot. The show came up short, but they still at least gave it a shot.

    I'll give this a shot. A fair one. If it fails, it fails, and so what, I didn't fuckin make it, it's not my baby, it's just another shitty movie I saw in a theater one day. I'm still VERY skeptical. The speed that this thing is coming together with tells me that Universal doesn't give a shit about the quality, only about the potential for having their own homegrown "Star Trek" revival. It's misguided thinking at best, not looking at why Star Trek was dead, why that revival worked, not devoting an ounce of thought beyond "They got one of those at Paramount, do we have one here at Universal?" The whole thing just feels crassly blatant in its cash-grab, fuck-the-quality feel. Almost like when ABC threw money at Larson because they saw Lucas shoving millions by the fistful into his still nascent neck-pouch-goiter-thing. And we ended up with a pretty looking, empty, stupid, pandering shitpile of sci-fi entertainment.

    My hope? They rescind the statement that they're not going to play in Moore's sandbox, and they tell a story set on the Battlestar Galactica, during the First Cylon War in Moore's timeline. No Adama commanding, no Apollo, no Starbuck, no journey across the stars, no quest to find earth, no apocalypse. Just a straight up War Movie set in space featuring a bunch of young bucks on the decks of a badass spaceship shooting holy fuck out of robots? I might start getting out pom-pom's for that. It's distanced from both shows, and presents enough of a blank slate. It's reimagination on the level Universal seems to want, without having to explore the now exhausted concept of apocalyptic footrace across the cosmos yet again. Hell, have the Galactica fight another colony's Battlestar, pre-Cylon War. From when the Cylons did all the Colonials dirty work. There are options here.

    Those options won't be explored, because Larson is almost devoid of skill as a storyteller, and Singer isn't great at coming up with a story, either (Superman Returns, his initial BSG pitch about 6 years ago) and we'll end up with Timber-buck getting his pew-pew on as another revamping of Stu Phillips' classic theme rumbles in the background. And I'll be in the theater watching it. Either being disappointed and rolling my eyes at this waste of money and time. Or being pleased at how something called Battlestar Galactica ended up being a decent movie in spite of its goofy name. Just like in 2003. Until then, the rage I'm seeing and feeling is too impotent. There's nothing to it. At least, nothing yet.


    Bit of a waste to copy it all, thank god its spoilered. I'm going to disagree with you about the boycotting the film, I think if it looks crap then there's no reason to go watch it, and maybe, if everyone starts doing that, Hollywood will be forced to make something original, something good that isn't just a blatant money grab filled with people who can't act, or the same five actors that seem to do every large budget film ever.

    I'm going to agree with you on the point that there's a lot of material they could use from the First War, and I'd love it if they would make an excuse to just fill it with lots of action, not worrying so much about character development, in a hope it will make people feel left out and more likely to see Caprica to fill in the blanks. Brave, perhaps foolish, but interesting I think.

    Finally, what were people's opinions of Caprica? I loved the little robot doorman thing, but otherwise wasn't that thrilled by it. I don't think the explanation for how the virtual her was the same as the real one wa strong enough, and a few other things seemed silly. It's a while since I watched it but I was left with a sense that it was a bit rushed? AS a pilot I guess it had to sell itself, set up the story, it would have been nice to have the exposition to her father come later in the series though.

    Asiriya on
  • edited August 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • QinguQingu Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    The best aspects of BSG stemmed from the show's naturalism. The best episodes centered on entirely believable conflicts that would emerge from the situations the characters found themselves in. They also spoke to greater, more universal truths about human nature and political structures. (My favorites include the arc with Kane, season 3 intro, and the mutiny arc at the end, which I thought was probably some of the best TV ever filmed, evar.) It was this naturalism, this internal believability and realism, that led to all the tension and connections I felt towards the characters.

    Which is why the finale sucked so much!
    It contradicted the naturalism ethos of the entire show. The characters all acted in unbelievable, contrived ways. And metaphysically, it was a Deus Machina—an unnatural explanation for the mysteries that, apparently, the shows' writers were just making up as they went along.

    Qingu on
  • Professor PhobosProfessor Phobos Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    It was still immensely pants on head retarded to throw all of your technology and history away, thereby leaving the potential open for the whole "Not learning from histories mistakes" part.

    JESUS CHRIST DON'T START THIS UP AGAIN.

    Then don't bring it up and then try to go "BUT I AM TOTALLY NOT ARGUING EVEN BY STATING MY OPINION!!" then. Otherwise I am going to tell you that I think it's stupid and I don't care if you don't want to start anything by posting about it (wait, how does that work again?).

    Dude, I was disagreeing with the idea that it would be better to live in a post-apocalyptic nuclear wasteland than it would be to a pre-civilizational undeveloped landscape, not that it would be a good idea to do the second. I thought I was pretty fucking clear about that, get a grip.

    Jesus, fuck.

    Professor Phobos on
  • Fatboy RobertsFatboy Roberts Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Asiriya wrote: »
    I'm going to disagree with you about the boycotting the film, I think if it looks crap then there's no reason to go watch it, and maybe, if everyone starts doing that, Hollywood will be forced to make something original, something good that isn't just a blatant money grab filled with people who can't act, or the same five actors that seem to do every large budget film ever.

    That's not what I'm really arguing against, though, and I made sure to include that specific instance in the list of things I get, because the above is at least based on stuff like a trailer, a synopsis, a couple movie reviews. If it looks crap, that means there was at least something to look AT. talking about "boycotting" this BSG movie before anything even resembling a script has been written seems grandstandingly petulant and premature, and again, I say this after grandstanding and whining my balls off for 3 straight days last week.

    We don't know if it actually looks crap, yet. If it does, then I get it. But right now, the parallels between Moore/Eick fans and BSG fans in 2002 are really similar. I'm not saying the movie WON'T be shit. I'm just saying it's better to wait until we have evidence that Universal is fucking the dog before we start getting seriously up in arms.

    Fatboy Roberts on
  • OneEyedJackOneEyedJack Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    The finale was lazy, awful writing. It really doesn't matter what you think about the specifics of what happened.

    EVERYTHING WILL BE REVEALED!


    ...except at least half the questions the series has brought up!

    It really saddens me that it took such a shit after the mutiny arc (which was incredible.) I really wish I could recommend this show to people, but knowing how it ends I just can't do it. It would be a cruel thing to do.

    OneEyedJack on
    1089605-1.png?1281667433
  • OneEyedJackOneEyedJack Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Qingu wrote: »
    The best aspects of BSG stemmed from the show's naturalism. The best episodes centered on entirely believable conflicts that would emerge from the situations the characters found themselves in. They also spoke to greater, more universal truths about human nature and political structures. (My favorites include the arc with Kane, season 3 intro, and the mutiny arc at the end, which I thought was probably some of the best TV ever filmed, evar.) It was this naturalism, this internal believability and realism, that led to all the tension and connections I felt towards the characters.

    Which is why the finale sucked so much!
    It contradicted the naturalism ethos of the entire show. The characters all acted in unbelievable, contrived ways. And metaphysically, it was a Deus Machina—an unnatural explanation for the mysteries that, apparently, the shows' writers were just making up as they went along.

    When you step away from it, the Deus Ex Machina was so literal and hilarious that I cannot believe anyone could take anything away other than "that was the worst bed shitting I have ever seen in my life."

    OneEyedJack on
    1089605-1.png?1281667433
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    How many different pleas for non-discussion re: the finale must be asked for before people realize that it goes for them, too?

    Atomika on
  • Bionic MonkeyBionic Monkey Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2009
    Okay, that's it. I'm done. You fuckers can't go five minutes without shitting over the finale. Have fun.

    Bionic Monkey on
    sig_megas_armed.jpg
  • ThisThis Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    We don't know if it actually looks crap, yet. If it does, then I get it. But right now, the parallels between Moore/Eick fans and BSG fans in 2002 are really similar. I'm not saying the movie WON'T be shit. I'm just saying it's better to wait until we have evidence that Universal is fucking the dog before we start getting seriously up in arms.

    I don't think a wait-and-see attitude is an appropriate stance. A new remake is completely bereft of artistic merit because the concept was just done. PERFECTLY.

    Also, we are not completely without information. We know that Bryan Singer is doing it. This is the guy who made X-Men and fucking Superman Returns, itself a masturbatory shitty remake of a shitty 80s movie. Yeah he also did Usual Suspects, but what has he done since then? X-Men 2 was okay but otherwise, the answer is junk.

    It may be kind of amusing in a "hey that's kind of amusing" sort of way that fan backlash to this new movie is reminiscent of fan backlash to the 2003 BSG reimagining. But the difference is the 2003 BSG show is not uncommmonly considered to be one of the best television shows ever made. Whereas the 70s BSG show is not uncommonly considered to be one of the silliest shows ever made. So I don't think it's terribly important to try and avoid somehow being hypocritical when the circumstances are not comparable to any reasonable degree.

    This on
  • edited August 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    This wrote: »
    We don't know if it actually looks crap, yet. If it does, then I get it. But right now, the parallels between Moore/Eick fans and BSG fans in 2002 are really similar. I'm not saying the movie WON'T be shit. I'm just saying it's better to wait until we have evidence that Universal is fucking the dog before we start getting seriously up in arms.

    I don't think a wait-and-see attitude is an appropriate stance. A new remake is completely bereft of artistic merit because the concept was just done. PERFECTLY.

    Also, we are not completely without information. We know that Bryan Singer is doing it. This is the guy who made X-Men and fucking Superman Returns, itself a masturbatory shitty remake of a shitty 80s movie. Yeah he also did Usual Suspects, but what has he done since then? X-Men 2 was okay but otherwise, the answer is junk.

    It may be kind of amusing in a "hey that's kind of amusing" sort of way that fan backlash to this new movie is reminiscent of fan backlash to the 2003 BSG reimagining. But the difference is the 2003 BSG show is not uncommmonly considered to be one of the best television shows ever made. Whereas the 70s BSG show is not uncommonly considered to be one of the silliest shows ever made. So I don't think it's terribly important to try and avoid somehow being hypocritical when the circumstances are not comparable to any reasonable degree.

    You're echoing my thoughts exactly.

    While any judgment is premature and unfair without viewing of the final product, I think we already have enough circumstantial evidence on hand to justify a cautious cynicism. A la,:

    - Deal brokered by Glen Larson, the hack behind original BSG.
    - Bryan Singer brought on board, a director who is as clueless as he is intermittently brilliant.
    - Once-remade series still ongoing, critically beloved.
    - Deal fast-tracked by studio without any script or story.


    Outside the better-than-average result of The Usual Suspects, I literally have nothing to assuage my doubts on this.

    Atomika on
  • edited August 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • Kipling217Kipling217 Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Its not like they can stick to canon, what with the ending of the show. (wich I will not disscuss here)

    They can't even make a prequel because hey Caprica.

    Singer strikes me as a guy thats at the mercy of his actors. If He got good ones(usual suspects) he is golden. Got bad ones (Superman Returns) he is boring. I can't think of anything visual in cojunction to those movies, nothing that stands out and says "there is a director on this thing"

    Kipling217 on
    The sky was full of stars, every star an exploding ship. One of ours.
  • OneEyedJackOneEyedJack Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    How many different pleas for non-discussion re: the finale must be asked for before people realize that it goes for them, too?

    When a finale completely invalidates what came before it in a show, there is no way to divorce the two. People want to talk about it, and its ludicrous to think that they wont just because you don't want to.

    OneEyedJack on
    1089605-1.png?1281667433
Sign In or Register to comment.