This will do nothing to protect women, or even victims. In fact, it will protect sexual predators as it will make it more unlikely that a victim will come forward.
Goddamn this is movie villain level of evil.
I would imagine this is unconstitutional
Is it unconstitutional with Scalia on the court?
fuck gendered marketing
0
Options
21stCenturyCall me Pixel, or Pix for short![They/Them]Registered Userregular
So I gave my classes this fun little survey thing as a kind of getting to know you thing for the beginning of the semester. One of the questions asks them what their favorite dinosaur is and this kid put, "Rammus, he's awesome" so I was like "Ok, first of all, Rammus is a girl, second of all, she's an armadillo, not a dinosaur, get your facts straight kid."
Then he asked me what my LOL name was and I was like yeaah i don't think I can tell you that sorry.
Rammus is a girl?
what...
Yeah, where is that written? Did Rammus get a revised lore entry like MF, Soraka, w/e
What..Rammus isn't? I just checked the lore and refers to him as a 'he'. But I SWEAR I remember rammus being refered to as a girl before.
This will do nothing to protect women, or even victims. In fact, it will protect sexual predators as it will make it more unlikely that a victim will come forward.
Goddamn this is movie villain level of evil.
Your mistake is thinking Republicans care about things like women, victims, or not being evil.
But how can anyone support this at all? Like, people voted for this person. How can so many people support such a thing?
because, contrary to what some chatters will blabber on about at length, there are a huge number of deeply shitty people in the country. And republican voters comprise a hell of a lot of them. People are very often not nice-at-heart and doing what you think is right does not make you not-an-asshole.
So I gave my classes this fun little survey thing as a kind of getting to know you thing for the beginning of the semester. One of the questions asks them what their favorite dinosaur is and this kid put, "Rammus, he's awesome" so I was like "Ok, first of all, Rammus is a girl, second of all, she's an armadillo, not a dinosaur, get your facts straight kid."
Then he asked me what my LOL name was and I was like yeaah i don't think I can tell you that sorry.
Rammus is a girl?
what...
Yeah, where is that written? Did Rammus get a revised lore entry like MF, Soraka, w/e
What..Rammus isn't? I just checked the lore and refers to him as a 'he'. But I SWEAR I remember rammus being refered to as a girl before.
well
samus is a girl!
Whelp, now I gotta write find samus/rammus fanfics.
0
Options
JacobkoshGamble a stamp.I can show you how to be a real man!Moderatormod
my modern history class is basically me and my professor talking for an hour while everyone watches. i am trying not to be 'that guy' but absolutely no one else is raising their hand, and this dude grades participation, so...
I've had classes like that, chu. And, you know, it just sucks to be them, I guess.
This will do nothing to protect women, or even victims. In fact, it will protect sexual predators as it will make it more unlikely that a victim will come forward.
Goddamn this is movie villain level of evil.
Your mistake is thinking Republicans care about things like women, victims, or not being evil.
But how can anyone support this at all? Like, people voted for this person. How can so many people support such a thing?
It's not clear that anyone supports this idea except the woman who proposed it.
0
Options
TavIrish Minister for DefenceRegistered Userregular
Matt Bellamy's dad's band are way cooler than Muse.
This will do nothing to protect women, or even victims. In fact, it will protect sexual predators as it will make it more unlikely that a victim will come forward.
Goddamn this is movie villain level of evil.
Your mistake is thinking Republicans care about things like women, victims, or not being evil.
But how can anyone support this at all? Like, people voted for this person. How can so many people support such a thing?
my modern history class is basically me and my professor talking for an hour while everyone watches. i am trying not to be 'that guy' but absolutely no one else is raising their hand, and this dude grades participation, so...
I've had classes like that, chu. And, you know, it just sucks to be them, I guess.
I've definitely had classes like that. It's disappointing, but I never felt bad about being "that guy" since, in this case, "that guy" is the only guy doing anything. The teacher almost certainly teaches better through discussion (and I'm not saying that's the only way to teach, just that some people are better at teaching that way) and having at least one person to bounce off of is helping the entire class.
+1
Options
VanguardBut now the dream is over. And the insect is awake.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
This will do nothing to protect women, or even victims. In fact, it will protect sexual predators as it will make it more unlikely that a victim will come forward.
Goddamn this is movie villain level of evil.
Your mistake is thinking Republicans care about things like women, victims, or not being evil.
But how can anyone support this at all? Like, people voted for this person. How can so many people support such a thing?
also there are people who still hold on to beliefs about sexuality and family and marriage in the way that people hold on to notions about national identity and ethnicity, i.e., not in a way that can actually be bargained with
0
Options
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
This will do nothing to protect women, or even victims. In fact, it will protect sexual predators as it will make it more unlikely that a victim will come forward.
Goddamn this is movie villain level of evil.
Your mistake is thinking Republicans care about things like women, victims, or not being evil.
But how can anyone support this at all? Like, people voted for this person. How can so many people support such a thing?
Because people are assholes.
and it's not the assholes that know they're assholes you have to worry about for the most part.
my modern history class is basically me and my professor talking for an hour while everyone watches. i am trying not to be 'that guy' but absolutely no one else is raising their hand, and this dude grades participation, so...
I've had classes like that, chu. And, you know, it just sucks to be them, I guess.
I've definitely had classes like that. It's disappointing, but I never felt bad about being "that guy" since, in this case, "that guy" is the only guy doing anything. The teacher almost certainly teaches better through discussion (and I'm not saying that's the only way to teach, just that some people are better at teaching that way) and having at least one person to bounce off of is helping the entire class.
I've been that guy and I've been the guy watching that guy when I'm just not interested in the class and it's fine either way. I think the only time it gets legitimately annoying is when that guy has a pet issue, he disagrees with the professor and everyone else, and he never wants to shut the fuck up about it ever and keeps trying to drag every conversation back to it.
This will do nothing to protect women, or even victims. In fact, it will protect sexual predators as it will make it more unlikely that a victim will come forward.
Goddamn this is movie villain level of evil.
Your mistake is thinking Republicans care about things like women, victims, or not being evil.
But how can anyone support this at all? Like, people voted for this person. How can so many people support such a thing?
Because she didn't throw shit out like this when she was running. She just used words like family values and pro-life! But in the end its because the most effort people put into their voting decision making for congress is "Have I heard their name before" and "Do they have an R or D next tho their name" and sometimes "What does their picture look like"
0
Options
21stCenturyCall me Pixel, or Pix for short![They/Them]Registered Userregular
also there are people who still hold on to beliefs about sexuality and family and marriage in the way that people hold on to notions about national identity and ethnicity, i.e., not in a way that can actually be bargained with
I think all of the guilds are well-balanced for limited. I'm playing Simic in the main sealed event, and then gf and I are going to do 2HG as a Gruul/Orzhov team.
I don't think Extort is broken - but I do think it's good. I think what will keep it in check is that you're generally getting it online at turn 3, maybe turn 4 (the only extort 1-drop is an uncommon) and using it sets you behind one turn on your curve. If Simic and Gruul can keep on top of their curves, they can push a lot of damage very efficiently.
Honestly, I think the best Orzhov card for limited is actually Smite. The instinct of most players against Orzhov is going to be to attack aggressively, and Smite punishes that. However, keeping mana open for Smite makes it even harder to keep on a curve and pay for Extort.
I could definitely see BRW being a thing. I think there's a draftable RW defense/burn archetype with stuff like Cinder Elemental and Boros Charm, and that dovetails nicely with Extort. If the BRW player has a Five-Alarm Fire or Boros Reckoner, attacking into him becomes very dangerous.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
0
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
also there are people who still hold on to beliefs about sexuality and family and marriage in the way that people hold on to notions about national identity and ethnicity, i.e., not in a way that can actually be bargained with
You've lost me
I think he means tribalism, basically.
And the idea you can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason into.
Posts
Is it unconstitutional with Scalia on the court?
Whelp, now I gotta write samus/rammus fanfics.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
three students will be randomly selected to draw one of three signaling pathways on the board
i feel he will pick on the grad students, especally me, since I work with insulin signaling
luckily i have that pathway mostly memorized
because, contrary to what some chatters will blabber on about at length, there are a huge number of deeply shitty people in the country. And republican voters comprise a hell of a lot of them. People are very often not nice-at-heart and doing what you think is right does not make you not-an-asshole.
I've had classes like that, chu. And, you know, it just sucks to be them, I guess.
Reminded me a bit of how Lily's mind progresses (in general) in HIMYM.
It's not clear that anyone supports this idea except the woman who proposed it.
Goddamn do I hate the just world fallacy.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
Because people are assholes.
I've definitely had classes like that. It's disappointing, but I never felt bad about being "that guy" since, in this case, "that guy" is the only guy doing anything. The teacher almost certainly teaches better through discussion (and I'm not saying that's the only way to teach, just that some people are better at teaching that way) and having at least one person to bounce off of is helping the entire class.
people who use karma in that context deserve to have several vertebrae removed from their spinal column and given to dogs as chew toys
Asshole is too kind for them.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
and it's not the assholes that know they're assholes you have to worry about for the most part.
The first 4 are 1170
Which one of you furrin bastards is calling me at work
I only threw that word in because English is rather ambiguous about "just" and it isn't obvious that "just world" is a term of art...
too late ronya
i am redistributing your wealth
of vertebrae
The answer is yes.
Can you find it? Completely different question.
wasn't me. you specifically told me no yiffing before 5pm
I've been that guy and I've been the guy watching that guy when I'm just not interested in the class and it's fine either way. I think the only time it gets legitimately annoying is when that guy has a pet issue, he disagrees with the professor and everyone else, and he never wants to shut the fuck up about it ever and keeps trying to drag every conversation back to it.
On the black screen
like we think he's talking about bugs, but to him, people are bugs
unreasonably angry.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
y/n
No, it's reasonable.
There's not a point where it's unreasonable to be angry about it.
festively pink:
I believe there already is a similar product on the market, targeted towards anime-watchers called "Tentacle Grape".
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
Yeah, it pisses me off as well. A broad spectrum from both political parties can expected to be p angry at the idea.
how do you like it
Oh, so I don't need to feel bad about kicking that baby?
Good... I was startin to feel guilty bout that.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
Because she didn't throw shit out like this when she was running. She just used words like family values and pro-life! But in the end its because the most effort people put into their voting decision making for congress is "Have I heard their name before" and "Do they have an R or D next tho their name" and sometimes "What does their picture look like"
That hurt, Lud.
That hurt.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
You've lost me
@wazilla
I think all of the guilds are well-balanced for limited. I'm playing Simic in the main sealed event, and then gf and I are going to do 2HG as a Gruul/Orzhov team.
I don't think Extort is broken - but I do think it's good. I think what will keep it in check is that you're generally getting it online at turn 3, maybe turn 4 (the only extort 1-drop is an uncommon) and using it sets you behind one turn on your curve. If Simic and Gruul can keep on top of their curves, they can push a lot of damage very efficiently.
Honestly, I think the best Orzhov card for limited is actually Smite. The instinct of most players against Orzhov is going to be to attack aggressively, and Smite punishes that. However, keeping mana open for Smite makes it even harder to keep on a curve and pay for Extort.
I could definitely see BRW being a thing. I think there's a draftable RW defense/burn archetype with stuff like Cinder Elemental and Boros Charm, and that dovetails nicely with Extort. If the BRW player has a Five-Alarm Fire or Boros Reckoner, attacking into him becomes very dangerous.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
I think he means tribalism, basically.
And the idea you can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason into.