I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
Stealing? SHE'S NOT PROPERTY YOU PATRIARCHAL SWINE
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
Stealing? SHE'S NOT PROPERTY YOU PATRIARCHAL SWINE
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
Stealing? SHE'S NOT PROPERTY YOU PATRIARCHAL SWINE
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
It feels like this is going to get into semantics but I think that stealing somebody's SO without considering them is more of a reckless disregard thing than malice.
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
One relationship ends and another begins.
or alternatively someone has sex with someone else and a third person never finds out about it.
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
It feels like this is going to get into semantics but I think that stealing somebody's SO without considering them is more of a reckless disregard thing than malice.
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
One relationship ends and another begins.
or alternatively someone has sex with someone else and a third person never finds out about it.
"and the morning stars I have seen
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
+3
Options
knitdanIn ur baseKillin ur guysRegistered Userregular
All Jim did, to start with
was fall in love with a girl he worked with. When the prospect of her actually maybe possibly getting married came along (rather than the perpetual limbo of engagement without a firm date), he decided to let her know how he felt.
And then she rejected him, and he took a job elsewhere and started dating someone else.
“I was quick when I came in here, I’m twice as quick now”
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
One relationship ends and another begins.
or alternatively someone has sex with someone else and a third person never finds out about it.
What is malicious in either instance?
dude are you fucking for real?
Is that weird? It seems kind of morally clear cut.
y2jake215certified Flat Birther theoristthe Last Good Boy onlineRegistered Userregular
Like, an ex was dating around (not seriously I don't think? I never found out and I never really cared) and I started talking to her again and made my interest clear
And she cut it off with them and we tried again and it didn't work out
But I don't think what I did was wrong and I'd do it again
Actually I probably wouldn't but that's for different reasons
maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
T pain was basically a martyr for intentional, obvious autotuning for effect. He knew it sounded good and bumped but pop audiences assumed he was doing it solely because he couldn't sing and didn't have taste.
And three years later or so F.U.N. Literally uses autotune as a guitar solo on Some Nights and people love it.
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
One relationship ends and another begins.
or alternatively someone has sex with someone else and a third person never finds out about it.
T pain was basically a martyr for intentional, obvious autotuning for effect. He knew it sounded good and bumped but pop audiences assumed he was doing it solely because he couldn't sing and didn't have taste.
And three years later or so F.U.N. Literally uses autotune as a guitar solo on Some Nights and people love it.
i mean.
i think he was just tuning the auto tune to the max for funsies and it worked.
songs have been autotuned foreeeeeveeeerr
+2
Options
Element BrianPeanut Butter ShillRegistered Userregular
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
One relationship ends and another begins.
or alternatively someone has sex with someone else and a third person never finds out about it.
What is malicious in either instance?
1. If that true this wouldn't be "stealing," she;'d have broken up before hooking up with another person. That's why it's cheating.
2. If it was a nice thing to do, why did it have to covered up in the first place? Relationships can get broken from this, which is why you want to keep it a secret. Right?
Because she's not your girlfriend (and/or boyfriend) when you're doing it.
If this was on the up-and-up why would she be keeping this from her boyfriend?
T pain was basically a martyr for intentional, obvious autotuning for effect. He knew it sounded good and bumped but pop audiences assumed he was doing it solely because he couldn't sing and didn't have taste.
And three years later or so F.U.N. Literally uses autotune as a guitar solo on Some Nights and people love it.
i mean.
i think he was just tuning the auto tune to the max for funsies and it worked.
songs have been autotuned foreeeeeveeeerr
True, but "I recognized this stupid setting that makes my singing sound funny bangs" is still an accomplishment, and he absolutely wasn't a shit singer overcompensating as people at the time believed all autotune was for.
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
One relationship ends and another begins.
or alternatively someone has sex with someone else and a third person never finds out about it.
What is malicious in either instance?
1. If that true this wouldn't be "stealing," she;'d have broken up before hooking up with another person. That's why it's cheating.
2. If it was a nice thing to do, why did it have to covered up in the first place? Relationships can get broken from this, which is why you want to keep it a secret. Right?
Because she's not your girlfriend (and/or boyfriend) when you're doing it.
If this was on the up-and-up why would she be keeping this from her boyfriend?
1. The fuck are you stealing? You don't have to break up with someone to spend time with someone else.
2. It's not a nice thing or a bad thing. Why does it have to be either?
It could happen independent of the knowledge of the person who has been cheated on and nothing would change.
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
One relationship ends and another begins.
or alternatively someone has sex with someone else and a third person never finds out about it.
What is malicious in either instance?
dude are you fucking for real?
Is that weird? It seems kind of morally clear cut.
I must disagree with your construction of dickishness: I think that malicious intent is not required to be a dick; only, as milski said, a reckless or callous disregard for another person's considerations. I also wouldn't agree with the alternative explanation that there must be a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued as a requirement, because that would require that the morality of an action is determined only by its outcome, which discounts intent, social expectations, and so on entirely, and we're left entirely without common measurements of propriety because I believe that in social interactions the journey is just as important as the outcome, otherwise why do we regard emotions with such importance?
As to your second post, I would say that keeping someone in the dark to something that they may have the right to know for a bevy of reasons is in itself dickish and we don't even have to reach the analysis of whether the covered-up action was dickish
Eddy on
"and the morning stars I have seen
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
oh my god the music in the background of the t-pain stream oh my god ;-;
Is it...
Is it t-pain
no. the heroic music from Overwatch started playing in the background as he was telling everyone to go live there dreams and not worry about what anyone else thinks as long as they have fun and embrace themselves for who they are.
Guest wants help calling Europe but I cant help him cause he speaks almost no English and its like man Im so sorry but I don't even know what the problem is cause I cant understand you and viceversa.
I would concede and call it 'intrinsically' dickish in a monogamous culture, despite my reluctance to consider any attribute intrinsic, because the pursuit perhaps necessarily clashes with the established culture in conjunction with deceitful, usurpous, and covetous undertones, but there are narrowly constructed justifications and excuses, arguably
erm, that is to say, as it were, like,
I disagree. For it to be intrinsically dickish it requires a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued or at the very least malicious intent.
I would say there'd need to be enormous caveats for me to be convinced someone stealing another's girlfriend isn't malicious.
One relationship ends and another begins.
or alternatively someone has sex with someone else and a third person never finds out about it.
What is malicious in either instance?
1. If that true this wouldn't be "stealing," she;'d have broken up before hooking up with another person. That's why it's cheating.
2. If it was a nice thing to do, why did it have to covered up in the first place? Relationships can get broken from this, which is why you want to keep it a secret. Right?
Because she's not your girlfriend (and/or boyfriend) when you're doing it.
If this was on the up-and-up why would she be keeping this from her boyfriend?
There are several reasons why that last sentence seems flawed to me, notably that it rings of "if you have nothing to hide..." and implies relationships must be free of any hidden information.
Not really taking a stance on the rest, just that I don't really think it's defensible to argue for a blanket distrust of any actions taken without an SOs knowledge.
Posts
my fallout waifu is a bloodborne now
perfect
http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/279600210851409840/AEFFA6B71DB83F6D4712F0DC00241ACA2D475271/
teammate pops lucio's ult he yells "THIS SHIT IS THE REMIX RIGHT HERE!"
Yeah. I set myself up for that, didn't I?
It feels like this is going to get into semantics but I think that stealing somebody's SO without considering them is more of a reckless disregard thing than malice.
One relationship ends and another begins.
or alternatively someone has sex with someone else and a third person never finds out about it.
What is malicious in either instance?
That works too.
dude are you fucking for real?
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
And then she rejected him, and he took a job elsewhere and started dating someone else.
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
dang t-pain
that pain is real
maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
Is that weird? It seems kind of morally clear cut.
In a different world he would've met the queen
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
PC
And she cut it off with them and we tried again and it didn't work out
But I don't think what I did was wrong and I'd do it again
Actually I probably wouldn't but that's for different reasons
maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
0:32 - 0:36
And three years later or so F.U.N. Literally uses autotune as a guitar solo on Some Nights and people love it.
I mean, the likely alternative is
i mean.
i think he was just tuning the auto tune to the max for funsies and it worked.
songs have been autotuned foreeeeeveeeerr
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
1. If that true this wouldn't be "stealing," she;'d have broken up before hooking up with another person. That's why it's cheating.
2. If it was a nice thing to do, why did it have to covered up in the first place? Relationships can get broken from this, which is why you want to keep it a secret. Right?
Because she's not your girlfriend (and/or boyfriend) when you're doing it.
If this was on the up-and-up why would she be keeping this from her boyfriend?
True, but "I recognized this stupid setting that makes my singing sound funny bangs" is still an accomplishment, and he absolutely wasn't a shit singer overcompensating as people at the time believed all autotune was for.
1. The fuck are you stealing? You don't have to break up with someone to spend time with someone else.
2. It's not a nice thing or a bad thing. Why does it have to be either?
It could happen independent of the knowledge of the person who has been cheated on and nothing would change.
I must disagree with your construction of dickishness: I think that malicious intent is not required to be a dick; only, as milski said, a reckless or callous disregard for another person's considerations. I also wouldn't agree with the alternative explanation that there must be a necessarily detrimental outcome for the pursued as a requirement, because that would require that the morality of an action is determined only by its outcome, which discounts intent, social expectations, and so on entirely, and we're left entirely without common measurements of propriety because I believe that in social interactions the journey is just as important as the outcome, otherwise why do we regard emotions with such importance?
As to your second post, I would say that keeping someone in the dark to something that they may have the right to know for a bevy of reasons is in itself dickish and we don't even have to reach the analysis of whether the covered-up action was dickish
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
I nee cho buddy
Lung you gut me dun knee no buddy
Is it...
Is it t-pain
maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
is it... is it T-Pain's own music
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
The masturbatory glee of being first by a pubic hair
maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
no. the heroic music from Overwatch started playing in the background as he was telling everyone to go live there dreams and not worry about what anyone else thinks as long as they have fun and embrace themselves for who they are.
it got all triumphant and american flag.
There are several reasons why that last sentence seems flawed to me, notably that it rings of "if you have nothing to hide..." and implies relationships must be free of any hidden information.
Not really taking a stance on the rest, just that I don't really think it's defensible to argue for a blanket distrust of any actions taken without an SOs knowledge.