FFIII was the only GBA/DS era remake I never finished. The game felt weirdly punishing/bullshit; it somehow put enough rails on player brokenness and the plot to "fix" being too powerful, but still made hard encounters with limited save access.
Oops i got confused by numbering! I didn't realize they remade the ones never released for SNES! Can you get them for emulators / SNES Classic?
Yeah sorry it's the OG FFIII not FFVI.
It also had kind of ugly chibi 3d artwork unlike most of the remakes using the original spritework.
I ate an engineer
+1
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
I'm strongly against ever generalizing #NotAllMen beyond men and sexual assault. Generally it's not okay to say a group of humans are trash because a subset did something bad. NotAllMen is a special case not a default principle!
i'm specifically saying not all gun owners are trash but it's a responsibility too many are not able to handle and not worth the cost
Allegedly a voice of reason.
+2
Options
amateurhourOne day I'll be professionalhourThe woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered Userregular
i used to be pretty okay with responsible gun ownership and stuff but gun people have so eroded any credibility i might have once been willing to extend
ban them all, confiscate them all and melt them down
it's well past time the worst elements have ruined it for everybody
yeah gun dudes have basically made my decision for me at this point
literally no concept of responsibility, stewardship, or even basic safety. it's all about posing in your cement block flag basement like you just did an ISIS
and it is a legitimate #NotAllDudes type of thing but i just am beyond my ability to say we're responsible enough to allow that distinction
just get rid of them
I used to argue it but realistically there is an easy way to "take all the guns"
I mean it's 2017 data but back then there were about 270 million reported guns in the US, and 135 million of them were owned by three percent of the US population (again, legally, but I imagine if you back it out to five percent, you'd get another 50 million.
2/3 of the countries firearms supply could be melted just by stepping on the rights of 5% of the US population.
That 5% could not hold an insurrection, their numbers are too low.
It could very, very easily be done with National Guard backing.
are YOU on the beer list?
+3
Options
amateurhourOne day I'll be professionalhourThe woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered Userregular
Bows are cool. But obviously I can only sanction their use for hunting, target shooting or killing the Sheriff's men if they make the mistake of entering Sherwood Forest.
I accept your terms.
are YOU on the beer list?
0
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
i used to be pretty okay with responsible gun ownership and stuff but gun people have so eroded any credibility i might have once been willing to extend
ban them all, confiscate them all and melt them down
it's well past time the worst elements have ruined it for everybody
yeah gun dudes have basically made my decision for me at this point
literally no concept of responsibility, stewardship, or even basic safety. it's all about posing in your cement block flag basement like you just did an ISIS
and it is a legitimate #NotAllDudes type of thing but i just am beyond my ability to say we're responsible enough to allow that distinction
just get rid of them
I used to argue it but realistically there is an easy way to "take all the guns"
I mean it's 2017 data but back then there were about 270 million reported guns in the US, and 135 million of them were owned by three percent of the US population (again, legally, but I imagine if you back it out to five percent, you'd get another 50 million.
2/3 of the countries firearms supply could be melted just by stepping on the rights of 5% of the US population.
That 5% could not hold an insurrection, their numbers are too low.
It could very, very easily be done with National Guard backing.
i dunno if very easily is necessarily the case. it would not be pretty
but it's a challenge that can be overcome as soon as we decide the cost is outweighed by the benefit
I bet the "guns are cool, pewpewpew" crowd and the toxic masculinity crowd overlap enough that there'd be fewer people wanting to have one tucked in their waistband or take photos of themselves holding one
[Muffled sounds of gorilla violence]
0
Options
amateurhourOne day I'll be professionalhourThe woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered Userregular
Frito
8AM meetings should get you sent to the Hague
are YOU on the beer list?
+6
Options
Powerpuppiesdrinking coffee in themountain cabinRegistered Userregular
I'm strongly against ever generalizing #NotAllMen beyond men and sexual assault. Generally it's not okay to say a group of humans are trash because a subset did something bad. NotAllMen is a special case not a default principle!
i'm specifically saying not all gun owners are trash but it's a responsibility too many are not able to handle and not worth the cost
Yes sorry i agree completely with you; it is a legitimate notAllGunOwners where they would be correct to call us on it, but also the last twenty years have moved my position from middle of the road to take all the guns because too many people want them for terrible reasons and make having the gun a big part of their identity and it's not healthy
I just left all of that context out of my first post because ????
+2
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
I'm strongly against ever generalizing #NotAllMen beyond men and sexual assault. Generally it's not okay to say a group of humans are trash because a subset did something bad. NotAllMen is a special case not a default principle!
i'm specifically saying not all gun owners are trash but it's a responsibility too many are not able to handle and not worth the cost
Yes sorry i agree completely with you; it is a legitimate notAllGunOwners where they would be correct to call us on it, but also the last twenty years have moved my position from middle of the road to take all the guns because too many people want them for terrible reasons and make having the gun a big part of their identity and it's not healthy
I just left all of that context out of my first post because ????
I'm strongly against ever generalizing #NotAllMen beyond men and sexual assault. Generally it's not okay to say a group of humans are trash because a subset did something bad. NotAllMen is a special case not a default principle!
i'm specifically saying not all gun owners are trash but it's a responsibility too many are not able to handle and not worth the cost
There's a difference between people who own guns and "gun people"
+1
Options
Powerpuppiesdrinking coffee in themountain cabinRegistered Userregular
I'm strongly against ever generalizing #NotAllMen beyond men and sexual assault. Generally it's not okay to say a group of humans are trash because a subset did something bad. NotAllMen is a special case not a default principle!
i'm specifically saying not all gun owners are trash but it's a responsibility too many are not able to handle and not worth the cost
Yes sorry i agree completely with you; it is a legitimate notAllGunOwners where they would be correct to call us on it, but also the last twenty years have moved my position from middle of the road to take all the guns because too many people want them for terrible reasons and make having the gun a big part of their identity and it's not healthy
I just left all of that context out of my first post because ????
okay we can still be friends i guess
You know, Chanus, if you weren't my friend, I just don't think I could bear it
+3
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
I'm strongly against ever generalizing #NotAllMen beyond men and sexual assault. Generally it's not okay to say a group of humans are trash because a subset did something bad. NotAllMen is a special case not a default principle!
i'm specifically saying not all gun owners are trash but it's a responsibility too many are not able to handle and not worth the cost
There's a difference between people who own guns and "gun people"
i mean that's what i'm saying
Allegedly a voice of reason.
+1
Options
amateurhourOne day I'll be professionalhourThe woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered Userregular
I'm strongly against ever generalizing #NotAllMen beyond men and sexual assault. Generally it's not okay to say a group of humans are trash because a subset did something bad. NotAllMen is a special case not a default principle!
i'm specifically saying not all gun owners are trash but it's a responsibility too many are not able to handle and not worth the cost
Yes sorry i agree completely with you; it is a legitimate notAllGunOwners where they would be correct to call us on it, but also the last twenty years have moved my position from middle of the road to take all the guns because too many people want them for terrible reasons and make having the gun a big part of their identity and it's not healthy
I just left all of that context out of my first post because ????
okay we can still be friends i guess
You know, Chanus, if you weren't my friend, I just don't think I could bear it
I'm strongly against ever generalizing #NotAllMen beyond men and sexual assault. Generally it's not okay to say a group of humans are trash because a subset did something bad. NotAllMen is a special case not a default principle!
#No,AllMen
+1
Options
amateurhourOne day I'll be professionalhourThe woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered Userregular
Frito
HAPPY BIRTHDAY BLACK INK BLOT!
are YOU on the beer list?
+2
Options
Powerpuppiesdrinking coffee in themountain cabinRegistered Userregular
I'm strongly against ever generalizing #NotAllMen beyond men and sexual assault. Generally it's not okay to say a group of humans are trash because a subset did something bad. NotAllMen is a special case not a default principle!
i'm specifically saying not all gun owners are trash but it's a responsibility too many are not able to handle and not worth the cost
Yes sorry i agree completely with you; it is a legitimate notAllGunOwners where they would be correct to call us on it, but also the last twenty years have moved my position from middle of the road to take all the guns because too many people want them for terrible reasons and make having the gun a big part of their identity and it's not healthy
I just left all of that context out of my first post because ????
okay we can still be friends i guess
You know, Chanus, if you weren't my friend, I just don't think I could bear it
Well I know what I'm watching this weekend.
Ringo what did that old priest mean, that a sick horse was gonna get us
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
Tortilla
broar have we checked the math on your daughter being six already because that can't be right
Allegedly a voice of reason.
+2
Options
JacobkoshGamble a stamp.I can show you how to be a real man!Moderatormod
Frito
people who have played the original Metal Gear Solid, are you able to KO guards in the beginning or do I need to just push past these early screens to gain that ability
0
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
people who have played the original Metal Gear Solid, are you able to KO guards in the beginning or do I need to just push past these early screens to gain that ability
it has been 20ish years since i played it but i don't remember having to work up to the ability to subdue them
Halberds? Lol more like tacticool spears. All you really need for home defense is a good trusty sarissa. You can defend your front door all the way back from your bedroom.
A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
Instead, she admitted to lying about her age (I don’t care but the lie is annoying) and then kept bringing up astrology in like…way more depth than I find interesting.
Instead, she admitted to lying about her age (I don’t care but the lie is annoying) and then kept bringing up astrology in like…way more depth than I find interesting.
There is a very thin line between like "tarot is cool as an aesthetic way to talk about shit without taking the predictions seriously" and "I actually believe in and base my life around magic".
I ate an engineer
+8
Options
TavIrish Minister for DefenceRegistered Userregular
Posts
Yeah sorry it's the OG FFIII not FFVI.
It also had kind of ugly chibi 3d artwork unlike most of the remakes using the original spritework.
i'm specifically saying not all gun owners are trash but it's a responsibility too many are not able to handle and not worth the cost
I used to argue it but realistically there is an easy way to "take all the guns"
I mean it's 2017 data but back then there were about 270 million reported guns in the US, and 135 million of them were owned by three percent of the US population (again, legally, but I imagine if you back it out to five percent, you'd get another 50 million.
2/3 of the countries firearms supply could be melted just by stepping on the rights of 5% of the US population.
That 5% could not hold an insurrection, their numbers are too low.
It could very, very easily be done with National Guard backing.
I accept your terms.
i dunno if very easily is necessarily the case. it would not be pretty
but it's a challenge that can be overcome as soon as we decide the cost is outweighed by the benefit
I bet the "guns are cool, pewpewpew" crowd and the toxic masculinity crowd overlap enough that there'd be fewer people wanting to have one tucked in their waistband or take photos of themselves holding one
Yes sorry i agree completely with you; it is a legitimate notAllGunOwners where they would be correct to call us on it, but also the last twenty years have moved my position from middle of the road to take all the guns because too many people want them for terrible reasons and make having the gun a big part of their identity and it's not healthy
I just left all of that context out of my first post because ????
okay we can still be friends i guess
There's a difference between people who own guns and "gun people"
You know, Chanus, if you weren't my friend, I just don't think I could bear it
i mean that's what i'm saying
Well I know what I'm watching this weekend.
From
Scratch
Once again the wife knocks out out of the park
Ringo what did that old priest mean, that a sick horse was gonna get us
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
i did not realize at first he had blacked out her name and thought i was seeing she had chosen to cut out a first piece that just encompassed her name
which is the story i am deciding to stick to
Ugh but halberd people...
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
All other weapons are banned, smokeless powder and blackpowder are banned as well because I am tired of fireworks.
Shields are also allowed.
it has been 20ish years since i played it but i don't remember having to work up to the ability to subdue them
and the cycle begins anew
it's a hoot
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
it was three nexuses in a trenchcoat
now how could that be a dud
Seriously that would have been awesome.
Instead, she admitted to lying about her age (I don’t care but the lie is annoying) and then kept bringing up astrology in like…way more depth than I find interesting.
There is a very thin line between like "tarot is cool as an aesthetic way to talk about shit without taking the predictions seriously" and "I actually believe in and base my life around magic".