As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

[Canadian Politics]: New Liberal Cabinet Sworn In

KetBraKetBra Dressed RidiculouslyRegistered User regular
edited November 2015 in Debate and/or Discourse
Welcome to the New and Improved Canadian Politics Thread! (This time with 100% more cowboys!)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLXQltR7vUQ

For the OP I thought I would clear up how exactly our system works, and how it is different from the American one.

The first thing you have to know, is that we only elect cowboys. Here are our current top three gunslingers:

Stephen "Steve" Harper

cNJNx1A.jpg

Current Prime Minister and Grand Sherriff of Canada, this cow-poke is the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada. He also really likes vests. And cats.

Tom "The Grizzly" Mulcair

Bd9jH9p.jpg

This fellow is the leader of the New Democratic Party, and leader of the Official Opposition. He's also in a bit of a bind, because he's pretty consistently polling in third place.

That is due to this rogue, Justin "the son of" Trudeau:

MxXgRbP.jpg

Expert pancake flipper, and Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. He claimed the leadership of the Liberal Party in the traditional way, by trial by combat.

There's also the BQ, and the Greens, but they technically don't have party status! Sorry Elizabeth May! You'll never get anywhere in politics without a cowboy hat!

1eeg3Jm.jpg

Also apparently Forces et Démocratie is a party with seats in the House. Who knew!

KGMvDLc.jpg?1
KetBra on
«134567102

Posts

  • Options
    KetBraKetBra Dressed Ridiculously Registered User regular
    BREAKING: New footage showing Elizabeth may both wearing a hat and flipping pancakes. Will she be a contender in the next election?

    cal070314lrha5-e1404528720190.jpg?w=300

    KGMvDLc.jpg?1
  • Options
    finnithfinnith ... TorontoRegistered User regular
    It seems like a bad time for the Green Party to have any level of influence.

    Bnet: CavilatRest#1874
    Steam: CavilatRest
  • Options
    CanadianWolverineCanadianWolverine Registered User regular
    edited January 2015
    Don't worry, they'll be a shoo in everywhere (as NDP) but Alberta just as soon as its (already) too late to fix anything with their environmental policies because the political will came along about a few decades too late, that is assuming the Cons haven't just done away with the farce of a Parliament and permanently seated themselves as the defacto power brokers for corporations so that they don't have to put up with nonsense like Opposition MPs questioning their ideological policies publicly and by publicly I mean reported on by the socialist CBC. :P
    This may or may not be a parody I saw on This Hour Has 22 Minutes.

    CanadianWolverine on
    steam_sig.png
  • Options
    Sir FabulousSir Fabulous Malevolent Squid God Registered User regular
    Am I the only person who has never heard of Forces et Démocratie before?

    pickup-sig.php?name=Orthanc

    Switch Friend Code: SW-1406-1275-7906
  • Options
    RichyRichy Registered User regular
    Am I the only person who has never heard of Forces et Démocratie before?
    I hadn't either, which is funny since it's (yet another) Québec party. You'd think it'd have made headlines news Infoman year-end recap that scroller at the bottom of the screen.

    Basically a former Bloc MP who had resigned over an argument with the new leader and a former NDP MP who was tired of being relevant got together and formed a new party. This party already equals the Green Party and the Bloc Québécois in representation

    sig.gif
  • Options
    TubularLuggageTubularLuggage Registered User regular
    Yeah, I feel like I follow Canadian politics pretty closely, and the OP there is the first time I'd ever heard of Forces et Democratie.
    There's something special about someone splintering off from the BQ to form another Quebec nationalist party.

    Also, looking at the two members, I like to think they have an unwritten rule about all of their members being named Jean-Francois.

  • Options
    DeciusDecius I'm old! I'm fat! I'M BLUE!Registered User regular
    Of all the party leaders, Mulcair definitely does the best job of selling that cowboy hat. Must be the beard.

    And now I just pictured Harper with a beard *shudder*

    camo_sig2.png
    I never finish anyth
  • Options
    SwashbucklerXXSwashbucklerXX Swashbucklin' Canuck Registered User regular
    finnith wrote: »
    It seems like a bad time for the Green Party to have any level of influence.

    Yeah, despite being a member, I'm not holding out a lot of hope for the Greens this election. Don't tell the nice people who send me all those e-mails. I do hope May wins her seat again.

    Want to find me on a gaming service? I'm SwashbucklerXX everywhere.
  • Options
    oldmankenoldmanken Registered User regular
    finnith wrote: »
    It seems like a bad time for the Green Party to have any level of influence.

    Yeah, despite being a member, I'm not holding out a lot of hope for the Greens this election. Don't tell the nice people who send me all those e-mails. I do hope May wins her seat again.

    I would expect the Greens to hold their two seats. May, at the very least should keep hers, as she has been a fantastic MP.

  • Options
    Disco11Disco11 Registered User regular
    Every one of those leader pictures was taken at the Calgary Stampeded fyi.

    I never even hear people talk about the NDP out here. It's all Cons or Liberal.

    Also, the legalizing Marijuana thing is going to be a lot more popular than Harper thinks. Most non-consumers I know are still pro legalization because at this point most people have tried it at some point and even if they did not enjoy the experience most did not go on a drug fueled crime spree.

    Just ate too many oreos and watched simpsons reruns.

    PSN: Canadian_llama
  • Options
    KetBraKetBra Dressed Ridiculously Registered User regular
    Yeah I know those are all stampede pictures.

    I just think it's funny that it's required that all the party leaders show up in their cowboy garb

    KGMvDLc.jpg?1
  • Options
    RichyRichy Registered User regular
    KetBra wrote: »
    Yeah I know those are all stampede pictures.

    I just think it's funny that it's required that all the party leaders show up in their cowboy garb

    I just checked the pictures again and tried to make up a mental story for each.

    "Ok, so what should I do at this stampede thing?"

    "Well sir, try to look cowboyish by putting on this hat and..."

    Harper aide: "...this leather vest and striking a pose for the cameras."

    Mulclair aide: "...this stampede t-shirt and talking about the issues in a manly way."

    Trudeau aide "...this dress shirt and flipping some pancakes."

    sig.gif
  • Options
    KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    I heard an ad on the radio the other day that was basically:
    "Stephen Harper is a strong leader we need, he's so strong, he managed to fix the Canadian Economy even with all the debt and unfair taxes. And who left that debt, and who destroyed the economy in the first place? Pierre Trudeau. Don't make the same mistake twice"



    It was almost art.

  • Options
    notdroidnotdroid Registered User regular
    edited January 2015
    Khavall wrote: »
    I heard an ad on the radio the other day that was basically:
    "Stephen Harper is a strong leader we need, he's so strong, he managed to fix the Canadian Economy even with all the debt and unfair taxes. And who left that debt, and who destroyed the economy in the first place? Pierre Trudeau. Don't make the same mistake twice"



    It was almost art.

    I wish I could make Conservative adds as a living.

    "Remember the robocall scandal? That's right, even machines are rooting for Stephen Harper. And machines are like, super smart. Are you smart? Then vote for Stephen Harper, or the machines will rise and destroy mankind!"

    notdroid on
  • Options
    RichyRichy Registered User regular
    notdroid wrote: »
    Khavall wrote: »
    I heard an ad on the radio the other day that was basically:
    "Stephen Harper is a strong leader we need, he's so strong, he managed to fix the Canadian Economy even with all the debt and unfair taxes. And who left that debt, and who destroyed the economy in the first place? Pierre Trudeau. Don't make the same mistake twice"



    It was almost art.

    I wish I could make Conservative adds as a living.

    "Remember the robocall scandal? That's right, even machines are rooting for Stephen Harper. And machines are like, super smart. Are you smart? Then vote for Stephen Harper, or the machines will rise and destroy mankind!"

    That's not a Conservative ad. This is a Conservative ad.

    "Remember the Robocall scandal? That's when the Liberals used robots to call people in Montreal and get Trudeau elected. And you know who lives in Montreal? Sovereignists who want to destroy Canada. That's the same goal the Jihadists have. And all this is funded using your tax money, like Pierre Trudeau did."

    sig.gif
  • Options
    CanadianWolverineCanadianWolverine Registered User regular
    I don't know, that doesn't seem like a big enough scary lie for them, it should involve immigrants, jails, and jerbs somehow. And be paid for with tax dollars as a message from the Government of Canada. Conveniently placed right beside an ad from a oil company trying to convince you the enviroment actually gets better the more pipeline you lay.

    steam_sig.png
  • Options
    finnithfinnith ... TorontoRegistered User regular
    The solution is to ignore political ads. They're all bunk.

    Bnet: CavilatRest#1874
    Steam: CavilatRest
  • Options
    Caulk Bite 6Caulk Bite 6 One of the multitude of Dans infesting this place Registered User regular
    I'm pretty sure they'll try to spin the 35000 extra people needed to be hired to help dig for worse data, in the wake of killing the long form census, as a good thing they totally meant to happen.

    jnij103vqi2i.png
  • Options
    RichyRichy Registered User regular
    I'm pretty sure they'll try to spin the 35000 extra people needed to be hired to help dig for worse data, in the wake of killing the long form census, as a good thing they totally meant to happen.

    "So after we killed the intrusive big-government census, we went eliminated all privacy laws and hired Conservative party interns to dig through your personal data without your knowledge and consent, and managed to discover some anecdotal evidence that our policies work, and lots of data proving they don't but we won't be releasing those because they're proprietary Conservative data and we'll sue anyone who talks about it. More importantly, all your personal banking information has been passed to the Conservative Party reelection fund, and your voting intentions have been extrapolated and used to plan road works and closures on election day. Oh, and our nation is now in massive deficit because of the cost of hiring those interns. What, you don't like massive government deficits and loss of privacy? See, big government doesn't work, that's why you have to keep the Liberals out of power and keep us slashing government services like the census!"

    sig.gif
  • Options
    hippofanthippofant ティンク Registered User regular
    Canada’s new backward-looking terror law: Walkom
    That theory, it seems, is no longer in vogue. Bill C-51 explicitly gives CSIS the right to contravene both the law and the Constitution’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

  • Options
    hippofanthippofant ティンク Registered User regular
    Veterans lawsuit costs federal government almost $700K:
    In the government's statement of defence, federal lawyers argue Ottawa has no special obligation to those who've fought the country's wars and that it is unfair to bind the current government to promises made nearly a century ago by another prime minister.

  • Options
    Sir FabulousSir Fabulous Malevolent Squid God Registered User regular
    hippofant wrote: »
    Veterans lawsuit costs federal government almost $700K:
    In the government's statement of defence, federal lawyers argue Ottawa has no special obligation to those who've fought the country's wars and that it is unfair to bind the current government to promises made nearly a century ago by another prime minister.

    Seriously? That's pretty fucking low.

    Look, I hate pretty much anything to do with the military. I actually get uncomfortable whenever I see a serviceperson. But, I know that it's not my place to try to push my personal philosophy.

    I say this because even though I don't like the military, I still realize that what's happening here is pretty disgusting.

    I mean, the whole argument here is that there's never been official legislation on the subject. There's only ever been verbal promises. And, while technically you might be correct, that's a pretty grotesque argument to make.

    It's not often that you hear politicians actually admit that their "promises" mean nothing.

    pickup-sig.php?name=Orthanc

    Switch Friend Code: SW-1406-1275-7906
  • Options
    ShadowenShadowen Snores in the morning LoserdomRegistered User regular
    hippofant wrote: »
    Canada’s new backward-looking terror law: Walkom
    That theory, it seems, is no longer in vogue. Bill C-51 explicitly gives CSIS the right to contravene both the law and the Constitution’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    ...what is with the Harper government adopting stuff that the US started to figure out wasn't really working like ten fucking years ago?

  • Options
    TubularLuggageTubularLuggage Registered User regular
    edited February 2015
    I actually get uncomfortable whenever I see a serviceperson.

    This seems like a really weird attitude to have. You'd probably have a conniption if you walked around Halifax for 15 minutes.

    TubularLuggage on
  • Options
    SwashbucklerXXSwashbucklerXX Swashbucklin' Canuck Registered User regular
    Not just the Harper government, sadly. I remember when I first moved here the Chretian and Martin governments were adopting some neoliberal policies that had failed in the US during the '90s. Harper's worse, though. Supermax prisons! War on drugs! Deregulation!

    Want to find me on a gaming service? I'm SwashbucklerXX everywhere.
  • Options
    shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    It's simple. Canada seems to constantly lag behind the US politically (good or bad) and Harper is a Republican.

  • Options
    TubularLuggageTubularLuggage Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    It's simple. Canada seems to constantly lag behind the US politically

    Well, that certainly explains marriage equality and our Martin era banking regulations.

  • Options
    shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited February 2015
    shryke wrote: »
    It's simple. Canada seems to constantly lag behind the US politically

    Well, that certainly explains marriage equality and our Martin era banking regulations.

    You are not getting what I'm saying. I'm talking with how our politics shift time wise. We get out Clinton-esque years and our Bush-esque years and such several years behind the US for the past while.

    shryke on
  • Options
    Sir FabulousSir Fabulous Malevolent Squid God Registered User regular
    I actually get uncomfortable whenever I see a serviceperson.

    This seems like a really weird attitude to have. You'd probably have a conniption if you walked around Halifax for 15 minutes.

    The cathedral I sing at is right next to an armoury. You'd think I'd get used to it after all these years, but nope.

    pickup-sig.php?name=Orthanc

    Switch Friend Code: SW-1406-1275-7906
  • Options
    CanadianWolverineCanadianWolverine Registered User regular
    edited February 2015
    Shadowen wrote: »
    hippofant wrote: »
    Canada’s new backward-looking terror law: Walkom
    That theory, it seems, is no longer in vogue. Bill C-51 explicitly gives CSIS the right to contravene both the law and the Constitution’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    ...what is with the Harper government adopting stuff that the US started to figure out wasn't really working like ten fucking years ago?

    Because they don't let that stop them from being idealogues.

    They have no love for anything that tells them their ideals are wrong and are so willing to hold a grudge against those messengers that pop their bubble that they will chip away at those things for years in any way that they can. They don't care if its the charter of rights, scientific study, public infrastructure, census, parliamentary procedure, bureaucratic principles, democratic right to vote, supreme court judges, peaceful protest...

    These aren't the Progressive Conservatives anymore. Hell, they are not even the Reform I thought I knew. And many of us have discovered that their detractors were right on many accounts for years now since they started showing their true colours when they only formed a minority government in Parliament.

    I think the only thing that gives me hope is that they don't have a militant wing that's willing to burn parliament to the ground and blame it on terrorists ... that I am aware of anyways. This C51 reads like they are making fucking secret police that will fuck up your life for whatever they determine is a terrorist.

    Which apparently could be for thinking badly of the pipeline if some recent events are anything to go by.

    CanadianWolverine on
    steam_sig.png
  • Options
    InfidelInfidel Heretic Registered User regular
    Quit criticizing the government, ecoterrorist.

    OrokosPA.png
  • Options
    oldmankenoldmanken Registered User regular
    So I know that many of you know who Morlock_Man is, and I believe I have previously mentioned that he was one of my best friends whilst growing up. He's obviously not the same person I grew up with and has some rather 'special' viewpoints now.

    I bring him up because he is currently in the process of taking the government to court for inciting genocide, vis-a-vis the current position on Israel and Hamas (link below). In addition, he has been pretty vociferous online about his belief that Russia is being setup by the West with regards to the Ukraine war. As objectionable and stupid as some of his commenting is, I can't help but think that this new bill is going to bleed over and effect him, despite his mostly harmless idiocy.

    I just really distrust this government, and the various Canadian security services, to use these powers with any kind of restraint.

    http://www.thewesternstar.com/News/Local/2015-01-29/article-4024247/Genoicide-hearing-begins-in-Corner-Brook-court/1

  • Options
    RichyRichy Registered User regular
    oldmanken wrote: »
    So I know that many of you know who Morlock_Man is, and I believe I have previously mentioned that he was one of my best friends whilst growing up. He's obviously not the same person I grew up with and has some rather 'special' viewpoints now.

    I bring him up because he is currently in the process of taking the government to court for inciting genocide, vis-a-vis the current position on Israel and Hamas (link below). In addition, he has been pretty vociferous online about his belief that Russia is being setup by the West with regards to the Ukraine war. As objectionable and stupid as some of his commenting is, I can't help but think that this new bill is going to bleed over and effect him, despite his mostly harmless idiocy.

    I just really distrust this government, and the various Canadian security services, to use these powers with any kind of restraint.

    http://www.thewesternstar.com/News/Local/2015-01-29/article-4024247/Genoicide-hearing-begins-in-Corner-Brook-court/1

    I do not understand the article linked. It says he is arguing that a Criminal Code law about genocide is anti-constitutional? What's his end-goal with this?

    sig.gif
  • Options
    Disco11Disco11 Registered User regular
    Richy wrote: »
    oldmanken wrote: »
    So I know that many of you know who Morlock_Man is, and I believe I have previously mentioned that he was one of my best friends whilst growing up. He's obviously not the same person I grew up with and has some rather 'special' viewpoints now.

    I bring him up because he is currently in the process of taking the government to court for inciting genocide, vis-a-vis the current position on Israel and Hamas (link below). In addition, he has been pretty vociferous online about his belief that Russia is being setup by the West with regards to the Ukraine war. As objectionable and stupid as some of his commenting is, I can't help but think that this new bill is going to bleed over and effect him, despite his mostly harmless idiocy.

    I just really distrust this government, and the various Canadian security services, to use these powers with any kind of restraint.

    http://www.thewesternstar.com/News/Local/2015-01-29/article-4024247/Genoicide-hearing-begins-in-Corner-Brook-court/1

    I do not understand the article linked. It says he is arguing that a Criminal Code law about genocide is anti-constitutional? What's his end-goal with this?

    from what I have read ( and I might be way off base) it's that he wants to change the definition of genocide to include the treatment of Palestinians.

    PSN: Canadian_llama
  • Options
    Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    I read it to mean that he thinks the code isn't being applied, and he's trying to force the AGs to apply it.

  • Options
    oldmankenoldmanken Registered User regular
    What @Nova_C said, I believe is correct. Though who really knows, it's a ridiculous case.

  • Options
    SilverWindSilverWind Registered User regular
    I'm unreasonably excited that they're thinking about bringing back the long form census.

    http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/long-form-census-back-on-lawmakers-radar-1.2216682

    signature.png
    Switch: SW-7603-3284-4227
    My ACNH Wishlists | My ACNH Catalog
  • Options
    RichyRichy Registered User regular
    He argues that, without the more detailed census data, policy makers are essentially flying without a radar, unsure of whether government programs are working now, and with no way of effectively planning for the future.
    Give this man a prize shaped like the word "prize" with a plaque on the bottom that reads "prize".

    sig.gif
  • Options
    EtiowsaEtiowsa Registered User regular
    SilverWind wrote: »
    I'm unreasonably excited that they're thinking about bringing back the long form census.

    http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/long-form-census-back-on-lawmakers-radar-1.2216682

    It's a bill sponsored by a liberal backbencher, it has literally no hope of passing.

Sign In or Register to comment.