So the new BBC detective show on Sunday nights is pretty great.
That sounds awfully generic. Quirky Old Lady Sleuth in: Teatime for Murder!
Oh Miss Marple, you senile old biddy.
My father has a theory that Miss Marple is actually the perpetrator of all the crimes she supposedly "solved." I mean, she's always right there for all this stuff. He figures she's just going around murdering people and framing others.
Edit: Note that this theory also has applications in re: Jessica Fletcher of Murder She Wrote.
Then this is your lot in life, and your life is going to be like this until you die. I suggest you learn to enjoy it. Since you can change it any time you decide to do so I have no sympathy for you. It is not easy, but it is simple.
She just needs to train up her willpower.
Unfortunately this is impossible when the person in question is completely unwilling to even try.
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man. This civility is stifling me anyway. I hate to tell you this, he of the arbitrarily enforced rule, but there is nothing in the rules that prohibits videos. Fine, you can read closed threads. I'm dumb on that one, it happens. But the issue at hand is, did you exceed your authority in closing the second thread, and the answer is a resounding yes. The best justification you can come up with is a feeble "but but but there was a video!" Yet videos AREN'T AGAINST THE RULES! I've seen others post videos today. In D&D.
My video was against the unwritten rule that the state of what's left of an addled mind determines what stays or goes. Everything in that thread conformed to the guidelines perfectly. The funny thing is, you all know that, cause the damned thing's got 130 hits, you've read the "offending" thread. I provided a clear topic for discussion, shared my thoughts about it in text form, solicited others opinions, even laid out what other viewpoints could be. If and when Tube can actually articulate a rationale for his power trip,
Amazing! Tell us more!
Silas Brown on
0
Options
JacobkoshGamble a stamp.I can show you how to be a real man!Moderatormod
It's called Wallander, and features a slightly chubby Kenneth Branagh as a Swedish policeman solving horrible crimes in an exceptionally bleak landscape while his pitiful life crumbles around him. David Warner plays his ailing artist father who relentlessly paints the same landscape over and over.
Kagera, Shazkar, you really want to risk the banhammer? Those are VIDEOS! I demand they be removed, they are verboten! And what's this? Banned books, as well? To the gulag with you!
Hobosapien on
0
Options
KageraImitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered Userregular
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man. This civility is stifling me anyway. I hate to tell you this, he of the arbitrarily enforced rule, but there is nothing in the rules that prohibits videos. Fine, you can read closed threads. I'm dumb on that one, it happens. But the issue at hand is, did you exceed your authority in closing the second thread, and the answer is a resounding yes. The best justification you can come up with is a feeble "but but but there was a video!" Yet videos AREN'T AGAINST THE RULES! I've seen others post videos today. In D&D.
My video was against the unwritten rule that the state of what's left of an addled mind determines what stays or goes. Everything in that thread conformed to the guidelines perfectly. The funny thing is, you all know that, cause the damned thing's got 130 hits, you've read the "offending" thread. I provided a clear topic for discussion, shared my thoughts about it in text form, solicited others opinions, even laid out what other viewpoints could be. If and when Tube can actually articulate a rationale for his power trip,
You know for such an avid fan of the PA forums you sure know fuck-all about how shit runs here.
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man. This civility is stifling me anyway. I hate to tell you this, he of the arbitrarily enforced rule, but there is nothing in the rules that prohibits videos. Fine, you can read closed threads. I'm dumb on that one, it happens. But the issue at hand is, did you exceed your authority in closing the second thread, and the answer is a resounding yes. The best justification you can come up with is a feeble "but but but there was a video!" Yet videos AREN'T AGAINST THE RULES! I've seen others post videos today. In D&D.
My video was against the unwritten rule that the state of what's left of an addled mind determines what stays or goes. Everything in that thread conformed to the guidelines perfectly. The funny thing is, you all know that, cause the damned thing's got 130 hits, you've read the "offending" thread. I provided a clear topic for discussion, shared my thoughts about it in text form, solicited others opinions, even laid out what other viewpoints could be. If and when Tube can actually articulate a rationale for his power trip,
We tend to read new threads. We only post in those that are well laid out and worthy of discussion.
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man.
Dude, you ARE going to get banned for "Mixing it up" with the Admin. Tube doesn't get paid to suffer fools or take shit. He is the biggest fucking cockwaver on the forum, and everyone knows it. The leniance he has shown you thus far is unpresidented, truely a christmas miracle. Do-not-test-him.
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man. This civility is stifling me anyway. I hate to tell you this, he of the arbitrarily enforced rule, but there is nothing in the rules that prohibits videos. Fine, you can read closed threads. I'm dumb on that one, it happens. But the issue at hand is, did you exceed your authority in closing the second thread, and the answer is a resounding yes. The best justification you can come up with is a feeble "but but but there was a video!" Yet videos AREN'T AGAINST THE RULES! I've seen others post videos today. In D&D.
My video was against the unwritten rule that the state of what's left of an addled mind determines what stays or goes. Everything in that thread conformed to the guidelines perfectly. The funny thing is, you all know that, cause the damned thing's got 130 hits, you've read the "offending" thread. I provided a clear topic for discussion, shared my thoughts about it in text form, solicited others opinions, even laid out what other viewpoints could be. If and when Tube can actually articulate a rationale for his power trip,
It's called Wallander, and features a slightly chubby Kenneth Branagh as a Swedish policeman solving horrible crimes in an exceptionally bleak landscape while his pitiful life crumbles around him. David Warner plays his ailing artist father who relentlessly paints the same landscape over and over.
It's wonderful.
Sold and sold!
Seriously, it's the best British detective show since Inspector Morse. Branagh is incredible. I saw him in a Chekov play recently and christ that man is brilliant. I want to skip ahead twenty years in time to see him play Lear and Prospero.
So the new BBC detective show on Sunday nights is pretty great.
That sounds awfully generic. Quirky Old Lady Sleuth in: Teatime for Murder!
It's called Wallander, and features a slightly chubby Kenneth Branagh as a Swedish policeman solving horrible crimes in an exceptionally bleak landscape while his pitiful life crumbles around him. David Warner plays his ailing artist father who relentlessly paints the same landscape over and over.
It's wonderful.
Wallander is fantastic. There were books first, if I recall correctly. Awesome books.
I don't know if you're mocking how little you all care, or the fact I left off in the middle of a sentence, so let's pretend I did that on purpose. It's more ominous that way
I don't know if you're mocking how little you all care, or the fact I left off in the middle of a sentence, so let's pretend I did that on purpose. It's more ominous that way
I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
0
Options
KageraImitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered Userregular
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man. This civility is stifling me anyway. I hate to tell you this, he of the arbitrarily enforced rule, but there is nothing in the rules that prohibits videos. Fine, you can read closed threads. I'm dumb on that one, it happens. But the issue at hand is, did you exceed your authority in closing the second thread, and the answer is a resounding yes. The best justification you can come up with is a feeble "but but but there was a video!" Yet videos AREN'T AGAINST THE RULES! I've seen others post videos today. In D&D.
My video was against the unwritten rule that the state of what's left of an addled mind determines what stays or goes. Everything in that thread conformed to the guidelines perfectly. The funny thing is, you all know that, cause the damned thing's got 130 hits, you've read the "offending" thread. I provided a clear topic for discussion, shared my thoughts about it in text form, solicited others opinions, even laid out what other viewpoints could be. If and when Tube can actually articulate a rationale for his power trip,
*I put on my lawyer hat*
This here Internet Court trial is now in session, Judge Elki now presiding.
I don't know if you're mocking how little you all care, or the fact I left off in the middle of a sentence, so let's pretend I did that on purpose. It's more ominous that way
Compare most of the OPs currently open in DnD to yours.
hobo just ditch the persecution complex and start talking normally about other shit
people will eventually forget and then in several months we can all say "haha remember your first thread?" and you'll say "haha yeah that was crazy times"
But the issue at hand is, did you exceed your authority in closing the second thread, and the answer is a resounding yes.
Actually it is no, because my authority here is absolute. Should I decide to ban the word jelly and enforce the rule retroactively, I am well within my authority to do so.
The best justification you can come up with is a feeble "but but but there was a video!" Yet videos AREN'T AGAINST THE RULES! I've seen others post videos today. In D&D.
"Look at my site! Buy my stuff!" - Uhhh, no. Go away, sitewhore. Its totally fine to put a link in your sig if you want to show off your work, or hock some gear, though.
Your youtube channel is included as your site. If you want to express your opinion, you do not use external sources to do so in the hope of bolstering your page views.
My video was against the unwritten rule that the state of what's left of an addled mind determines what stays or goes.
It is a written rule.
Everything in that thread conformed to the guidelines perfectly.
Nope
The funny thing is, you all know that, cause the damned thing's got 130 hits, you've read the "offending" thread.
This forum currently has 929 users online and this is dead time. 130 hits is bupkus.
We also have a rule about publicly arguing with moderator decisions, which with my characteristic generosity I have waived in order to explain the problem to you. That waiver is now gone. If you wish to continue discussing this, PM a D&D mod because I have no plans to discourse with you further given your apparent inability to perform even the most rudimentary of research before posting your opinion.
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man. This civility is stifling me anyway. I hate to tell you this, he of the arbitrarily enforced rule, but there is nothing in the rules that prohibits videos. Fine, you can read closed threads. I'm dumb on that one, it happens. But the issue at hand is, did you exceed your authority in closing the second thread, and the answer is a resounding yes. The best justification you can come up with is a feeble "but but but there was a video!" Yet videos AREN'T AGAINST THE RULES! I've seen others post videos today. In D&D.
My video was against the unwritten rule that the state of what's left of an addled mind determines what stays or goes. Everything in that thread conformed to the guidelines perfectly. The funny thing is, you all know that, cause the damned thing's got 130 hits, you've read the "offending" thread. I provided a clear topic for discussion, shared my thoughts about it in text form, solicited others opinions, even laid out what other viewpoints could be. If and when Tube can actually articulate a rationale for his power trip,
Threads in which you bitch about the rules, the mods, the thread that just got locked, or your "worst forum enemy." PM us if you have a problem. Mind you, if you have a "worst forum enemy," seek mental help instead. Corollary: Don't pull this crap in established threads either. Mod decisions are to be discussed in private.
hobo just ditch the persecution complex and start talking normally about other shit
people will eventually forget and then in several months we can all say "haha remember your first thread?" and you'll say "haha yeah that was crazy times"
hobo just ditch the persecution complex and start talking normally about other shit
people will eventually forget and then in several months we can all say "haha remember your first thread?" and you'll say "haha yeah that was crazy times"
Hey guys, remember when I said global warming was fake. Oh the times we had.
hobo just ditch the persecution complex and start talking normally about other shit
people will eventually forget and then in several months we can all say "haha remember your first thread?" and you'll say "haha yeah that was crazy times"
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man.
Dude, you ARE going to get banned for "Mixing it up" with the Admin. Tube doesn't get paid to suffer fools or take shit. He is the biggest fucking cockwaver on the forum, and everyone knows it. The leniance he has shown you thus far is unpresidented, truely a christmas miracle. Do-not-test-him.
hobo just ditch the persecution complex and start talking normally about other shit
people will eventually forget and then in several months we can all say "haha remember your first thread?" and you'll say "haha yeah that was crazy times"
Hey guys, remember when I said global warming was fake. Oh the times we had.
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man.
Dude, you ARE going to get banned for "Mixing it up" with the Admin. Tube doesn't get paid to suffer fools or take shit. He is the biggest fucking cockwaver on the forum, and everyone knows it. The leniance he has shown you thus far is unpresidented, truely a christmas miracle. Do-not-test-him.
If I get banned, I get banned, I'll live. This is my first anonymous net message board, and with this experience, it may be my last. Weep for me. Weep! Seriously, though, I've been reading PA for 6 years w/o ever posting on the boards, as long as Mike and Jerry don't murder each other before then, I can read it for another 6 years either way. There are times when authority figures act like little Napoleons geeked out on power, and other times when people have legitimate disagreements. I'm realy not sure which this is, but thankfully, I don't have to be afraid. If it's a legitimate disagreement, I won't be punished, and if it's a power trip and I get banned 1) I wouldn't want to be here and 2) Tube would look pathetic, weak, and incapable of taking criticism. So score
If you don't get banned for mixing it up with a mod, then we can dance, old man. This civility is stifling me anyway. I hate to tell you this, he of the arbitrarily enforced rule, but there is nothing in the rules that prohibits videos. Fine, you can read closed threads. I'm dumb on that one, it happens. But the issue at hand is, did you exceed your authority in closing the second thread, and the answer is a resounding yes. The best justification you can come up with is a feeble "but but but there was a video!" Yet videos AREN'T AGAINST THE RULES! I've seen others post videos today. In D&D.
My video was against the unwritten rule that the state of what's left of an addled mind determines what stays or goes. Everything in that thread conformed to the guidelines perfectly. The funny thing is, you all know that, cause the damned thing's got 130 hits, you've read the "offending" thread. I provided a clear topic for discussion, shared my thoughts about it in text form, solicited others opinions, even laid out what other viewpoints could be. If and when Tube can actually articulate a rationale for his power trip,
*I put on my lawyer hat*
Oh you're silly new guy. Videos aren't against the rules.
But sitewhoring is.
Your first post contained a link to your youtube.
Sitewhore. Sitewhore. Sitewhore.
--
Think about how big PA is. Tube does his job for free. There's no time to take everything on a case by case basis. You were on the fence and you fell off the wrong side. Believe it or not there are legal theories that claim the real world works this way. So uh enjoy the ban. Or maybe don't get one.
Either way I completed my philosophy of law term paper in only five hours. Someone high five me.
hobo just ditch the persecution complex and start talking normally about other shit
people will eventually forget and then in several months we can all say "haha remember your first thread?" and you'll say "haha yeah that was crazy times"
Posts
Only if she gets her kit off.
Oh Miss Marple, you senile old biddy.
My father has a theory that Miss Marple is actually the perpetrator of all the crimes she supposedly "solved." I mean, she's always right there for all this stuff. He figures she's just going around murdering people and framing others.
Edit: Note that this theory also has applications in re: Jessica Fletcher of Murder She Wrote.
Battle.net
Unfortunately this is impossible when the person in question is completely unwilling to even try.
Amazing! Tell us more!
Sold and sold!
You know for such an avid fan of the PA forums you sure know fuck-all about how shit runs here.
We tend to read new threads. We only post in those that are well laid out and worthy of discussion.
Dude, you ARE going to get banned for "Mixing it up" with the Admin. Tube doesn't get paid to suffer fools or take shit. He is the biggest fucking cockwaver on the forum, and everyone knows it. The leniance he has shown you thus far is unpresidented, truely a christmas miracle. Do-not-test-him.
*I put on my lawyer hat*
Seriously, it's the best British detective show since Inspector Morse. Branagh is incredible. I saw him in a Chekov play recently and christ that man is brilliant. I want to skip ahead twenty years in time to see him play Lear and Prospero.
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
Elki, it's time to practice long-distance mind melding.
I don't know if you're mocking how little you all care, or the fact I left off in the middle of a sentence, so let's pretend I did that on purpose. It's more ominous that way
This here Internet Court trial is now in session, Judge Elki now presiding.
Compare most of the OPs currently open in DnD to yours.
I'm going to go take my final, and when I get back, we're all going to pretend none of this ever happened.
Battle.net
people will eventually forget and then in several months we can all say "haha remember your first thread?" and you'll say "haha yeah that was crazy times"
Actually it is no, because my authority here is absolute. Should I decide to ban the word jelly and enforce the rule retroactively, I am well within my authority to do so.
Your youtube channel is included as your site. If you want to express your opinion, you do not use external sources to do so in the hope of bolstering your page views.
It is a written rule.
Nope
This forum currently has 929 users online and this is dead time. 130 hits is bupkus.
We also have a rule about publicly arguing with moderator decisions, which with my characteristic generosity I have waived in order to explain the problem to you. That waiver is now gone. If you wish to continue discussing this, PM a D&D mod because I have no plans to discourse with you further given your apparent inability to perform even the most rudimentary of research before posting your opinion.
This is done. Deal with it or find another forum.
http://forums.penny-arcade.com/faq.php?faq=global_rules#faq_no_threads_like
you so broke the rules
EDIT: THE HIVE SUX
yeah we will forget
My reputation far exceeds my actions.
You demand, and I supply.
xoxo
If I get banned, I get banned, I'll live. This is my first anonymous net message board, and with this experience, it may be my last. Weep for me. Weep! Seriously, though, I've been reading PA for 6 years w/o ever posting on the boards, as long as Mike and Jerry don't murder each other before then, I can read it for another 6 years either way. There are times when authority figures act like little Napoleons geeked out on power, and other times when people have legitimate disagreements. I'm realy not sure which this is, but thankfully, I don't have to be afraid. If it's a legitimate disagreement, I won't be punished, and if it's a power trip and I get banned 1) I wouldn't want to be here and 2) Tube would look pathetic, weak, and incapable of taking criticism. So score
:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x
honestly sometimes i dont even know why i try so hard* for you guys
*10 seconds in mspaint
Oh you're silly new guy. Videos aren't against the rules.
But sitewhoring is.
Your first post contained a link to your youtube.
Sitewhore. Sitewhore. Sitewhore.
--
Think about how big PA is. Tube does his job for free. There's no time to take everything on a case by case basis. You were on the fence and you fell off the wrong side. Believe it or not there are legal theories that claim the real world works this way. So uh enjoy the ban. Or maybe don't get one.
Either way I completed my philosophy of law term paper in only five hours. Someone high five me.
Do you have two middle names?