Options

Mormons are fucking prompt

1323335373862

Posts

  • Options
    Me Too!Me Too! __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2009
    Does it really matter to me as long as the general idea gets across

    Do I care if such and such event happened April 21 and not April 22

    Nope and nope

    Fuck you Phonehand

    Me Too! on
  • Options
    BelruelBelruel NARUTO FUCKS Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    you know what the members did instead of being angry? they gave millions of dollars to help the cause, and when the lie came to light went 'oh well! God's will was done'
    Honesty and integrity are only important when you're not hating gays.

    When you are hating gays, you're encouraged to lie to people and do whatever it takes, because there's nothing God hates more than faggots.
    do you get off knowing that thousands and thousands of non-mormon voters voted for prop 8
    does that make you hot
    i bet it doesn't
    Over half of the financial support and a shit-ton (certainly a majority, likely much more) of the groundwork done for Prop 8 came from the Mormon Church. They're a group that people are hugely prejudiced against, largely on the basis of their marriage practices. You'd expect them to be sympathetic, rather than huge, bigoted douchebags. Well, at least, you would if they weren't insane cultists.

    And they may not have made up a majority of the voters, but if it weren't for them, and their ridiculously hypocritical willingness to lie through their teeth and do whatever it takes to get it passed, it wouldn't be law today. But hey, you know, at least the church knows where its priorities are at. Lucky that in the Book of Mormon, the ninth commandment is "don't be gay," instead of "thou shalt not bear false witness against they neighbor," eh?

    have you seen the icing on the cake of their audaciousness?


    in their own book it says that they believe in being subject to magistrates, such as maybe the judges who made gay marriage legal maybe a little

    D&C 134:3
    "3. We believe that all governments necessarily require civil officers and magistrates to enforce the laws of the same; and that such as will administer the law in equity and justice should be sought for and upheld by the voice of the people if a republic, or the will of the sovereign."


    or this one gets me each time on this issue

    D&C 134:9
    "9. We do not believe it just to mingle religious influence with civil government, whereby one religious society is fostered and another proscribed in its spiritual privileges, and the individual rights of its members, as citizens, denied."

    Belruel on
    vmn6rftb232b.png
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Me Too! wrote: »
    Does it really matter to me as long as the general idea gets across

    Do I care if such and such event happened April 21 and not April 22

    Nope and nope

    Fuck you Phonehand

    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    Me Too!Me Too! __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2009
    Hrm

    Based on passage 2 yes I do feel safe blaming the church

    Me Too! on
  • Options
    satansfingerssatansfingers Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    phonehand remember when we were bros

    what even happened

    I dunno, bro. I act like a dick most of the time but it's all fun and games. I think you are hella.

    you are pretty hella too

    i think we don't forum at the same time as much and also joanna newsom hasn't released and album in awhile so

    satansfingers on
  • Options
    Me Too!Me Too! __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Me Too! wrote: »
    Does it really matter to me as long as the general idea gets across

    Do I care if such and such event happened April 21 and not April 22

    Nope and nope

    Fuck you Phonehand

    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.

    I meant the cessation of blessings thing you twit

    Me Too! on
  • Options
    BelruelBelruel NARUTO FUCKS Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Me Too! wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    and the fact that the mormon church was what tipped the scales most likely, and that many many people voted for it out of retarded knee-jerk reaction to being told their kids would be taught buttsex in school

    i mean, i was called because the church still has my number on their call lists, and they told my dad our family's names were going down on a list of dissenters being sent to utah because we were voting no.

    they were threatening their members with a cessation of blessings over this

    I guess that's a Bad Thing for Mormons?

    Short version of why, please, fuck you Phonehand I don't give a shit if something is incorrect as long as I get the gist

    well to a mormon it is huge to no longer get the blessings of the church, it is why you pay tithing and all that, it is a big threat (if one gives a damn)

    Belruel on
    vmn6rftb232b.png
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    and the fact that the mormon church was what tipped the scales most likely, and that many many people voted for it out of retarded knee-jerk reaction to being told their kids would be taught buttsex in school

    i mean, i was called because the church still has my number on their call lists, and they told my dad our family's names were going down on a list of dissenters being sent to utah because we were voting no.

    they were threatening their members with a cessation of blessings over this
    A lot of people did a lot of really sleazy and underhanded things so let's blame the church as a whole.
    You mean like lying to the tune of 10,000% about how much their contributions were? Or threatening to boycott people who contributed to the "No on 8" campaign, then turning around and calling it persecution when it was turned around on them? Or trying to keep their lists of donors secret after using the same goddamn lists to threaten donors to the "No on 8" campaign?

    Sleazebag things like everything the church as a whole did during the campaign? Or sleazebag things like telling your followers to donate millions of dollars to help pass a law to fuck over people who don't want anything but to be allowed to love each other? Sleazebag shit like that?

    Their behavior is unconscionable, and I'm not going to give them a pass because they trot out some bullshit about "religious freedom" and "persecution." They don't have any problem at all persecuting gay people or their supporters, so fuck them.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    Me Too!Me Too! __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2009
    Belruel wrote: »
    Me Too! wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    and the fact that the mormon church was what tipped the scales most likely, and that many many people voted for it out of retarded knee-jerk reaction to being told their kids would be taught buttsex in school

    i mean, i was called because the church still has my number on their call lists, and they told my dad our family's names were going down on a list of dissenters being sent to utah because we were voting no.

    they were threatening their members with a cessation of blessings over this

    I guess that's a Bad Thing for Mormons?

    Short version of why, please, fuck you Phonehand I don't give a shit if something is incorrect as long as I get the gist

    well to a mormon it is huge to no longer get the blessings of the church, it is why you pay tithing and all that, it is a big threat (if one gives a damn)

    Oh OK

    I was curious, Catholics don't really have something analogous I don't think

    Also we're supposed to tithe but really collection time Sunday is like "give us what you can/feel like"

    Me Too! on
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Me Too! wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Me Too! wrote: »
    Does it really matter to me as long as the general idea gets across

    Do I care if such and such event happened April 21 and not April 22

    Nope and nope

    Fuck you Phonehand

    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.

    I meant the cessation of blessings thing you twit
    Ah well. My point still stands. People were doing bad things in California, man.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    Me Too!Me Too! __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    and the fact that the mormon church was what tipped the scales most likely, and that many many people voted for it out of retarded knee-jerk reaction to being told their kids would be taught buttsex in school

    i mean, i was called because the church still has my number on their call lists, and they told my dad our family's names were going down on a list of dissenters being sent to utah because we were voting no.

    they were threatening their members with a cessation of blessings over this
    A lot of people did a lot of really sleazy and underhanded things so let's blame the church as a whole.
    You mean like lying to the tune of 10,000% about how much their contributions were? Or threatening to boycott people who contributed to the "No on 8" campaign, then turning around and calling it persecution when it was turned around on them? Or trying to keep their lists of donors secret after using the same goddamn lists to threaten donors to the "No on 8" campaign?

    Sleazebag things like everything the church as a whole did during the campaign? Or sleazebag things like telling your followers to donate millions of dollars to help pass a law to fuck over people who don't want anything but to be allowed to love each other? Sleazebag shit like that?

    Their behavior is unconscionable, and I'm not going to give them a pass because they trot out some bullshit about "religious freedom" and "persecution." They don't have any problem at all persecuting gay people or their supporters, so fuck them.

    As fond as I am of saying "blame the folks not the Church" I feel justified in blaming the church for all this

    Me Too! on
  • Options
    Me Too!Me Too! __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Me Too! wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Me Too! wrote: »
    Does it really matter to me as long as the general idea gets across

    Do I care if such and such event happened April 21 and not April 22

    Nope and nope

    Fuck you Phonehand

    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.

    I meant the cessation of blessings thing you twit
    Ah well. My point still stands. People were doing bad things in California, man.

    That didn't answer my question you shit

    Bel did though thank you Bel

    Me Too! on
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    and the fact that the mormon church was what tipped the scales most likely, and that many many people voted for it out of retarded knee-jerk reaction to being told their kids would be taught buttsex in school

    i mean, i was called because the church still has my number on their call lists, and they told my dad our family's names were going down on a list of dissenters being sent to utah because we were voting no.

    they were threatening their members with a cessation of blessings over this
    A lot of people did a lot of really sleazy and underhanded things so let's blame the church as a whole.
    You mean like lying to the tune of 10,000% about how much their contributions were? Or threatening to boycott people who contributed to the "No on 8" campaign, then turning around and calling it persecution when it was turned around on them? Or trying to keep their lists of donors secret after using the same goddamn lists to threaten donors to the "No on 8" campaign?

    Sleazebag things like everything the church as a whole did during the campaign? Or sleazebag things like telling your followers to donate millions of dollars to help pass a law to fuck over people who don't want anything but to be allowed to love each other? Sleazebag shit like that?

    Their behavior is unconscionable, and I'm not going to give them a pass because they trot out some bullshit about "religious freedom" and "persecution." They don't have any problem at all persecuting gay people or their supporters, so fuck them.

    Surprisingly, many members of the church also think it was a terrible thing! Wow, and fuck those guys too!

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.
    Really compassionate, progressive, silent members. Members who won't actually speak up for fear of being shunned by the rest of their church, including the people who actually run it.

    This is like saying "I knew a nice guy who was in the KKK. Therefore, the KKK must be full of nice people."

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    BelruelBelruel NARUTO FUCKS Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    and the fact that the mormon church was what tipped the scales most likely, and that many many people voted for it out of retarded knee-jerk reaction to being told their kids would be taught buttsex in school

    i mean, i was called because the church still has my number on their call lists, and they told my dad our family's names were going down on a list of dissenters being sent to utah because we were voting no.

    they were threatening their members with a cessation of blessings over this
    A lot of people did a lot of really sleazy and underhanded things so let's blame the church as a whole.
    You mean like lying to the tune of 10,000% about how much their contributions were? Or threatening to boycott people who contributed to the "No on 8" campaign, then turning around and calling it persecution when it was turned around on them? Or trying to keep their lists of donors secret after using the same goddamn lists to threaten donors to the "No on 8" campaign?

    Sleazebag things like everything the church as a whole did during the campaign? Or sleazebag things like telling your followers to donate millions of dollars to help pass a law to fuck over people who don't want anything but to be allowed to love each other? Sleazebag shit like that?

    Their behavior is unconscionable, and I'm not going to give them a pass because they trot out some bullshit about "religious freedom" and "persecution." They don't have any problem at all persecuting gay people or their supporters, so fuck them.

    Surprisingly, many members of the church also think it was a terrible thing! Wow, and fuck those guys too!

    yeah, some of them do, and those dudes can join right in with us saying 'fuck/heck you mormon church' and some have.

    Belruel on
    vmn6rftb232b.png
  • Options
    Volucrisus AedriusVolucrisus Aedrius Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos is 100% in the right on this one.

    You can't tell me that we should excuse people who, through their silence, condone bigotry.

    Volucrisus Aedrius on
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.
    Really compassionate, progressive, silent members. Members who won't actually speak up for fear of being shunned by the rest of their church, including the people who actually run it.

    This is like saying "I knew a nice guy who was in the KKK. Therefore, the KKK must be full of nice people."

    Yeah, like all those people protesting the church in California and Salt Lake City. Fuck, man. Those guys are the worst.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Surprisingly, many members of the church also think it was a terrible thing! Wow, and fuck those guys too!
    Well, let's see, by being members of the church, that means that they tithe. So, they're giving financial support to the bigots, while giving lip service to reasonable, progressive ideology.

    Only they don't actually say anything about thinking it was a terrible thing, so they're not actually paying lip service. So, really, the only way we'd know the difference between a Mormon who agreed with the church and a Mormon who disagreed with the church is by being able to read their minds. None of them actually affected the outcome in any meaningful way, other than by contributing to the "Yes on 8" campaign (by tithing). So, while they might think all these nice thoughts, that's all they are: nice thoughts. It's completely meaningless.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    BelruelBelruel NARUTO FUCKS Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.
    Really compassionate, progressive, silent members. Members who won't actually speak up for fear of being shunned by the rest of their church, including the people who actually run it.

    This is like saying "I knew a nice guy who was in the KKK. Therefore, the KKK must be full of nice people."

    Yeah, like all those people protesting the church in California and Salt Lake City. Fuck, man. Those guys are the worst.

    not all, or even most, of them are members. there are lots of good mormon duders who are doing the right thing, there are many many many more who are not, whether by being silent now, or by giving money then.

    Belruel on
    vmn6rftb232b.png
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Belruel wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    and the fact that the mormon church was what tipped the scales most likely, and that many many people voted for it out of retarded knee-jerk reaction to being told their kids would be taught buttsex in school

    i mean, i was called because the church still has my number on their call lists, and they told my dad our family's names were going down on a list of dissenters being sent to utah because we were voting no.

    they were threatening their members with a cessation of blessings over this
    A lot of people did a lot of really sleazy and underhanded things so let's blame the church as a whole.
    You mean like lying to the tune of 10,000% about how much their contributions were? Or threatening to boycott people who contributed to the "No on 8" campaign, then turning around and calling it persecution when it was turned around on them? Or trying to keep their lists of donors secret after using the same goddamn lists to threaten donors to the "No on 8" campaign?

    Sleazebag things like everything the church as a whole did during the campaign? Or sleazebag things like telling your followers to donate millions of dollars to help pass a law to fuck over people who don't want anything but to be allowed to love each other? Sleazebag shit like that?

    Their behavior is unconscionable, and I'm not going to give them a pass because they trot out some bullshit about "religious freedom" and "persecution." They don't have any problem at all persecuting gay people or their supporters, so fuck them.

    Surprisingly, many members of the church also think it was a terrible thing! Wow, and fuck those guys too!

    yeah, some of them do, and those dudes can join right in with us saying 'fuck/heck you mormon church' and some have.

    Like it is in most religions, members understand that the leadership isn't infallible. I don't know your history with the church but some people aren't so keen to just drop their religious beliefs like that.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Belruel wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.
    Really compassionate, progressive, silent members. Members who won't actually speak up for fear of being shunned by the rest of their church, including the people who actually run it.

    This is like saying "I knew a nice guy who was in the KKK. Therefore, the KKK must be full of nice people."

    Yeah, like all those people protesting the church in California and Salt Lake City. Fuck, man. Those guys are the worst.

    not all, or even most, of them are members. there are lots of good mormon duders who are doing the right thing, there are many many many more who are not, whether by being silent now, or by giving money then.
    I trust you have these figures handy?

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    BelruelBelruel NARUTO FUCKS Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    and the fact that the mormon church was what tipped the scales most likely, and that many many people voted for it out of retarded knee-jerk reaction to being told their kids would be taught buttsex in school

    i mean, i was called because the church still has my number on their call lists, and they told my dad our family's names were going down on a list of dissenters being sent to utah because we were voting no.

    they were threatening their members with a cessation of blessings over this
    A lot of people did a lot of really sleazy and underhanded things so let's blame the church as a whole.
    You mean like lying to the tune of 10,000% about how much their contributions were? Or threatening to boycott people who contributed to the "No on 8" campaign, then turning around and calling it persecution when it was turned around on them? Or trying to keep their lists of donors secret after using the same goddamn lists to threaten donors to the "No on 8" campaign?

    Sleazebag things like everything the church as a whole did during the campaign? Or sleazebag things like telling your followers to donate millions of dollars to help pass a law to fuck over people who don't want anything but to be allowed to love each other? Sleazebag shit like that?

    Their behavior is unconscionable, and I'm not going to give them a pass because they trot out some bullshit about "religious freedom" and "persecution." They don't have any problem at all persecuting gay people or their supporters, so fuck them.

    Surprisingly, many members of the church also think it was a terrible thing! Wow, and fuck those guys too!

    yeah, some of them do, and those dudes can join right in with us saying 'fuck/heck you mormon church' and some have.

    Like it is in most religions, members understand that the leadership isn't infallible. I don't know your history with the church but some people aren't so keen to just drop their religious beliefs like that.
    so they don't have to drop their beliefs then. just protest. this country is built upon the damn stuff, going against those in charge doesn't mean you are defecting, but expressing displeasure is a very important thing.

    if i go protest against the war in iraq, that doesn't mean i don't want to be an american, i just don't agree with the way certain things are being done, and i am making my displeasure known

    Belruel on
    vmn6rftb232b.png
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    yeah, some of them do, and those dudes can join right in with us saying 'fuck/heck you mormon church' and some have.
    Like it is in most religions, members understand that the leadership isn't infallible. I don't know your history with the church but some people aren't so keen to just drop their religious beliefs like that.
    So, they disagree with the church, just not enough to actually do anything about it.

    Yeah, like I said: nice thoughts, completely meaningless.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    BelruelBelruel NARUTO FUCKS Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.
    Really compassionate, progressive, silent members. Members who won't actually speak up for fear of being shunned by the rest of their church, including the people who actually run it.

    This is like saying "I knew a nice guy who was in the KKK. Therefore, the KKK must be full of nice people."

    Yeah, like all those people protesting the church in California and Salt Lake City. Fuck, man. Those guys are the worst.

    not all, or even most, of them are members. there are lots of good mormon duders who are doing the right thing, there are many many many more who are not, whether by being silent now, or by giving money then.
    I trust you have these figures handy?

    as i trust you have all the proof saying that they are members? please. from the protests that i have read about, and even stopped and spoken to the people involved, there were hardly any members evident.

    Belruel on
    vmn6rftb232b.png
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    not all, or even most, of them are members. there are lots of good mormon duders who are doing the right thing, there are many many many more who are not, whether by being silent now, or by giving money then.
    I trust you have these figures handy?
    Doesn't the Mormon church excommunicate people who don't tithe?

    So, 100% of the people who were in the church previous to the prop and are still in the church now financially supported it, and continue to financially support the ideology.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    BelruelBelruel NARUTO FUCKS Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    not all, or even most, of them are members. there are lots of good mormon duders who are doing the right thing, there are many many many more who are not, whether by being silent now, or by giving money then.
    I trust you have these figures handy?
    Doesn't the Mormon church excommunicate people who don't tithe?

    So, 100% of the people who were in the church previous to the prop and are still in the church now financially supported it, and continue to financially support the ideology.

    naw, you just don't get the blessings involved. i am still on the member lists even though i have told my bishop i do not consider myself a member anymore, and i have never paid a dime

    to them i am "inactive"

    every few months they start coming around again bothering me, leaving cards, and i have to politely tell them i am not interested

    Belruel on
    vmn6rftb232b.png
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Belruel wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    The general gist is that there are extremists within the church who have a lot of money and a lot of pull with people. On the other hand, there are a great number of really compassionate and progressive members who felt a total sense dismay at what happened in California.
    Really compassionate, progressive, silent members. Members who won't actually speak up for fear of being shunned by the rest of their church, including the people who actually run it.

    This is like saying "I knew a nice guy who was in the KKK. Therefore, the KKK must be full of nice people."

    Yeah, like all those people protesting the church in California and Salt Lake City. Fuck, man. Those guys are the worst.

    not all, or even most, of them are members. there are lots of good mormon duders who are doing the right thing, there are many many many more who are not, whether by being silent now, or by giving money then.
    I trust you have these figures handy?

    as i trust you have all the proof saying that they are members? please. from the protests that i have read about, and even stopped and spoken to the people involved, there were hardly any members evident.
    Good solid evidence for your claim. Protesting is bullshit. The only way to really do something about the issue would have been to vote against the proposition. Once again irrelevant as the Mormon population in California is like less than 2%.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    not all, or even most, of them are members. there are lots of good mormon duders who are doing the right thing, there are many many many more who are not, whether by being silent now, or by giving money then.
    I trust you have these figures handy?
    Doesn't the Mormon church excommunicate people who don't tithe?

    So, 100% of the people who were in the church previous to the prop and are still in the church now financially supported it, and continue to financially support the ideology.

    Wrong.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    not all, or even most, of them are members. there are lots of good mormon duders who are doing the right thing, there are many many many more who are not, whether by being silent now, or by giving money then.
    I trust you have these figures handy?
    Doesn't the Mormon church excommunicate people who don't tithe?

    So, 100% of the people who were in the church previous to the prop and are still in the church now financially supported it, and continue to financially support the ideology.

    Wrong.
    What percentage of regular LDS church attendees don't tithe? I suspect it's somewhere south of the 5% mark. I suspect it's substantially south of the 5% mark.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    TubeTube Registered User admin
    edited February 2009
    wah wah democracy sucks when it doesn't go my way wah wah

    Tube on
  • Options
    Volucrisus AedriusVolucrisus Aedrius Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand, when your religion imposed political beliefs via a "pay to pray" program like the Mormons, most people don't end up openly disagreeing until it reaches a boiling point and a powerful "loyal opposition" is formed.

    When the LDS schisms I'll say "hey, I can't make blanket statements about Mormon politics!" but until such time.... I've gotta say that whatever silent opposition in their ranks is useless because they've denied their own responsibility.

    Volucrisus Aedrius on
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Belruel wrote: »
    not all, or even most, of them are members. there are lots of good mormon duders who are doing the right thing, there are many many many more who are not, whether by being silent now, or by giving money then.
    I trust you have these figures handy?
    Doesn't the Mormon church excommunicate people who don't tithe?

    So, 100% of the people who were in the church previous to the prop and are still in the church now financially supported it, and continue to financially support the ideology.

    Wrong.
    What percentage of regular LDS church attendees don't tithe? I suspect it's somewhere south of the 5% mark. I suspect it's substantially south of the 5% mark.

    As soon as you obtain that confidential information from the church, then it will be relevant.
    Also take into account that tithing money goes toward a great number of aspects of the church so people will continue to contribute regardless.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    wah wah democracy sucks when it doesn't go my way wah wah
    Democracy is more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner, Tube. And that particular fight isn't over yet.

    Regardless of how it goes, though, the Mormon church is still a fucking bigoted organization, full of some very nice bigoted, intolerant douchebags.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    As soon as you obtain that confidential information from the church, then it will be relevant.
    Also take into account that tithing money goes toward a great number of aspects of the church so people will continue to contribute regardless.
    Right: they need some of it to keep gays and atheists out of the Boy Scouts, some of it to spread their particular brand of intolerance and bigotry throughout the world, and some of it to do everything they can to prevent gay people from ever being happy.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    BelruelBelruel NARUTO FUCKS Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    As soon as you obtain that confidential information from the church, then it will be relevant.
    Also take into account that tithing money goes toward a great number of aspects of the church so people will continue to contribute regardless.
    Right: they need some of it to keep gays and atheists out of the Boy Scouts, some of it to spread their particular brand of intolerance and bigotry throughout the world, and some of it to do everything they can to prevent gay people from ever being happy.

    and some of it to feed the poor, and other amounts of it to fund their 2 billion dollar mall they are building across from the temple

    Belruel on
    vmn6rftb232b.png
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand, when your religion imposed political beliefs via a "pay to pray" program like the Mormons, most people don't end up openly disagreeing until it reaches a boiling point and a powerful "loyal opposition" is formed.

    When the LDS schisms I'll say "hey, I can't make blanket statements about Mormon politics!" but until such time.... I've gotta say that whatever silent opposition in their ranks is useless because they've denied their own responsibility.

    Once again, I don't attend church and I haven't for many years. Generally speaking, members of a religious organization are sheep. There are quite a few publications by members discrediting aspects of the church's leadership but that type of thing goes mostly unnoticed and many times those members are excommunicated. Just like lots of religions!

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Belruel wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    As soon as you obtain that confidential information from the church, then it will be relevant.
    Also take into account that tithing money goes toward a great number of aspects of the church so people will continue to contribute regardless.
    Right: they need some of it to keep gays and atheists out of the Boy Scouts, some of it to spread their particular brand of intolerance and bigotry throughout the world, and some of it to do everything they can to prevent gay people from ever being happy.
    and some of it to feed the poor, and other amounts of it to fund their 2 billion dollar mall they are building across from the temple
    Yes, "feeding the poor" is coupled with the "spreading their particular brand of intolerance and bigotry throughout the world."

    Because you can't feed poor people without telling them that God wants them to hate the gays.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    SomestickguySomestickguy Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    whoa

    This thread filled up fast. Any chance of a summary?

    Somestickguy on
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    As soon as you obtain that confidential information from the church, then it will be relevant.
    Also take into account that tithing money goes toward a great number of aspects of the church so people will continue to contribute regardless.
    Right: they need some of it to keep gays and atheists out of the Boy Scouts, some of it to spread their particular brand of intolerance and bigotry throughout the world, and some of it to do everything they can to prevent gay people from ever being happy.

    Oh boy I think you've cracked the case, Sherlock.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Phonehand, when your religion imposed political beliefs via a "pay to pray" program like the Mormons, most people don't end up openly disagreeing until it reaches a boiling point and a powerful "loyal opposition" is formed.

    When the LDS schisms I'll say "hey, I can't make blanket statements about Mormon politics!" but until such time.... I've gotta say that whatever silent opposition in their ranks is useless because they've denied their own responsibility.
    Once again, I don't attend church and I haven't for many years. Generally speaking, members of a religious organization are sheep. There are quite a few publications by members discrediting aspects of the church's leadership but that type of thing goes mostly unnoticed and many times those members are excommunicated. Just like lots of religions!
    And Wahhabi Muslims stone women for adultery, just like lots of religions. Since it's just like lots of religions, that makes it okay!

    Thanatos on
This discussion has been closed.