why don't they put G-20 in a real city where the police aren't afraid to shoot first and plant weapons later?
Why don't they just video-conference the damn thing.
Or as someone in the Canadian politics thread said, hold it on cruise ships or a abandoned oil rig in the middle of the ocean where no one can get to it.
those solutions don't result in a lot of dead anarchistic protesters worried about something that isn't happening and protesting it by destroying shit.
why don't they put G-20 in a real city where the police aren't afraid to shoot first and plant weapons later?
Why don't they just video-conference the damn thing.
Or as someone in the Canadian politics thread said, hold it on cruise ships or a abandoned oil rig in the middle of the ocean where no one can get to it.
Because then there'd be some idiot protesters with boats
and then you can't just tear gas them and beat them over the head with truncheons
your options are basically 1. shoot them a little 2. shoot them a lot
Abdhyius on
0
Options
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
why don't they put G-20 in a real city where the police aren't afraid to shoot first and plant weapons later?
Why don't they just video-conference the damn thing.
Or as someone in the Canadian politics thread said, hold it on cruise ships or a abandoned oil rig in the middle of the ocean where no one can get to it.
Because then there'd be some idiot protesters with boats
and then you can't just tear gas them and beat them over the head with truncheons
your options are basically 1. shoot them a little 2. shoot them a lot
It would be a pretty small group of rioters who were dumb enough to try to storm your ship in international waters.
So I think the annoying woman that sits behind me was messing with my computer when I was gone.
I walked away with the desktop up.
Go on the mail run
Come back and Outlook is up on my screen.
Hmmmmmm.
She's already been caught sending an e-mail from another user's log in. But my boss won't do anything about it because it was reported a day or two later and I wasn't able to catch her.
So I think the annoying woman that sits behind me was messing with my computer when I was gone.
I walked away with the desktop up.
Go on the mail run
Come back and Outlook is up on my screen.
Hmmmmmm.
She's already been caught sending an e-mail from another user's log in. But my boss won't do anything about it because it was reported a day or two later and I wasn't able to catch her.
why don't they put G-20 in a real city where the police aren't afraid to shoot first and plant weapons later?
Why don't they just video-conference the damn thing.
Or as someone in the Canadian politics thread said, hold it on cruise ships or a abandoned oil rig in the middle of the ocean where no one can get to it.
Because then there'd be some idiot protesters with boats
and then you can't just tear gas them and beat them over the head with truncheons
your options are basically 1. shoot them a little 2. shoot them a lot
It would be a pretty small group of rioters who were dumb enough to try to storm your ship in international waters.
yes but it only takes one
because a ship manned by protestors that are refusing to stop is indistinguishable from a ship full of explosives refusing to stop
So I think the annoying woman that sits behind me was messing with my computer when I was gone.
I walked away with the desktop up.
Go on the mail run
Come back and Outlook is up on my screen.
Hmmmmmm.
She's already been caught sending an e-mail from another user's log in. But my boss won't do anything about it because it was reported a day or two later and I wasn't able to catch her.
did you check your sent messages?
Dunadan019 on
0
Options
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
edited June 2010
There are very few people that inspire perfectly genuine ill will towards their well being in me.
People who think that it is OK to destroy property because they're angry about politics or a sports game rank pretty high up there.
Followed closely by Paul Watson and his brainwashed Sea Shepard cronies.
why don't they put G-20 in a real city where the police aren't afraid to shoot first and plant weapons later?
Why don't they just video-conference the damn thing.
Or as someone in the Canadian politics thread said, hold it on cruise ships or a abandoned oil rig in the middle of the ocean where no one can get to it.
Because then there'd be some idiot protesters with boats
and then you can't just tear gas them and beat them over the head with truncheons
your options are basically 1. shoot them a little 2. shoot them a lot
Middle of the ocean.
I'm not saying "five miles off coast where you can still swim back to land".
I'm saying "middle of the motherfucking ocean".
I'd like to see some anarchist anti-capitalist moron take his rich daddy's fishing boat from the second summer camp and drive it to the middle of the motherfucking ocean.
So I think the annoying woman that sits behind me was messing with my computer when I was gone.
I walked away with the desktop up.
Go on the mail run
Come back and Outlook is up on my screen.
Hmmmmmm.
She's already been caught sending an e-mail from another user's log in. But my boss won't do anything about it because it was reported a day or two later and I wasn't able to catch her.
why don't they put G-20 in a real city where the police aren't afraid to shoot first and plant weapons later?
Why don't they just video-conference the damn thing.
Or as someone in the Canadian politics thread said, hold it on cruise ships or a abandoned oil rig in the middle of the ocean where no one can get to it.
Because then there'd be some idiot protesters with boats
and then you can't just tear gas them and beat them over the head with truncheons
your options are basically 1. shoot them a little 2. shoot them a lot
It would be a pretty small group of rioters who were dumb enough to try to storm your ship in international waters.
yes but it only takes one
because a ship manned by protestors that are refusing to stop is indistinguishable from a ship full of explosives refusing to stop
Yeah, but to go further: nobody is going to get very upset about a boatload of dickheads ignoring repeated warnings of "stop or we will fire" and getting blown out of the water. Compare with the police beating down anyone in arm's reach.
they were whining about how violent the police was (tear gas and batons. The police actually sat rather passive through the whole thing, just trying to contain the rioters)
and whining about how horrible the conditions was in jail
and whining
and whining
jesus, shut up, or next time we won't send the police
we'll just send the king's guard and tell them to fire at will
Abdhyius on
0
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
So I think the annoying woman that sits behind me was messing with my computer when I was gone.
I walked away with the desktop up.
Go on the mail run
Come back and Outlook is up on my screen.
Hmmmmmm.
She's already been caught sending an e-mail from another user's log in. But my boss won't do anything about it because it was reported a day or two later and I wasn't able to catch her.
Windows-L solves that problem for you at least.
That's not a good excuse for someone snooping on my computer though. Especially someone that's not a manager or supervisor, but a co-worker. It's still an invasion of privacy, especially considering the work that I do is supposed to be for my eyes only. I've been sitting at this same desk for over 3 years and I haven't had an issue until this woman showed up.
My other point of evidence is that these PCs turn off their monitor after 10 minutes and auto lock after 15 minutes of inactivity. I was gone for 20. It was unlocked and the monitor was still on.
And Duna, I did. Nothing, unfortunately.
I told my boss if he doesn't do something about it, I will. And if I do, it won't be pretty.
why don't they put G-20 in a real city where the police aren't afraid to shoot first and plant weapons later?
Why don't they just video-conference the damn thing.
Or as someone in the Canadian politics thread said, hold it on cruise ships or a abandoned oil rig in the middle of the ocean where no one can get to it.
Because then there'd be some idiot protesters with boats
and then you can't just tear gas them and beat them over the head with truncheons
your options are basically 1. shoot them a little 2. shoot them a lot
It would be a pretty small group of rioters who were dumb enough to try to storm your ship in international waters.
yes but it only takes one
because a ship manned by protestors that are refusing to stop is indistinguishable from a ship full of explosives refusing to stop
Yeah, but to go further: nobody is going to get very upset about a boatload of dickheads ignoring repeated warnings of "stop or we will fire" and getting blown out of the water. Compare with the police beating down anyone in arm's reach.
Yeah that too. There are no innocent bystanders in the middle of the ocean.
Richy on
0
Options
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
edited June 2010
would your boss be opposed to you setting up a honeypot webcam trap?
So I think the annoying woman that sits behind me was messing with my computer when I was gone.
I walked away with the desktop up.
Go on the mail run
Come back and Outlook is up on my screen.
Hmmmmmm.
She's already been caught sending an e-mail from another user's log in. But my boss won't do anything about it because it was reported a day or two later and I wasn't able to catch her.
Windows-L solves that problem for you at least.
That's not a good excuse for someone snooping on my computer though. Especially someone that's not a manager or supervisor, but a co-worker. It's still an invasion of privacy, especially considering the work that I do is supposed to be for my eyes only. I've been sitting at this same desk for over 3 years and I haven't had an issue until this woman showed up.
My other point of evidence is that these PCs turn off their monitor after 10 minutes and auto lock after 15 minutes of inactivity. I was gone for 20. It was unlocked and the monitor was still on.
And Duna, I did. Nothing, unfortunately.
I told my boss if he doesn't do something about it, I will. And if I do, it won't be pretty.
Well, I know it doesn't solve the actual problem... but it protects your shit.
Set up a hidden camera or something. Does your office have security cameras?
why don't they put G-20 in a real city where the police aren't afraid to shoot first and plant weapons later?
Why don't they just video-conference the damn thing.
Or as someone in the Canadian politics thread said, hold it on cruise ships or a abandoned oil rig in the middle of the ocean where no one can get to it.
Because then there'd be some idiot protesters with boats
and then you can't just tear gas them and beat them over the head with truncheons
your options are basically 1. shoot them a little 2. shoot them a lot
Middle of the ocean.
I'm not saying "five miles off coast where you can still swim back to land".
I'm saying "middle of the motherfucking ocean".
I'd like to see some anarchist anti-capitalist moron take his rich daddy's fishing boat from the second summer camp and drive it to the middle of the motherfucking ocean.
okay
that's not hard
what you do is, you take a boat, then you go out into the ocean for a while
after a few days you'll be in the middle of the ocean
Aroused bull: Oh yes they'd be upset. They'd be so very very upset. Because if they in fact weren't terrorists everyone would say "they shot unarmed protesters!" ignoring the fact that it's like shooting a bear that was charging you to give you a hug
EDIT: Also dead is far worse than beaten up a little then arrested.
they were whining about how violent the police was (tear gas and batons. The police actually sat rather passive through the whole thing, just trying to contain the rioters)
and whining about how horrible the conditions was in jail
and whining
and whining
jesus, shut up, or next time we won't send the police
we'll just send the king's guard and tell them to fire at will
Pre-1988 they basically could have done that here too.
I think the fuss here is the possibility of Charter violations and the odd way it was handled. If people do illegal shit, we have a thing called due process.
Aroused bull: Oh yes they'd be upset. They'd be so very very upset. Because if they in fact weren't terrorists everyone would say "they shot unarmed protesters!" ignoring the fact that it's like shooting a bear that was charging you to give you a hug
It would depend entirely on media spin, really. If you leave out enough facts it would get very upsetting indeed.
they were whining about how violent the police was (tear gas and batons. The police actually sat rather passive through the whole thing, just trying to contain the rioters)
and whining about how horrible the conditions was in jail
and whining
and whining
jesus, shut up, or next time we won't send the police
we'll just send the king's guard and tell them to fire at will
Pre-1988 they basically could have done that here too.
I think the fuss here is the possibility of Charter violations and the odd way it was handled. If people do illegal shit, we have a thing called due process.
Uh, yeah. And no-one is receiving extrajudiciary punishment unless the police are beating people up after they've been locked up or something like that.
Aroused Bull: Yeah, I mean, isn't there already a lot of fuss over this where nothing bad has happened AFAIK?
Posts
Cass, every single protest of an international summit turns to a riot. Every single one. Every damn time. It's as predictable as the sun rising.
those solutions don't result in a lot of dead anarchistic protesters worried about something that isn't happening and protesting it by destroying shit.
Because then there'd be some idiot protesters with boats
and then you can't just tear gas them and beat them over the head with truncheons
your options are basically 1. shoot them a little 2. shoot them a lot
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
To clarify I was going to stick with a group of people
then I heard that the people I was planning to go with were planning on throwing some bricks "if someone else started it"
Suddenly I had pressing engagements elsewhere
nah, there have been a good few of them over the past two weeks like wet bandit and some dude whose name was just random letters and numbers.
It would be a pretty small group of rioters who were dumb enough to try to storm your ship in international waters.
I walked away with the desktop up.
Go on the mail run
Come back and Outlook is up on my screen.
Hmmmmmm.
She's already been caught sending an e-mail from another user's log in. But my boss won't do anything about it because it was reported a day or two later and I wasn't able to catch her.
This is the reason I hate the rioters so much.
Windows-L solves that problem for you at least.
yes but it only takes one
because a ship manned by protestors that are refusing to stop is indistinguishable from a ship full of explosives refusing to stop
did you check your sent messages?
People who think that it is OK to destroy property because they're angry about politics or a sports game rank pretty high up there.
Followed closely by Paul Watson and his brainwashed Sea Shepard cronies.
Middle of the ocean.
I'm not saying "five miles off coast where you can still swim back to land".
I'm saying "middle of the motherfucking ocean".
I'd like to see some anarchist anti-capitalist moron take his rich daddy's fishing boat from the second summer camp and drive it to the middle of the motherfucking ocean.
Lock your computer every time you get up.
Yeah, but to go further: nobody is going to get very upset about a boatload of dickheads ignoring repeated warnings of "stop or we will fire" and getting blown out of the water. Compare with the police beating down anyone in arm's reach.
we don't have many riots
god, the whining
the whining!
they were whining about how violent the police was (tear gas and batons. The police actually sat rather passive through the whole thing, just trying to contain the rioters)
and whining about how horrible the conditions was in jail
and whining
and whining
jesus, shut up, or next time we won't send the police
we'll just send the king's guard and tell them to fire at will
The problem is how often they're middle-class joiners just along for the party.
That's not a good excuse for someone snooping on my computer though. Especially someone that's not a manager or supervisor, but a co-worker. It's still an invasion of privacy, especially considering the work that I do is supposed to be for my eyes only. I've been sitting at this same desk for over 3 years and I haven't had an issue until this woman showed up.
My other point of evidence is that these PCs turn off their monitor after 10 minutes and auto lock after 15 minutes of inactivity. I was gone for 20. It was unlocked and the monitor was still on.
And Duna, I did. Nothing, unfortunately.
I told my boss if he doesn't do something about it, I will. And if I do, it won't be pretty.
Well, I know it doesn't solve the actual problem... but it protects your shit.
Set up a hidden camera or something. Does your office have security cameras?
Probably not but the PC would. The USB ports are disabled. We still use the PS/2 ports.
okay
that's not hard
what you do is, you take a boat, then you go out into the ocean for a while
after a few days you'll be in the middle of the ocean
Aroused bull: Oh yes they'd be upset. They'd be so very very upset. Because if they in fact weren't terrorists everyone would say "they shot unarmed protesters!" ignoring the fact that it's like shooting a bear that was charging you to give you a hug
EDIT: Also dead is far worse than beaten up a little then arrested.
Pre-1988 they basically could have done that here too.
I think the fuss here is the possibility of Charter violations and the odd way it was handled. If people do illegal shit, we have a thing called due process.
It's just middle-class kids talking about stuff they don't know anything about.
No first-hand experience=shut the hell up.
It would depend entirely on media spin, really. If you leave out enough facts it would get very upsetting indeed.
surviving on a small boat in the middle of the ocean, or getting there without wrecking your boat in the first place, is a big problem
Do you also want those damn kids to turn their music down and get off your lawn?
Uh, yeah. And no-one is receiving extrajudiciary punishment unless the police are beating people up after they've been locked up or something like that.
Aroused Bull: Yeah, I mean, isn't there already a lot of fuss over this where nothing bad has happened AFAIK?
Uh, yeah, sure.
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
It isn't.
Have you ever been on a boat, by the way?
I'm on a... No, I'm not doing that. I do it enough when I'm not on the internet.