I've been practicing with the Lacky Lock deck. I've played at least 2 dozen games. I've still not drawn the damn legendary that makes your lacky's 4/4 a single time.
the uldum song, I'll go as far to say, is not even not good. It was bad. I was very disappointed the thread had lied to me about how good it was when I first saw it.
excuse me??? exCUSE ME????? EXCUSE YOU???????????
you're banished from this thread TEG
begone blasphemer and never return
Battle.net Tag: Dibby#1582
+2
Options
3cl1ps3I will build a labyrinth to house the cheeseRegistered Userregular
I've been practicing with the Lacky Lock deck. I've played at least 2 dozen games. I've still not drawn the damn legendary that makes your lacky's 4/4 a single time.
#NeverLackey
+3
Options
BeastehTHAT WOULD NOTKILL DRACULARegistered Userregular
Prior to VS this seems fairly accurate
+2
Options
ObiFettUse the ForceAs You WishRegistered Userregular
Thief Rogue can get real weird.
I'm playing a Shaman, get Academic Espionage off and draw Hagatha.
I play Hagatha to clear his board, then a few turns later play Tess Greymane. Apparently playing a hero turns your class into that class? so Tess replayed every Rogue card I had played to that point. I Shadowstep'd her back into my hand which resulted in every subsequent play of her shadowstep'ing her back into my hand since apparently I was a Shaman now...
zepherinRussian warship, go fuck yourselfRegistered Userregular
edited August 2019
So I've got a theorycraft muligan question.
I've been going murlock paladin for that crazy amphibian sex.
I've seen the stats that decks that start with prismatic lens. Should I be keeping that (above all), usually I'm trying to get a 1 2 3 mana setup with a murmy or tidecaller followed by a fishflinger/ tide hunter
but don't worry guys, warrior is balanced. after all, they only take up the first 16 cards, i mean cmon, this is clearly overblown.
Warriors are tough. There isn't really a good deck that just counters it. At best you have a deck your hoping to outlive them, go for ridiculous combo, or rush them down before they can stablize (which is not an easy feet given the number of board wipes and controls the warrior has.
The problem with warrior's new quest is the same as Warlock's old one. Once you get to the point in the game where you could complete it, the board presence it gives isn't enough.
two 3/2s every turn is easily beatable, and one sometimes two 4/3s is the same.
+6
Options
BeastehTHAT WOULD NOTKILL DRACULARegistered Userregular
Hilariously, the 4/3s from warrior quest just get deleted by quest rogue for free
The problem with warrior's new quest is the same as Warlock's old one. Once you get to the point in the game where you could complete it, the board presence it gives isn't enough.
two 3/2s every turn is easily beatable, and one sometimes two 4/3s is the same.
Turn 7 Doctor Boom is infinitely better than completing the warriors quest.
And doing both would be way too slow. You'd just get agroed down. So you control till doctor boom and then win, most of the time. Sometimes they have something in the shoot for that, and sometimes warriors already used their effective counters elsewhere, but most of the time Doctor boom, and win.
i fucking told y'all that puzzle box wasn't gonna be a meme card
i told y'all!!!
I mean, “pay 10 mana to kick over the table” is a pretty good effect if you’re losing anyway, especially since mage has a lot of ways to discover/discount it
it was the smallest on the list but
Pluto was a planet and I'll never forget
+7
Options
zepherinRussian warship, go fuck yourselfRegistered Userregular
I've been going murlock paladin for that crazy amphibian sex.
I've seen the stats that decks that start with prismatic lens. Should I be keeping that (above all), usually I'm trying to get a 1 2 3 mana setup with a murmy or tidecaller followed by a fishflinger/ tide hunter
Also while I am looking at the theory crafting. It seams that by dropping a true silver champion for Leeroy Jenkins, it drops the winning percentage of the deck.
Having Sir Finley
Zepphyrs
Leeroy
Nomi
1 True silver champion
Why would you expect a 5 mana 6 damage charge finisher to be better than a 4 mana 4/2 healing weapon? It's more face damage overall if you go twice, you don't have a glut of weapons competing anyway and truesilver handles many roles and early/mid game favourable trades but leeroy is only face and only at the end. Leeory is probably only better if they have absurd numbers of taunts and you only get one open turn or everybody is packing lots of weapon destruction
And finally the deck that Abar went on a 14-0 run to hit 43:
lwt1973 on
"He's sulking in his tent like Achilles! It's the Iliad?...from Homer?! READ A BOOK!!" -Handy
+4
Options
lwt1973King of ThievesSyndicationRegistered Userregular
I've played all of those decks with the Druid and the Tess Rogue making Warrior cry about the value. The aggro Rogue is fast but can stall out if they have some clears. I have won a game with the Rogue using Zeph to grab a Twisting Nether after I Myra's. The rush Warrior is a fun deck but it can also stall if you don't have the card draw of Battle Rage going on.
"He's sulking in his tent like Achilles! It's the Iliad?...from Homer?! READ A BOOK!!" -Handy
Togglewaggling 15 Tesses into your deck does make control warrior head for the bottom right real quick like.
if this is still an effective gameplan once this meta shakes out i'll be very happy
bsjezz on
+1
Options
zepherinRussian warship, go fuck yourselfRegistered Userregular
I was 2 and 2 in brawlnasium, lethal in my hand I was just waiting for them to finish wiping the board so I can drop leeroy and finish, I stood up in the train to let someone sit down and when I did that hearthstone took a shit and wouldn’t reconnect. Pissed
0
Options
BeastehTHAT WOULD NOTKILL DRACULARegistered Userregular
that quest druid is madness, i love it
if only i weren't so dust poor after crafting highlander mage
Thief rogue has dunked on control warrior for a while, it’s just that in the prior meta it had tons of bad matchups. If the quest lets you survive well enough against aggro it’ll be eminently playable
it was the smallest on the list but
Pluto was a planet and I'll never forget
I saw Kripp playing this cool funky Highlander Quest Shaman deck on stream last night. It looked surprisingly effective.
Turns out double battlecry on Zeph is kind of nuts? But then also have two bounces, plus Barista (which you can double up on for even MORE Zephs) PLUS Shudderwock is kind of fucking absurd.
I do not have a deckcode (sorry!), but I did screenshot the list he was using. It actually looked FAIRLY good, honestly, I can't find any real faults with the list:
Crazed Alch I assume is there for Doomsayers... I'm maybe not too sure about Fountain (does it belong in this list?), like maybe that could just be Zilliax instead, who knows. Oh, and honestly I'm not super sold on Beaming Sidekick, but I guess I'm also not sure what else that'd be? Hmm.
Maybe later I can slap this together in Hearthstone and actually get the code....
I think they expected it to be a tech choice against Bomb warrior.
Remember what the original version of warrior's scheme was.
0
Options
BeastehTHAT WOULD NOTKILL DRACULARegistered Userregular
rdu just hit rank 1 legend with highlander hunter
it was a crash course in how to use zephrys
(he never EVER sees silence vs stealthed stuff so you won't get mass dispel, you can manipulate him into giving you certain options by controlling your mana before you play him, he never takes your hand into account so say you have an opponent with 12 health and double eviscerate, you need to double evisc and THEN play him for a third evisc)
Posts
i told y'all!!!
Battle.net Tag: Dibby#1582
excuse me??? exCUSE ME????? EXCUSE YOU???????????
you're banished from this thread TEG
begone blasphemer and never return
Battle.net Tag: Dibby#1582
only if the uldum song is blasting in the background
Battle.net Tag: Dibby#1582
GG NO RE
NERDS.
Witty signature comment goes here...
wra
I'm playing a Shaman, get Academic Espionage off and draw Hagatha.
I play Hagatha to clear his board, then a few turns later play Tess Greymane. Apparently playing a hero turns your class into that class? so Tess replayed every Rogue card I had played to that point. I Shadowstep'd her back into my hand which resulted in every subsequent play of her shadowstep'ing her back into my hand since apparently I was a Shaman now...
I've been going murlock paladin for that crazy amphibian sex.
I've seen the stats that decks that start with prismatic lens. Should I be keeping that (above all), usually I'm trying to get a 1 2 3 mana setup with a murmy or tidecaller followed by a fishflinger/ tide hunter
this is from individual card data on HSReplay
but don't worry guys, warrior is balanced. after all, they only take up the first 16 cards, i mean cmon, this is clearly overblown.
Battle.net Tag: Dibby#1582
And here's our winner!
(Play at 1.5 speed for best results)
Legends of Runeterra: MNCdover #moc
Switch ID: MNC Dover SW-1154-3107-1051
Steam ID
Twitch Page
Twitch: KoopahTroopah - Steam: Koopah
RIGGED!!!
FUKKEN RIGGED!!!!!!!
Battle.net Tag: Dibby#1582
Twitch: KoopahTroopah - Steam: Koopah
two 3/2s every turn is easily beatable, and one sometimes two 4/3s is the same.
And doing both would be way too slow. You'd just get agroed down. So you control till doctor boom and then win, most of the time. Sometimes they have something in the shoot for that, and sometimes warriors already used their effective counters elsewhere, but most of the time Doctor boom, and win.
I mean, “pay 10 mana to kick over the table” is a pretty good effect if you’re losing anyway, especially since mage has a lot of ways to discover/discount it
Pluto was a planet and I'll never forget
Having Sir Finley
Zepphyrs
Leeroy
Nomi
1 True silver champion
Seams like it would be stronger than
Sir Finley
zephyrs
Nomi
2 true silver champions.
https://hsreplay.net/decks/2swQn7SZxi6nrHa2BewIx/#tab=overview
I need to understand the why there is a statistically significant deviation in wins (4%) between those two.
https://hsreplay.net/decks/8KAoFIlb03u0Viis4FPWLb/
if you want Leeroy in there, there's other cuts you can make: https://hsreplay.net/decks/#playerClasses=PALADIN&sortBy=winrate&archetypes=157&includedCards=847,847,559
Battle.net Tag: Dibby#1582
Here's a deck that went 14-1 during the tournament this weekend to get into Bucharest.
AAECAYwWBNICrwSEnwOftwMNFhydApADjgXUCIXtAp3wArP8Ap+hA/SnA/WoA9ypAwA=
Also here's the Quest Rogue that was doing work in the Brawl for Jalexander:
AAECAYwWBNICrwSEnwOftwMNFhydApADjgXUCIXtAp3wArP8Ap+hA/SnA/WoA9ypAwA=
Here's the deck that hit 2 for Boarcontrol:
And finally the deck that Abar went on a 14-0 run to hit 43:
Maybe
https://hsreplay.net/decks/X4xFAjuTwBPzL5IfOpI0Sb/
that has some potential, that might be the ticket.
if this is still an effective gameplan once this meta shakes out i'll be very happy
if only i weren't so dust poor after crafting highlander mage
Pluto was a planet and I'll never forget
Turns out double battlecry on Zeph is kind of nuts? But then also have two bounces, plus Barista (which you can double up on for even MORE Zephs) PLUS Shudderwock is kind of fucking absurd.
I do not have a deckcode (sorry!), but I did screenshot the list he was using. It actually looked FAIRLY good, honestly, I can't find any real faults with the list:
Crazed Alch I assume is there for Doomsayers... I'm maybe not too sure about Fountain (does it belong in this list?), like maybe that could just be Zilliax instead, who knows. Oh, and honestly I'm not super sold on Beaming Sidekick, but I guess I'm also not sure what else that'd be? Hmm.
Maybe later I can slap this together in Hearthstone and actually get the code....
Battle.net Tag: Dibby#1582
Remember what the original version of warrior's scheme was.
it was a crash course in how to use zephrys
(he never EVER sees silence vs stealthed stuff so you won't get mass dispel, you can manipulate him into giving you certain options by controlling your mana before you play him, he never takes your hand into account so say you have an opponent with 12 health and double eviscerate, you need to double evisc and THEN play him for a third evisc)