As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

[Second Impeachment] Acquitted of Armed Insurrection | 57 Votes for Guilty

1679111276

Posts

  • Options
    EncEnc A Fool with Compassion Pronouns: He, Him, HisRegistered User regular
    Yes, though when not in session they typically are still working in coordinating for the next session.

  • Options
    DrezDrez Registered User regular
    America needs surgery and it needs it now. Fuck everything else until that's done.

    Switch: SW-7690-2320-9238Steam/PSN/Xbox: Drezdar
  • Options
    tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    Drez wrote: »
    America needs surgery and it needs it now. Fuck everything else until that's done.

    Usually true, but unlike anecdotal surgery, we have like actual real disease causing real death on a scale not seen since the actual Civil War. Both things are a priority and both must be done. Fortunately the impeachment trial need take all of 5 minutes.

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
  • Options
    shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Elki wrote: »
    Sarah Jeong (NYT, elsewhere) had a relevant thought about the whole they almost died thing.
    honestly there has nothing been more flabbergasting than Democrats having faced down getting blown up / shot / kidnapped and then pretending like they have no power to do anything about it

    It turns out it’s not that they didn’t care about their constituents, they’re just abject cowards who can’t even stand up for themselves in an ongoing emergency where the lack of consequences makes a second, third, fourth attack more likely????

    ...

    Silicon Valley companies with soul-crushing moral cowardice built into their DNA have moved faster, *what is wrong with you*


    This part is what sticks out to me:


    “Ah ha, but let’s not ruin Biden’s first one hundred days”

    A mob just tried to kill you??? Like, there’s bombs and stuff and a cop died???? Why the fuck do you think we’re on a normal schedule anymore!!!

    This whole "We can't do that" mentality is asinine under the circumstances. YOU CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING. Jesus, if this doesn't qualify as an emergency, a time to break precedent, a time to get shit done, then when???

    The GOP were breaking norms and bucking rules from day one, but the dems are just like "We caaaaaaan't", even when someone almost literally has a gun to their head. What the fuck.

    Because impeaching Trump will not get Democrats re-elected. That's what this comes down to imo. The historical lesson here is that voters just don't care enough about all this shit to have it move their votes so the question of what is more important is skewed away from shit like "holding Trump accountable" and towards their legislative agenda.

  • Options
    MeeqeMeeqe Lord of the pants most fancy Someplace amazingRegistered User regular
    I know the bar has been really, really, really low recently, but doing both is well within what I would consider a functional government.

    Lets hope one is on the way.

  • Options
    rahkeesh2000rahkeesh2000 Registered User regular
    edited January 2021
    shryke wrote: »
    Elki wrote: »
    Sarah Jeong (NYT, elsewhere) had a relevant thought about the whole they almost died thing.
    honestly there has nothing been more flabbergasting than Democrats having faced down getting blown up / shot / kidnapped and then pretending like they have no power to do anything about it

    It turns out it’s not that they didn’t care about their constituents, they’re just abject cowards who can’t even stand up for themselves in an ongoing emergency where the lack of consequences makes a second, third, fourth attack more likely????

    ...

    Silicon Valley companies with soul-crushing moral cowardice built into their DNA have moved faster, *what is wrong with you*


    This part is what sticks out to me:


    “Ah ha, but let’s not ruin Biden’s first one hundred days”

    A mob just tried to kill you??? Like, there’s bombs and stuff and a cop died???? Why the fuck do you think we’re on a normal schedule anymore!!!

    This whole "We can't do that" mentality is asinine under the circumstances. YOU CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING. Jesus, if this doesn't qualify as an emergency, a time to break precedent, a time to get shit done, then when???

    The GOP were breaking norms and bucking rules from day one, but the dems are just like "We caaaaaaan't", even when someone almost literally has a gun to their head. What the fuck.

    Because impeaching Trump will not get Democrats re-elected. That's what this comes down to imo. The historical lesson here is that voters just don't care enough about all this shit to have it move their votes so the question of what is more important is skewed away from shit like "holding Trump accountable" and towards their legislative agenda.

    This sounds like a collective action problem because not impeaching Trump could lead to the end of elections.

    rahkeesh2000 on
  • Options
    OrcaOrca Also known as Espressosaurus WrexRegistered User regular
    tbloxham wrote: »
    Drez wrote: »
    America needs surgery and it needs it now. Fuck everything else until that's done.

    Usually true, but unlike anecdotal surgery, we have like actual real disease causing real death on a scale not seen since the actual Civil War. Both things are a priority and both must be done. Fortunately the impeachment trial need take all of 5 minutes.

    As horrible as it is, COVID (on its own) is not an immediate threat to democracy. Long term? Absolutely, though with the vaccines out and a commitment to COVID relief I think it's "just" a stressor and not a game-ender now.

    Trumpism on the other hand, is, IMO. Sort of the difference between a fire on a ship, and a leak on the same ship. The leak is a problem that needs to get fixed, but that fire might just fuck you up before the leak does if you don't get a handle on it.

    At this point I think we've gone beyond the galley fire in this metaphor. It's still containable but it has done a bunch of damage and will do more before it's out. And most importantly, it's not yet under control.

  • Options
    shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    Elki wrote: »
    Sarah Jeong (NYT, elsewhere) had a relevant thought about the whole they almost died thing.
    honestly there has nothing been more flabbergasting than Democrats having faced down getting blown up / shot / kidnapped and then pretending like they have no power to do anything about it

    It turns out it’s not that they didn’t care about their constituents, they’re just abject cowards who can’t even stand up for themselves in an ongoing emergency where the lack of consequences makes a second, third, fourth attack more likely????

    ...

    Silicon Valley companies with soul-crushing moral cowardice built into their DNA have moved faster, *what is wrong with you*


    This part is what sticks out to me:


    “Ah ha, but let’s not ruin Biden’s first one hundred days”

    A mob just tried to kill you??? Like, there’s bombs and stuff and a cop died???? Why the fuck do you think we’re on a normal schedule anymore!!!

    This whole "We can't do that" mentality is asinine under the circumstances. YOU CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING. Jesus, if this doesn't qualify as an emergency, a time to break precedent, a time to get shit done, then when???

    The GOP were breaking norms and bucking rules from day one, but the dems are just like "We caaaaaaan't", even when someone almost literally has a gun to their head. What the fuck.

    Because impeaching Trump will not get Democrats re-elected. That's what this comes down to imo. The historical lesson here is that voters just don't care enough about all this shit to have it move their votes so the question of what is more important is skewed away from shit like "holding Trump accountable" and towards their legislative agenda.

    This sounds like a collective action problem because not impeaching Trump could lead to the end of elections.

    It's not a collective action problem, it's a democracy problem. Voters don't pay a lot of attention, don't care about process and don't really care about the big picture. This is, I would bet, what is shaping their behaviour here because Democratic leadership's goal is basically always winning the next election.

    The democrats are also seemingly aware of the election issue since the first bill they passed after winning the House was, afaik, a huge pro-democracy one.

  • Options
    ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    Elki wrote: »
    Sarah Jeong (NYT, elsewhere) had a relevant thought about the whole they almost died thing.
    honestly there has nothing been more flabbergasting than Democrats having faced down getting blown up / shot / kidnapped and then pretending like they have no power to do anything about it

    It turns out it’s not that they didn’t care about their constituents, they’re just abject cowards who can’t even stand up for themselves in an ongoing emergency where the lack of consequences makes a second, third, fourth attack more likely????

    ...

    Silicon Valley companies with soul-crushing moral cowardice built into their DNA have moved faster, *what is wrong with you*


    This part is what sticks out to me:


    “Ah ha, but let’s not ruin Biden’s first one hundred days”

    A mob just tried to kill you??? Like, there’s bombs and stuff and a cop died???? Why the fuck do you think we’re on a normal schedule anymore!!!

    This whole "We can't do that" mentality is asinine under the circumstances. YOU CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING. Jesus, if this doesn't qualify as an emergency, a time to break precedent, a time to get shit done, then when???

    The GOP were breaking norms and bucking rules from day one, but the dems are just like "We caaaaaaan't", even when someone almost literally has a gun to their head. What the fuck.

    Because impeaching Trump will not get Democrats re-elected. That's what this comes down to imo. The historical lesson here is that voters just don't care enough about all this shit to have it move their votes so the question of what is more important is skewed away from shit like "holding Trump accountable" and towards their legislative agenda.

    This sounds like a collective action problem because not impeaching Trump could lead to the end of elections.

    It's not a collective action problem, it's a democracy problem. Voters don't pay a lot of attention, don't care about process and don't really care about the big picture. This is, I would bet, what is shaping their behaviour here because Democratic leadership's goal is basically always winning the next election.

    The democrats are also seemingly aware of the election issue since the first bill they passed after winning the House was, afaik, a huge pro-democracy one.

    57% percent of voters are in favor of removal, for what it's worth

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-poll/majority-of-americans-want-trump-removed-immediately-after-u-s-capitol-violence-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN29D2VG

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • Options
    RedTideRedTide Registered User regular
    So,

    Since I also have my own head up my own ass all of the time, simple googling reveals a pdf the Senate put out just under a year ago about the procedures surrounding the last impeachment trial.

    The basic order is they can go about convicting/acquitting Trump and all it takes them to get onto the business of passing COVID relief is banging the gavel, playing musical chairs and banging the gavel again.

    RedTide#1907 on Battle.net
    Come Overwatch with meeeee
  • Options
    shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    Elki wrote: »
    Sarah Jeong (NYT, elsewhere) had a relevant thought about the whole they almost died thing.
    honestly there has nothing been more flabbergasting than Democrats having faced down getting blown up / shot / kidnapped and then pretending like they have no power to do anything about it

    It turns out it’s not that they didn’t care about their constituents, they’re just abject cowards who can’t even stand up for themselves in an ongoing emergency where the lack of consequences makes a second, third, fourth attack more likely????

    ...

    Silicon Valley companies with soul-crushing moral cowardice built into their DNA have moved faster, *what is wrong with you*


    This part is what sticks out to me:


    “Ah ha, but let’s not ruin Biden’s first one hundred days”

    A mob just tried to kill you??? Like, there’s bombs and stuff and a cop died???? Why the fuck do you think we’re on a normal schedule anymore!!!

    This whole "We can't do that" mentality is asinine under the circumstances. YOU CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING. Jesus, if this doesn't qualify as an emergency, a time to break precedent, a time to get shit done, then when???

    The GOP were breaking norms and bucking rules from day one, but the dems are just like "We caaaaaaan't", even when someone almost literally has a gun to their head. What the fuck.

    Because impeaching Trump will not get Democrats re-elected. That's what this comes down to imo. The historical lesson here is that voters just don't care enough about all this shit to have it move their votes so the question of what is more important is skewed away from shit like "holding Trump accountable" and towards their legislative agenda.

    This sounds like a collective action problem because not impeaching Trump could lead to the end of elections.

    It's not a collective action problem, it's a democracy problem. Voters don't pay a lot of attention, don't care about process and don't really care about the big picture. This is, I would bet, what is shaping their behaviour here because Democratic leadership's goal is basically always winning the next election.

    The democrats are also seemingly aware of the election issue since the first bill they passed after winning the House was, afaik, a huge pro-democracy one.

    57% percent of voters are in favor of removal, for what it's worth

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-poll/majority-of-americans-want-trump-removed-immediately-after-u-s-capitol-violence-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN29D2VG

    538 had support for removing Trump from office at ~48% last time around:
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/impeachment-polls/

    Like, I'm 100% in favour of impeaching his ass and probably as soon as possible. I just think we should also be realistic about what the actual incentives here are.

  • Options
    ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    Chanus wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    Elki wrote: »
    Sarah Jeong (NYT, elsewhere) had a relevant thought about the whole they almost died thing.
    honestly there has nothing been more flabbergasting than Democrats having faced down getting blown up / shot / kidnapped and then pretending like they have no power to do anything about it

    It turns out it’s not that they didn’t care about their constituents, they’re just abject cowards who can’t even stand up for themselves in an ongoing emergency where the lack of consequences makes a second, third, fourth attack more likely????

    ...

    Silicon Valley companies with soul-crushing moral cowardice built into their DNA have moved faster, *what is wrong with you*


    This part is what sticks out to me:


    “Ah ha, but let’s not ruin Biden’s first one hundred days”

    A mob just tried to kill you??? Like, there’s bombs and stuff and a cop died???? Why the fuck do you think we’re on a normal schedule anymore!!!

    This whole "We can't do that" mentality is asinine under the circumstances. YOU CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING. Jesus, if this doesn't qualify as an emergency, a time to break precedent, a time to get shit done, then when???

    The GOP were breaking norms and bucking rules from day one, but the dems are just like "We caaaaaaan't", even when someone almost literally has a gun to their head. What the fuck.

    Because impeaching Trump will not get Democrats re-elected. That's what this comes down to imo. The historical lesson here is that voters just don't care enough about all this shit to have it move their votes so the question of what is more important is skewed away from shit like "holding Trump accountable" and towards their legislative agenda.

    This sounds like a collective action problem because not impeaching Trump could lead to the end of elections.

    It's not a collective action problem, it's a democracy problem. Voters don't pay a lot of attention, don't care about process and don't really care about the big picture. This is, I would bet, what is shaping their behaviour here because Democratic leadership's goal is basically always winning the next election.

    The democrats are also seemingly aware of the election issue since the first bill they passed after winning the House was, afaik, a huge pro-democracy one.

    57% percent of voters are in favor of removal, for what it's worth

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-poll/majority-of-americans-want-trump-removed-immediately-after-u-s-capitol-violence-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN29D2VG

    538 had support for removing Trump from office at ~48% last time around:
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/impeachment-polls/

    Like, I'm 100% in favour of impeaching his ass and probably as soon as possible. I just think we should also be realistic about what the actual incentives here are.

    yeah, removal by Congress is entirely impossible

    i just don't know if polling is necessarily the issue in this case

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • Options
    discriderdiscrider Registered User regular
    I would have thought democratic voters would care somewhat about the attempted coup and not treating the issue with gravity would likely depress voter turnout, because why bother voting for a party that can't even help itself, let alone you.
    So would've thought voters do care.

  • Options
    shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited January 2021
    discrider wrote: »
    I would have thought democratic voters would care somewhat about the attempted coup and not treating the issue with gravity would likely depress voter turnout, because why bother voting for a party that can't even help itself, let alone you.
    So would've thought voters do care.

    There is, as far as I'm aware, no evidence of that.

    Hell, the immediate aftermath of last time was basically no movement in the polls except for an increase in disillusionment with the political process according to 538:
    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/impeachment-didnt-change-minds-it-eroded-trust/

    By election time afaik it wasn't even showing up as a thing people said effected their votes.

    shryke on
  • Options
    ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    discrider wrote: »
    I would have thought democratic voters would care somewhat about the attempted coup and not treating the issue with gravity would likely depress voter turnout, because why bother voting for a party that can't even help itself, let alone you.
    So would've thought voters do care.

    There is, as far as I'm aware, no evidence of that.

    Hell, the immediate aftermath of last time was basically no movement in the polls except for an increase in disillusionment with the political process according to 538:
    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/impeachment-didnt-change-minds-it-eroded-trust/

    By election time afaik it wasn't even showing up as a thing people said effected their votes.

    this is showing that impeachment shored up Republican support

    it did erode Democrat support slightly

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • Options
    zagdrobzagdrob Registered User regular
    discrider wrote: »
    I would have thought democratic voters would care somewhat about the attempted coup and not treating the issue with gravity would likely depress voter turnout, because why bother voting for a party that can't even help itself, let alone you.
    So would've thought voters do care.

    The question is how much time and capital do you spend on impeachment when you could be getting checks / healthcare / voters rights out there instead.

    If impeachment is a non-starter because you will never get 2/3 and will neither help people nor turn out your base in 2022 I can understand focusing on what you can do.

    Especially if part of that is confirming an AG that will go after the people who incited the attempted coup and handle things through that avenue.

    I do think impeachment is absolutely necessary as is expulsions and prison time, but I can see reasonable arguments why that may not be tenible. And a lot is jockeying and fighting for position the past and next week.

  • Options
    joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    You can still make every Republican vote for fascism and put the scarlet letter on them forever

    Make it known to the voters that if they reject Trumpism they can keep voting against Trump next time by voting out X, Y and Z

    I guess we’ll see what happens this week, hopefully the Dems don’t do their usual “always let a crisis go to waste”

  • Options
    Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    I mean technically the democrats gained two seats of government post impeachment.

    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • Options
    durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    Chanus wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    Elki wrote: »
    Sarah Jeong (NYT, elsewhere) had a relevant thought about the whole they almost died thing.
    honestly there has nothing been more flabbergasting than Democrats having faced down getting blown up / shot / kidnapped and then pretending like they have no power to do anything about it

    It turns out it’s not that they didn’t care about their constituents, they’re just abject cowards who can’t even stand up for themselves in an ongoing emergency where the lack of consequences makes a second, third, fourth attack more likely????

    ...

    Silicon Valley companies with soul-crushing moral cowardice built into their DNA have moved faster, *what is wrong with you*


    This part is what sticks out to me:


    “Ah ha, but let’s not ruin Biden’s first one hundred days”

    A mob just tried to kill you??? Like, there’s bombs and stuff and a cop died???? Why the fuck do you think we’re on a normal schedule anymore!!!

    This whole "We can't do that" mentality is asinine under the circumstances. YOU CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING. Jesus, if this doesn't qualify as an emergency, a time to break precedent, a time to get shit done, then when???

    The GOP were breaking norms and bucking rules from day one, but the dems are just like "We caaaaaaan't", even when someone almost literally has a gun to their head. What the fuck.

    Because impeaching Trump will not get Democrats re-elected. That's what this comes down to imo. The historical lesson here is that voters just don't care enough about all this shit to have it move their votes so the question of what is more important is skewed away from shit like "holding Trump accountable" and towards their legislative agenda.

    This sounds like a collective action problem because not impeaching Trump could lead to the end of elections.

    It's not a collective action problem, it's a democracy problem. Voters don't pay a lot of attention, don't care about process and don't really care about the big picture. This is, I would bet, what is shaping their behaviour here because Democratic leadership's goal is basically always winning the next election.

    The democrats are also seemingly aware of the election issue since the first bill they passed after winning the House was, afaik, a huge pro-democracy one.

    57% percent of voters are in favor of removal, for what it's worth

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-poll/majority-of-americans-want-trump-removed-immediately-after-u-s-capitol-violence-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN29D2VG

    538 had support for removing Trump from office at ~48% last time around:
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/impeachment-polls/

    Like, I'm 100% in favour of impeaching his ass and probably as soon as possible. I just think we should also be realistic about what the actual incentives here are.

    yeah, removal by Congress is entirely impossible

    i just don't know if polling is necessarily the issue in this case

    I think a clear majority of the public wants him removed, but I think the inevitable fact of the Republicans refusing to vote for his removal will likely go down for most folks as "Those Clowns in Congress failed us again!"

    We have a bad political system that feeds into people's existing cynicism.

    Take a moment to donate what you can to Critical Resistance and Black Lives Matter.
  • Options
    ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    Chanus wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    Elki wrote: »
    Sarah Jeong (NYT, elsewhere) had a relevant thought about the whole they almost died thing.
    honestly there has nothing been more flabbergasting than Democrats having faced down getting blown up / shot / kidnapped and then pretending like they have no power to do anything about it

    It turns out it’s not that they didn’t care about their constituents, they’re just abject cowards who can’t even stand up for themselves in an ongoing emergency where the lack of consequences makes a second, third, fourth attack more likely????

    ...

    Silicon Valley companies with soul-crushing moral cowardice built into their DNA have moved faster, *what is wrong with you*


    This part is what sticks out to me:


    “Ah ha, but let’s not ruin Biden’s first one hundred days”

    A mob just tried to kill you??? Like, there’s bombs and stuff and a cop died???? Why the fuck do you think we’re on a normal schedule anymore!!!

    This whole "We can't do that" mentality is asinine under the circumstances. YOU CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING. Jesus, if this doesn't qualify as an emergency, a time to break precedent, a time to get shit done, then when???

    The GOP were breaking norms and bucking rules from day one, but the dems are just like "We caaaaaaan't", even when someone almost literally has a gun to their head. What the fuck.

    Because impeaching Trump will not get Democrats re-elected. That's what this comes down to imo. The historical lesson here is that voters just don't care enough about all this shit to have it move their votes so the question of what is more important is skewed away from shit like "holding Trump accountable" and towards their legislative agenda.

    This sounds like a collective action problem because not impeaching Trump could lead to the end of elections.

    It's not a collective action problem, it's a democracy problem. Voters don't pay a lot of attention, don't care about process and don't really care about the big picture. This is, I would bet, what is shaping their behaviour here because Democratic leadership's goal is basically always winning the next election.

    The democrats are also seemingly aware of the election issue since the first bill they passed after winning the House was, afaik, a huge pro-democracy one.

    57% percent of voters are in favor of removal, for what it's worth

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-poll/majority-of-americans-want-trump-removed-immediately-after-u-s-capitol-violence-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN29D2VG

    538 had support for removing Trump from office at ~48% last time around:
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/impeachment-polls/

    Like, I'm 100% in favour of impeaching his ass and probably as soon as possible. I just think we should also be realistic about what the actual incentives here are.

    yeah, removal by Congress is entirely impossible

    i just don't know if polling is necessarily the issue in this case

    I think a clear majority of the public wants him removed, but I think the inevitable fact of the Republicans refusing to vote for his removal will likely go down for most folks as "Those Clowns in Congress failed us again!"

    We have a bad political system that feeds into people's existing cynicism.

    i mean this entire thread can be summed up as two camps:

    Maybe This Time Is Different and Democrats Won't Do What They Always Do?

    This Time Is Different and Democrats Will Do The Same Thing They Always Do!

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • Options
    discriderdiscrider Registered User regular
    zagdrob wrote: »
    discrider wrote: »
    I would have thought democratic voters would care somewhat about the attempted coup and not treating the issue with gravity would likely depress voter turnout, because why bother voting for a party that can't even help itself, let alone you.
    So would've thought voters do care.

    The question is how much time and capital do you spend on impeachment when you could be getting checks / healthcare / voters rights out there instead.

    Frankly, I think this should've been "Impeachment #27645 - Crimes showing Trump is a clear and present danger to democracy: Who's wasting time now", after impeaching over and over for new and exciting crimes throughout his entire tenure.

    So I guess my answer is 'all of it, there is no greater issue'.

  • Options
    Inkstain82Inkstain82 Registered User regular
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

  • Options
    joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

  • Options
    Inkstain82Inkstain82 Registered User regular
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

  • Options
    joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

  • Options
    GiantGeek2020GiantGeek2020 Registered User regular
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

    The Democrats lost seats in the house.

  • Options
    GiantGeek2020GiantGeek2020 Registered User regular
    Basically, the call was coming from inside the house the whole time.

    Literally there are like 80 members of the fucking House who believe in this batshit stuff.

  • Options
    ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User regular
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

    i think you are conflating losing an election with not being mainstream, and that is not really the case

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • Options
    Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    The sixth is being a real come to Jesus moment for a lot of Rs who had dismissed the claims of fascism about their own party

    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • Options
    joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

    i think you are conflating losing an election with not being mainstream, and that is not really the case

    The point I am actually making is that when fascism is visible and obvious, people turn out in droves to oppose it

    I’m sorry (not sarcastically!) if that isn’t clear

  • Options
    OrcaOrca Also known as Espressosaurus WrexRegistered User regular
    The sixth is being a real come to Jesus moment for a lot of Rs who had dismissed the claims of fascism about their own party

    I hope it's enough of one

  • Options
    jothkijothki Registered User regular
    Bear in mind that with McConnell out of the way, the Senate won't be the only viable source for crafting legislation any more. The Senate can rely on the House to hash things out and then just rubber-stamp what they put out, rather than completely ignoring it and putting out their own version that the House will be forced to accept because they want the country to continue to function.

  • Options
    GiantGeek2020GiantGeek2020 Registered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

    i think you are conflating losing an election with not being mainstream, and that is not really the case

    Yeah. Essentially 22.85% of the entire population of the US is at least partially okay with Trump. He's done shit that should disqualify him from holding a job on a school council, much less the Presidency.

    So yeah, kind of spooky.

  • Options
    Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    If I told my dad in October that he was going to vote for a fascist he would have lambasted me and we’d have had a huge drawn out argument involving yelling

    I told my dad after the sixth that he voted for a fascist and he did not argue the point at all and called for Trump, Brooks, and Cruz to all be arrested and removed from power.

    So yeah, bit of a zeitgeist shift there.

    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • Options
    RedTideRedTide Registered User regular
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

    The Democrats lost seats in the house.

    They lost the seats they won because Trump wasn't on the 2018 ballot.

    Trump was still good for the Republican ballot compared to their last two standard bearers.

    RedTide#1907 on Battle.net
    Come Overwatch with meeeee
  • Options
    Inkstain82Inkstain82 Registered User regular
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

    That’s true. I didn’t say “Democrats can never win against mainstreamed fascists.” They can and did.

    It’s just that our country is so committed to both-sidesism that a major party embracing fascism elevates fascism further than it drags down the major party

  • Options
    GiantGeek2020GiantGeek2020 Registered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

    i think you are conflating losing an election with not being mainstream, and that is not really the case

    The point I am actually making is that when fascism is visible and obvious, people turn out in droves to oppose it

    I’m sorry (not sarcastically!) if that isn’t clear

    They also turn out in droves to support it. Trump's number of votes went up between elections.

    Absolute panic is definitely not an appropriate place to be right now. But I am not confident of where the future is going to take us either.

  • Options
    joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

    i think you are conflating losing an election with not being mainstream, and that is not really the case

    The point I am actually making is that when fascism is visible and obvious, people turn out in droves to oppose it

    I’m sorry (not sarcastically!) if that isn’t clear

    They also turn out in droves to support it. Trump's number of votes went up between elections.

    Absolute panic is definitely not an appropriate place to be right now. But I am not confident of where the future is going to take us either.

    If I have one failing it’s that I am unfailingly optimistic, even in the face of real shitfuckery

  • Options
    GiantGeek2020GiantGeek2020 Registered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    We watched very different 2020 elections

    The one where the fascists got 75 million votes? Seemed pretty mainstream

    The one where people were so fed up with fascism they took the House, Senate, and presidency

    i think you are conflating losing an election with not being mainstream, and that is not really the case

    The point I am actually making is that when fascism is visible and obvious, people turn out in droves to oppose it

    I’m sorry (not sarcastically!) if that isn’t clear

    They also turn out in droves to support it. Trump's number of votes went up between elections.

    Absolute panic is definitely not an appropriate place to be right now. But I am not confident of where the future is going to take us either.

    If I have one failing it’s that I am unfailingly optimistic, even in the face of real shitfuckery

    Better that than my tendency to let my anxiety try to eat it's way through my stomach wall.

  • Options
    LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    Inkstain82 wrote: »
    When mainstream republicans vote for fascism, it doesn’t stain them, it mainstreams fascism

    Fascism has, unfortunately, always been fairly mainstream in America:

    https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2019/02/20/695941323/when-nazis-took-manhattan

    jh3200xiv46d.jpeg


    That’s Madison Square Garden chock full of a shitton of Nazis.

    Literal “we support Hitler and it is the 1930s” Nazis

    waNkm4k.jpg?1
This discussion has been closed.