The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Filming of Tom Cruise movie banned in Germany

1356713

Posts

  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    nialscorva wrote: »
    Operation Snow White

    Among other things, Scientology had 4 programs designed to infiltrate the German government and had plans to take the German government to the UN on accusations of "Genocide." As you might guess, Germans can be a little sensitive about the word "genocide" being thrown about.

    Okay, if Tom Cruise is a member of an organization that has planned espionage on and infiltration of the German government, I'm going to kind of side with Germany on this one. It's a little like not allowing a confirmed Soviet spy to wander around our military bases.

    Guilt by association? Tom Cruise never did anything to Germany, except try to bring them some money by making a movie there. You might as well say that Christians shouldn't be allowed in museums because they stole a lot of artwork during the Crusades.

    Tom Cruise is a member of an organization that has actively conspired against the current German Government. I think that gives them a bit of a leeway into denying a member of the organization onto its military bases to film a movie.

    Goumindong on
    wbBv3fj.png
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Goumindong wrote: »
    The difference is that when religions receive money, they take pay operating expenses and use the rest for charitable purpose.
    LOL
    Well, it's true.

    How big "the rest" actually is varies from case to case, of course.

    Andrew_Jay on
  • HorusHorus Los AngelesRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    I wish I could think of an example, but I'm sure there must be other examples of an actor being criticised for not being "suitable" to play some historical figure.


    Well I know a lot of Mexican (maybe Latin American) producers and directors really hate Antonio Banderas for his portrayal on Latin American historical heroes. Like this one awards show Antonio sang in spanish and Cuaron I am guessing went on stage later on and sang it claiming thats how you do it. Thats the only example I can think of.

    Horus on
    “You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself any direction you choose. You're on your own. And you know what you know. And YOU are the one who'll decide where to go...”
    ― Dr. Seuss, Oh, the Places You'll Go!
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Crusades? That's hardly a current event.

    Okay, you're right. How about, "a Nazi in the 60's shouldn't be allowed in a museum because the Nazi's stole a lot of artwork in WWII. "

    LiveWire on
  • The_ScarabThe_Scarab Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Im laughing at the fact that people think Scientology is any worse at extorting the public for money to line their own coffers when the Christian Church has been doing this for thousands of years on a vastly larger scale.

    The_Scarab on
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Crusades? That's hardly a current event.
    Okay, you're right. How about, "a Nazi in the 60's shouldn't be allowed in a museum because the Nazi's stole a lot of artwork in WWII. "
    Well, if we're talking about an actual member of the (illegal) Nazi party as opposed to a mere German, then yeah, they probably wouldn't get into a museum.

    Andrew_Jay on
  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Just FYI, pretty much all religion (Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc) are based on a power hungry and money loving doctrine.

    I'm amazed so many people still haven't realized this yet.

    Magus` on
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    Goumindong wrote: »
    The difference is that when religions receive money, they take pay operating expenses and use the rest for charitable purpose.
    LOL
    Well, it's true.

    How big "the rest" actually is varies from case to case, of course.

    I guess if you expand the definition of "charitable purposes" to spreading church influence and building new/expanding church facilities, okay.

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • ÆthelredÆthelred Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Goumindong wrote: »
    The difference is that when religions receive money, they take pay operating expenses and use the rest for charitable purpose.

    LOL

    What are you talking about Loren? How can you pray to Jesus without this?

    r3_6_1d_culture_russia.jpg

    Æthelred on
    pokes: 1505 8032 8399
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    Goumindong wrote: »
    The difference is that when religions receive money, they take pay operating expenses and use the rest for charitable purpose.
    LOL
    Well, it's true.
    I guess if you expand the definition of "charitable purposes" to spreading church influence and building new/expanding church facilities, okay.
    Yeah, that too (though the misquote isn't really appreciated) - I was mostly thinking of those churches you come across where "charitable causes" include a villa and private helicopter for the pastor.

    Andrew_Jay on
  • AdrienAdrien Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Goumindong wrote: »
    The difference is that when religions receive money, they take pay operating expenses and use the rest for charitable purpose.

    LOL

    What are you talking about Loren? How can you pray to Jesus without this?

    IMG

    So that's what that's for.


    :oops:

    Adrien on
    tmkm.jpg
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    We don't arrest gang members for belonging to a gang. We arrest individuals for breaking the law.
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.

    LiveWire on
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    (though the misquote isn't really appreciated)

    Ah, I read you as being sincere. My apologies.

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • HaphazardHaphazard Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    We don't arrest gang members for belonging to a gang. We arrest individuals for breaking the law.
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.

    Why, was he arrested now?

    Haphazard on
  • FirstComradeStalinFirstComradeStalin Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Apparently Germany has a long history of hating Scientology. They once tried to boycott Windows 2000 because the CEO of the company that developed its defrag program was a Scientologist.

    FirstComradeStalin on
    Picture1-4.png
  • ShintoShinto __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    What will you do if the Scientologists convert David Hasslehoff Germany?

    What will you do?

    Shinto on
  • HaphazardHaphazard Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Shinto wrote: »
    What will you do if the Scientologists convert David Hasslehoff Germany?

    What will you do?

    Knock on wood? :P

    Haphazard on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Haphazard wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    We don't arrest gang members for belonging to a gang. We arrest individuals for breaking the law.
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.

    Why, was he arrested now?

    Learn what an analogy is.

    Again,
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.

    LiveWire on
  • AzioAzio Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    We don't arrest gang members for belonging to a gang. We arrest individuals for breaking the law.
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.
    Tom Cruise is a prominent, outspoken, high-ranking member of an organization that has actively conspired against the German government. Based solely on this fact I think they are well within their rights to deny him access to sensitive military areas.

    Azio on
  • HaphazardHaphazard Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Haphazard wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    We don't arrest gang members for belonging to a gang. We arrest individuals for breaking the law.
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.

    Why, was he arrested now?

    Learn what an analogy is.

    Again,
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.

    Yeah, I know what an analogy is. Something kinky, right?

    Anyway, he may believe whatever crazy shit he wants, but that doesn't enable him to walz into some army barracks.

    So, you're analogy was a crappy one.

    Haphazard on
  • ColdredColdred Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Azio wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    We don't arrest gang members for belonging to a gang. We arrest individuals for breaking the law.
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.
    Tom Cruise is a prominent, outspoken, high-ranking member of an organization that has actively conspired against the German government. Based solely on this fact I think they are well within their rights to deny him access to sensitive military areas.

    They're well within their rights to deny anyone they like clearance to enter a military site. It's not like they're stopping him from entering the country, or some public area.

    Coldred on
    sig1-1.jpg
  • 12gauge12gauge Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I don't really see the problem here - Scientology has no good standing with the german government, so they do not allow one of Scientologies most famous spokespersons to film in german military bases. Well, bad luck, just go to a fucking soundstage and do it there. I don't really see why Germany should open it's military bases because Tom fucking Cruise wants to do a movie there. I mean, if I want to make a movie happening in some american military base, will I be allowed to without any further restrictions? Honestly, I was not even allowed into parts of NASA's fucking visitors center because I was a foreigner and could have laid my eyes on some technology from the sixties :lol:

    12gauge on
    davidoc0.jpg
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Azio wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    We don't arrest gang members for belonging to a gang. We arrest individuals for breaking the law.
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.
    Tom Cruise is a prominent, outspoken, high-ranking member of an organization that has actively conspired against the German government. Based solely on this fact I think they are well within their rights to deny him access to sensitive military areas.

    Get real. Tom Cruise's bacteria is more of a threat to the security of their military base than his Scientology.

    Moreover, "allowing him access to sensitive military areas" is wildly different from "allowing him onto a movie set to film a movie which happens to be on a military base".

    LiveWire on
  • ColdredColdred Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Azio wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    We don't arrest gang members for belonging to a gang. We arrest individuals for breaking the law.
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.
    Tom Cruise is a prominent, outspoken, high-ranking member of an organization that has actively conspired against the German government. Based solely on this fact I think they are well within their rights to deny him access to sensitive military areas.

    Get real. Tom Cruise's bacteria is more of a threat to the security of their military base than his Scientology.

    Moreover, "allowing him access to sensitive military areas" is wildly different from "allowing him onto a movie set to film a movie which happens to be on a military base".

    He'd still need to get clearance to get onto the base, and things like say, belonging to an organisation that has had, shall we say, poor previous relations with the German government, tend to affect whether you can get cleared. Plus the fact that he normally brings his "scientology tent" or whatever with him, will only set off more alarm bells.

    Coldred on
    sig1-1.jpg
  • VorusVorus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Interview with L. Ron Hubbard, among other things

    Also, so as to contribute, any government should be allowed to deny anyone access to their facilities. If it was a public place, the argument would be different, but for their own military bases? I'm pretty sure that's allowed.

    Vorus on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Mr_RoseMr_Rose 83 Blue Ridge Protects the Holy Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    The thread title is still misleading: Filming was not banned; a particular person who is a high ranking member of an organisation which has made several previous attempts to directly attack the German government has been denied access to a military base.

    Would you seriously consider letting a high-ranking member of Hamas onto an American base?

    Mr_Rose on
    ...because dragons are AWESOME! That's why.
    Nintendo Network ID: AzraelRose
    DropBox invite link - get 500MB extra free.
  • ZombiemamboZombiemambo Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Vorus wrote: »
    Interview with L. Ron Hubbard, among other things

    Also, so as to contribute, any government should be allowed to deny anyone access to their facilities. If it was a public place, the argument would be different, but for their own military bases? I'm pretty sure that's allowed.

    Indeed. They can do it for pretty much any reason they want to, considering he wasn't allowed access there in the first place.

    Zombiemambo on
    JKKaAGp.png
  • ALockslyALocksly Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    wiki wrote:
    Operation Freakout was the name given by the Church of Scientology to a covert plan intended to have the author Paulette Cooper imprisoned or committed to a mental institution. The plan, undertaken in 1976 following years of Church-initiated lawsuits and covert harassment, was meant to eliminate the perceived threat that Cooper posed to the Church and obtain revenge for her publication in 1971 of a highly critical book, The Scandal of Scientology.

    No other church has such a dedicated program of harassment and organised character assasination as these turds.

    ALocksly on
    Yes,... yes, I agree. It's totally unfair that sober you gets into trouble for things that drunk you did.
  • ShintoShinto __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    I don't know.

    I think if they were willing to allow the filming on the base, but the sticking point is Tom Cruise - this is a shitty reason.

    A military has power over their bases for certain reasons, none of which involve furthering government vendettas against certain actors for their social affiliations.

    I mean, what if they were going to deny the filming of a movie with Jon Stewart purely because the German government of the time was closely allied with the Bush administration and didn't like his critics?

    Is that also just fine and cool?

    Shinto on
  • YallYall Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XW8eTe_Ank8

    Come on guys, I think they are pretty cool.

    Why wouldn't everyone want them in their town?

    Yall on
  • MuddBuddMuddBudd Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I'm not sure I agree with their tactic but it's certainly hilarious as I'm not a fan of Scientology.

    I wouldn't go so far as to call them a cult, but I don't like how they are trying to set themselves up as a networking society for Hollywood/the movie industry.

    Sea Org scares me a bit too.

    MuddBudd on
    There's no plan, there's no race to be run
    The harder the rain, honey, the sweeter the sun.
  • TarranonTarranon Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Yall wrote: »
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XW8eTe_Ank8

    Come on guys, I think they are pretty cool.

    Why wouldn't everyone want them in their town?

    Wow, I'm sure every other mainstream religion is like scientology! Their wide popularity certainly doesn't tone down any unseemly social practices that might arise otherwise!

    Tarranon on
    You could be anywhere
    On the black screen
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Haphazard wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Haphazard wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    We don't arrest gang members for belonging to a gang. We arrest individuals for breaking the law.
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.

    Why, was he arrested now?

    Learn what an analogy is.

    Again,
    The point is that an individual should not be blamed for the action of other individuals, even if they are in the same organization. Tom Cruise has committed no offense and there is no reasonable evidence that he is planning to.

    Yeah, I know what an analogy is. Something kinky, right?

    Anyway, he may believe whatever crazy shit he wants, but that doesn't enable him to walz into some army barracks.

    So, you're analogy was a crappy one.

    Are you being serious here?

    No one is suggesting that Scientologists should be allowed to go anywhere on earth they please, least of all BECAUSE they are scientologists. The debate here is if the German government is justified in denying Tom Cruise access to a movie set specifically because he is a scientologist. You are WAY off base.

    LiveWire on
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Why can't the German government deny him access to a base just because they don't like him? The American government disapproves movies filming on facilities even if they don't like the script.

    Glaeal on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Shinto wrote: »
    I think if they were willing to allow the filming on the base, but the sticking point is Tom Cruise - this is a shitty reason.

    This is the case:
    Harald Kammerbauer, spokesman for the country's Defense Ministry, says, "(Producers) will not be allowed to film at German military sites if Count Stauffenberg is played by Tom Cruise, who has publicly professed to being a member of the Scientology cult."

    LiveWire on
  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    So the German military doesn't want a cult member on their military base. I don't get why everyone is freaking out.

    Hacksaw on
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    This is nothing and ridiculous that it gets more press than what Germany did some 7 - 8 years ago. They forced Microsoft to remove the Diskeeper software (the built in windows de-fragmentation software) from Windows 2000 because it was written by a company that backs Scientology.

    stigweard on
  • ZombiemamboZombiemambo Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    stigweard wrote: »
    This is nothing and ridiculous that it gets more press than what Germany did some 7 - 8 years ago. They forced Microsoft to remove the Diskeeper software (the built in windows de-fragmentation software) from Windows 2000 because it was written by a company that backs Scientology.

    That's, uhm, err....I wouldn't go that far.

    Zombiemambo on
    JKKaAGp.png
  • Wonder_HippieWonder_Hippie __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    Capt Howdy wrote:
    Gary Oldman FUCKING ACTS!

    I can't believe this hasn't been limed yet.

    Wonder_Hippie on
  • Low KeyLow Key Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    It's not so much "afraid of someone who things differently than them" as much as they are unwilling to co-operate with a production that will feature someone who they consider to be a weirdo portraying an important German hero. The temporary physical presence of Tom Cruise on the set is the least of their worries.

    I wish I could think of an example, but I'm sure there must be other examples of an actor being criticised for not being "suitable" to play some historical figure.

    You are awesome Jay.

    And yeah, Germany would've done better for themselves if they hadn't used the word cult here. They get in enough trouble for spying on and bullying the scientologists as it is.

    Low Key on
Sign In or Register to comment.