The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Pope Benedict's recent mass in Paris, oh gimme a break.

BasarBasar IstanbulRegistered User regular
edited September 2008 in Debate and/or Discourse
I just read this while browsing Yahoo News archieves. Am I the only one who finds this ironic? Actually, forget about irony, lets call it hypocrisy. The head of the richest religion out there complains about power, possessions, and money.

Statements like this are why seperation of church and state is an absolute necessity today. Jebus.
PARIS - 13 September 2008. Pope Benedict XVI condemned unbridled "pagan" passion for power, possessions and money as a modern-day plague Saturday as he led more than a quarter of a million Catholics in an outdoor Mass in Paris.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080913/ap_on_re_eu/france_pope


benedict_xvi-769613.jpg

i live in a country with a batshit crazy president and no, english is not my first language

Basar on
«13456

Posts

  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    So basically, you've basically been paying no attention to the Catholic Church since... ever? Also, what the fuck does his statement have to do abut government?

    Fencingsax on
  • romanqwertyromanqwerty Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Christianity is basically founded on hypocrisy. How is this new?

    romanqwerty on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    So basically, you've basically been paying no attention to the Catholic Church since... ever? Also, what the fuck does his statement have to do abut government?

    Really.
    vaticancity21hm1.jpg
    The hypocrisy isn't exactly new.

    Couscous on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Christians!

    Raaaaawwwwwwrg!

    Quid on
  • AntihippyAntihippy Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    To be fair, all those power, possessions and money are for god.

    Not heathens.

    Antihippy on
    10454_nujabes2.pngPSN: Antiwhippy
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Actually, I want my question fucking answered, because random morons shouting about "separation of Church and State BLARGH!" (especially concerning fucking France) is stupid, and dilutes the message when it actually applies.

    Fencingsax on
  • TarantioTarantio Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Yeah, if you ever take a tour of the Vatican, you begin to get an impression of where the "more money than God" saying comes from.

    This is far from the worst sort of thing for a religious leader to hypocritically condemn, though. Money is the root of all evil, yadda yadda.

    Tarantio on
  • saint2esaint2e Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Actually "The love of money is a root of all evil".

    Sorry, pet peeve.

    saint2e on
    banner_160x60_01.gif
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    saint2e wrote: »
    Actually "The love of money is a root of all evil".

    Sorry, pet peeve.
    Thank you!

    Fencingsax on
  • TarantioTarantio Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Oh wow, I didn't even know that was a quote from the bible. That a significantly different meaning, but more in keeping with what the pope said, in any case.

    Yeah, essentially I'm not too bothered by this, because the message is at least good.

    Tarantio on
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    I for one applaud the catholic church's slow descent into total irrelevance

    nexuscrawler on
  • FallingmanFallingman Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    I dont usually like to wail on the Church as its too easy - but this reminded me of the new 7 deadly sins that they brought out. Some of this raised my eyebrows.

    - Environmental pollution
    - Genetic manipulation
    - Accumulating excessive wealth
    - Inflicting poverty
    - Drug trafficking and consumption
    - Morally debatable experiments
    - Violation of fundamental rights of human nature

    Fallingman on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • muninnmuninn Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Wow, talk about anti-science. Under whose regime were these things setup?

    muninn on
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Basar wrote: »
    I just read this while browsing Yahoo News archieves. Am I the only one who finds this ironic? Actually, forget about irony, lets call it hypocrisy. The head of the richest religion out there complains about power, possessions, and money.
    Most of the Church's wealth is in priceless artifacts. Their actual liquid wealth goes to do a lot of humanitarian work and pretty much nothing else.

    Salvation122 on
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Basar wrote: »
    I just read this while browsing Yahoo News archieves. Am I the only one who finds this ironic? Actually, forget about irony, lets call it hypocrisy. The head of the richest religion out there complains about power, possessions, and money.
    Most of the Church's wealth is in priceless artifacts. Their actual liquid wealth goes to do a lot of humanitarian work and pretty much nothing else.
    You may disagree with their ideologies See: Condoms, but yeah, it's not like they're pooling their wealth, or using it to buy big screen TVs.

    Fencingsax on
  • TachTach Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Basar wrote: »
    I just read this while browsing Yahoo News archieves. Am I the only one who finds this ironic? Actually, forget about irony, lets call it hypocrisy. The head of the richest religion out there complains about power, possessions, and money.
    Most of the Church's wealth is in priceless artifacts. Their actual liquid wealth goes to do a lot of humanitarian work and pretty much nothing else.
    about-indiana-jones-1.jpg

    "It belongs in a museum!"

    Tach on
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Tach wrote: »
    Basar wrote: »
    I just read this while browsing Yahoo News archieves. Am I the only one who finds this ironic? Actually, forget about irony, lets call it hypocrisy. The head of the richest religion out there complains about power, possessions, and money.
    Most of the Church's wealth is in priceless artifacts. Their actual liquid wealth goes to do a lot of humanitarian work and pretty much nothing else.
    about-indiana-jones-1.jpg

    "It belongs in a museum!"
    A lot of it is in museums. Like the Vatican City Museum. or on loan

    Fencingsax on
  • Casual EddyCasual Eddy The Astral PlaneRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Oh and the millions used to settle the abuse lawsuits of course

    Casual Eddy on
  • TachTach Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Tach wrote: »
    "It belongs in a museum!"
    A lot of it is in museums. Like the Vatican City Museum. or on loan
    Dammit. Nobody gets me.

    Tach on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Oh and the millions used to settle the abuse lawsuits of course

    Giving millions of dollars to victims of sexual abuse? That is humanitarian work!
    if you spin it right

    Daedalus on
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Oh and the millions used to settle the abuse lawsuits of course

    Yeah, frankly, that made me really really angry. Those fuckers should have been excommunicated and hung out to dry.

    Salvation122 on
  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Basar wrote: »
    I just read this while browsing Yahoo News archieves. Am I the only one who finds this ironic? Actually, forget about irony, lets call it hypocrisy. The head of the richest religion out there complains about power, possessions, and money.
    Most of the Church's wealth is in priceless artifacts. Their actual liquid wealth goes to do a lot of humanitarian work and pretty much nothing else.

    Why do they need priceless artifacts?

    MikeMan on
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Oh and the millions used to settle the abuse lawsuits of course

    Yeah, frankly, that made me really really angry. Those fuckers should have been excommunicated and hung out to dry.
    Ditto, Ditto!

    Fencingsax on
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Basar wrote: »
    I just read this while browsing Yahoo News archieves. Am I the only one who finds this ironic? Actually, forget about irony, lets call it hypocrisy. The head of the richest religion out there complains about power, possessions, and money.
    Most of the Church's wealth is in priceless artifacts. Their actual liquid wealth goes to do a lot of humanitarian work and pretty much nothing else.

    Why do they need priceless artifacts?
    Because the Sistine Chapel and St Paul's Cathedral aren't really something anyone would just give away?

    Fencingsax on
  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Oh and the millions used to settle the abuse lawsuits of course

    Yeah, frankly, that made me really really angry. Those fuckers should have been excommunicated and hung out to dry.

    Or maybe that should have happened and then, you know, the church could stop calling gay acts a sin and let popes marry other people, men included.

    MikeMan on
  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Basar wrote: »
    I just read this while browsing Yahoo News archieves. Am I the only one who finds this ironic? Actually, forget about irony, lets call it hypocrisy. The head of the richest religion out there complains about power, possessions, and money.
    Most of the Church's wealth is in priceless artifacts. Their actual liquid wealth goes to do a lot of humanitarian work and pretty much nothing else.

    Why do they need priceless artifacts?
    Because the Sistine Chapel and St Paul's Cathedral aren't really something anyone would just give away?

    I'm not talking about buildings, I'm talking about artifacts.

    Why do they need the artifacts?

    Sell them to a museum and give the money to the poor.

    MikeMan on
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Man what? Catholicism is the essence of unwavering dogma. They refuse to change, and in fact, take pride in their refusal to change. A progressive Pope is a Pope that wears beige robes instead of sandy egg-white robes. :P

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Oh and the millions used to settle the abuse lawsuits of course

    Yeah, frankly, that made me really really angry. Those fuckers should have been excommunicated and hung out to dry.

    Or maybe that should have happened and then, you know, the church could stop calling gay acts a sin and let popes marry other people, men included.

    Priests not marrying is intended as a sacrifice and a protection from conflicts of interest between the Church and their spouse, and is not (and should not, in my opinion) going anywhere soon.

    The Church considering homosexuality a sin is kind of douchey, but is at least internally consistent with their position that all sexual acts not intended to produce children is sinful, which has some reasonable scriptural backing.

    Salvation122 on
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Basar wrote: »
    I just read this while browsing Yahoo News archieves. Am I the only one who finds this ironic? Actually, forget about irony, lets call it hypocrisy. The head of the richest religion out there complains about power, possessions, and money.
    Most of the Church's wealth is in priceless artifacts. Their actual liquid wealth goes to do a lot of humanitarian work and pretty much nothing else.

    Why do they need priceless artifacts?
    Because the Sistine Chapel and St Paul's Cathedral aren't really something anyone would just give away?

    I'm not talking about buildings, I'm talking about artifacts.

    Why do they need the artifacts?

    Sell them to a museum and give the money to the poor.

    The church really doesn't need the couple hundred million that would come from selling the Pieta. They're already very well funded through tithe and investments. (Did you know that the Roman Catholic Church is the majority shareholder in Coca-Cola? It's true!)

    Salvation122 on
  • TamTam Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Man what? Catholicism is the essence of unwavering dogma. They refuse to change, and in fact, take pride in their refusal to change. A progressive Pope is a Pope that wears beige robes instead of sandy egg-white robes. :P

    While I agree with the spirit of this, didn't Benedict basically say he accepted evolution as the mechanism for God's creation of creatures?

    The Catholic church, for all its faults, also does a lot of good humanitarian work.

    Tam on
  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Oh and the millions used to settle the abuse lawsuits of course

    Yeah, frankly, that made me really really angry. Those fuckers should have been excommunicated and hung out to dry.

    Or maybe that should have happened and then, you know, the church could stop calling gay acts a sin and let popes marry other people, men included.

    Priests not marrying is intended as a sacrifice and a protection from conflicts of interest between the Church and their spouse, and is not (and should not, in my opinion) going anywhere soon.

    I understand what their rationale is. It's just a mindbogglingly stupid rationale. Conflict of interest? There are thousands of perfectly find pastors in protestant churches who get along just dandy while married.
    The Church considering homosexuality a sin is kind of douchey, but is at least internally consistent with their position that all sexual acts not intended to produce children is sinful, which has some reasonable scriptural backing.

    Being "internally consistent" is not a virtue when your entire internal framework is retarded.

    MikeMan on
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Tam wrote: »
    Man what? Catholicism is the essence of unwavering dogma. They refuse to change, and in fact, take pride in their refusal to change. A progressive Pope is a Pope that wears beige robes instead of sandy egg-white robes. :P

    While I agree with the spirit of this, didn't Benedict basically say he accepted evolution as the mechanism for God's creation of creatures?

    The Catholic church, for all its faults, also does a lot of good humanitarian.
    It's still a slap in the face to science. Behind it all, there was an architect doing his ominscient and omnipotent thing. What good humanitarian efforts does it do that don't involve proselytizing at the same time?

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • TamTam Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Tam wrote: »
    Man what? Catholicism is the essence of unwavering dogma. They refuse to change, and in fact, take pride in their refusal to change. A progressive Pope is a Pope that wears beige robes instead of sandy egg-white robes. :P

    While I agree with the spirit of this, didn't Benedict basically say he accepted evolution as the mechanism for God's creation of creatures?

    The Catholic church, for all its faults, also does a lot of good humanitarian.
    It's still a slap in the face to science. Behind it all, there was an architect doing his ominscient and omnipotent thing. What good humanitarian efforts does it do that don't involve proselytizing at the same time?

    How is that a slap in the face to science? If his statement gets people to stop denying evolution, then what does it matter if they believe that a God controls it?

    If I'm starving, I'll listen to fundie bullshit as long as they feed me- to me, the good of feeding hungry people or bringing them water or giving them a place to sleep far far outweighs the evil of proselytizing.

    Tam on
  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Tam wrote: »
    Man what? Catholicism is the essence of unwavering dogma. They refuse to change, and in fact, take pride in their refusal to change. A progressive Pope is a Pope that wears beige robes instead of sandy egg-white robes. :P

    While I agree with the spirit of this, didn't Benedict basically say he accepted evolution as the mechanism for God's creation of creatures?

    The Catholic church, for all its faults, also does a lot of good humanitarian work.

    The Catholic church does not believe in "Evolution", it believes in "Intelligent Design." There's a huge difference.

    The Catholic church's good humanitarian work is offset by the monumental evil they do in Africa in promoting abstinence-only education and discouraging condom use.

    MikeMan on
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Tam wrote: »
    Tam wrote: »
    Man what? Catholicism is the essence of unwavering dogma. They refuse to change, and in fact, take pride in their refusal to change. A progressive Pope is a Pope that wears beige robes instead of sandy egg-white robes. :P

    While I agree with the spirit of this, didn't Benedict basically say he accepted evolution as the mechanism for God's creation of creatures?

    The Catholic church, for all its faults, also does a lot of good humanitarian.
    It's still a slap in the face to science. Behind it all, there was an architect doing his ominscient and omnipotent thing. What good humanitarian efforts does it do that don't involve proselytizing at the same time?

    How is that a slap in the face to science?
    Science doesn't and WILL NEVER account for an intelligent architect pulling the marionette strings. First off, an omnipotent, omniscient being is not falsifiable (meaning there is no tangible evidence to prove, or more importantly, disprove its existence), so it will never have a role in science. Second, you try writing a paper on tRNA mechanisms in drosiphila melanogaster, and when things get fuzzy, you write "god did it here". What a wonderful explanation, and how easy, yes?

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Tam wrote: »
    Tam wrote: »
    Man what? Catholicism is the essence of unwavering dogma. They refuse to change, and in fact, take pride in their refusal to change. A progressive Pope is a Pope that wears beige robes instead of sandy egg-white robes. :P

    While I agree with the spirit of this, didn't Benedict basically say he accepted evolution as the mechanism for God's creation of creatures?

    The Catholic church, for all its faults, also does a lot of good humanitarian.
    It's still a slap in the face to science. Behind it all, there was an architect doing his ominscient and omnipotent thing. What good humanitarian efforts does it do that don't involve proselytizing at the same time?

    How is that a slap in the face to science?

    Please read up on their stance on evolution. They do not actually believe in evolution as a scientist would describe it. They believe God guided the evolution of humanity. That is not only not evolution, it is laughable as a concept and entirely unscientific. You might as well believe tropical storms are guided by God's hand instead of currents and climates. It doesn't explain anything, and it's indeed a slap in the face to honest science.

    MikeMan on
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Evolution has no person. Organisms that fit an environment survive. Organisms that don't fit an environment perish or migrate. Everything thing we see in a given environment is a product of survivors. It's a really neat concept, actually.

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    MikeMan wrote: »
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Oh and the millions used to settle the abuse lawsuits of course

    Yeah, frankly, that made me really really angry. Those fuckers should have been excommunicated and hung out to dry.

    Or maybe that should have happened and then, you know, the church could stop calling gay acts a sin and let popes marry other people, men included.

    Priests not marrying is intended as a sacrifice and a protection from conflicts of interest between the Church and their spouse, and is not (and should not, in my opinion) going anywhere soon.

    I understand what their rationale is. It's just a mindbogglingly stupid rationale. Conflict of interest? There are thousands of perfectly find pastors in protestant churches who get along just dandy while married.
    Living in the heart of the Bible Belt I have yet to hear of a church who has not at one time or another had a big chunk of parishioners leave because the pastor was a dick to his wife in one way or another.

    Salvation122 on
  • FallingmanFallingman Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    MikeMan wrote: »
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Oh and the millions used to settle the abuse lawsuits of course

    Yeah, frankly, that made me really really angry. Those fuckers should have been excommunicated and hung out to dry.

    Or maybe that should have happened and then, you know, the church could stop calling gay acts a sin and let popes marry other people, men included.

    Priests not marrying is intended as a sacrifice and a protection from conflicts of interest between the Church and their spouse, and is not (and should not, in my opinion) going anywhere soon.

    I understand what their rationale is. It's just a mindbogglingly stupid rationale. Conflict of interest? There are thousands of perfectly find pastors in protestant churches who get along just dandy while married.
    Living in the heart of the Bible Belt I have yet to hear of a church who has not at one time or another had a big chunk of parishioners leave because the pastor was a dick to his wife in one way or another.

    ...Because not being a dick conflicted with their spiritual position? I'm not sure I understand. Can you give some examples?

    Fallingman on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Tam wrote: »
    Tam wrote: »
    Man what? Catholicism is the essence of unwavering dogma. They refuse to change, and in fact, take pride in their refusal to change. A progressive Pope is a Pope that wears beige robes instead of sandy egg-white robes. :P

    While I agree with the spirit of this, didn't Benedict basically say he accepted evolution as the mechanism for God's creation of creatures?

    The Catholic church, for all its faults, also does a lot of good humanitarian.
    It's still a slap in the face to science. Behind it all, there was an architect doing his ominscient and omnipotent thing. What good humanitarian efforts does it do that don't involve proselytizing at the same time?

    How is that a slap in the face to science?

    Please read up on their stance on evolution. They do not actually believe in evolution as a scientist would describe it. They believe God guided the evolution of humanity. That is not only not evolution, it is laughable as a concept and entirely unscientific. You might as well believe tropical storms are guided by God's hand instead of currents and climates. It doesn't explain anything, and it's indeed a slap in the face to honest science.

    Oh so we're going to make this an atheism thread.

    Have fun with that.

    Salvation122 on
Sign In or Register to comment.