Brovid Hasselsmof[Growling historic on the fury road]Registered Userregular
I caught Black Widow's name, and I heard that guy get called the hawk once. But I mean I have no idea what their respective deals were, like their powers and history and stuff. I'm guessing 'shoots arrows like a boss' and 'sexy ninja'.
You pretty much got everything you need to know about them in the movie, except they never mentioned how Hawkeye learned to shoot arrows in the circus and was a criminal for a while.
You pretty much got everything you need to know about them in the movie, except they never mentioned how Hawkeye learned to shoot arrows in the circus and was a criminal for a while.
Well it looks like they went with Ultimate Hawkeye
CorporateLogoThe toilet knowshow I feelRegistered Userregular
He learned from Art Carney
Do not have a cow, mortal.
0
Options
Brovid Hasselsmof[Growling historic on the fury road]Registered Userregular
I'm not saying they weren't good characters. Just that I went into the movie knowing who Hulk and Iron Man were, with kind of an idea of who Thor was, but no clue who they were. And the film didn't exactly have time for a lot of back story. But that's cool. They were cool. I like the hurt locker guy.
And I guess by slow to start I meant it took a while to gather all the bits together and introduce everyone. I felt like it got properly interesting and fun once the team were all done meeting up and started wrecking stuff.
Finally saw this tonight after it being in the cinemas for 2 weeks
Overall a brilliant film, but some parts fell a little flat.
The entire 'bridging' section in the middle felt a little forced, particularly Hawkeye's recovery and conversation with natasha. Not sure why it didn't work, but there was really no chemistry between them at all and that entire scene could have been cut without really losing anything. except maybe a pee break.
Cap's uniform looked a lot better in motion than it does in screencaps, but still managed to look pretty dorky.
Ruffalo's Hulk was excellent, not really a fan of his Banner though. Like, at all. He really overplayed the timid scientist bit to a ridiculously hammy extreme.
I still vastly prefer Ang Lee's Hulk over the Norton one
Are you serious
Absolutely.
I think the article linked above made some good points about what was wrong with Ang Lee's Hulk, but it was way more interesting than Norton's film.
Norton's hulk was way more coherent, had way better action sequences, and had a much better leading man. Nick nolte is also horrible.
Nolte could have worked as anyone but Absorbing Man.
Like seriously even Abomination would have made more sense.
Yes, okay, I agree, the Absorbing Man was a bizarre choice for the bad guy, but they made it work pretty okay.
No they didn't
not at all
the big fight scene is him turning into a big cloud/storm and Hulk yelling at him and fight over
that is not doing it pretty okay
Absorbing Man could be a great movie villain, dude has the potential for some really cool scenes and awesome fights
they did it about the worst way you possibly could
You should maybe consider trying to be right about some things sometime.
It feels pretty good, let me tell you.
Yeah it is always awesome when your response to someone disagreeing with you is "HA YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT FUCK YOU"
super great and not at all obnoxious
You want to sit down and go through the movies point by point and compare scenes?
Because "I didn't like the final fight scene" is pretty much as can't change your mind about this as it gets. I thought that scene was fine. Sorry you disagree. But if you legitimately want to sit down here and tell me objectively what was "wrong" with that scene other than "yelling is dumb for some reason!", you're more than welcome to give it a shot.
I am saying it is a very shitty adaptation of the Absorbing Man, which it objectively is.
Absorbing Man is a fairly simple thug who ends up with godlike powers and does exactly what you'd expect with them. His charm is that he has the personality of a generic goon working at the docks but can give Hulk or Thor a decent fight. Which is why he would be a really fun villain if he was like, the muscle for Leader or something.
Having him be Bruce Banner's father who mutated his DNA with Starfish cells and turns into a giant cloud
that is not Absorbing Man
It's an "unfaithful" adaptation, certainly.
Calling that "bad" is a matter of opinion, and pretty much ignores what the point of the Absorbing Man in the film was, and the metaphors for "terrible father" that go hand in hand with the power of the Absorbing Man.
I also notice that you're way off point, since you just plain didn't address the thing I challenged you on, which is "final fight scene was bad". What was bad about it? That it had the Absorbing Man in it at all?
It is bad because it is not a dang fight scene
I understand that Lee's Hulk ISN'T AN ACTION MOVIE or whatever
but having Hulk defeat Absorbing Man via yelling and having the most physical action between them be Hulk smashing some things being thrown at him
not a good Hulk fight scene
Look, I get that you like the movie. I am not trying to change your mind, but stating that people who disagree with you are SO WRONG is just being a dick
people have opinions, it is crazy!
Okay, you are being thick-headed on purpose.
There was plenty of action in that scene. The very end of it has some dialogue and the yelling bit you are referring to.
So you are, y'know, wrong.
And like I said, I ain't izzactly think I was gonna change your mind, so might as well let you know the situation and get on with things. If that makes me a dick, well, (b'.')b
I still vastly prefer Ang Lee's Hulk over the Norton one
Are you serious
Absolutely.
I think the article linked above made some good points about what was wrong with Ang Lee's Hulk, but it was way more interesting than Norton's film.
Norton's hulk was way more coherent, had way better action sequences, and had a much better leading man. Nick nolte is also horrible.
Nolte could have worked as anyone but Absorbing Man.
Like seriously even Abomination would have made more sense.
Yes, okay, I agree, the Absorbing Man was a bizarre choice for the bad guy, but they made it work pretty okay.
No they didn't
not at all
the big fight scene is him turning into a big cloud/storm and Hulk yelling at him and fight over
that is not doing it pretty okay
Absorbing Man could be a great movie villain, dude has the potential for some really cool scenes and awesome fights
they did it about the worst way you possibly could
You should maybe consider trying to be right about some things sometime.
It feels pretty good, let me tell you.
Yeah it is always awesome when your response to someone disagreeing with you is "HA YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT FUCK YOU"
super great and not at all obnoxious
You want to sit down and go through the movies point by point and compare scenes?
Because "I didn't like the final fight scene" is pretty much as can't change your mind about this as it gets. I thought that scene was fine. Sorry you disagree. But if you legitimately want to sit down here and tell me objectively what was "wrong" with that scene other than "yelling is dumb for some reason!", you're more than welcome to give it a shot.
I am saying it is a very shitty adaptation of the Absorbing Man, which it objectively is.
Absorbing Man is a fairly simple thug who ends up with godlike powers and does exactly what you'd expect with them. His charm is that he has the personality of a generic goon working at the docks but can give Hulk or Thor a decent fight. Which is why he would be a really fun villain if he was like, the muscle for Leader or something.
Having him be Bruce Banner's father who mutated his DNA with Starfish cells and turns into a giant cloud
that is not Absorbing Man
It's an "unfaithful" adaptation, certainly.
Calling that "bad" is a matter of opinion, and pretty much ignores what the point of the Absorbing Man in the film was, and the metaphors for "terrible father" that go hand in hand with the power of the Absorbing Man
ok maybe I'm dumb
but please, enlighten me as to how the power to "absorb chemical and structural properties of what you touch and then changing into them" is a metaphor for being a terrible father
because I am just not seeing it
Good fathers give. Life, shelter, sustenance, opportunities.
Dr. Banner in the film was all about possessing, or destroying that which he could not have. Hence, the Absorbing Man. Wanted to take back everything he had given, the power, down to Bruce's very life.
This is not exactly rocket science, kid, this is basic-level 1:1 shit.
I still vastly prefer Ang Lee's Hulk over the Norton one
Are you serious
Absolutely.
I think the article linked above made some good points about what was wrong with Ang Lee's Hulk, but it was way more interesting than Norton's film.
Norton's hulk was way more coherent, had way better action sequences, and had a much better leading man. Nick nolte is also horrible.
Nolte could have worked as anyone but Absorbing Man.
Like seriously even Abomination would have made more sense.
Yes, okay, I agree, the Absorbing Man was a bizarre choice for the bad guy, but they made it work pretty okay.
No they didn't
not at all
the big fight scene is him turning into a big cloud/storm and Hulk yelling at him and fight over
that is not doing it pretty okay
Absorbing Man could be a great movie villain, dude has the potential for some really cool scenes and awesome fights
they did it about the worst way you possibly could
You should maybe consider trying to be right about some things sometime.
It feels pretty good, let me tell you.
Yeah it is always awesome when your response to someone disagreeing with you is "HA YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT FUCK YOU"
super great and not at all obnoxious
You want to sit down and go through the movies point by point and compare scenes?
Because "I didn't like the final fight scene" is pretty much as can't change your mind about this as it gets. I thought that scene was fine. Sorry you disagree. But if you legitimately want to sit down here and tell me objectively what was "wrong" with that scene other than "yelling is dumb for some reason!", you're more than welcome to give it a shot.
I am saying it is a very shitty adaptation of the Absorbing Man, which it objectively is.
Absorbing Man is a fairly simple thug who ends up with godlike powers and does exactly what you'd expect with them. His charm is that he has the personality of a generic goon working at the docks but can give Hulk or Thor a decent fight. Which is why he would be a really fun villain if he was like, the muscle for Leader or something.
Having him be Bruce Banner's father who mutated his DNA with Starfish cells and turns into a giant cloud
that is not Absorbing Man
It's an "unfaithful" adaptation, certainly.
Calling that "bad" is a matter of opinion, and pretty much ignores what the point of the Absorbing Man in the film was, and the metaphors for "terrible father" that go hand in hand with the power of the Absorbing Man.
I also notice that you're way off point, since you just plain didn't address the thing I challenged you on, which is "final fight scene was bad". What was bad about it? That it had the Absorbing Man in it at all?
I am a staunch defender of the idea that there is n objectivity in art
and so I will simply say that I think that the Ang Lee version of Absorbing Man sucked balls
And I will pat you on the head and suggest you maybe try being right about shit for a change, and all will be right with the world.
you just replied to 3 different people who disagreed with you by saying HEH YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING KID JEEZ, I AM SO MUCH MORE INTELLIGENT AND RIGHT THAN YOU
I still vastly prefer Ang Lee's Hulk over the Norton one
Are you serious
Absolutely.
I think the article linked above made some good points about what was wrong with Ang Lee's Hulk, but it was way more interesting than Norton's film.
Norton's hulk was way more coherent, had way better action sequences, and had a much better leading man. Nick nolte is also horrible.
Nolte could have worked as anyone but Absorbing Man.
Like seriously even Abomination would have made more sense.
Yes, okay, I agree, the Absorbing Man was a bizarre choice for the bad guy, but they made it work pretty okay.
No they didn't
not at all
the big fight scene is him turning into a big cloud/storm and Hulk yelling at him and fight over
that is not doing it pretty okay
Absorbing Man could be a great movie villain, dude has the potential for some really cool scenes and awesome fights
they did it about the worst way you possibly could
You should maybe consider trying to be right about some things sometime.
It feels pretty good, let me tell you.
Yeah it is always awesome when your response to someone disagreeing with you is "HA YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT FUCK YOU"
super great and not at all obnoxious
You want to sit down and go through the movies point by point and compare scenes?
Because "I didn't like the final fight scene" is pretty much as can't change your mind about this as it gets. I thought that scene was fine. Sorry you disagree. But if you legitimately want to sit down here and tell me objectively what was "wrong" with that scene other than "yelling is dumb for some reason!", you're more than welcome to give it a shot.
I am saying it is a very shitty adaptation of the Absorbing Man, which it objectively is.
Absorbing Man is a fairly simple thug who ends up with godlike powers and does exactly what you'd expect with them. His charm is that he has the personality of a generic goon working at the docks but can give Hulk or Thor a decent fight. Which is why he would be a really fun villain if he was like, the muscle for Leader or something.
Having him be Bruce Banner's father who mutated his DNA with Starfish cells and turns into a giant cloud
that is not Absorbing Man
It's an "unfaithful" adaptation, certainly.
Calling that "bad" is a matter of opinion, and pretty much ignores what the point of the Absorbing Man in the film was, and the metaphors for "terrible father" that go hand in hand with the power of the Absorbing Man.
I also notice that you're way off point, since you just plain didn't address the thing I challenged you on, which is "final fight scene was bad". What was bad about it? That it had the Absorbing Man in it at all?
I am a staunch defender of the idea that there is n objectivity in art
and so I will simply say that I think that the Ang Lee version of Absorbing Man sucked balls
And I will pat you on the head and suggest you maybe try being right about shit for a change, and all will be right with the world.
Wow you really do have an inflated sense of self-importance, don't you
Solar on
0
Options
AntimatterDevo Was RightGates of SteelRegistered Userregular
Finally saw this tonight after it being in the cinemas for 2 weeks
Overall a brilliant film, but some parts fell a little flat.
The entire 'bridging' section in the middle felt a little forced, particularly Hawkeye's recovery and conversation with natasha. Not sure why it didn't work, but there was really no chemistry between them at all and that entire scene could have been cut without really losing anything. except maybe a pee break.
Cap's uniform looked a lot better in motion than it does in screencaps, but still managed to look pretty dorky.
Ruffalo's Hulk was excellent, not really a fan of his Banner though. Like, at all. He really overplayed the timid scientist bit to a ridiculously hammy extreme.
Hulk smash puny opinion!
0
Options
BlackDragon480Bluster KerfuffleMaster of Windy ImportRegistered Userregular
edited May 2012
Behold, the majesty of Loki's hat:
Tell me, who wouldn't bow before that.
(and yes, I know that still's from Thor, the helmet more or less the same though)
BlackDragon480 on
No matter where you go...there you are. ~ Buckaroo Banzai
I still vastly prefer Ang Lee's Hulk over the Norton one
Are you serious
Absolutely.
I think the article linked above made some good points about what was wrong with Ang Lee's Hulk, but it was way more interesting than Norton's film.
Norton's hulk was way more coherent, had way better action sequences, and had a much better leading man. Nick nolte is also horrible.
Nolte could have worked as anyone but Absorbing Man.
Like seriously even Abomination would have made more sense.
Yes, okay, I agree, the Absorbing Man was a bizarre choice for the bad guy, but they made it work pretty okay.
No they didn't
not at all
the big fight scene is him turning into a big cloud/storm and Hulk yelling at him and fight over
that is not doing it pretty okay
Absorbing Man could be a great movie villain, dude has the potential for some really cool scenes and awesome fights
they did it about the worst way you possibly could
You should maybe consider trying to be right about some things sometime.
It feels pretty good, let me tell you.
Yeah it is always awesome when your response to someone disagreeing with you is "HA YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT FUCK YOU"
super great and not at all obnoxious
You want to sit down and go through the movies point by point and compare scenes?
Because "I didn't like the final fight scene" is pretty much as can't change your mind about this as it gets. I thought that scene was fine. Sorry you disagree. But if you legitimately want to sit down here and tell me objectively what was "wrong" with that scene other than "yelling is dumb for some reason!", you're more than welcome to give it a shot.
I am saying it is a very shitty adaptation of the Absorbing Man, which it objectively is.
Absorbing Man is a fairly simple thug who ends up with godlike powers and does exactly what you'd expect with them. His charm is that he has the personality of a generic goon working at the docks but can give Hulk or Thor a decent fight. Which is why he would be a really fun villain if he was like, the muscle for Leader or something.
Having him be Bruce Banner's father who mutated his DNA with Starfish cells and turns into a giant cloud
that is not Absorbing Man
It's an "unfaithful" adaptation, certainly.
Calling that "bad" is a matter of opinion, and pretty much ignores what the point of the Absorbing Man in the film was, and the metaphors for "terrible father" that go hand in hand with the power of the Absorbing Man.
I also notice that you're way off point, since you just plain didn't address the thing I challenged you on, which is "final fight scene was bad". What was bad about it? That it had the Absorbing Man in it at all?
I am a staunch defender of the idea that there is n objectivity in art
and so I will simply say that I think that the Ang Lee version of Absorbing Man sucked balls
And I will pat you on the head and suggest you maybe try being right about shit for a change, and all will be right with the world.
Wow you really do have an inflated sense of self-importance, don't you
It's the internet, whaddaya gonna do.
Seems an appropriate response to the "no accounting for taste" argument in the opposite direction, anyway.
you just replied to 3 different people who disagreed with you by saying HEH YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING KID JEEZ, I AM SO MUCH MORE INTELLIGENT AND RIGHT THAN YOU
good god
I'm not sure why you would think I'm unaware of it.
Moreover, I tried to engage you genuinely in discourse and you didn't really answer my questions
you just replied to 3 different people who disagreed with you by saying HEH YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING KID JEEZ, I AM SO MUCH MORE INTELLIGENT AND RIGHT THAN YOU
good god
I'm not sure why you would think I'm unaware of it.
Moreover, I tried to engage you genuinely in discourse and you didn't really answer my questions
Turnabout's fair play, and all of that.
I did engage you! I explained why I felt that way and said that if you enjoy the film that is totally okay, I don't but everyone doesn't like the same shit. No big deal.
you're the one who insists they are so superior and smarter than everyone else in the room. The answers I gave you not being ones you liked doesn't suddenly make them not answers.
0
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
As the only person here who is unfairly immune to the edict, I can say that yes.
Sarukun is being an asshole and probably should tone it down.
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
I still vastly prefer Ang Lee's Hulk over the Norton one
Are you serious
Absolutely.
I think the article linked above made some good points about what was wrong with Ang Lee's Hulk, but it was way more interesting than Norton's film.
Norton's hulk was way more coherent, had way better action sequences, and had a much better leading man. Nick nolte is also horrible.
Nolte could have worked as anyone but Absorbing Man.
Like seriously even Abomination would have made more sense.
Yes, okay, I agree, the Absorbing Man was a bizarre choice for the bad guy, but they made it work pretty okay.
No they didn't
not at all
the big fight scene is him turning into a big cloud/storm and Hulk yelling at him and fight over
that is not doing it pretty okay
Absorbing Man could be a great movie villain, dude has the potential for some really cool scenes and awesome fights
they did it about the worst way you possibly could
You should maybe consider trying to be right about some things sometime.
It feels pretty good, let me tell you.
Yeah it is always awesome when your response to someone disagreeing with you is "HA YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT FUCK YOU"
super great and not at all obnoxious
You want to sit down and go through the movies point by point and compare scenes?
Because "I didn't like the final fight scene" is pretty much as can't change your mind about this as it gets. I thought that scene was fine. Sorry you disagree. But if you legitimately want to sit down here and tell me objectively what was "wrong" with that scene other than "yelling is dumb for some reason!", you're more than welcome to give it a shot.
I am saying it is a very shitty adaptation of the Absorbing Man, which it objectively is.
Absorbing Man is a fairly simple thug who ends up with godlike powers and does exactly what you'd expect with them. His charm is that he has the personality of a generic goon working at the docks but can give Hulk or Thor a decent fight. Which is why he would be a really fun villain if he was like, the muscle for Leader or something.
Having him be Bruce Banner's father who mutated his DNA with Starfish cells and turns into a giant cloud
that is not Absorbing Man
It's an "unfaithful" adaptation, certainly.
Calling that "bad" is a matter of opinion, and pretty much ignores what the point of the Absorbing Man in the film was, and the metaphors for "terrible father" that go hand in hand with the power of the Absorbing Man.
I also notice that you're way off point, since you just plain didn't address the thing I challenged you on, which is "final fight scene was bad". What was bad about it? That it had the Absorbing Man in it at all?
I am a staunch defender of the idea that there is n objectivity in art
and so I will simply say that I think that the Ang Lee version of Absorbing Man sucked balls
And I will pat you on the head and suggest you maybe try being right about shit for a change, and all will be right with the world.
Wow you really do have an inflated sense of self-importance, don't you
It's the internet, whaddaya gonna do.
Yes, because this is a perfectly mature reason for anything at all.
As the only person here who is unfairly immune to the edict, I can say that yes.
Sarukun is being an asshole and probably should tone it down.
how does it feel, to have such power.
0
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
I still vastly prefer Ang Lee's Hulk over the Norton one
Are you serious
Absolutely.
I think the article linked above made some good points about what was wrong with Ang Lee's Hulk, but it was way more interesting than Norton's film.
Norton's hulk was way more coherent, had way better action sequences, and had a much better leading man. Nick nolte is also horrible.
Nolte could have worked as anyone but Absorbing Man.
Like seriously even Abomination would have made more sense.
Yes, okay, I agree, the Absorbing Man was a bizarre choice for the bad guy, but they made it work pretty okay.
No they didn't
not at all
the big fight scene is him turning into a big cloud/storm and Hulk yelling at him and fight over
that is not doing it pretty okay
Absorbing Man could be a great movie villain, dude has the potential for some really cool scenes and awesome fights
they did it about the worst way you possibly could
You should maybe consider trying to be right about some things sometime.
It feels pretty good, let me tell you.
Yeah it is always awesome when your response to someone disagreeing with you is "HA YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT FUCK YOU"
super great and not at all obnoxious
You want to sit down and go through the movies point by point and compare scenes?
Because "I didn't like the final fight scene" is pretty much as can't change your mind about this as it gets. I thought that scene was fine. Sorry you disagree. But if you legitimately want to sit down here and tell me objectively what was "wrong" with that scene other than "yelling is dumb for some reason!", you're more than welcome to give it a shot.
I am saying it is a very shitty adaptation of the Absorbing Man, which it objectively is.
Absorbing Man is a fairly simple thug who ends up with godlike powers and does exactly what you'd expect with them. His charm is that he has the personality of a generic goon working at the docks but can give Hulk or Thor a decent fight. Which is why he would be a really fun villain if he was like, the muscle for Leader or something.
Having him be Bruce Banner's father who mutated his DNA with Starfish cells and turns into a giant cloud
that is not Absorbing Man
It's an "unfaithful" adaptation, certainly.
Calling that "bad" is a matter of opinion, and pretty much ignores what the point of the Absorbing Man in the film was, and the metaphors for "terrible father" that go hand in hand with the power of the Absorbing Man.
I also notice that you're way off point, since you just plain didn't address the thing I challenged you on, which is "final fight scene was bad". What was bad about it? That it had the Absorbing Man in it at all?
I am a staunch defender of the idea that there is n objectivity in art
and so I will simply say that I think that the Ang Lee version of Absorbing Man sucked balls
And I will pat you on the head and suggest you maybe try being right about shit for a change, and all will be right with the world.
Wow you really do have an inflated sense of self-importance, don't you
It's the internet, whaddaya gonna do.
Seems an appropriate response to the "no accounting for taste" argument in the opposite direction, anyway.
Well you see what I would do
is not be really condescending to other people about their movie opinions
Posts
Also they say black widow's name and even write it on the screen at one point when there are subtitles.
Yup.
Arguably the least powerful, but 2 of the most awesome members The Avengers have ever had in the comics, IMO.
~ Buckaroo Banzai
Having being blown away by the rest of the film, I decided on "deliberately tongue-in-cheek"
who didn't do that
I mean he could have been a carney but I doubt it
And I guess by slow to start I meant it took a while to gather all the bits together and introduce everyone. I felt like it got properly interesting and fun once the team were all done meeting up and started wrecking stuff.
Downey Junior pretty much rocked it.
I've been on a Whedon kick recently.
I can't say I really like Buffy the Vampire Slayer all that much, but pretty much everything else I've seen by him is stellar.
I hear Hawkeye used to be called the Canary in the Movieverse
Isn't that close enough
Overall a brilliant film, but some parts fell a little flat.
Cap's uniform looked a lot better in motion than it does in screencaps, but still managed to look pretty dorky.
Ruffalo's Hulk was excellent, not really a fan of his Banner though. Like, at all. He really overplayed the timid scientist bit to a ridiculously hammy extreme.
Tall-Paul MIPsDroid
Okay, you are being thick-headed on purpose.
There was plenty of action in that scene. The very end of it has some dialogue and the yelling bit you are referring to.
So you are, y'know, wrong.
And like I said, I ain't izzactly think I was gonna change your mind, so might as well let you know the situation and get on with things. If that makes me a dick, well, (b'.')b
Jesus Christ.
Good fathers give. Life, shelter, sustenance, opportunities.
Dr. Banner in the film was all about possessing, or destroying that which he could not have. Hence, the Absorbing Man. Wanted to take back everything he had given, the power, down to Bruce's very life.
This is not exactly rocket science, kid, this is basic-level 1:1 shit.
And I will pat you on the head and suggest you maybe try being right about shit for a change, and all will be right with the world.
do you not see how you are being an asshole
you just replied to 3 different people who disagreed with you by saying HEH YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING KID JEEZ, I AM SO MUCH MORE INTELLIGENT AND RIGHT THAN YOU
good god
Wow you really do have an inflated sense of self-importance, don't you
Wow
I try
Hulk smash puny opinion!
Tell me, who wouldn't bow before that.
(and yes, I know that still's from Thor, the helmet more or less the same though)
~ Buckaroo Banzai
It's the internet, whaddaya gonna do.
Seems an appropriate response to the "no accounting for taste" argument in the opposite direction, anyway.
I'm not sure why you would think I'm unaware of it.
Moreover, I tried to engage you genuinely in discourse and you didn't really answer my questions
Turnabout's fair play, and all of that.
I didn't think anyone would top that one chain slam in the Ghost Rider 2 trailer or Iron Man's aoe laser at the end of Iron Man 2
but daaaamn this was so great
you're the one who insists they are so superior and smarter than everyone else in the room. The answers I gave you not being ones you liked doesn't suddenly make them not answers.
Sarukun is being an asshole and probably should tone it down.
Yes, because this is a perfectly mature reason for anything at all.
how does it feel, to have such power.
It feels smug.
SPOILERS
Entertainment Weekly - The story behind the Avengers after-credits scene
Well you see what I would do
is not be really condescending to other people about their movie opinions