Kaminsky was alone in his Seattle apartment when he discovered a security vulnerability that could leave banks, online retailers, and ISPs open to hackers.
Jesus Christ, do people not get out at all or something?
Multiple people in H/A claiming they've never seen a red right turn arrow. WTF?
What is a ‘red right turn arrow’? Do you mean ‘no right turns’, or something in the traffic light?
It's a traffic light with arrows for making a protected right turn, as opposed to a protected left turn. It's identical to a protected left turn signal, but the arrows point right instead of left.
Well, like I said, they can also be used in order to eliminate confusion over which light belongs to what lane, and make clear that a particular lane is a right turn only lane.
You would want to prevent right turns on red for intersections that are particularly busy, have poor visibility, or in which it is difficult to determine from the right turn lane what cars may or may not be coming into the lane you're pulling into.
Well, like I said, they can also be used in order to eliminate confusion over which light belongs to what lane, and make clear that a particular lane is a right turn only lane.
You would want to prevent right turns on red for intersections that are particularly busy, have poor visibility, or in which it is difficult to determine from the right turn lane what cars may or may not be coming into the lane you're pulling into.
I prefer Darwinism in that case.
Yes, well, if you're going to kill yourself, doing it at a busy intersection is a great way to insure it costs other people a lot of money and a lot of inconvenience.
Jesus Christ, do people not get out at all or something?
Multiple people in H/A claiming they've never seen a red right turn arrow. WTF?
What is a ‘red right turn arrow’? Do you mean ‘no right turns’, or something in the traffic light?
It's a traffic light with arrows for making a protected right turn, as opposed to a protected left turn. It's identical to a protected left turn signal, but the arrows point right instead of left.
I have no idea what you’re talking about, then.
We have green lights that indicate a single lane is free to turn, but no red arrows.
Well, like I said, they can also be used in order to eliminate confusion over which light belongs to what lane, and make clear that a particular lane is a right turn only lane.
You would want to prevent right turns on red for intersections that are particularly busy, have poor visibility, or in which it is difficult to determine from the right turn lane what cars may or may not be coming into the lane you're pulling into.
I prefer Darwinism in that case.
If they'd raise the interstate speed limits to Autobahn levels, you wouldn't need other driving related Darwinism.
Jesus Christ, do people not get out at all or something?
Multiple people in H/A claiming they've never seen a red right turn arrow. WTF?
What is a ‘red right turn arrow’? Do you mean ‘no right turns’, or something in the traffic light?
It's a traffic light with arrows for making a protected right turn, as opposed to a protected left turn. It's identical to a protected left turn signal, but the arrows point right instead of left.
I have no idea what you’re talking about, then.
We have green lights that indicate a single lane is free to turn, but no red arrows.
Well, like I said, they can also be used in order to eliminate confusion over which light belongs to what lane, and make clear that a particular lane is a right turn only lane.
You would want to prevent right turns on red for intersections that are particularly busy, have poor visibility, or in which it is difficult to determine from the right turn lane what cars may or may not be coming into the lane you're pulling into.
I prefer Darwinism in that case.
Yes, well, if you're going to kill yourself, doing it at a busy intersection is a great way to insure it costs other people a lot of money and a lot of inconvenience.
Survival of the fittest?
Elki if you're still in here, apparently the Iphone doesn't have a default passcode, so you have to sync it up with itunes to remove one.
Well, like I said, they can also be used in order to eliminate confusion over which light belongs to what lane, and make clear that a particular lane is a right turn only lane.
You would want to prevent right turns on red for intersections that are particularly busy, have poor visibility, or in which it is difficult to determine from the right turn lane what cars may or may not be coming into the lane you're pulling into.
I prefer Darwinism in that case.
If they'd raise the interstate speed limits to Autobahn levels, you wouldn't need other driving related Darwinism.
Honestly I drive way over the speed limit down the interstate, normally 90 in a 65, but would be against them raising the limit.
Jesus Christ, do people not get out at all or something?
Multiple people in H/A claiming they've never seen a red right turn arrow. WTF?
What is a ‘red right turn arrow’? Do you mean ‘no right turns’, or something in the traffic light?
It's a traffic light with arrows for making a protected right turn, as opposed to a protected left turn. It's identical to a protected left turn signal, but the arrows point right instead of left.
I have no idea what you’re talking about, then.
We have green lights that indicate a single lane is free to turn, but no red arrows.
Well, like I said, they can also be used in order to eliminate confusion over which light belongs to what lane, and make clear that a particular lane is a right turn only lane.
You would want to prevent right turns on red for intersections that are particularly busy, have poor visibility, or in which it is difficult to determine from the right turn lane what cars may or may not be coming into the lane you're pulling into.
I prefer Darwinism in that case.
Yes, well, if you're going to kill yourself, doing it at a busy intersection is a great way to insure it costs other people a lot of money and a lot of inconvenience.
Survival of the fittest?
It's cheaper and more convenient all around to have clearer road signs than it is to deal with the fallout from people misinterpreting the signs.
Though, Seattle seems to make a point of making their road signs as confusing as humanly possibly. I do love the arrows that point between two different roads, though.
Well, like I said, they can also be used in order to eliminate confusion over which light belongs to what lane, and make clear that a particular lane is a right turn only lane.
You would want to prevent right turns on red for intersections that are particularly busy, have poor visibility, or in which it is difficult to determine from the right turn lane what cars may or may not be coming into the lane you're pulling into.
I prefer Darwinism in that case.
If they'd raise the interstate speed limits to Autobahn levels, you wouldn't need other driving related Darwinism.
Honestly I drive way over the speed limit down the interstate, normally 90 in a 65, but would be against them raising the limit.
When I had only recently returned to the states, I would find myself, completely unconsciously, heading toward 100 on parts of the interstates. It was just habit, hitting that cruising speed and going.
At certain intersections in Alberta and California (and possibly other places permitting a right turn to be made during a solid red light, also known as "right turn on red"), a solid green right-turn arrow will illuminate underneath a solid red light to indicate that traffic coming from the right side of the intersection has a protected left turn (blocking traffic coming from the left side) and thus a right turn can be safely made.
It's cheaper and more convenient all around to have clearer road signs than it is to deal with the fallout from people misinterpreting the signs.
Though, Seattle seems to make a point of making their road signs as confusing as humanly possibly. I do love the arrows that point between two different roads, though.
Than seriously two options which do you think is more clear.
Option one, "No right turn on red" followed by a picture of a red circle.
Option two, a red arrow pointing right.
My point though was, if you choose to turn right on red when you can't clearly see whether its safe or not, you deserve what happens to you.
It's cheaper and more convenient all around to have clearer road signs than it is to deal with the fallout from people misinterpreting the signs.
Though, Seattle seems to make a point of making their road signs as confusing as humanly possibly. I do love the arrows that point between two different roads, though.
Than seriously two options which do you think is more clear.
Option one, "No right turn on red" followed by a picture of a red circle.
Option two, a red arrow pointing right.
My point though was, if you choose to turn right on red when you can't clearly see whether its safe or not, you deserve what happens to you.
The problem with your point is that there are people in the other car.
Well, like I said, they can also be used in order to eliminate confusion over which light belongs to what lane, and make clear that a particular lane is a right turn only lane.
You would want to prevent right turns on red for intersections that are particularly busy, have poor visibility, or in which it is difficult to determine from the right turn lane what cars may or may not be coming into the lane you're pulling into.
I prefer Darwinism in that case.
If they'd raise the interstate speed limits to Autobahn levels, you wouldn't need other driving related Darwinism.
Honestly I drive way over the speed limit down the interstate, normally 90 in a 65, but would be against them raising the limit.
When I had only recently returned to the states, I would find myself, completely unconsciously, heading toward 100 on parts of the interstates. It was just habit, hitting that cruising speed and going.
I drive around 40 miles each way down the interstate between home and work every day, so its honestly not worth it for me to drive slow.
DeShadowC on
0
Options
ZimmydoomAccept no substitutesRegistered Userregular
edited November 2008
I bailed on Tropic Thunder after an hour.
I'll watch the rest some other time, but I thought it was kinda meh.
Zimmydoom, Zimmydoom
Flew away in a balloon
Had sex with polar bears
While sitting in a reclining chair
Now there are Zim-Bear hybrids
Running around and clawing eyelids
Watch out, a Zim-Bear is about to have sex with yooooooou!
It's cheaper and more convenient all around to have clearer road signs than it is to deal with the fallout from people misinterpreting the signs.
Though, Seattle seems to make a point of making their road signs as confusing as humanly possibly. I do love the arrows that point between two different roads, though.
Than seriously two options which do you think is more clear.
Option one, "No right turn on red" followed by a picture of a red circle.
Option two, a red arrow pointing right.
My point though was, if you choose to turn right on red when you can't clearly see whether its safe or not, you deserve what happens to you.
The way some intersections are constructed, it's possible that you believe it looks clearly safe, when in reality it isn't.
And like I said, not all states use it for that purpose; some of them just use it to more clearly delineate the signal for the right turn lane from the other signals, or more clearly mark that the rightmost lane is, in fact, right turn only.
Thanatos on
0
Options
Podlyyou unzipped me! it's all coming back! i don't like it!Registered Userregular
edited November 2008
Nevada and Alaska are the states with the fewest google searches for "Kant"
Zimmydoom, Zimmydoom
Flew away in a balloon
Had sex with polar bears
While sitting in a reclining chair
Now there are Zim-Bear hybrids
Running around and clawing eyelids
Watch out, a Zim-Bear is about to have sex with yooooooou!
Zimmydoom, Zimmydoom
Flew away in a balloon
Had sex with polar bears
While sitting in a reclining chair
Now there are Zim-Bear hybrids
Running around and clawing eyelids
Watch out, a Zim-Bear is about to have sex with yooooooou!
It's cheaper and more convenient all around to have clearer road signs than it is to deal with the fallout from people misinterpreting the signs.
Though, Seattle seems to make a point of making their road signs as confusing as humanly possibly. I do love the arrows that point between two different roads, though.
Than seriously two options which do you think is more clear.
Option one, "No right turn on red" followed by a picture of a red circle.
Option two, a red arrow pointing right.
My point though was, if you choose to turn right on red when you can't clearly see whether its safe or not, you deserve what happens to you.
The way some intersections are constructed, it's possible that you believe it looks clearly safe, when in reality it isn't.
And like I said, not all states use it for that purpose; some of them just use it to more clearly delineate the signal for the right turn lane from the other signals, or more clearly mark that the rightmost lane is, in fact, right turn only.
Fair enough
With your second point though, arrows on the road, plus green arrows instead of red ones, which I've actually seen, should work for that point.
DeShadowC on
0
Options
Podlyyou unzipped me! it's all coming back! i don't like it!Registered Userregular
edited November 2008
And compared with New York, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts, like ten states have a relative rate of search of about 0%
Posts
I prefer Darwinism in that case.
We have green lights that indicate a single lane is free to turn, but no red arrows.
It's still illegal in New York City, though, and I don't think there's a sign.
If they'd raise the interstate speed limits to Autobahn levels, you wouldn't need other driving related Darwinism.
Battle.net
Survival of the fittest?
Elki if you're still in here, apparently the Iphone doesn't have a default passcode, so you have to sync it up with itunes to remove one.
Honestly I drive way over the speed limit down the interstate, normally 90 in a 65, but would be against them raising the limit.
Though, Seattle seems to make a point of making their road signs as confusing as humanly possibly. I do love the arrows that point between two different roads, though.
When I had only recently returned to the states, I would find myself, completely unconsciously, heading toward 100 on parts of the interstates. It was just habit, hitting that cruising speed and going.
Battle.net
Than seriously two options which do you think is more clear.
Option one, "No right turn on red" followed by a picture of a red circle.
Option two, a red arrow pointing right.
My point though was, if you choose to turn right on red when you can't clearly see whether its safe or not, you deserve what happens to you.
Seattle has the traffic/parking lane, the one-way two-way, and the signless intersection.
The latter is the one that scares me the most, though; I'm convinced that I'm inevitably going to die at one of those.
The problem with your point is that there are people in the other car.
Battle.net
Thanks.
I drive around 40 miles each way down the interstate between home and work every day, so its honestly not worth it for me to drive slow.
I'll watch the rest some other time, but I thought it was kinda meh.
Kinda like your mom.
And like I said, not all states use it for that purpose; some of them just use it to more clearly delineate the signal for the right turn lane from the other signals, or more clearly mark that the rightmost lane is, in fact, right turn only.
My mom is not here to judge the relative merits of this particular film.
so good
I kant believe it.
Somebody Hi5 me!
Ok am I reading this correctly. Intersections with no stop signs, right of ways, or lights?
Prostitutes and soccer moms?
Soccer prostitutes.
I was going to go with (Southern state) has the most, largely due to the widespread misspelling of "can't"
Fair enough
With your second point though, arrows on the road, plus green arrows instead of red ones, which I've actually seen, should work for that point.
West Virginia is the one I want