The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Another Way Schools Are Failing Our Kids

245678

Posts

  • Pants ManPants Man Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    DiscGrace wrote: »
    wawkin is incorrect that it's illegal for teachers to touch students when they're fighting - first you're supposed to try to get your body between the fighters, as a lot of times the presence of a teacher is enough to break that shit up. But if it continues to escalate, and there's another teacher handy to grab the second fighter so that the two of you can pull them apart (and so there's a witness to what happens) you should definitely do that. You absolutely NOT supposed to watch two students just whale on each other.

    And yeah, hard as it might be sometimes, it IS my job as a teacher to police students. Because my job is to help them learn, and in order to learn they need a safe environment.

    Ah. I was under the impression that laws governing the physical contact between students and teachers were more strict.

    it's not a law, but yeah, teachers shouldn't just stand there and wait for the fight to play itself out. either get a security person or do what disc said.

    but again, a teacher getting involved in a confrontation just increases the risk of something happening that creates a lawsuit. always look for the security guy first

    Pants Man on
    "okay byron, my grandma has a right to be happy, so i give you my blessing. just... don't get her pregnant. i don't need another mom."
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    JebusUD wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    Aldo wrote: »
    Wawkin, did you just say you got bullied because you had it comin'? I mean, geez, they might have given a reason to pick on you, but all reasons I ever heard were complete bullocks. :|

    Maybe I was unclear. Bullying happens for, as you put it, bullocks reasons. My claim is that when the bullying escalates to physical violence, it is usually due to provocation.

    Maybe provocation of the bullied physicaly. Is bullying, non physicaly, not itself provocation?

    Well, let me ask you in turn:
    A mugger, while holding a weapon and threatening violence against your person may also insult you in some manner. Is that insult provocation? I would say yes. Is it necessary or smart to retaliate to that provocation? I would argue no, if you have already made the decision not to fight back. And in this case, Billy made that decision a long time ago.

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • DiscGraceDiscGrace Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    If you have security people. (We don't.)

    DiscGrace on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Pants ManPants Man Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    DiscGrace wrote: »
    If you have security people. (We don't.)

    well there you go, obviously you have to step in and do something. how big is your school?

    Pants Man on
    "okay byron, my grandma has a right to be happy, so i give you my blessing. just... don't get her pregnant. i don't need another mom."
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    JebusUD wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    Aldo wrote: »
    Wawkin, did you just say you got bullied because you had it comin'? I mean, geez, they might have given a reason to pick on you, but all reasons I ever heard were complete bullocks. :|

    Maybe I was unclear. Bullying happens for, as you put it, bullocks reasons. My claim is that when the bullying escalates to physical violence, it is usually due to provocation.

    Maybe provocation of the bullied physicaly. Is bullying, non physicaly, not itself provocation?

    Well, let me ask you in turn:
    A mugger, while holding a weapon and threatening violence against your person may also insult you in some manner. Is that insult provocation? I would say yes. Is it necessary or smart to retaliate to that provocation? I would argue no, if you have already made the decision not to fight back. And in this case, Billy made that decision a long time ago.
    I think the comparisons between bullies and muggers show exactly how acceptable the latter should be.

    Fencingsax on
  • DiscGraceDiscGrace Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Pants Man wrote: »
    DiscGrace wrote: »
    If you have security people. (We don't.)

    well there you go, obviously you have to step in and do something. how big is your school?

    Maybe 1,000 kids, grade 9-12. It's a pretty small, pretty racially homogeneous town, which helps I guess.

    DiscGrace on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Pants ManPants Man Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    DiscGrace wrote: »
    Pants Man wrote: »
    DiscGrace wrote: »
    If you have security people. (We don't.)

    well there you go, obviously you have to step in and do something. how big is your school?

    Maybe 1,000 kids, grade 9-12. It's a pretty small, pretty racially homogeneous town, which helps I guess.

    that's not too bad, but i think for any school above 750 kids, there should be at least one security person at school at all times.

    edit: actually you know what? fuck that, EVERY school, regardless of size, should have at least one security person on site at all times.

    Pants Man on
    "okay byron, my grandma has a right to be happy, so i give you my blessing. just... don't get her pregnant. i don't need another mom."
  • JebusUDJebusUD Adventure! Candy IslandRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Pants Man wrote: »
    DiscGrace wrote: »
    Pants Man wrote: »
    DiscGrace wrote: »
    If you have security people. (We don't.)

    well there you go, obviously you have to step in and do something. how big is your school?

    Maybe 1,000 kids, grade 9-12. It's a pretty small, pretty racially homogeneous town, which helps I guess.

    that's not too bad, but i think for any school above 750 kids, there should be at least one security person at school at all times.

    edit: actually you know what? fuck that, EVERY school, regardless of size, should have at least one security person on site at all times.


    Really? At my highschool the security guy was some douche that basicaly got paid to sit there. Or tell you off for stupid things that didnt matter.

    JebusUD on
    and I wonder about my neighbors even though I don't have them
    but they're listening to every word I say
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    JebusUD wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    Aldo wrote: »
    Wawkin, did you just say you got bullied because you had it comin'? I mean, geez, they might have given a reason to pick on you, but all reasons I ever heard were complete bullocks. :|

    Maybe I was unclear. Bullying happens for, as you put it, bullocks reasons. My claim is that when the bullying escalates to physical violence, it is usually due to provocation.

    Maybe provocation of the bullied physicaly. Is bullying, non physicaly, not itself provocation?

    Well, let me ask you in turn:
    A mugger, while holding a weapon and threatening violence against your person may also insult you in some manner. Is that insult provocation? I would say yes. Is it necessary or smart to retaliate to that provocation? I would argue no, if you have already made the decision not to fight back. And in this case, Billy made that decision a long time ago.
    I think the comparisons between bullies and muggers show exactly how acceptable the latter should be.

    The way I see it, a bully tries to put you under his thumb and he only has two options available for keeping you there.
    1) Verbal abuse (often consisting of a threat of phyical violence or abject humiliation)
    2) Physical violence

    If you show that option 1 is not going to work on you, a bully is faced with an ultimatum : hit you or leave you alone.
    What I'm trying to say, and doing an awful job of it I guess, is do not force the ultimatum if you are not willing to 'accept the consequences'/'back up your challenge'.

    Does this seem unreasonable?

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    The bullies' actual-peers have more power to effectively end this shit than any official authority-figures do. While apparently many schools are retarded in handling this kind of thing, losing social support from the rest of the popular-kids costs bullies/abusers a great deal of their power.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • His CorkinessHis Corkiness Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I don't know if there are any highschools in Australia that have security guards. Mine didn't, and it was a pretty big one at 1,100 students.

    His Corkiness on
  • JebusUDJebusUD Adventure! Candy IslandRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    The way I see it, a bully tries to put you under his thumb and he only has two options available for keeping you there.
    1) Verbal abuse (often consisting of a threat of phyical violence or abject humiliation)
    2) Physical violence

    If you show that option 1 is not going to work on you, a bully is faced with an ultimatum : hit you or leave you alone.
    What I'm trying to say, and doing an awful job of it I guess, is do not force the ultimatum if you are not willing to 'accept the consequences'/'back up your challenge'.

    Does this seem unreasonable?

    This only holds if we accept your premise that physical violence against the bully'ed is instigated by them.

    I find this to be innaccurate at best, and a total load of shit at worst.

    JebusUD on
    and I wonder about my neighbors even though I don't have them
    but they're listening to every word I say
  • Pants ManPants Man Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    JebusUD wrote: »
    Pants Man wrote: »
    DiscGrace wrote: »
    Pants Man wrote: »
    DiscGrace wrote: »
    If you have security people. (We don't.)

    well there you go, obviously you have to step in and do something. how big is your school?

    Maybe 1,000 kids, grade 9-12. It's a pretty small, pretty racially homogeneous town, which helps I guess.

    that's not too bad, but i think for any school above 750 kids, there should be at least one security person at school at all times.

    edit: actually you know what? fuck that, EVERY school, regardless of size, should have at least one security person on site at all times.


    Really? At my highschool the security guy was some douche that basicaly got paid to sit there. Or tell you off for stupid things that didnt matter.

    uh huh. your personal experience aside, someone needs to be at every school to act as a contingency when things get out of hand. a physical presence whose only job is to maintain order is a crucial job in most schools.

    Pants Man on
    "okay byron, my grandma has a right to be happy, so i give you my blessing. just... don't get her pregnant. i don't need another mom."
  • MagicPrimeMagicPrime FiresideWizard Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    JebusUD wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    Aldo wrote: »
    Wawkin, did you just say you got bullied because you had it comin'? I mean, geez, they might have given a reason to pick on you, but all reasons I ever heard were complete bullocks. :|

    Maybe I was unclear. Bullying happens for, as you put it, bullocks reasons. My claim is that when the bullying escalates to physical violence, it is usually due to provocation.

    Maybe provocation of the bullied physicaly. Is bullying, non physicaly, not itself provocation?

    Well, let me ask you in turn:
    A mugger, while holding a weapon and threatening violence against your person may also insult you in some manner. Is that insult provocation? I would say yes. Is it necessary or smart to retaliate to that provocation? I would argue no, if you have already made the decision not to fight back. And in this case, Billy made that decision a long time ago.
    I think the comparisons between bullies and muggers show exactly how acceptable the latter should be.

    The way I see it, a bully tries to put you under his thumb and he only has two options available for keeping you there.
    1) Verbal abuse (often consisting of a threat of phyical violence or abject humiliation)
    2) Physical violence

    If you show that option 1 is not going to work on you, a bully is faced with an ultimatum : hit you or leave you alone.
    What I'm trying to say, and doing an awful job of it I guess, is do not force the ultimatum if you are not willing to 'accept the consequences'/'back up your challenge'.

    Does this seem unreasonable?

    Bully: "You're a fag!"
    Victim: "Please just leave me alone..."
    Bully: "FAG!" *punch in gut - kick,kick,kick"

    Totally the victim's fault.

    MagicPrime on
    BNet • magicprime#1430 | PSN/Steam • MagicPrime | Origin • FireSideWizard
    Critical Failures - Havenhold CampaignAugust St. Cloud (Human Ranger)
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    JebusUD wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    The way I see it, a bully tries to put you under his thumb and he only has two options available for keeping you there.
    1) Verbal abuse (often consisting of a threat of phyical violence or abject humiliation)
    2) Physical violence

    If you show that option 1 is not going to work on you, a bully is faced with an ultimatum : hit you or leave you alone.
    What I'm trying to say, and doing an awful job of it I guess, is do not force the ultimatum if you are not willing to 'accept the consequences'/'back up your challenge'.

    Does this seem unreasonable?

    This only holds if we accept your premise that physical violence against the bully'ed is instigated by them.

    I find this to be innaccurate at best, and a total load of shit at worst.

    Ok. then lets drop that premise. Do you agree there are ways to deflect a bullies attention? Or are you of the mind there are only two options: confront the bully or run away?

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • JebusUDJebusUD Adventure! Candy IslandRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    Ok. then lets drop that premise. Do you agree there are ways to deflect a bullies attention? Or are you of the mind there are only two options: confront the bully or run away?

    Sometimes there are, sometimes there are not. And it may work one day and not work the next.

    Generally the best course of action is to stand up to the bully.

    JebusUD on
    and I wonder about my neighbors even though I don't have them
    but they're listening to every word I say
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    MagicPrime wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    JebusUD wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    Aldo wrote: »
    Wawkin, did you just say you got bullied because you had it comin'? I mean, geez, they might have given a reason to pick on you, but all reasons I ever heard were complete bullocks. :|

    Maybe I was unclear. Bullying happens for, as you put it, bullocks reasons. My claim is that when the bullying escalates to physical violence, it is usually due to provocation.

    Maybe provocation of the bullied physicaly. Is bullying, non physicaly, not itself provocation?

    Well, let me ask you in turn:
    A mugger, while holding a weapon and threatening violence against your person may also insult you in some manner. Is that insult provocation? I would say yes. Is it necessary or smart to retaliate to that provocation? I would argue no, if you have already made the decision not to fight back. And in this case, Billy made that decision a long time ago.
    I think the comparisons between bullies and muggers show exactly how acceptable the latter should be.

    The way I see it, a bully tries to put you under his thumb and he only has two options available for keeping you there.
    1) Verbal abuse (often consisting of a threat of phyical violence or abject humiliation)
    2) Physical violence

    If you show that option 1 is not going to work on you, a bully is faced with an ultimatum : hit you or leave you alone.
    What I'm trying to say, and doing an awful job of it I guess, is do not force the ultimatum if you are not willing to 'accept the consequences'/'back up your challenge'.

    Does this seem unreasonable?

    Bully: "You're a fag!"
    Victim: "Please just leave me alone..."
    Bully: "FAG!" *punch in gut - kick,kick,kick"

    Totally the victim's fault.

    I would not correlate hate crimes and bullying. They seem to be seperate issues and require different mentalities on the part of the agressor.

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • MagicPrimeMagicPrime FiresideWizard Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    JebusUD wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    Ok. then lets drop that premise. Do you agree there are ways to deflect a bullies attention? Or are you of the mind there are only two options: confront the bully or run away?

    Sometimes there are, sometimes there are not. And it may work one day and not work the next.

    Generally the best course of action is to stand up to the bully.

    I saw a kid try to stand up to a bully once and he got thrown down a flight of stairs.

    MagicPrime on
    BNet • magicprime#1430 | PSN/Steam • MagicPrime | Origin • FireSideWizard
    Critical Failures - Havenhold CampaignAugust St. Cloud (Human Ranger)
  • MagicPrimeMagicPrime FiresideWizard Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    I would not correlate hate crimes and bullying. They seem to be seperate issues and require different mentalities on the part of the agressor.


    Hate crimes?

    You do realize that a typical bully calls everyone a "fag"? Whether they be straight or not. Its pretty much just the default bully line.

    MagicPrime on
    BNet • magicprime#1430 | PSN/Steam • MagicPrime | Origin • FireSideWizard
    Critical Failures - Havenhold CampaignAugust St. Cloud (Human Ranger)
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    I would not correlate hate crimes and bullying. They seem to be seperate issues and require different mentalities on the part of the agressor.
    A-are you sure you've been bullied? Because this is pretty standard issue in my experience.

    Aldo on
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Aldo wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    I would not correlate hate crimes and bullying. They seem to be seperate issues and require different mentalities on the part of the agressor.
    A-are you sure you've been bullied? Because this is pretty standard issue in my experience.
    I think he's confusing being bullied with bullying.

    Fencingsax on
  • whitey9whitey9 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin: kids will usually find a way to deflect. An extremely common method is to, strangely enough, develop a sense of humor. I went from the nerdyish kid who was just on the borderlines of being bullied, to the funny kid who the bullies liked.

    To those who say that it's silly to get suspended for fighting back, I can understand that. But unless you saw the whole fight, it would be easy to just start a fight with someone and then go in and say "I was just defending myself." It opens itself to abuse. If I had a fucking nickel for every group of kids screaming "HE STARTED IT" "NO HE STARTED IT", I would be a rich man indeed.

    A colleague of mine has a nerdy son who took enough shit one day and threw the bully to the ground hard. They both got suspended for a day. The mom of the nerdy kid told him why he had to be suspended as well, but she let him stay home, eat pizza, and play video games because she was so proud. That's all you can do.

    I think that teachers can and should establish an environment where bullying and abuse should be looked upon as total abhorrent, but again, look who's raising these little monsters. Bullies almost always come from abusive families as well.

    whitey9 on
    llcoolwhitey.png
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    I think he's confusing being bullied with bullying.
    Now let's not start bullying people in this thread

    it might just cause a time/space rift.

    Aldo on
  • MagicPrimeMagicPrime FiresideWizard Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Wawkin out of curiosity, did you go to public schools or private/religious/academy schools?

    MagicPrime on
    BNet • magicprime#1430 | PSN/Steam • MagicPrime | Origin • FireSideWizard
    Critical Failures - Havenhold CampaignAugust St. Cloud (Human Ranger)
  • InquisitorInquisitor Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    My high school managed to have practically zero bullying due to a near zero tolerance policy towards anything violent. I'm talking two girls go suspended for throwing nachos at each other angrily during lunch. The worst that could happen was low key verbal bullying for the most part, which is easy to mitigate through wit if you know the odds of it escalating to actual violence are nil. The closest anything ever got to a fight was a single punch or kick thrown in some remote location of the school at some un-busy time, anything remotely resembling a fight would just get you expelled.

    Unfortunately I'm sure not all schools could adopt such a zero tolerance policy. I went to a public magnate school, so if you made a stink through something like bullying you just got kicked back to your standard local public school. However, obviously you can't just expel people with such ease at a standard public school.

    Inquisitor on
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    whitey9 wrote: »
    wawkin: kids will usually find a way to deflect. An extremely common method is to, strangely enough, develop a sense of humor. I went from the nerdyish kid who was just on the borderlines of being bullied, to the funny kid who the bullies liked.

    To those who say that it's silly to get suspended for fighting back, I can understand that. But unless you saw the whole fight, it would be easy to just start a fight with someone and then go in and say "I was just defending myself." It opens itself to abuse. If I had a fucking nickel for every group of kids screaming "HE STARTED IT" "NO HE STARTED IT", I would be a rich man indeed.

    A colleague of mine has a nerdy son who took enough shit one day and threw the bully to the ground hard. They both got suspended for a day. The mom of the nerdy kid told him why he had to be suspended as well, but she let him stay home, eat pizza, and play video games because she was so proud. That's all you can do.

    I think that teachers can and should establish an environment where bullying and abuse should be looked upon as total abhorrent, but again, look who's raising these little monsters. Bullies almost always come from abusive families as well.


    In highschool, I'd say I handled more bullies with humor than with fists. I was trying to think of a way to explain the deflection, because it wasn't always accomplished through humor.

    I only adopted the method in response to the consequences for fighting gaining in severity. I was tired of being punished for defending myself.

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    whitey9 wrote: »
    wawkin: kids will usually find a way to deflect. An extremely common method is to, strangely enough, develop a sense of humor. I went from the nerdyish kid who was just on the borderlines of being bullied, to the funny kid who the bullies liked.

    To those who say that it's silly to get suspended for fighting back, I can understand that. But unless you saw the whole fight, it would be easy to just start a fight with someone and then go in and say "I was just defending myself." It opens itself to abuse. If I had a fucking nickel for every group of kids screaming "HE STARTED IT" "NO HE STARTED IT", I would be a rich man indeed.

    A colleague of mine has a nerdy son who took enough shit one day and threw the bully to the ground hard. They both got suspended for a day. The mom of the nerdy kid told him why he had to be suspended as well, but she let him stay home, eat pizza, and play video games because she was so proud. That's all you can do.

    I think that teachers can and should establish an environment where bullying and abuse should be looked upon as total abhorrent, but again, look who's raising these little monsters. Bullies almost always come from abusive families as well.

    Same thing happened to me a few times. I have an unusually trusting relationship with my parents so it was pretty easy. I'd get in trouble for hitting some douche who was being abusive to me. My parents would just ask if he hit me first and if he did they said "They have to punish you but you did the right thing". To this day I make it clear to anyone who tries to physically harm me I feel totally justified decking them as hard as I can.

    nexuscrawler on
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    MagicPrime wrote: »
    Wawkin out of curiosity, did you go to public schools or private/religious/academy schools?

    Public for the first half, private (non-reiglious affiliated) for the second half.

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    My high school managed to have practically zero bullying due to a near zero tolerance policy towards anything violent. I'm talking two girls go suspended for throwing nachos at each other angrily during lunch. The worst that could happen was low key verbal bullying for the most part, which is easy to mitigate through wit if you know the odds of it escalating to actual violence are nil. The closest anything ever got to a fight was a single punch or kick thrown in some remote location of the school at some un-busy time, anything remotely resembling a fight would just get you expelled.

    Unfortunately I'm sure not all schools could adopt such a zero tolerance policy. I went to a public magnate school, so if you made a stink through something like bullying you just got kicked back to your standard local public school. However, obviously you can't just expel people with such ease at a standard public school.
    There wasn't any violence outside of the school's property?

    Aldo on
  • whitey9whitey9 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    The ratio of in school violence to out of school violence is like 1000 to 1. Only when you force these kids to be together do you get problems. Out of school, the kids tend to avoid each other as much as they can.

    whitey9 on
    llcoolwhitey.png
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Aldo wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    My high school managed to have practically zero bullying due to a near zero tolerance policy towards anything violent. I'm talking two girls go suspended for throwing nachos at each other angrily during lunch. The worst that could happen was low key verbal bullying for the most part, which is easy to mitigate through wit if you know the odds of it escalating to actual violence are nil. The closest anything ever got to a fight was a single punch or kick thrown in some remote location of the school at some un-busy time, anything remotely resembling a fight would just get you expelled.

    Unfortunately I'm sure not all schools could adopt such a zero tolerance policy. I went to a public magnate school, so if you made a stink through something like bullying you just got kicked back to your standard local public school. However, obviously you can't just expel people with such ease at a standard public school.
    There wasn't any violence outside of the school's property?

    I am wondering the same thing.

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    whitey9 wrote: »
    The ratio of in school violence to out of school violence is like 1000 to 1. Only when you force these kids to be together do you get problems. Out of school, the kids tend to avoid each other as much as they can.
    I suppose. Don't you guys cycle home or something? Half the reason why I'm so fast on bikes is because I often had to run from bullies. :P

    Aldo on
  • KingGrahamKingGraham Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I avoided the most damaging forms of bullying with the "safety in numbers" strategy. There was a group of nerds and drama geeks huddled for protection. Whoever was on the edges would have to take some verbal harassment now and then, but it was pretty low key. Most of the hardcore physical violence tended to erupt between people who were in the bullying group to begin with.

    Maybe there was so much infighting they couldn't effectively bully the nerd populous?

    Either way, this is seriously fucked up.

    KingGraham on
  • InquisitorInquisitor Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    Aldo wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    My high school managed to have practically zero bullying due to a near zero tolerance policy towards anything violent. I'm talking two girls go suspended for throwing nachos at each other angrily during lunch. The worst that could happen was low key verbal bullying for the most part, which is easy to mitigate through wit if you know the odds of it escalating to actual violence are nil. The closest anything ever got to a fight was a single punch or kick thrown in some remote location of the school at some un-busy time, anything remotely resembling a fight would just get you expelled.

    Unfortunately I'm sure not all schools could adopt such a zero tolerance policy. I went to a public magnate school, so if you made a stink through something like bullying you just got kicked back to your standard local public school. However, obviously you can't just expel people with such ease at a standard public school.
    There wasn't any violence outside of the school's property?

    I am wondering the same thing.

    Because it was a magnet school it pooled students from multiple pretty big areas, I guess students lived too far apart for anything like that to happen, at least that I heard of. I imagine that there might have been some scuffles when people got off their buses, but, nothing that I ever heard of or saw or experienced first hand.

    Inquisitor on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    My school had a decent sized gang population so off property violence was actually fairly common. My only real bully in my actual high school was too fat to catch me.

    This thread mostly just makes me want some nationalized standards for school.

    Quid on
  • Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I was that kid who couldn't fight back. Even to this day I doubt I'd know how. All my life I heard "Hey, just fight back and they'll leave you alone!" from everyone - teachers, my parents, whatever. All it did was make me feel even more worthless because obviously something was wrong with me if I couldn't fix it.

    Some of the beatings were pretty bad. I think the worst was one kid using his backpack full of textbooks like a club. Put my teeth through my lip. I went to the principal once about it. I ended up in detention for two weeks. It's hopeless because as much as anyone pays lip service to it, not enough people care. Really, when it comes down to it, the bullies enjoy the freedom because there is absolutely nobody who gives enough of a shit about these kids to actually do something.

    So it'll never end. We'll always have maladjusted, socially inept adults who were so abused as children they can hardly speak to people.

    Nova_C on
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I was that kid who couldn't fight back. Even to this day I doubt I'd know how. All my life I heard "Hey, just fight back and they'll leave you alone!" from everyone - teachers, my parents, whatever. All it did was make me feel even more worthless because obviously something was wrong with me if I couldn't fix it.

    Perplexing. I was the kid who always fought back. And every authority, including parents, kept telling me to stop fighting back. For a short time, I thought I was wrong for, what I saw as, standing up for myself.

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    I was that kid who couldn't fight back. Even to this day I doubt I'd know how. All my life I heard "Hey, just fight back and they'll leave you alone!" from everyone - teachers, my parents, whatever. All it did was make me feel even more worthless because obviously something was wrong with me if I couldn't fix it.

    Perplexing. I was the kid who always fought back. And every authority, including parents, kept telling me to stop fighting back. For a short time, I thought I was wrong for, what I saw as, standing up for myself.

    Well, I guess the answer is to not be bullied. We're all victims by choice, right?

    Nova_C on
  • JebusUDJebusUD Adventure! Candy IslandRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Nova_C wrote: »
    I was that kid who couldn't fight back. Even to this day I doubt I'd know how. All my life I heard "Hey, just fight back and they'll leave you alone!" from everyone - teachers, my parents, whatever. All it did was make me feel even more worthless because obviously something was wrong with me if I couldn't fix it.

    You were physically unable to fight back? Or you just didn't fight back?

    I was about the scrawniest kid you could immagine and I only got in a fight twice. You just have to make them think you are going to hit them. Im not saying you have to be effective at fighting. Just a couple knocks and then you usualy get the crap beat out of you, at least until someone shows up to break it up. You don't have to be UFC champion or anything.

    JebusUD on
    and I wonder about my neighbors even though I don't have them
    but they're listening to every word I say
  • Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    JebusUD wrote: »
    You were physically unable to fight back? Or you just didn't fight back?

    I was about the scrawniest kid you could immagine and I only got in a fight twice. You just have to make them think you are going to hit them. Im not saying you have to be effective at fighting. Just a couple knocks and then you usualy get the crap beat out of you, at least until someone shows up to break it up. You don't have to be UFC champion or anything.

    I just didn't. I can't explain it.

    Nova_C on
Sign In or Register to comment.