The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Several officials say veteran Republican Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania intends to switch parties, advancing his own hopes of winning a new term next year while pushing Democrats one step closer to a 60-vote filibuster-resistant majority.
The sources said an announcement could come later in the day — or Wednesday. The officials who provided the information did so on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to discuss his plans.
Specter is a 79-year-old veteran of five Senate terms, and one of only a handful of moderate Republicans left in Congress in a party made up largely of conservatives.
This would be so awesome but somehow I think this is mostly out of self preservation and an attempt to get re-elected. Though I would say Specter has seemed more pragmatic than most in the republican party recently.
Edit: Feel free to lock if we want to discuss this in the State of the US Congress and Governorships thread.
No, I am not really communist. Yes, it is weird that I use this name.
Republican Sen. Arlen Specter is switching parties so he can run in the Pennsylvania Democratic Senate primary, abandoning his party because he does not want to be "judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate."
Specter, in a Tuesday afternoon statement, said he knows his supporters will be disappointed, but says he is "willing to take all comers" in his Senate race
My change in party affiliation does not mean that I will be a party-line voter any more for the Democrats that I have been for the Republicans. Unlike Senator Jeffords’ switch which changed party control, I will not be an automatic 60th vote for cloture. For example, my position on Employees Free Choice (Card Check) will not change.
This seems more than a little odd to me. He's got a history with labor, and now that he's switching being against EFCA will hurt in the primary rather than help. Wonder what he's thinking.
My change in party affiliation does not mean that I will be a party-line voter any more for the Democrats that I have been for the Republicans. Unlike Senator Jeffords’ switch which changed party control, I will not be an automatic 60th vote for cloture. For example, my position on Employees Free Choice (Card Check) will not change.
This seems more than a little odd to me. He's got a history with labor, and now that he's switching being against EFCA will hurt in the primary rather than help. Wonder what he's thinking.
Yeah this seems idiotic. Card check is down the list on priorities for me but it seems dumb to switch parties, thus burning bridges with the GOP and still refuse to budge on an issue that would help quite a bit in terms of unions.
The question is, can the Dems use this as leverage against Bayh, Nelson, etc. They won't have the excuse of needing Republicans to provide cover any more.
President Obama was informed of Sen. Arlen Specter's decison to switch parties at 10:25 this morning while receiving his daily economic briefing in the Oval Office, according to a White House official.
Obama was handed a note by an aide that read: "Specter is announcing he is changing parties."
The president reached Sen. Specter, one of only three Republicans to support his stimulus package, on the phone at 10:32 and told him "you have my full support." He added that we are "thrilled to have you."
Union influence would be too strong in a PA Dem primary for him to filibuster EFCA and still win, and as long as he's going to be a dick on this issue, there will be a primary. As long as he's just giving the GOP nom to Toomey, winning the Dem primary will be as good as a free pass to the Senate.
He likely knows all this, and this is just political bullshit. Either floating a trial balloon, or trying to scare some people over to his side in the GOP primary, or some other nonsense.
I don't know the ramifications of Democrats having the 60 votes.
Filibuster proof majority. Basically they can pass legislation now, rather than have it cock blocked every day on every issue.
Because if repubs are in power it's "Lets do this bipartisan" and if it is dems then for pubs it is "lets not let them pass anything, ever," at least right now.
JebusUD on
and I wonder about my neighbors even though I don't have them
but they're listening to every word I say
Somewhat off-topic, but after a reading of what seemed like a really overly-simplified explanation of the EFCA I'm a little confused. Do we have an EFCA thread?
“I’m still at a loss,†said Soloveichik. “I don’t know if we’re going to put anything out.†The Club was taken completely by surprise and is not yet discussing the effect that Toomey’s decision may have had on forcing Specter over to the Democrats.
I don't know the ramifications of Democrats having the 60 votes.
Filibuster proof majority. Basically they can pass legislation now, rather than have it cock blocked every day on every issue.
Because if repubs are in power it's "Lets do this bipartisan" and if it is dems then for pubs it is "lets not let them pass anything, ever," at least right now.
Oh I know about the filibuster, but I don't know the ramifications on specific legislative initiatives that will get through now. I don't know of any particularly bad bills that the dems are trying to push.
Fox News: "Highlighting the intense unpopularity of Obama's handling of the economy, support for his stimulus package among Republicans has dropped by 33% in the last day."
ElJeffe on
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
I don't know the ramifications of Democrats having the 60 votes.
Filibuster proof majority. Basically they can pass legislation now, rather than have it cock blocked every day on every issue.
Because if repubs are in power it's "Lets do this bipartisan" and if it is dems then for pubs it is "lets not let them pass anything, ever," at least right now.
Oh I know about the filibuster, but I don't know the ramifications on specific legislative initiatives that will get through now.
Caucusing with the Dems doesn't mean always voting with them. It's not like Specter just switched brains with someone.
Fox News: "Highlighting the intense unpopularity of Obama's handling of the economy, support for his stimulus package among Republicans has dropped by 33% in the last day."
He'd better firm up on the right side of EFCA if he expects this to help him at all.
He probably figures on coasting to a win in the Dem primary based entirely on name recognition and the support of the national party, knowing that the unions aren't going to support a Republican in the general.
Fox News: "Highlighting the intense unpopularity of Obama's handling of the economy, support for his stimulus package among Republicans has dropped by 33% in the last day."
You're absolutely joking, right?
The fact that it's not obvious is hilarious.
Wait, no, what's the word?
Horrible. That's it.
ElJeffe on
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
I don't know the ramifications of Democrats having the 60 votes.
Filibuster proof majority. Basically they can pass legislation now, rather than have it cock blocked every day on every issue.
Because if repubs are in power it's "Lets do this bipartisan" and if it is dems then for pubs it is "lets not let them pass anything, ever," at least right now.
Oh I know about the filibuster, but I don't know the ramifications on specific legislative initiatives that will get through now.
Caucusing with the Dems doesn't mean always voting with them. It's not like Specter just switched brains with someone.
Nor are all Republicans guaranteed to unite on a filibuster. But that's why I said if he becomes part of the democrat bloc as a whole, trying to stop filibusters, it will increase the likelihood of bills being passed with no republican support.
Septus on
PSN: Kurahoshi1
0
ZimmydoomAccept no substitutesRegistered Userregular
edited April 2009
This, and Lincoln Chafee has put out feelers about switching parties to take out Carcieri in Rhode Island.
Now if only we could get Olympia Snowe to either switch or start picking real fights with the leadership. Susan Collins has been a double-agent (the bad kind) for some time; I called it before the election and cast a protest vote for Tom Allen even though I didn't like him, and the bullshit she pulled with the Swine Flu/stimulus bill was validating in an "I feel sick" sort of way. Unfortunately by 2014 I don't think it will be anything we can use against her, but still it pisses me off...
Zimmydoom, Zimmydoom
Flew away in a balloon
Had sex with polar bears
While sitting in a reclining chair
Now there are Zim-Bear hybrids
Running around and clawing eyelids
Watch out, a Zim-Bear is about to have sex with yooooooou!
Another aspect - what does this mean for the two Maine Senators? They have a lot less leverage now. And will this cause a trend of retirements in the GOP Senate?
Specter can now only do two things. He can be a Dem or a he can be an Independent. He can't win reelection as the latter. If he says his the former but keeps being a dick, its open primary time and without union or progressive support he's fucked.
Its not a blank check by any means. But this could have real significance and could conceivably be a tidal change.
“I’m still at a loss,†said Soloveichik. “I don’t know if we’re going to put anything out.†The Club was taken completely by surprise and is not yet discussing the effect that Toomey’s decision may have had on forcing Specter over to the Democrats.
FencingsaxIt is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understandingGNU Terry PratchettRegistered Userregular
edited April 2009
The two Maine Senators are really popular, and even though Collins was involved with the pandemic thing on the stimulus bill, they're both actually quite good.
Fencingsax on
0
GoslingLooking Up Soccer In Mongolia Right Now, ProbablyWatertown, WIRegistered Userregular
edited April 2009
Okay, it appears that:
A) The Dems are going to basically shepherd Specter through the Democratic primary. Probably was part of the deal. (You can still run against him; you're just on your own as far as support goes.) The remaining Republicans are in a meeting; McConnell should have a statement out when that's over. That'll be fun.
Gosling on
I have a new soccer blog The Minnow Tank. Reading it psychically kicks Sepp Blatter in the bean bag.
He has to be a registered Democrat in order to run in that primary. And I don't think he can run and win a statewide race in Pennsylvania as an independent against a Democrat and Toomey's crazy ass.
enlightenedbum on
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
I don't know the ramifications of Democrats having the 60 votes.
Filibuster proof majority. Basically they can pass legislation now, rather than have it cock blocked every day on every issue.
Because if repubs are in power it's "Lets do this bipartisan" and if it is dems then for pubs it is "lets not let them pass anything, ever," at least right now.
Oh I know about the filibuster, but I don't know the ramifications on specific legislative initiatives that will get through now. I don't know of any particularly bad bills that the dems are trying to push.
Reid would take a GOP filibuster so far up his ass it'd be like a gay Houdini
He'd better firm up on the right side of EFCA if he expects this to help him at all.
He probably figures on coasting to a win in the Dem primary based entirely on name recognition and the support of the national party, knowing that the unions aren't going to support a Republican in the general.
Don't know how effective that will be, though.
That would work in the general. It assumes no one runs against him in the primary though, which doesn't seem too likely as long as he's against EFCA, and especially since a general election against Toomey would be a walk in the park for just about any random jackass with a D after his name.
Another aspect - what does this mean for the two Maine Senators? They have a lot less leverage now. And will this cause a trend of retirements in the GOP Senate?
Specter can now only do two things. He can be a Dem or a he can be an Independent. He can't win reelection as the latter. If he says his the former but keeps being a dick, its open primary time and without union or progressive support he's fucked.
Its not a blank check by any means. But this could have real significance and could conceivably be a tidal change.
I think most of the senators that are gonna retire have already announced it, at this point.
The two Maine Senators are really popular, and even though Collins was involved with the pandemic thing on the stimulus bill, they're both actually quite good.
Their unofficial "moderate Pubs" caucus has just been cut off at the knees, though. They'd have more power caucusing with the Dems and throwing in with Bayh's semi-fictional ConservaDem caucus.
President Obama was informed of Sen. Arlen Specter's decison to switch parties at 10:25 this morning while receiving his daily economic briefing in the Oval Office, according to a White House official.
Obama was handed a note by an aide that read: "Specter is announcing he is changing parties."
The president reached Sen. Specter, one of only three Republicans to support his stimulus package, on the phone at 10:32 and told him "you have my full support." He added that we are "thrilled to have you."
At 10:45 he then called John Cornyn and gave what can only be described as a 'raspberry'.
Tomanta on
0
FencingsaxIt is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understandingGNU Terry PratchettRegistered Userregular
The two Maine Senators are really popular, and even though Collins was involved with the pandemic thing on the stimulus bill, they're both actually quite good.
Their unofficial "moderate Pubs" caucus has just been cut off at the knees, though. They'd have more power caucusing with the Dems and throwing in with Bayh's semi-fictional ConservaDem caucus.
Well, until Franken is seated they still have power. And they've been doing the "moderate Pub" thing for years. That's one of the reasons they're so popular. Maine's kind of conservative, but it's still New England.
I don't know the ramifications of Democrats having the 60 votes.
Filibuster proof majority. Basically they can pass legislation now, rather than have it cock blocked every day on every issue.
Because if repubs are in power it's "Lets do this bipartisan" and if it is dems then for pubs it is "lets not let them pass anything, ever," at least right now.
Oh I know about the filibuster, but I don't know the ramifications on specific legislative initiatives that will get through now.
Caucusing with the Dems doesn't mean always voting with them. It's not like Specter just switched brains with someone.
Someone needs to photoshop that asap!
JebusUD on
and I wonder about my neighbors even though I don't have them
but they're listening to every word I say
Posts
We dont need to wait 2 years. fuck yes.
This seems more than a little odd to me. He's got a history with labor, and now that he's switching being against EFCA will hurt in the primary rather than help. Wonder what he's thinking.
Well the RNC is actively campaigning against him?
Can you blame the guy?
Yeah this seems idiotic. Card check is down the list on priorities for me but it seems dumb to switch parties, thus burning bridges with the GOP and still refuse to budge on an issue that would help quite a bit in terms of unions.
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
Does this make sixty? Once Franken gets seated?
but they're listening to every word I say
I think that's a good thing. At least the Governor part. I don't know the ramifications of Democrats having the 60 votes.
Yes it does.
The question is, can the Dems use this as leverage against Bayh, Nelson, etc. They won't have the excuse of needing Republicans to provide cover any more.
Me either, this seems to come out of nowhere. Maybe he saw that 100 days was over and Obama was still in firm control?
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
haha, I think we all know the answer to that
He likely knows all this, and this is just political bullshit. Either floating a trial balloon, or trying to scare some people over to his side in the GOP primary, or some other nonsense.
Filibuster proof majority. Basically they can pass legislation now, rather than have it cock blocked every day on every issue.
Because if repubs are in power it's "Lets do this bipartisan" and if it is dems then for pubs it is "lets not let them pass anything, ever," at least right now.
but they're listening to every word I say
They tried to bury us. They didn't know that we were seeds. 2018 Midterms. Get your shit together.
Oh I know about the filibuster, but I don't know the ramifications on specific legislative initiatives that will get through now. I don't know of any particularly bad bills that the dems are trying to push.
They tried to bury us. They didn't know that we were seeds. 2018 Midterms. Get your shit together.
Don't know how effective that will be, though.
The fact that it's not obvious is hilarious.
Wait, no, what's the word?
Horrible. That's it.
Nor are all Republicans guaranteed to unite on a filibuster. But that's why I said if he becomes part of the democrat bloc as a whole, trying to stop filibusters, it will increase the likelihood of bills being passed with no republican support.
Now if only we could get Olympia Snowe to either switch or start picking real fights with the leadership. Susan Collins has been a double-agent (the bad kind) for some time; I called it before the election and cast a protest vote for Tom Allen even though I didn't like him, and the bullshit she pulled with the Swine Flu/stimulus bill was validating in an "I feel sick" sort of way. Unfortunately by 2014 I don't think it will be anything we can use against her, but still it pisses me off...
Specter can now only do two things. He can be a Dem or a he can be an Independent. He can't win reelection as the latter. If he says his the former but keeps being a dick, its open primary time and without union or progressive support he's fucked.
Its not a blank check by any means. But this could have real significance and could conceivably be a tidal change.
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
A) The Dems are going to basically shepherd Specter through the Democratic primary. Probably was part of the deal. (You can still run against him; you're just on your own as far as support goes.)
The remaining Republicans are in a meeting; McConnell should have a statement out when that's over. That'll be fun.
Reid would take a GOP filibuster so far up his ass it'd be like a gay Houdini
That would work in the general. It assumes no one runs against him in the primary though, which doesn't seem too likely as long as he's against EFCA, and especially since a general election against Toomey would be a walk in the park for just about any random jackass with a D after his name.
edit-
nevermind, seems i'm falling behind
They tried to bury us. They didn't know that we were seeds. 2018 Midterms. Get your shit together.
Someone needs to photoshop that asap!
but they're listening to every word I say