I like how all these votes coming in towards the end, the ones that are actually determining the winner after it was close for a while, are being made with no reason given whatsoever. Or a joke reason like "Haha Zand's only cool when he has a post restriction."
Was all of the important stuff about yesterday's voting patterns completely ignored?
Rawkking Goodguy. To go way back I think the (bodyguard) kills are not room specific because it would be too easy to get them outed with such small numbers. Location based mafia kills would be too crippling for them. That's my reasoning, though it may be faulty.
I like how all these votes coming in towards the end, the ones that are actually determining the winner after it was close for a while, are being made with no reason given whatsoever. Or a joke reason like "Haha Zand's only cool when he has a post restriction."
Was all of the important stuff about yesterday's voting patterns completely ignored?
That actually happens an unfortunate amount of times. Bothersome, huh?
I like how all these votes coming in towards the end, the ones that are actually determining the winner after it was close for a while, are being made with no reason given whatsoever. Or a joke reason like "Haha Zand's only cool when he has a post restriction."
Was all of the important stuff about yesterday's voting patterns completely ignored?
That actually happens an unfortunate amount of times. Bothersome, huh?
A bit.
I wonder if I should copy/paste my wall of text reasoning from earlier.
Really, though. We had a lot of good, constructive discussion about the reasons behind the Zand/Rawkking votes earlier. Now people are just popping in, throwing an important vote that will determine the winner, and giving no reasoning whatsoever. Slightly annoying when some people actually put thought into this, or at least acknowledged that they read the analysis. Even a simple "Well from what I've read about the two, my instincts are leaning towards..."
Bah
Edit: @ Delmain - Yeah, I'm really hoping both Rawkking and Zand will die very soon so we can make sense out of what went on.
I like how all these votes coming in towards the end, the ones that are actually determining the winner after it was close for a while, are being made with no reason given whatsoever. Or a joke reason like "Haha Zand's only cool when he has a post restriction."
Was all of the important stuff about yesterday's voting patterns completely ignored?
That actually happens an unfortunate amount of times. Bothersome, huh?
A bit.
I wonder if I should copy/paste my wall of text reasoning from earlier.
Really, though. We had a lot of good, constructive discussion about the reasons behind the Zand/Rawkking votes earlier. Now people are just popping in, throwing an important vote that will determine the winner, and giving no reasoning whatsoever. Slightly annoying when some people actually put thought into this, or at least acknowledged that they read the analysis. Even a simple "Well from what I've read about the two, my instincts are leaning towards..."
Bah
good constructive discussion is only useful to those that can't read other's minds based on their posts over the internet.
I like how all these votes coming in towards the end, the ones that are actually determining the winner after it was close for a while, are being made with no reason given whatsoever. Or a joke reason like "Haha Zand's only cool when he has a post restriction."
Was all of the important stuff about yesterday's voting patterns completely ignored?
That actually happens an unfortunate amount of times. Bothersome, huh?
A bit.
I wonder if I should copy/paste my wall of text reasoning from earlier.
Really, though. We had a lot of good, constructive discussion about the reasons behind the Zand/Rawkking votes earlier. Now people are just popping in, throwing an important vote that will determine the winner, and giving no reasoning whatsoever. Slightly annoying when some people actually put thought into this, or at least acknowledged that they read the analysis. Even a simple "Well from what I've read about the two, my instincts are leaning towards..."
Bah
good constructive discussion is only useful to those that can't read other's minds based on their posts over the internet.
Wow today has been pretty nuts. Rereading everything was fun. There is a close vote coming. Shenanigans, go!
Does anyone else feel like today's voting reasons are less than ideal? The vote for Zandacroniumnus is as good as we got, because its based on math logic. But, phallas are more organic moving entities. The vote toward Ardor was a weird one. It was all based on very few posts from him, and all he was doing was making some decent assumptions and making intelligent posts. Then the Rqawking votes started based on Argors own posts. Who else? Kime. Small kimewagons because we don't know anything else. Wise?
Just all looked off from my persective. I'm going to stand back and hope I don't get attacked tonight by people that my motivations don't match and just gonna enjoy the party a bit....
My vote is still on Zan.
I hope the butler comes by with champaign.
oaklore on
0
Options
adventfallsWhy would you wish to know?Registered Userregular
edited October 2009
And I hope you check that champagne. With all these people going 'round, someone's bound to have poisoned it for Lucky.
Does anyone else feel like today's voting reasons are less than ideal? The vote for Zandacroniumnus is as good as we got, because its based on math logic.
Ok, so, having finally caught up from so many pages ago, I feel the evidence against zandracon is circumstantial at best.
Rawkking seems like a better choice, even if the evidence isn't hugely tipping the balance.
Most of what we have right now is pretty inconclusive, so mildly suspicious activity is really all we have. Though if we keep up this level of attention when we have more info this game should go pretty well for the village. Assuming there aren't crazy mechanics we don't know about.
I like how all these votes coming in towards the end, the ones that are actually determining the winner after it was close for a while, are being made with no reason given whatsoever. Or a joke reason like "Haha Zand's only cool when he has a post restriction."
Was all of the important stuff about yesterday's voting patterns completely ignored?
On that note.
Warban, daius, simonwolf, obbi, and iamtheaznman deserve to be whacked.
El Skid, ShadowThomas get an honorable mention for posting something game related, but not justifying their votes whatsoever. V_w can be tossed in this category, but he's on the rawkking side of things.
BuzzBuzz is off the hook since he admitted he was just skimming. :P
I like how all these votes coming in towards the end, the ones that are actually determining the winner after it was close for a while, are being made with no reason given whatsoever. Or a joke reason like "Haha Zand's only cool when he has a post restriction."
Was all of the important stuff about yesterday's voting patterns completely ignored?
That actually happens an unfortunate amount of times. Bothersome, huh?
A bit.
I wonder if I should copy/paste my wall of text reasoning from earlier.
Really, though. We had a lot of good, constructive discussion about the reasons behind the Zand/Rawkking votes earlier. Now people are just popping in, throwing an important vote that will determine the winner, and giving no reasoning whatsoever. Slightly annoying when some people actually put thought into this, or at least acknowledged that they read the analysis. Even a simple "Well from what I've read about the two, my instincts are leaning towards..."
Bah
Edit: @ Delmain - Yeah, I'm really hoping both Rawkking and Zand will die very soon so we can make sense out of what went on.
HHHHHeeeellarious story. I just got done taking apart the day one vote spreadsheet from Eecc, modifying it so that every single vote was a seperate entry, modifying that so that it allowed me to sort by post number, resorting it so it was accending from first to last post, then going over that to try to find out who I thought was the more likely villian.
And also looking at that thing that some people brought up with DDJ going to burnage, then EEcc saying oo noes, that's bringing it too close, I'll switch to burnage.
The vote count was 8 to 5 at that time, so it was only... somewhat close. As EECC had voted for sky about 10 votes prior to DDJ's... I don't find either EECC or DDJ to be "more" suspicious than the other. I find them to be equally suspicious. And of course, almost immediately afterwards (post 420, hilariously), SkyCaptain turned on his Jackass Thrusters to maximum levels... making it hard to reconcile any further votes as either motivated by the desire to hide in bandwagon or cause he was being a jackass.
Also, Houn was 3rd on the Burnage wagon. You know what that means ^_^
And having determined that I have no fucking clue who's suspicious today, I then deleted it all cause I didn't like the formatting.
Anyway... I'm going with my gut. Zandy, for randomness in the jump to Kime without either an explanatory post, or at least a semi-recent Kime post that would be good justification for said post, plus, Trophy room.
And as a side note, does Zand ever actually talk? I'm not sure I remember having seen a fully coherent sentence from him at any point in history.
I want popcorn Shalmelo. I have a feeling the partie's bout to get real.
*Cue Yakety Sax*
edit: Nocturne: Huh? I haven't seen the Ardor post since earlier, but I thought Rawking was on it and someone started the votes based on that.
Nocturne(and to a lesser extent myself) started the Rawkkingwagon in response to Ardor. Ardor listed everyone to not vote for skycaptain after the last point the vote was tied and listed them in order of who he found most suspicious.
Personally I think he threw darts to determine what order he listed them in.
Job: Zand's jump was within a page of kime pointing out he was actually in the game. I believe it was right after houn quoted kime pointing it out, at which point Houn voted for kime. He was immediately followed by Zandracon.
Does a kime is in the game gogogo bandwagon joke post really need an explanation?
Warban, daius, simonwolf, obbi, and iamtheaznman deserve to be whacked.
El Skid, ShadowThomas get an honorable mention for posting something game related, but not justifying their votes whatsoever. V_w can be tossed in this category, but he's on the rawkking side of things.
BuzzBuzz is off the hook since he admitted he was just skimming. :P
That's just the last two pages(50 ppp).
I don't need to Justify my vote to anyone. If I did then there would be a mechanic for doing so.
Posts
oh god
now i'm imagining all of Rawwking's lines as spoken by Axel
it is glorious
And that's a bad thing?
// Switch: SW-5306-0651-6424 //
No. I just need someone to make that his new sig. Because that was the most awesome thought I've had in weeks.
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
I'm going insane already!
How else would one read that?
Are you surprised? :rotate:
Was all of the important stuff about yesterday's voting patterns completely ignored?
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
A bit.
I wonder if I should copy/paste my wall of text reasoning from earlier.
Really, though. We had a lot of good, constructive discussion about the reasons behind the Zand/Rawkking votes earlier. Now people are just popping in, throwing an important vote that will determine the winner, and giving no reasoning whatsoever. Slightly annoying when some people actually put thought into this, or at least acknowledged that they read the analysis. Even a simple "Well from what I've read about the two, my instincts are leaning towards..."
Bah
Edit: @ Delmain - Yeah, I'm really hoping both Rawkking and Zand will die very soon so we can make sense out of what went on.
good constructive discussion is only useful to those that can't read other's minds based on their posts over the internet.
Wait, there are people who can't?
If anyone could make that happen I suggest they do so. If only to help make more sense of all this.
Does anyone else feel like today's voting reasons are less than ideal? The vote for Zandacroniumnus is as good as we got, because its based on math logic. But, phallas are more organic moving entities. The vote toward Ardor was a weird one. It was all based on very few posts from him, and all he was doing was making some decent assumptions and making intelligent posts. Then the Rqawking votes started based on Argors own posts. Who else? Kime. Small kimewagons because we don't know anything else. Wise?
Just all looked off from my persective. I'm going to stand back and hope I don't get attacked tonight by people that my motivations don't match and just gonna enjoy the party a bit....
My vote is still on Zan.
I hope the butler comes by with champaign.
Rawkking seems like a better choice, even if the evidence isn't hugely tipping the balance.
Flawed logic with math is still flawed.
// Switch: SW-5306-0651-6424 //
Thats another one because it was based of Argors logic, who was previously starting to get bandwagonned.
Most of what we have right now is pretty inconclusive, so mildly suspicious activity is really all we have. Though if we keep up this level of attention when we have more info this game should go pretty well for the village. Assuming there aren't crazy mechanics we don't know about.
On that note.
Warban, daius, simonwolf, obbi, and iamtheaznman deserve to be whacked.
El Skid, ShadowThomas get an honorable mention for posting something game related, but not justifying their votes whatsoever. V_w can be tossed in this category, but he's on the rawkking side of things.
BuzzBuzz is off the hook since he admitted he was just skimming. :P
That's just the last two pages(50 ppp).
You fail at reading again. The Rawkking thing was not based off Ardor.
*Cue Yakety Sax*
edit: Nocturne: Huh? I haven't seen the Ardor post since earlier, but I thought Rawking was on it and someone started the votes based on that.
HHHHHeeeellarious story. I just got done taking apart the day one vote spreadsheet from Eecc, modifying it so that every single vote was a seperate entry, modifying that so that it allowed me to sort by post number, resorting it so it was accending from first to last post, then going over that to try to find out who I thought was the more likely villian.
The vote count was 8 to 5 at that time, so it was only... somewhat close. As EECC had voted for sky about 10 votes prior to DDJ's... I don't find either EECC or DDJ to be "more" suspicious than the other. I find them to be equally suspicious. And of course, almost immediately afterwards (post 420, hilariously), SkyCaptain turned on his Jackass Thrusters to maximum levels... making it hard to reconcile any further votes as either motivated by the desire to hide in bandwagon or cause he was being a jackass.
Also, Houn was 3rd on the Burnage wagon. You know what that means ^_^
Anyway... I'm going with my gut. Zandy, for randomness in the jump to Kime without either an explanatory post, or at least a semi-recent Kime post that would be good justification for said post, plus, Trophy room.
And as a side note, does Zand ever actually talk? I'm not sure I remember having seen a fully coherent sentence from him at any point in history.
Backlog Wars - Sonic Generations | Steam!
Viewing the forums through rose colored glasses... or Suriko's Ye Old Style and The PostCount/TimeStamp Restoral Device
Nocturne(and to a lesser extent myself) started the Rawkkingwagon in response to Ardor. Ardor listed everyone to not vote for skycaptain after the last point the vote was tied and listed them in order of who he found most suspicious.
Personally I think he threw darts to determine what order he listed them in.
Job: Zand's jump was within a page of kime pointing out he was actually in the game. I believe it was right after houn quoted kime pointing it out, at which point Houn voted for kime. He was immediately followed by Zandracon.
Does a kime is in the game gogogo bandwagon joke post really need an explanation?
On another note, the Zand vote has a fair margin now, yes?
He was pretty awesome when he had that posting restriction. He talked alot in whatever game that was. And it was glorious.
Yah, six votes or so, I think.
As of #1091:
Zandracon 21
Rawkking Goodguy 15
Ardor 4
adventfalls 3
dunedainjedi 3
TehSloth 2
Bremen 1
Dogbone33 1
Houn 1
jdarksun 1
Kay 1
kime 1
oaklore 1
Romantic Undead 1
Zellpher 1
Burnage [dead] [C] 1
Zand says all that needs to be said
But this one will have to wait until tomorrow
I don't need to Justify my vote to anyone. If I did then there would be a mechanic for doing so.
I didn't realise it was your party.
And to Noct and DDJ again: OK I do remember that now. I guess not as weird? Still felt off as I was reading it before.