As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

[Hiberno-Britannic Politics] - Tories Dropping like Johnson's Flies

17273757778101

Posts

  • Options
    monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Gumpy wrote: »
    MorganV wrote: »
    It's no secret who and what modern conservatives are. If you're still willing to work for them as a means to an end of gaining wealth or power, yeah, my sympathies are with the people your assistance hurts.

    Does the same logic apply across the Civil Service?

    Shouldn't members of career staff know better than to attend a party in a pandemic, and be insulated from repercussions if they are absent from getting assaulted with cake?

  • Options
    GumpyGumpy There is always a greater powerRegistered User regular
    moniker wrote: »
    Gumpy wrote: »
    MorganV wrote: »
    It's no secret who and what modern conservatives are. If you're still willing to work for them as a means to an end of gaining wealth or power, yeah, my sympathies are with the people your assistance hurts.

    Does the same logic apply across the Civil Service?

    Shouldn't members of career staff know better than to attend a party in a pandemic, and be insulated from repercussions if they are absent from getting assaulted with cake?

    I'm not defending the people who got fines! Just teasing out:
    1. If the proximity to No 10 is factoring into people's views of these Civil Servants (Aka, is a young diary manager who was assigned to No 10 more morally responsible for the decisions of the Government than someone more senior based across the road?)
    2. If Civil Servants as a profession are considered political allies of the tories or neutral servants of the state
    3. If Civil Servants are responsible for causing harm to the wider population
    4. If the above things are true, what should be done to Civil Servants who don't resign their posts

    So the thought springs off the fines, but isn't about them per se - it's been a while week within the Civil Service, so the view from outside is very relevant right now

  • Options
    japanjapan Registered User regular
    Gumpy wrote: »
    japan wrote: »
    Gumpy wrote: »
    MorganV wrote: »
    It's no secret who and what modern conservatives are. If you're still willing to work for them as a means to an end of gaining wealth or power, yeah, my sympathies are with the people your assistance hurts.

    Does the same logic apply across the Civil Service?

    I think it kind of does, to an extent

    Like, I'm job hunting at the moment and have specifically ruled out a couple of civil service jobs because I know that taking a neutral stance on policy implementation is not something I'm going to be comfortable with, especially in the current climate

    I do think that I may have made different choices (in fact I did, I was a fast stream applicant) pre Brexit, so I have some sympathies with anyone that made these decisions at a time when we had governments that weren't as outright unhinged as this one

    Edit: to develop the thought a little further, by now it's perfectly clear that this government is perfectly willing to throw the civil service, same even particular civil servants, under the bus for policy failures, so I think the "social contract" of civil service independence can no longer really be relied upon

    At least it's the entire Civil Service, and not just the young diary managers, that are at the pointed end of this thought - which I guess gives some relief!

    So what do we do with Civil Servants, if the view is that they are actively hurting the rest of the population?

    I think it's less that civil servants in general are actively hurting the population, than at this time, in this place, the view that civil servants in some sense share in the culpability for the acts of this government isn't a totally unreasonable one

    I don't even think this is a situation that has arisen because of the fault of the civil service, it's pretty much entirely because the government has blurred that line on purpose, so it falls to the individual to decide whether they're comfortable that they're still on the right side of it

    Fwiw, and without getting into the specifics of where I work and what I do, this isn't a dilemma that I'm unfamiliar with

  • Options
    SolarSolar Registered User regular
    I actually do tend to blame civil servants for government policy getting enacted to some extent

    I know there's a culture of x, y and z and okay whatever but implementing austerity killed people, I think the civil service is implicated in that

  • Options
    GumpyGumpy There is always a greater powerRegistered User regular
    japan wrote: »
    Gumpy wrote: »
    japan wrote: »
    Gumpy wrote: »
    MorganV wrote: »
    It's no secret who and what modern conservatives are. If you're still willing to work for them as a means to an end of gaining wealth or power, yeah, my sympathies are with the people your assistance hurts.

    Does the same logic apply across the Civil Service?

    I think it kind of does, to an extent

    Like, I'm job hunting at the moment and have specifically ruled out a couple of civil service jobs because I know that taking a neutral stance on policy implementation is not something I'm going to be comfortable with, especially in the current climate

    I do think that I may have made different choices (in fact I did, I was a fast stream applicant) pre Brexit, so I have some sympathies with anyone that made these decisions at a time when we had governments that weren't as outright unhinged as this one

    Edit: to develop the thought a little further, by now it's perfectly clear that this government is perfectly willing to throw the civil service, same even particular civil servants, under the bus for policy failures, so I think the "social contract" of civil service independence can no longer really be relied upon

    At least it's the entire Civil Service, and not just the young diary managers, that are at the pointed end of this thought - which I guess gives some relief!

    So what do we do with Civil Servants, if the view is that they are actively hurting the rest of the population?

    I think it's less that civil servants in general are actively hurting the population, than at this time, in this place, the view that civil servants in some sense share in the culpability for the acts of this government isn't a totally unreasonable one

    I don't even think this is a situation that has arisen because of the fault of the civil service, it's pretty much entirely because the government has blurred that line on purpose, so it falls to the individual to decide whether they're comfortable that they're still on the right side of it

    Fwiw, and without getting into the specifics of where I work and what I do, this isn't a dilemma that I'm unfamiliar with

    Yea, it's a dilemma - and we've seen a lot of grump in the last week. I'm basically on the side that total politicisation of the state would make things worse, not better - and as it's pretty public knowledge where I am in the system, all I can really do is listen to folks views.

  • Options
    Rhesus PositiveRhesus Positive GNU Terry Pratchett Registered User regular
    *raises hand*

    I'm in a non-ministerial Civil Service department, may I please be spared the guillotine?

    If it helps, I raised charges to the tune of a couple mil on some big businesses this week

    [Muffled sounds of gorilla violence]
  • Options
    japanjapan Registered User regular
    Non ministerial departments and NDPBs are excused

  • Options
    GumpyGumpy There is always a greater powerRegistered User regular
    japan wrote: »
    Non ministerial departments and NDPBs are excused

    That's not fair - non ministerial work for ministerial departments!

  • Options
    SolarSolar Registered User regular
    I don't really believe in political neutrality any more I think

  • Options
    Rhesus PositiveRhesus Positive GNU Terry Pratchett Registered User regular
    When I was job seeking on the Civil Service portal back in the day I knew I didn't want to work at DWP, basically because I didn't want to spend my day telling people that they weren't quite disabled enough to get any assistance and had they thought of bar work

    At least at the Revenue I spent the first couple of years refunding people their PAYE overpayments, which was a good way to give the soul a bit of a karmic spit and polish

    [Muffled sounds of gorilla violence]
  • Options
    M-VickersM-Vickers Registered User regular
    Gumpy wrote: »
    MorganV wrote: »
    It's no secret who and what modern conservatives are. If you're still willing to work for them as a means to an end of gaining wealth or power, yeah, my sympathies are with the people your assistance hurts.

    Does the same logic apply across the Civil Service?

    If so, I'd like to know when my wealth will be arriving.

  • Options
    Redcoat-13Redcoat-13 Registered User regular
    My friend’s wife is a civil servant; she got asked to help with some department regarding Brexit and effectively told them to “fuck off I’m not touching that mess”

    PSN Fleety2009
  • Options
    Jam WarriorJam Warrior Registered User regular
    Passport achieved. I hate it in its comparatively cheap feeling black ugliness for being totemic of our rejection of the EU. But needs must and it’s nice to be able to unclench in a manner I haven’t quite managed since entering this race between passport renewal and upcoming German wedding trip.

    MhCw7nZ.gif
  • Options
    evilthecatevilthecat Registered User regular
    Just gonna leave this here for all to morbidly stare at:
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/may/22/tweet-on-tory-local-election-candidates-account-says-teenage-girls-smell-buttery-and-creamy

    The mirror had another sex allegation article but I couldn't source it from somewhere else that wasn't the mirror but it involves spiking drinks sooo that's another one to keep an eye out for this week.

    tip.. tip.. TALLY.. HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
  • Options
    zepherinzepherin Russian warship, go fuck yourself Registered User regular
    Passport achieved. I hate it in its comparatively cheap feeling black ugliness for being totemic of our rejection of the EU. But needs must and it’s nice to be able to unclench in a manner I haven’t quite managed since entering this race between passport renewal and upcoming German wedding trip.
    Did they just issue everyone new passports? Or did you have to spend money apply and apply for a new passport?

  • Options
    JazzJazz Registered User regular
    zepherin wrote: »
    Passport achieved. I hate it in its comparatively cheap feeling black ugliness for being totemic of our rejection of the EU. But needs must and it’s nice to be able to unclench in a manner I haven’t quite managed since entering this race between passport renewal and upcoming German wedding trip.
    Did they just issue everyone new passports? Or did you have to spend money apply and apply for a new passport?

    Spend money and apply as normal, existing EU-branded ones are still valid until they expire so they'll be around for years yet in ever more dwindling numbers; but you don't get the EU benefits of it, they work just like the stupid shitty new ones.

  • Options
    EchoEcho ski-bap ba-dapModerator mod
    evilthecat wrote: »
    Just gonna leave this here for all to morbidly stare at:
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/may/22/tweet-on-tory-local-election-candidates-account-says-teenage-girls-smell-buttery-and-creamy

    The mirror had another sex allegation article but I couldn't source it from somewhere else that wasn't the mirror but it involves spiking drinks sooo that's another one to keep an eye out for this week.

    OK, the tweet itself is one thing, but then there’s the whole aspect of going ”yes, this is a thing I feel like tweeting out to the whole internet right now”.

  • Options
    JazzJazz Registered User regular
    Buttery and creamy in limited and specific ways?

  • Options
    M-VickersM-Vickers Registered User regular
    Jazz wrote: »
    Buttery and creamy in limited and specific ways?

    I’m also confused by the way he thinks 28 year old women are still girls…

  • Options
    honoverehonovere Registered User regular
    M-Vickers wrote: »
    Jazz wrote: »
    Buttery and creamy in limited and specific ways?

    I’m also confused by the way he thinks 28 year old women are still girls…

    Sexism

  • Options
    Rhesus PositiveRhesus Positive GNU Terry Pratchett Registered User regular
    The US had "but her emails" and we've managed to top that with "buttery females"

    I want to know who that guy beat for the candidacy

    [Muffled sounds of gorilla violence]
  • Options
    electricitylikesmeelectricitylikesme Registered User regular
    Echo wrote: »
    evilthecat wrote: »
    Just gonna leave this here for all to morbidly stare at:
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/may/22/tweet-on-tory-local-election-candidates-account-says-teenage-girls-smell-buttery-and-creamy

    The mirror had another sex allegation article but I couldn't source it from somewhere else that wasn't the mirror but it involves spiking drinks sooo that's another one to keep an eye out for this week.

    OK, the tweet itself is one thing, but then there’s the whole aspect of going ”yes, this is a thing I feel like tweeting out to the whole internet right now”.

    The current zeitgeist seems to be "if something would be catastrophically stupid, do it any way". At least in this case it kind of works out?

  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    The US had "but her emails" and we've managed to top that with "buttery females"

    I want to know who that guy beat for the candidacy

    Probably someone much the same. Local candidates are swivel eyed lunatics all the way down. It takes a special kind of crazy to be attracted to low level politics.

  • Options
    BogartBogart Streetwise Hercules Registered User, Moderator mod
    I think that'll be the thread title forever now.

  • Options
    Rhesus PositiveRhesus Positive GNU Terry Pratchett Registered User regular
    I'm both proud and ashamed

    [Muffled sounds of gorilla violence]
  • Options
    MuzzmuzzMuzzmuzz Registered User regular
    Well, it certainly grabbed my attention and click to catch up on what’s happening on your side of the pond.

    So, mission accomplished?

  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    Bogart wrote: »
    I think that'll be the thread title forever now.

    Oh god can it please not? I feel slightly violated every time my eyes pass over those words and the implications of the context wash over my brain.

    I can only take so many showers in a day.

  • Options
    NorgothNorgoth cardiffRegistered User regular
    Of course it was a fucking Jonty. How could I expect anything else?

  • Options
    JazzJazz Registered User regular
    edited May 2022
    Missed this one from the Mirror the other day...

    DWP staff get power to arrest Brits in hardline Universal Credit fraud crackdown
    Tory DWP chief Therese Coffey will announce sweeping laws to mass-request bank account data and slap people with fines even if they're not convicted of a crime. But work on the law won't start for at least a year

    ...

    DWP staff will be given the power to arrest Brits in a hardline Universal Credit crackdown.

    Two million claimants will have their cases dredged up and face fines for fraud under sweeping laws - even if they’re not convicted of a crime.

    Department for Work and Pensions officers will be allowed to mass-request bank data more easily to spot-check if people are cheating the Jobcentre.

    DWP staff will then make arrests, execute warrants, conduct searches and seize evidence themselves instead of leaving the work to police.

    Even if a case does not make it to court, they will then get power to dish out civil fines - like those issued by HMRC.

    But Tory ministers will be accused of chasing headlines as there’s no timetable for a new law and it's unlikely to start work for at least a year.

    Many of the new powers need an Act of Parliament - but it’s thought this would only be introduced from May 2023 at the earliest.

    Jazz on
  • Options
    Santa ClaustrophobiaSanta Claustrophobia Ho Ho Ho Disconnecting from Xbox LIVERegistered User regular
    Jazz wrote: »
    Missed this one from the Mirror the other day...

    DWP staff get power to arrest Brits in hardline Universal Credit fraud crackdown
    Tory DWP chief Therese Coffey will announce sweeping laws to mass-request bank account data and slap people with fines even if they're not convicted of a crime. But work on the law won't start for at least a year

    ...

    DWP staff will be given the power to arrest Brits in a hardline Universal Credit crackdown.

    Two million claimants will have their cases dredged up and face fines for fraud under sweeping laws - even if they’re not convicted of a crime.

    Department for Work and Pensions officers will be allowed to mass-request bank data more easily to spot-check if people are cheating the Jobcentre.

    DWP staff will then make arrests, execute warrants, conduct searches and seize evidence themselves instead of leaving the work to police.

    Even if a case does not make it to court, they will then get power to dish out civil fines - like those issued by HMRC.

    But Tory ministers will be accused of chasing headlines as there’s no timetable for a new law and it's unlikely to start work for at least a year.

    Many of the new powers need an Act of Parliament - but it’s thought this would only be introduced from May 2023 at the earliest.

    By Order of the Sherrif of Nottingham...

  • Options
    SporkAndrewSporkAndrew Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Jazz wrote: »
    Missed this one from the Mirror the other day...

    DWP staff get power to arrest Brits in hardline Universal Credit fraud crackdown
    Tory DWP chief Therese Coffey will announce sweeping laws to mass-request bank account data and slap people with fines even if they're not convicted of a crime. But work on the law won't start for at least a year

    ...

    DWP staff will be given the power to arrest Brits in a hardline Universal Credit crackdown.

    Two million claimants will have their cases dredged up and face fines for fraud under sweeping laws - even if they’re not convicted of a crime.

    Department for Work and Pensions officers will be allowed to mass-request bank data more easily to spot-check if people are cheating the Jobcentre.

    DWP staff will then make arrests, execute warrants, conduct searches and seize evidence themselves instead of leaving the work to police.

    Even if a case does not make it to court, they will then get power to dish out civil fines - like those issued by HMRC.

    But Tory ministers will be accused of chasing headlines as there’s no timetable for a new law and it's unlikely to start work for at least a year.

    Many of the new powers need an Act of Parliament - but it’s thought this would only be introduced from May 2023 at the earliest.

    The cruelty really is the point. Massive sweeping changes requiring tons more money to catch a miniscule amount of people "cheating the system" instead of using the funding to actually do something positive and help the people trapped in the system.

    More headlines to distract from the Gray report

    The one about the fucking space hairdresser and the cowboy. He's got a tinfoil pal and a pedal bin
  • Options
    Brovid HasselsmofBrovid Hasselsmof [Growling historic on the fury road] Registered User regular
    Casual wrote: »
    Bogart wrote: »
    I think that'll be the thread title forever now.

    Oh god can it please not? I feel slightly violated every time my eyes pass over those words and the implications of the context wash over my brain.

    I can only take so many showers in a day.

    It just makes me think of this

    https://youtu.be/IfeyUGZt8nk

  • Options
    CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    Casual wrote: »
    Bogart wrote: »
    I think that'll be the thread title forever now.

    Oh god can it please not? I feel slightly violated every time my eyes pass over those words and the implications of the context wash over my brain.

    I can only take so many showers in a day.

    It just makes me think of this

    https://youtu.be/IfeyUGZt8nk

    I am jealous, out of the two of us you have the better deal.

  • Options
    JazzJazz Registered User regular
    Former Tory MP Imran Ahmad Khan sentenced to 18 months over sexual assault of boy, 15

    On the one hand, holy shit, one of them actually faced consequences.

    On the other hand, 18 months? Really? And we know what that translates to...

    The judge said Khan should serve 18 months, “half on custody, released on license for remainder of the term, subject to recall should you commit a further offence”.

    Naturally. Blah.

  • Options
    SharpyVIISharpyVII Registered User regular
    edited May 2022


    Paul is a news editor for ITV.

    I believe Johnson wasn't fined for this event. Unsure if the police actually knew about this one or just didn't bother fining him.

    Good timing on the release of the pictures though, keeping this whole thing in the public eye.

    SharpyVII on
  • Options
    klemmingklemming Registered User regular
    I assume this was timed for the Sue Gray report so it'll be too late for her to edit it, so if it's a whitewash it'll be 100% obvious?

    Nobody remembers the singer. The song remains.
  • Options
    AlphaRomeroAlphaRomero Registered User regular
  • Options
    Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    klemming wrote: »
    I assume this was timed for the Sue Gray report so it'll be too late for her to edit it, so if it's a whitewash it'll be 100% obvious?

    I wonder if someone with access to the contents of the report (unsympathetic to BJ) noticed these photos aren't in it so got them to ITV in order to highlight the shenanigans at play..?

  • Options
    Redcoat-13Redcoat-13 Registered User regular
    Jazz wrote: »
    Former Tory MP Imran Ahmad Khan sentenced to 18 months over sexual assault of boy, 15

    On the one hand, holy shit, one of them actually faced consequences.

    On the other hand, 18 months? Really? And we know what that translates to...

    The judge said Khan should serve 18 months, “half on custody, released on license for remainder of the term, subject to recall should you commit a further offence”.

    Naturally. Blah.

    The thinking seems to be that because this all came out while he was MP, he thus lost his job and will forever be known for this, that this is part of his punishment as opposed to if he’d been found guilty back in the day, not so many would know about his behaviour.

    . Which is some real mental gymnastics that should just fuck off. I don’t see how you can read / listen to the victim statement and think 9 months in prison is enough.

    SharpyVII wrote: »


    Paul is a news editor for ITV.

    I believe Johnson wasn't fined for this event. Unsure if the police actually knew about this one or just didn't bother fining him.

    Good timing on the release of the pictures though, keeping this whole thing in the public eye.

    It should be noted that others at this event received FPNs so some are asking the police their reasoning for this; the answer is they’re cowards and are shit at their jobs because they’ve had to be dragged to do what should have been done at great expense.

    I started to get in an argument with someone at work because he was starting to parrot the line “what a waste of money this investigation was” as if it should have not taken place. I had to remind him that if Boris et al had not had the parties or lied about the parties then the investigation wouldn’t have cost so much.

    And before he then prattled on about drinks after work (because he was going to), I said that Tories tried to deflect by saying my wife, a teacher who gets spat on, shouted abuse, kicked, head butted and sexually assaulted by the kids she teaches, never had a drink after work.

    PSN Fleety2009
  • Options
    Rhesus PositiveRhesus Positive GNU Terry Pratchett Registered User regular

    NEW

    Grant Shapps has bizarrely claimed Boris Johnson was “clearly not partying” when he raised fizz at a No10 party.

    Shapps says PM was in fact mourning his mum...despite the fact Charlotte Johnson Wahl died “suddenly” 10 months after the party happened

    https://t.co/574JRWgvsH

    Dan Bloom is political editor for the Mirror, Grant Shapps is a lying shit, PM is a lying shit

    The idea that Johnson was mourning his mum in a gathering that would have still been illegal even if she had actually been dead just shows they've given up any pretence they had

    It's Putin levels of "say whatever, because everybody's already made up their minds and it shows the non-believers how futile demanding the truth is"

    [Muffled sounds of gorilla violence]
This discussion has been closed.