I watched the first half of Storks which was pretty funny, rewatched most of Aliens which is still good, all of some other movie which I will come back to once I remember what it was, and about a 3rd of The Grand Budaphest Hotel for which I couldn't make it the dialog.
jungleroomxIt's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovelsRegistered Userregular
From my understanding (and I'm not completely up on everything), stuff like the "following the butt while woman is walking towards someone" kind of shots are entirely male-gaze oriented, and the shot could be done a million different ways.
Basically, think of how Megan Fox is shot in the Bayformers movies.
+1
Options
AtomikaLive fast and get fucked or whateverRegistered Userregular
Charlize kissing Jaylah from Star Trek: Beyond? Okay, yeah, that sounds pretty good.
Male gaze? Sure. I know a number of females that will be into that, too.
Okay whatever but this is what I'm talking about
I understand what you mean now.
Interesting topic of discussion, but probably not suited for this thread.
It does feel a little weird when they film women like that all the time. I know I always get weirded out when i think of the camera guy actually filming the scene.
On the other hand -as a guy- I'd be remiss if i didn't admit (bashfully) to really liking Charlize Theron and finding her quite pretty. But then i creep myself out when i think about her having to sit there and get filmed up and down in her knickers.
As a progressive guy politically i admit to being confused as to what to say about it.
I understand the male gaze part. But I need more explanation what a douchey production style is. It is probably not helping that I'm not really into Malick and haven't seen any Bekmambetov.
I think the new Thor trailer looks great but I'm kind of hoping it doesn't end up aping Guardians and is actually it's own good movie. I think it will be but at the same time it is a little worrying as I love the character so I want them to get him right.
I understand the male gaze part. But I need more explanation what a douchey production style is. It is probably not helping that I'm not really into Malick and haven't seen any Bekmambetov.
I watched Sameblod (sami blood, translated literally) recently, a swedish movie about a young woman struggling to find where she belongs. It mostly depicts her youth, growing up when racial biology was big in Sweden. It's a slow and thoughtful movie with some amazing performances. I am however not sure if it works as well without some knowledge of how the sami population has been treated in Sweden throughout history.
I think the new Thor trailer looks great but I'm kind of hoping it doesn't end up aping Guardians and is actually it's own good movie. I think it will be but at the same time it is a little worrying as I love the character so I want them to get him right.
I hope Thor sits down to a bowl of basgetti.
+1
Options
AtomikaLive fast and get fucked or whateverRegistered Userregular
I understand the male gaze part. But I need more explanation what a douchey production style is. It is probably not helping that I'm not really into Malick and haven't seen any Bekmambetov.
I think the new Thor trailer looks great but I'm kind of hoping it doesn't end up aping Guardians and is actually it's own good movie. I think it will be but at the same time it is a little worrying as I love the character so I want them to get him right.
Depends on how you're looking to get him "right".
I think going full-bore on the cosmic, 80's-inspired neon Kirbyness is a p great idea and something the series needed. Also, Asgard and wherever the GoTG are at are all in the same spacey community, so the two should absolutely share an aesthetic.
+2
Options
KetarCome on upstairswe're having a partyRegistered Userregular
I understand the male gaze part. But I need more explanation what a douchey production style is. It is probably not helping that I'm not really into Malick and haven't seen any Bekmambetov.
All MCU movies share a certain aesthetic. Probably due to all costumes being designed/done by one company, and because Marvel wants them to all feel like they take place in a shared universe.
That being said, i suspect Guardians with still be a bit more irreverent and wacky.
I understand the male gaze part. But I need more explanation what a douchey production style is. It is probably not helping that I'm not really into Malick and haven't seen any Bekmambetov.
Charlize kissing Jaylah from Star Trek: Beyond? Okay, yeah, that sounds pretty good.
Male gaze? Sure. I know a number of females that will be into that, too.
Okay whatever but this is what I'm talking about
I'm not going to sit here and deny liking Sexy Ladies Doing Awesome Shit. I watch CW shows a lot, and I never begrudge all them for their very pretty shirtless dudes as being "Female Gaze" because the world is dark as fuck and everyone deserves some eye candy. Like, that scene in Thor 1, when Jane catches him shirtless, I was like, "yeah, girl. Go get that."
Hollywood has some serious fucking problems with sexism and racism, but forgive me if I don't have too much problem with one of the most powerful actresses in Hollywood choosing to play a bi female asskicker in an R-rated James Bond homage.
Charlize can write her own ticket at this point, so I'm not super concerned that she's being exploited. If she had wanted to do a non-sexualized gender-swapped espionage flick (like Angelina Jolie did with Salt), I bet she totally could've.
I continue to be annoyed that a woman can cap motherfuckers all day long, but people whose opinions I find invaluable get bent out of shape about her showing some skin. Or is it only 'male gaze' when it's shot in a sexy way? Can we praise camera work that shows off the talent of the actors in an action scene and then turn around and criticize the sex scene for making the camera fall in love with the performers?
I'm all in favor of toppling the patriarchy. Fuck those guys. But I know a lot of people (women and men), who are angry about bi erasure. It is a real thing. I can't help being hopeful that this movie might show a protagonist female that can smooch women and men and not really make a big deal of it herself.
I think my biggest beef with the Atomic Blond trailer was that the fight scenes for some reason didnt look very realistic, which made the sexy/romantic scenes seem more exploitive by comparison.
I think my biggest beef with the Atomic Blond trailer was that the fight scenes for some reason didnt look very realistic, which made the sexy/romantic scenes seem more exploitive by comparison.
First trailer felt a bit like that to me, but the second trailer was better.
0
Options
AstaerethIn the belly of the beastRegistered Userregular
To be honest I'm not really sure what the female gaze looks like. The male gaze is more than just ogling.
Posts
Life, Power Rangers, Logan, Split, Ghost in the Shell '95 (not '17), Kong.
Mr. Freedom, Applause, The Cyclist, A Cottage on Dartmoor
I watched the first half of Storks which was pretty funny, rewatched most of Aliens which is still good, all of some other movie which I will come back to once I remember what it was, and about a 3rd of The Grand Budaphest Hotel for which I couldn't make it the dialog.
Don't watch movies on planes I guess.
It’s not a very important country most of the time
http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
Hush, Full Metal Jacket, Logan
It's just gotten a lot more personal and difficult to write about, moreso than I thought it would be.
What is "male-gaze mindlessness" ?
Boob and booty shots.
cheap titilation and objectification
Basically, think of how Megan Fox is shot in the Bayformers movies.
The production style occasionally erred on the douchey side
Apparently Atomic Blonde cranks that pretty high
If there's a scale where, say, Terrence Malick is a 0 and Timur Bekmambetov is a 10, I'd put the Wick movies around a 7 or 8
This is the important question here.
The end credits start?
...there are bad parts of John Wick?
I just learned about Atomic Blonde just now, and I gotta say, I'm onboard. Charlize has my money any day of the week.
Trailer
Male gaze? Sure. I know a number of females that will be into that, too.
I honestly don't know what that means exactly.
Kong.
Serious. My girlfriend has an unnatural obsession with Charlize and is more excited about this movie than I've ever seen her get.
I suppose its not that weird because i got unnaturally excited at the Thor trailer....
Chris Hemsworth is a fine hunk of manliness...
Also, funny as fuck, and I'm glad they're showing that side of him more in the new Thor.
Okay whatever but this is what I'm talking about
I understand what you mean now.
Interesting topic of discussion, but probably not suited for this thread.
It does feel a little weird when they film women like that all the time. I know I always get weirded out when i think of the camera guy actually filming the scene.
On the other hand -as a guy- I'd be remiss if i didn't admit (bashfully) to really liking Charlize Theron and finding her quite pretty. But then i creep myself out when i think about her having to sit there and get filmed up and down in her knickers.
As a progressive guy politically i admit to being confused as to what to say about it.
There are worse directors to be like.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timur_Bekmambetov
I watched Sameblod (sami blood, translated literally) recently, a swedish movie about a young woman struggling to find where she belongs. It mostly depicts her youth, growing up when racial biology was big in Sweden. It's a slow and thoughtful movie with some amazing performances. I am however not sure if it works as well without some knowledge of how the sami population has been treated in Sweden throughout history.
I hope Thor sits down to a bowl of basgetti.
Not many, for my tastes
Depends on how you're looking to get him "right".
I think going full-bore on the cosmic, 80's-inspired neon Kirbyness is a p great idea and something the series needed. Also, Asgard and wherever the GoTG are at are all in the same spacey community, so the two should absolutely share an aesthetic.
He has yet to direct a good movie. He's like a cheap knock-off of Zack Snyder or Michael Bay.
That being said, i suspect Guardians with still be a bit more irreverent and wacky.
Yup. I liked Night Watch, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, and Wanted*. I mean, it's not like he's Andrzej Bartkowiak - who did
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFo1mDMJ1u8
* purely as a guilty pleasure
I'm not going to sit here and deny liking Sexy Ladies Doing Awesome Shit. I watch CW shows a lot, and I never begrudge all them for their very pretty shirtless dudes as being "Female Gaze" because the world is dark as fuck and everyone deserves some eye candy. Like, that scene in Thor 1, when Jane catches him shirtless, I was like, "yeah, girl. Go get that."
Hollywood has some serious fucking problems with sexism and racism, but forgive me if I don't have too much problem with one of the most powerful actresses in Hollywood choosing to play a bi female asskicker in an R-rated James Bond homage.
Charlize can write her own ticket at this point, so I'm not super concerned that she's being exploited. If she had wanted to do a non-sexualized gender-swapped espionage flick (like Angelina Jolie did with Salt), I bet she totally could've.
I continue to be annoyed that a woman can cap motherfuckers all day long, but people whose opinions I find invaluable get bent out of shape about her showing some skin. Or is it only 'male gaze' when it's shot in a sexy way? Can we praise camera work that shows off the talent of the actors in an action scene and then turn around and criticize the sex scene for making the camera fall in love with the performers?
I'm all in favor of toppling the patriarchy. Fuck those guys. But I know a lot of people (women and men), who are angry about bi erasure. It is a real thing. I can't help being hopeful that this movie might show a protagonist female that can smooch women and men and not really make a big deal of it herself.
MWO: Adamski
First trailer felt a bit like that to me, but the second trailer was better.
pleasepaypreacher.net