The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Spend more on snacks than what it cost to get in, cause you're at the [Movies]
ArtreusI'm a wizardAnd that looks fucked upRegistered Userregular
Oh my god
So Grave Encounters was a dumb fun horror movie about a ghost hunters type show that finds real bad stuff in an asylum.
Anyway, I just found out there was a sequel, and in googling I find the entire thing on Youtube. With an annotation on it that says "In no way do I hold any rights to this film... it is purely for you the viewers enjoyment... so.. enjoy...."
and then in the comments they put
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
If for any reason My uploads "disappear" it is because Google/youtube has broken the law
Watching " Seeking a friend for the end of the world" on Netflix and it occurred to me, this is far from the first Romantic Comedy + Apocalypse movie I've seen lately, how is this a genre ?
Watching " Seeking a friend for the end of the world" on Netflix and it occurred to me, this is far from the first Romantic Comedy + Apocalypse movie I've seen lately, how is this a genre ?
Two of the most pivotal human experiences are love and death. The apocalypse brings them together without forcing the viewer to watch old people have sex.
And the OP does not feature The Raid 2 and is therefore invalid as a judgement of cinematic quality.
It's just when any movie, let alone romantic comedies, end with wiping out all of earth's existance. it's weird. Trying to remember the name of the last one I saw it was like, 2 couples fighting at a dinner party, and in the background there's hints on the news that they are oblivious to, then at end, yep armageddon everyone is dead.
It's just when any movie, let alone romantic comedies, end with wiping out all of earth's existance. it's weird. Trying to remember the name of the last one I saw it was like, 2 couples fighting at a dinner party, and in the background there's hints on the news that they are oblivious to, then at end, yep armageddon everyone is dead.
It's just when any movie, let alone romantic comedies, end with wiping out all of earth's existance. it's weird. Trying to remember the name of the last one I saw it was like, 2 couples fighting at a dinner party, and in the background there's hints on the news that they are oblivious to, then at end, yep armageddon everyone is dead.
That was the previous one I had seen, current one was "seeking a friend for the end of the world" and I've seen another one that does this recently too.
Was Seeking a Friend any good? It does have a cast I like.
Ya it was decent ( I missed a chunk of the middle twice, once to a phone call and then again to the door after I rewound, I will watch again if that's anything to say. Nothing super amazing, but a decent timekiller nonetheless.)
I was just mostly weirded out by it being the 3rd movie that is a romantic comedy that ends with everyone on earth dying I've seen recently
So Grave Encounters was a dumb fun horror movie about a ghost hunters type show that finds real bad stuff in an asylum.
Anyway, I just found out there was a sequel, and in googling I find the entire thing on Youtube. With an annotation on it that says "In no way do I hold any rights to this film... it is purely for you the viewers enjoyment... so.. enjoy...."
and then in the comments they put
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
If for any reason My uploads "disappear" it is because Google/youtube has broken the law
Pretty sure that disclaimer - even when correctly applied, which it isn't here - is the Youtube equivalent of "You can't get pregnant if you do it standing up".
Every few years I watch the Godfather trilogy again, well sometimes I don't bother with 3 even though it's not that bad, anyway they are damn, damn good entertainment.
I prefer Godfather and a New Hope to Godfather II and Empire Strikes Back.
I acknowledge that the later entries contain the high points of their respective series, and they're both good movies, but the first entries feel like they're more consistently good. Does that make sense?
Watching " Seeking a friend for the end of the world" on Netflix and it occurred to me, this is far from the first Romantic Comedy + Apocalypse movie I've seen lately, how is this a genre ?
this was a shitty movie
why didn't steve and keira stay in the friendly's and get high with britta
was it not hipster enough? i believe that was the reason
Theodore Flooseveltproud parent of eight beautiful girls and shalmelodorne (which is currently being ruled by a woman (awesome role model for my daughters)) #dornedadRegistered Userregular
if YA movies are going to insist on splitting the final book in half it would be great if they could just come up with another name of either of the halves of the book, part 1 and part 2 is so creatively lazy
I don't think it's all that risky for brand recognition to eschew or invent a subtitle when you're at the end of a film series that, by now, has its own massive audience basically independent of the books' quality or initial draw
if YA movies are going to insist on splitting the final book in half it would be great if they could just come up with another name of either of the halves of the book, part 1 and part 2 is so creatively lazy
I don't think it's all that risky for brand recognition to eschew or invent a subtitle when you're at the end of a film series that, by now, has its own massive audience basically independent of the books' quality or initial draw
Jackson managed to come up with three subtitles for The Hobbit, and that was only supposed to be 2 movies.
+4
Theodore Flooseveltproud parent of eight beautiful girls and shalmelodorne (which is currently being ruled by a woman (awesome role model for my daughters)) #dornedadRegistered Userregular
if YA movies are going to insist on splitting the final book in half it would be great if they could just come up with another name of either of the halves of the book, part 1 and part 2 is so creatively lazy
I don't think it's all that risky for brand recognition to eschew or invent a subtitle when you're at the end of a film series that, by now, has its own massive audience basically independent of the books' quality or initial draw
Jackson managed to come up with three subtitles for The Hobbit, and that was only supposed to be 2 movies.
four, even! hobbit team is brimming over with subtitles, they can't even use em all
Hunger Games should snatch up "there and back again"
if YA movies are going to insist on splitting the final book in half it would be great if they could just come up with another name of either of the halves of the book, part 1 and part 2 is so creatively lazy
I don't think it's all that risky for brand recognition to eschew or invent a subtitle when you're at the end of a film series that, by now, has its own massive audience basically independent of the books' quality or initial draw
Jackson managed to come up with three subtitles for The Hobbit, and that was only supposed to be 2 movies.
and then they changed the best one
If you were going to call a Hobbit movie ANYTHING besides "The Hobbit" it should be "There and Back Again"
+21
AtomicTofuShe's a straight-up supervillain, yoRegistered Userregular
edited August 2014
But how would I know there's going to a battle with FIVE armies? That shit's gonna be so dopeeeee
Here’s what we know about The Look Of Silence right now: It explores the same genocide as The Act Of Killing, but from the point of view of the victims’ families
Posts
Also, this
Yeah.
Not sure why folks watch that nonsense.
Steam ID - VeldrinD
So Grave Encounters was a dumb fun horror movie about a ghost hunters type show that finds real bad stuff in an asylum.
Anyway, I just found out there was a sequel, and in googling I find the entire thing on Youtube. With an annotation on it that says "In no way do I hold any rights to this film... it is purely for you the viewers enjoyment... so.. enjoy...."
and then in the comments they put
Anywho. Grave Encounters was really fun. The sequel is hot garbage.
The scene in II where Vito is tracking Fanucci through the street fair is the best thing.
I prefer Once Upon A Time In America, but I'll admit it's not as good a film as the Godfather.
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
Two of the most pivotal human experiences are love and death. The apocalypse brings them together without forcing the viewer to watch old people have sex.
And the OP does not feature The Raid 2 and is therefore invalid as a judgement of cinematic quality.
Why I fear the ocean.
Was it this?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_a_Disaster
Incidentally, pretty decent movie
http://www.audioentropy.com/
That was the previous one I had seen, current one was "seeking a friend for the end of the world" and I've seen another one that does this recently too.
There is, of course, nothing wrong with that, but I wouldn't put it in the same category as Citizen Kane or The Godfather. Or was that the joke?
Funny that Scarlett Johansson was in both Lucy and Under the Skin in the same year. For similar concepts, you couldn't have two more different movies.
Ya it was decent ( I missed a chunk of the middle twice, once to a phone call and then again to the door after I rewound, I will watch again if that's anything to say. Nothing super amazing, but a decent timekiller nonetheless.)
I was just mostly weirded out by it being the 3rd movie that is a romantic comedy that ends with everyone on earth dying I've seen recently
Pretty sure that disclaimer - even when correctly applied, which it isn't here - is the Youtube equivalent of "You can't get pregnant if you do it standing up".
I saw Godfather once in a college english class, for some reason, years ago. It didn't really do anything for me.
Casino is great, though.
I acknowledge that the later entries contain the high points of their respective series, and they're both good movies, but the first entries feel like they're more consistently good. Does that make sense?
this was a shitty movie
why didn't steve and keira stay in the friendly's and get high with britta
was it not hipster enough? i believe that was the reason
I read Anti's livetweets.
That sounded like a weird-ass movie.
Steam
dang
Does he like... really hate being in good movies?
There's a lot of evidence that points that way.
I don't think it's all that risky for brand recognition to eschew or invent a subtitle when you're at the end of a film series that, by now, has its own massive audience basically independent of the books' quality or initial draw
Jackson managed to come up with three subtitles for The Hobbit, and that was only supposed to be 2 movies.
four, even! hobbit team is brimming over with subtitles, they can't even use em all
Hunger Games should snatch up "there and back again"
and then they changed the best one
If you were going to call a Hobbit movie ANYTHING besides "The Hobbit" it should be "There and Back Again"
Steam
"I'm sorry, I don't work with supremely talented directors."
He probably only pays attention to his own work because he literally doesn't have to do anything else
Steam
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
Steam
Hoooo boy
Steam