I am hyped for the debate Sunday. I think the last time I was this hyped for a live TV event was when was real young and was a mark (believed it was real) for professional wrestling.
My girlfriend is dragging me to a WWE PPV and I will not be able to watch this one live as a result.
I'll be flying to a work convention for 5 hours roughly when this thing starts.
So basically when I land the ashes will be settling, and there'll likely be a 50+ page thread to catch up on.
Forar's Request will one again apply; whatever context you're willing to put into your posts during said debate will be *immensely* appreciated.
First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
+5
Options
jmcdonaldI voted, did you?DC(ish)Registered Userregular
God, whenever I have a day where I am not paying attention to everything that's happening in politics, it seems like Trump does/is revealed to have done something extremely dumb/offensive
Just watched the tape.
Gross. Gross. Gross.
I see this as a bit like the Ray Rice video. Everyone knew he knocked out his wife in a elevator but it only really got massive outrage when the video came out. Everyone knows Trump is a cad but there's nothing like having it on tape.
Also, this doesn't just hurt Trump with women. It also hurts him with conservative dad's with daughters who already don't like Trump but want an excuse to vote for him anyway. This actually matters whereas Trump was already losing very badly with women.
On the other hand, to take the devil's advocate position on why any woman would vote for Trump, plenty of excellent President's have been fairly icky with their dealings with women (Kennedy and Clinton come to mind).
At this point, my non-Trumpy conservative friends are caught between wanting him to win to save the Supreme Court and wanting him to lose in a landslide to save the GOP.
In any case, Trump lost what tiny chance he had in the last debate and these servings of October Suprise are just shovels of dirt on the coffin.
“Reject your sense of injury and the injury itself disappears.”
― Marcus Aurelius
I just realized that Clinton is going to release an updated Mirrors/Our Daughter's Deserve Better ad with this audio. It's going to be blasted, every day.
Titles for the next thread:
US Presidential Election: How is he so bad at this?
US Presidential Election: Oppo research is important!
US Presidential Election: An October Advent Calander
Shadowhope on
Civics is not a consumer product that you can ignore because you don’t like the options presented.
Aaaand as I'm sure most of us suspected, even the leaked "damaging" transcripts aren't even real.
Edited for direct link to tweet..
Do we have a source on this besides a tweet linking to another tweet?
What I've read of the Podesta emails is pretty lame, but I can't find anything saying they've been doctored.
I haven't noticed any reporting about those yet from a forensic standpoint but the latest Guccifer 2.0 drop was fraudulent. As far as I'm concerned anything from a tangentially Russian related source is extremely suspect.
I mean that's fine, I wanted to see if there was more than just "Assange hates TrumpClinton."
It doesn't really matter, I seriously doubt anything in those transcripts is even remotely bad. The worst thing I've seen so far is that she doesn't want to overregulate Wall Street.
Which I mean, yeah, is that supposed to be a surprise?
Erin Burnett, one of CNN's anchors, quoting an unnamed friend of hers who claims to have been kissed by Trump after he gave her a tik-tak
I'd condemn that line by Trump's supporter but honestly she looks like she's about to cry
Kana on
A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
I've seen the belief that Pence can save them come up from severa conservatives today and it is hilarious and delicious. They *still* can't accept that there is more to an election than white male appeal
Weren't the Podesta emails different? This is what I was referencing last page.
Kind of. No one has done forensic analysis on them yet. But the source is inherently tainted since we are getting all of this through the same actors.
Which is also what I said. Although technically not the same as explicit links between Russian hackers and Wikileaks haven't been made yet, to my knowledge, whereas everything about Guccifer 2.0 appears Russian.
Even if it didn't come up in the primary you'd think somebody would have found this and maybe used it to keep Trump in line.
You can't use it to keep someone in line if they're not ashamed or afraid of it, though. He was bragging about getting away with murder in the primaries. Literally.
I would about guarantee Trump will not apologize or run away from this. He's gonna latch on to it like a bulldog because as unfathomable as it is to normal people, he is proud of what he is.
I have been wrong on nearly everything I've predicted so far, though. I thought a few hours ago this would end up being just another nasty anecdote. So who knows!
0
Options
jmcdonaldI voted, did you?DC(ish)Registered Userregular
Even if it didn't come up in the primary you'd think somebody would have found this and maybe used it to keep Trump in line.
I think they all completely swallowed the party line that Trump could shoot someone and not lose, they were all convinced that everyone hated Clinton so much that Trump could just show up and say, "I'm not Clinton!" and win. And with that headspace why even bother doing oppo research?
Even if it didn't come up in the primary you'd think somebody would have found this and maybe used it to keep Trump in line.
I think they all completely swallowed the party line that Trump could shoot someone and not lose, they were all convinced that everyone hated Clinton so much that Trump could just show up and say, "I'm not Clinton!" and win. And with that headspace why even bother doing oppo research?
They meant the primary. Like how did none of them find ANY of this shit out and use it against him then?
+1
Options
jmcdonaldI voted, did you?DC(ish)Registered Userregular
and the email just him my inbox
Joshua --
The general election is a choice between the potential first female president and a guy who says, and I quote, (and I'm sorry), "grab them by the p**sy."
Do something with that sick-to-your-stomach feeling, Joshua. Chip in $5 right now.
You’re one of our most committed supporters. If you've saved your payment information, your donation will go through immediately:
Joshua, donate now: $5
Joshua, donate now: $5
Joshua, donate now: $10
Joshua, donate now: $25
Joshua, donate now: $50
Thanks,
Mini
Mini Timmaraju
National Women's Vote Director
Hillary for America
Guest on FOX right now shocked that this video is making such a big deal because none of the sentiment is actually unknown about Trump.
And for those of us who saw the NFL twist themselves into a pretzel with the second Ray Rice video came out, we all know that it isn't the knowledge of something bad, its having it on tape for all to see and hear.
Even if it didn't come up in the primary you'd think somebody would have found this and maybe used it to keep Trump in line.
I think they all completely swallowed the party line that Trump could shoot someone and not lose, they were all convinced that everyone hated Clinton so much that Trump could just show up and say, "I'm not Clinton!" and win. And with that headspace why even bother doing oppo research?
They meant the primary. Like how did none of them find ANY of this shit out and use it against him then?
Even if it didn't come up in the primary you'd think somebody would have found this and maybe used it to keep Trump in line.
I think they all completely swallowed the party line that Trump could shoot someone and not lose, they were all convinced that everyone hated Clinton so much that Trump could just show up and say, "I'm not Clinton!" and win. And with that headspace why even bother doing oppo research?
They meant the primary. Like how did none of them find ANY of this shit out and use it against him then?
He won with a plurality comprised of deplorables. It might not have mattered.
Posts
I'll be flying to a work convention for 5 hours roughly when this thing starts.
So basically when I land the ashes will be settling, and there'll likely be a 50+ page thread to catch up on.
Forar's Request will one again apply; whatever context you're willing to put into your posts during said debate will be *immensely* appreciated.
click me
I see this as a bit like the Ray Rice video. Everyone knew he knocked out his wife in a elevator but it only really got massive outrage when the video came out. Everyone knows Trump is a cad but there's nothing like having it on tape.
Also, this doesn't just hurt Trump with women. It also hurts him with conservative dad's with daughters who already don't like Trump but want an excuse to vote for him anyway. This actually matters whereas Trump was already losing very badly with women.
On the other hand, to take the devil's advocate position on why any woman would vote for Trump, plenty of excellent President's have been fairly icky with their dealings with women (Kennedy and Clinton come to mind).
At this point, my non-Trumpy conservative friends are caught between wanting him to win to save the Supreme Court and wanting him to lose in a landslide to save the GOP.
In any case, Trump lost what tiny chance he had in the last debate and these servings of October Suprise are just shovels of dirt on the coffin.
― Marcus Aurelius
Path of Exile: themightypuck
US Presidential Election: How is he so bad at this?
US Presidential Election: Oppo research is important!
US Presidential Election: An October Advent Calander
Here's ars technica on the details. Some appear to have been edited, the rest do not come from where theyre claimed to be from.
http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/10/researchers-find-fake-data-in-olympic-anti-doping-guccifer-2-0-clinton-dumps/
PSN: Wstfgl | GamerTag: An Evil Plan | Battle.net: FallenIdle#1970
Hit me up on BoardGameArena! User: Loaded D1
Weren't the Podesta emails different? This is what I was referencing last page.
I mean that's fine, I wanted to see if there was more than just "Assange hates TrumpClinton."
It doesn't really matter, I seriously doubt anything in those transcripts is even remotely bad. The worst thing I've seen so far is that she doesn't want to overregulate Wall Street.
Which I mean, yeah, is that supposed to be a surprise?
edit: Clinton, not Trump.
Erin Burnett, one of CNN's anchors, quoting an unnamed friend of hers who claims to have been kissed by Trump after he gave her a tik-tak
I'd condemn that line by Trump's supporter but honestly she looks like she's about to cry
Like, seriously.
How were they so bad at their jobs?
this is the right approach, good on you CNN
oh
oh, wow.
3DS: 1607-3034-6970
All I can picture is an elephant weeping in the corner of a bathroom: "Not like this. Not like this."
So buy the 79 cent shares and give me a better price!!!!!!!! @So It Goes
Even if it didn't come up in the primary you'd think somebody would have found this and maybe used it to keep Trump in line.
Which is also what I said. Although technically not the same as explicit links between Russian hackers and Wikileaks haven't been made yet, to my knowledge, whereas everything about Guccifer 2.0 appears Russian.
Trump is no longer attending the event with Ryan tomorrow.
Trump is going to get in a fight with Ryan now. It is the most Trump thing he could do.
Edit: McCain now has a statement but does not unendorse Trump.
E: Breaks the satire rule, I guess. BE NICE TO ME!
You can't use it to keep someone in line if they're not ashamed or afraid of it, though. He was bragging about getting away with murder in the primaries. Literally.
I would about guarantee Trump will not apologize or run away from this. He's gonna latch on to it like a bulldog because as unfathomable as it is to normal people, he is proud of what he is.
I have been wrong on nearly everything I've predicted so far, though. I thought a few hours ago this would end up being just another nasty anecdote. So who knows!
a valid observation. will anyone call them on it? normally i'd say no, but these are...interesting times.
I think they all completely swallowed the party line that Trump could shoot someone and not lose, they were all convinced that everyone hated Clinton so much that Trump could just show up and say, "I'm not Clinton!" and win. And with that headspace why even bother doing oppo research?
FTC: HONK.
PAX Prime 2014 Resistance Tournament Winner
Usul, we have Wormsign the likes of which God has never seen.
Steam | XBL
They meant the primary. Like how did none of them find ANY of this shit out and use it against him then?
Joshua --
The general election is a choice between the potential first female president and a guy who says, and I quote, (and I'm sorry), "grab them by the p**sy."
Do something with that sick-to-your-stomach feeling, Joshua. Chip in $5 right now.
You’re one of our most committed supporters. If you've saved your payment information, your donation will go through immediately:
Joshua, donate now: $5
Joshua, donate now: $5
Joshua, donate now: $10
Joshua, donate now: $25
Joshua, donate now: $50
Thanks,
Mini
Mini Timmaraju
National Women's Vote Director
Hillary for America
(i donated)
And for those of us who saw the NFL twist themselves into a pretzel with the second Ray Rice video came out, we all know that it isn't the knowledge of something bad, its having it on tape for all to see and hear.
"Women should be championed and revered, not objectified."
That statement makes my head hurt. Reverence is just another form of objectification, and in the long term leads to the Madonna/whore dynamic.
Rules of Regan. Never attack a fellow Republican.
FTC: HONK.
PAX Prime 2014 Resistance Tournament Winner
He won with a plurality comprised of deplorables. It might not have mattered.
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+