So TehSpectre called a vigilante kill on LewieP's mom (brave boy!), and it turns out that she's still alive today.
So either
a) someone was protecting LewieP's mom (unless Tube has a default guard in this phalla :P)
b) TS is lying for some reason.
I'm thinking that a) is more reasonable at this point.
What to do about this? Hard to say... TehSpectre is crafty. Normally I'd say "lets seer TS and make sure he's a good guy and lay off the votes", but I hardly know what he'd do if he was some sort of thrall (role that doesn't seer as evil but is evil).
For now, I'll just vote !FCC. Durax has immunity from my vote for the time being from saving me from that song in my head yesterday... Trying very hard not to think about which one, lest it come back and haunt me.
Edit- NOTHING TO SEE HERE- MOVE ALONG...
Or c) TehSpectre was only kidding about the vig kill. That's how I took his comment yesterday, at least. There's really not much that was said in the thread yesterday that seemed serious.
After examining the events of last night, I have concluded that one of three things happened:
1.) Fuzzy is a bad guy and his saving was a result of a concentrated effort by a larger conspiracy of bad guys. If this is the case, the best action would be to off Fuzzy.
2.) Fuzzy is just a villager and his saving was the result of a coalition of bad guys attempting cast suspicion on him in order to cover their own tracks. The best action would be to let Fuzzy be and start investigating other suspicious persons.
3.) It was all just the standard Day One madness.
I'm leaning strongly toward option three, but I'll withhold my vote for a bit.
After examining the events of last night, I have concluded that one of three things happened:
1.) Fuzzy is a bad guy and his saving was a result of a concentrated effort by a larger conspiracy of bad guys. If this is the case, the best action would be to off Fuzzy.
2.) Fuzzy is just a villager and his saving was the result of a coalition of bad guys attempting cast suspicion on him in order to cover their own tracks. The best action would be to let Fuzzy be and start investigating other suspicious persons.
3.) It was all just the standard Day One madness.
I'm leaning strongly toward option three, but I'll withhold my vote for a bit.
I have nothing else to go on, and it seems reasonable. I would prefer not to jump on the kill Fuzzy bandwagon again since that seems even more retarded.
Voting for Fuzzy right now is pretty obvious and easy. And lookee here, a nice bandwagon for baddies to jump on without much question.
I'm seriously doubting that anyone was making a concerted effort to swing the vote either way yesterday, other than random "olol tie!" motivations and shenanigans.
I have nothing else to go on, and it seems reasonable. I would prefer not to jump on the kill Fuzzy bandwagon again since that seems even more retarded.
Everyone else read that it was a joke and pointed it out to Skid.
I even said it was a joke in my post.
There is no grey area.
Not only did you fail to read my "ololvig" post, you failed to read half the last page.
After examining the events of last night, I have concluded that one of three things happened:
1.) Fuzzy is a bad guy and his saving was a result of a concentrated effort by a larger conspiracy of bad guys. If this is the case, the best action would be to off Fuzzy.
2.) Fuzzy is just a villager and his saving was the result of a coalition of bad guys attempting cast suspicion on him in order to cover their own tracks. The best action would be to let Fuzzy be and start investigating other suspicious persons.
3.) It was all just the standard Day One madness.
I'm leaning strongly toward option three, but I'll withhold my vote for a bit.
I'm also thinking option 3.
There are too many variables to make a vote for Fuzzy at the moment. We should just have a vig kill Fuzzy tonight. The guardian should agree not to protect him and that will be that. The village will get two kills in this event.
I have nothing else to go on, and it seems reasonable. I would prefer not to jump on the kill Fuzzy bandwagon again since that seems even more retarded.
Everyone else read that it was a joke and pointed it out to Skid.
I even said it was a joke in my post.
There is no grey area.
Not only did you fail to read my "ololvig" post, you failed to read half the last page.
I understood it was a joke, I've read the entire thread. However, rereading the kill Fuzzy arguments makes that option seem a little more viable. I'll just save my vote till late tonight if something important comes up.
I would lean towards the Fuzzy vote being a bunch of day one madness, I figure we have three options:
If we really think Fuzzy was evil we can either vote for Fuzzy or vote for the person whose last second vote saved him, durax.
If on the other hand, we think Fuzzy was the victim of day one silliness, I would argue we vote for someone who seemed to be aiming for a tie. Frosteey tied the vote at 10:57, so I think he would be the target in that case.
enlightenedbum on
Self-righteousness is incompatible with coalition building.
0
Options
VariableMouth CongressStroke Me Lady FameRegistered Userregular
Damn, there's some dimwittedness going on around here.
Now sit y'all down and take notes
- We vote in bold (that's the b /b tags) and in the colour red. If you are not doing this you risk that the host misses your vote, decides to ignore it or he has to spend more time noticing your vote. In short: don't be a moron and vote properly.
- Last night a number of players tried to create a tie, even though the host noted that a tie would not be good for the village, for as far as I could notice the following people are guilty of this: Hilger, Werehippy, Satan., Medopine and Durax. Naturally not all of them can be bad guys, but I would not be surprised if one or more of them just tried to create confusion.
-Last night was day one, the day where we kill someone on little to no information, we picked on FCC and Maximus for no proper reason, just because one of the two of them was not a bad guy does not mean the other was. FCC did not make a bigger effort than one would expect to dodge a baseless bandwagon so I do not get the people going "hmm, he is not dead, how suspicious!" If someone thinks otherwise I urge him to properly quote some posts incriminating FCC.
I base my vote on these variables: who tried to create a tie? and who jumps on the FCC bandwagon?
That reduces my list to Werehippy and Durax. Considering Durax already has more than null votes I will hereby !vote to kill Durax.
This is only an educated guess, I am only going off on information available in this thread. YMMV
Durax was pretty quick to play follow the leader at the start of the day (less than stellar reasoning included), and I really have nothing to suspect FCC of.
I would like to point out that there was no vig kill last night.
Also, I don't like the idea of the village choosing who the vig should kill. It reeks of evil tampering.
How do you know? There were two kills, in addition to the village kill. Could have been one vigilante and one bad guy kill.
EDIT: Also, holy crap that list you made... I'm adding it to the Upcoming Games Thread's OP.
But there are at the very least 2 seperate bad guys, so someone didn't kill someone. Either they just decided not to (unlikely) or were stopped by the guardian.
How do you know? There were two kills, in addition to the village kill. Could have been one vigilante and one bad guy kill.
EDIT: Also, holy crap that list you made... I'm adding it to the Upcoming Games Thread's OP.
Uh, that's just CF's list, Richy. :P
Well it has CF and D&D games on it. And it's cool. And I'm cool. And you're not, so there.
Richy on
0
Options
Toxic ToysAre you really taking my advice?Really?Registered Userregular
edited May 2008
I can agree with Aldo's thinking. Some where in all the last minute vote switching is people doing evil things. We were warned bad things could happen if there was a tie, and people tried hard to make one.
Toxic Toys on
3DS code: 2938-6074-2306, Nintendo Network ID: ToxicToys, PSN: zutto
I can agree with Aldo's thinking. Some where in all the last minute vote switching is people doing evil things. We were warned bad things could happen if there was a tie, and people tried hard to make one.
It didn't sound like automatic bad things to me, just like something different. I like different.
!Durax because I think he's trying to kill all of us.
duallain on
0
Options
duraxWho watches the watchdogs?Registered Userregular
edited May 2008
I think my actions Yesterday prove that I was trying to avoid a tie, not create one.
I don't see how events leading up to my vote switch can be interpreted in any other way.
Posts
That could be a problem. What if she is evil. No one is going to vote for her because she's LewieP's mum. And because it is her first phalla.
Hmmmmmm...
While I do fear tube, the is a lot of temptation here... And tube doesn't read d&d, does he?
The idea of something randomly happening in Phalla is a strange and terrifying one
I'll get you next time, Spectre.
NEXT TIIIIME!
1.) Fuzzy is a bad guy and his saving was a result of a concentrated effort by a larger conspiracy of bad guys. If this is the case, the best action would be to off Fuzzy.
2.) Fuzzy is just a villager and his saving was the result of a coalition of bad guys attempting cast suspicion on him in order to cover their own tracks. The best action would be to let Fuzzy be and start investigating other suspicious persons.
3.) It was all just the standard Day One madness.
I'm leaning strongly toward option three, but I'll withhold my vote for a bit.
Steam | Twitter
Are you retarded?
Edit: That came off a little harsh. Go back and read the thread instead of picking certain posts to read.
I'm seriously doubting that anyone was making a concerted effort to swing the vote either way yesterday, other than random "olol tie!" motivations and shenanigans.
Shenanigans.
I even said it was a joke in my post.
There is no grey area.
Not only did you fail to read my "ololvig" post, you failed to read half the last page.
Pedophalla was hilarious, and I feel like some reading.
Old Games not in CF
D&D
Edit: I would suggest Phallopolis (Comic Book Style), Haunted House, and Disgaea.
There are too many variables to make a vote for Fuzzy at the moment. We should just have a vig kill Fuzzy tonight. The guardian should agree not to protect him and that will be that. The village will get two kills in this event.
I understood it was a joke, I've read the entire thread. However, rereading the kill Fuzzy arguments makes that option seem a little more viable. I'll just save my vote till late tonight if something important comes up.
Retract !TehSpectre
Also, I don't like the idea of the village choosing who the vig should kill. It reeks of evil tampering.
If we really think Fuzzy was evil we can either vote for Fuzzy or vote for the person whose last second vote saved him, durax.
If on the other hand, we think Fuzzy was the victim of day one silliness, I would argue we vote for someone who seemed to be aiming for a tie. Frosteey tied the vote at 10:57, so I think he would be the target in that case.
was this the last post on this subject? I find it suspicious.
Now sit y'all down and take notes
- We vote in bold (that's the b /b tags) and in the colour red. If you are not doing this you risk that the host misses your vote, decides to ignore it or he has to spend more time noticing your vote. In short: don't be a moron and vote properly.
- Last night a number of players tried to create a tie, even though the host noted that a tie would not be good for the village, for as far as I could notice the following people are guilty of this: Hilger, Werehippy, Satan., Medopine and Durax. Naturally not all of them can be bad guys, but I would not be surprised if one or more of them just tried to create confusion.
-Last night was day one, the day where we kill someone on little to no information, we picked on FCC and Maximus for no proper reason, just because one of the two of them was not a bad guy does not mean the other was. FCC did not make a bigger effort than one would expect to dodge a baseless bandwagon so I do not get the people going "hmm, he is not dead, how suspicious!" If someone thinks otherwise I urge him to properly quote some posts incriminating FCC.
I base my vote on these variables: who tried to create a tie? and who jumps on the FCC bandwagon?
That reduces my list to Werehippy and Durax. Considering Durax already has more than null votes I will hereby !vote to kill Durax.
This is only an educated guess, I am only going off on information available in this thread. YMMV
Durax was pretty quick to play follow the leader at the start of the day (less than stellar reasoning included), and I really have nothing to suspect FCC of.
EDIT: Also, holy crap that list you made... I'm adding it to the Upcoming Games Thread's OP.
But there are at the very least 2 seperate bad guys, so someone didn't kill someone. Either they just decided not to (unlikely) or were stopped by the guardian.
It didn't sound like automatic bad things to me, just like something different. I like different.
I don't see how events leading up to my vote switch can be interpreted in any other way.